West Virginia Public Broadcasting executive director contemplates future after Senate passes funding cut
The Senate on Thursday voted 51-48 to approve a package that would cut $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funding.
"I did actually follow it throughout the evening," West Virginia Public Broadcasting executive director Eddie Isom said.
The package includes $1.1 billion in cuts to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
"The first thing I thought was 'what now?'" Isom said.
West Virginia Public Broadcasting gets about $1.6 million in federal funding a year.
"I don't think that we can make that up from our viewers and listeners," Isom said.
Isom said it's a tough dilemma.
"We're gonna take a hard look at our budget and see if there's anything that we can cut," Isom said.
"We have about a couple months to kind of regroup and try to get some kind of a plan in place," he added.
West Virginia Public Broadcasting transmits all over West Virginia with a series of transmitters.
"We're one of the few stations that reaches into the rural areas," Isom said.
This package could also impact stations like Pittsburgh NPR affiliate WESA. Its CEO said it could lose about 9% of its funding, about $700,000.
"I challenge anybody to show me anything that looks similar to PBS and NPR," Isom said.
Both WESA and WQED say they will continue without federal money.
"We are firmly committed to remaining a strong and independent source for news and music in Pittsburgh...as we have been for more than 50 years," Terry O'Reilly, the president and CEO of Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting, told KDKA-TV in a statement. "The majority of our financial support comes from local individuals and institutions who value what we do: they're the audience we serve every day."
West Virginia Public Broadcasting will try the same, saying it will also ask listeners and viewers to donate.
"We don't just air shows, we do things that matter here," Isom said.
"It's part of the community, it's part of preserving Appalachia culture and heritage," he added.
The bill has to go back down to the House from the Senate, since the version of the package was revised. If that's approved there, it will then go to the president's desk.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump gives Starmer the green light to recognise a Palestinian state
Donald Trump has given Keir Starmer the green light to go ahead and recognise the state of Palestine. It came as the prime minister met with the US president at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland for crucial talks on the Middle East crisis, trade and Ukraine. Speaking to journalists ahead of their meeting in Scotland, the US president took a very different tone to his secretary of state Marco Rubio who last Friday condemned French president Emmanuel Macron for going ahead in recognising Palestine. President Trump and Sir Keir appeared to be on the same page in wanting to end the hunger in the besieged territory, with the UK set to lead a new peace process with American support. On the political issue vexing Sir Keir Starmer over recognising Palestine as a state, Mr Trump said: 'I'm not going to take a position. I don't mind him [Sir Keir] taking a position. I'm looking to getting people fed right now. That's the number one position, because you have a lot of starving people.' He also made it very clear that he does not agree with Benjamin Netanyahu, after the Israeli PM claimed 'nobody is starving in Gaza'. He said: 'Based on television I would say [on agreeing with Netanyahu] 'not particularly', because those children look pretty hungry to me.' He also was not enthused about Israel's tactics saying that nobody was coming out of the crisis well. 'It's a real mess,' he added. But the US president warned that Hamas will not release its final 20 hostages and that was now the sticking point. The issue of recognising Palestine has moved up Sir Keir's agenda in the last week with the issue set to dominate a cabinet meeting this week with ministers deeply divided over what to do. But with a threat on his left flank from Jeremy Corbyn's new party and its support from so-called 'Gaza independents' and more than 250 MPs from nine political parties signing a letter calling for recognition, the prime minister is under pressure to act. Sir Keir made a point of thanking President Trump over his efforts in the Middle East. The prime minister appears to be putting together a plan for peace there following his talks over the weekend with Macron and German chancellor Friedrich Merz in the E3 group of leaders. The prime minister told journalists: 'It's an absolute catastrophe [in Gaza]. Nobody wants to see that. And I think people in Britain are revolted at seeing what they're seeing on their screen. So we've got to get to that ceasefire. Turning to Mr Trump, he added: 'Thank you, Mr President, for leading on that, and also to just get more and more aid in. And again, America has done a lot on this.' The two were also set to discuss the war in Ukraine, with President Trump again emphasising that he is losing patience with Russian president Vladimir Putin. He said: 'We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kiev and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever, you have bodies lying all over the street. And I say that's not the way to do it. So we'll see what happens with that. I'm very disappointed.'
Wall Street Journal
28 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Politicians Don't Understand Young Workers
Regarding 'Democrats Attack Gig-Worker Benefits' (Review & Outlook, July 23): Expanding benefits to more people isn't partisan—it's common sense. A poll conducted last year found that a majority of Americans, including 71% of Democrats, supported companies like DoorDash providing benefits for independent workers and keeping independent contractor status. Now members of Congress from both parties can deliver just that. Sen. Bill Cassidy's (R., La.) legislation is an important step toward making it easier to expand portable benefits. The bill generated thoughtful discussion at a recent Senate hearing, not only from Republicans on the committee but also from Democrats such as Sens. Tim Kaine (D., Va.), John Hickenlooper (D., Colo.), Andy Kim (D., N.J.) and Lisa Blunt Rochester (D., Del.).
Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
GOP lawmakers clash over strategy to avert government shutdown crisis
An intra-GOP battle is already brewing over how to avert a government shutdown before the next fiscal year begins on Oct. 1. House and Senate lawmakers will need to strike a deal on funding the federal government by then – and while that deadline is still weeks away, Congress' August recess means that they have just 14 legislative days with both chambers in session to come to an agreement. That will be no easy feat, considering both House and Senate Republicans are working with three-seat majorities. Meanwhile, there's already divisions being sown over the viability of a short-term extension of fiscal year 2025 (FY2025) government funding levels, known as a continuing resolution (CR). Some fiscal conservatives in the House have suggested they could get behind a full-year CR, an idea that mainstream Republicans and defense hawks have balked at. "I think we ought to start planning for a full-year CR," House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris, R-Md., told reporters last week. "A funding freeze in a setting of 2.7% inflation actually is a real cut in the size of the scope of government." Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., a member of the conservative group, told Fox News Digital, "I would be open to that." He added, however, "But really, a CR is kind of a surrender." Others, like Rep. Eli Crane, R-Ariz., said, "I never like CRs, but we'll see how it plays out." But one House GOP lawmaker who spoke with Fox News Digital under the condition of anonymity argued it could have dangerous effects on military funding. "It's absolutely ridiculous," the lawmaker said. "That destroys our defense. I mean, if it's a CR encompassing everything, that's…contrary to everything they've ever said before. But when has that stopped the Freedom Caucus?" The idea of extending the previous year's government funding levels has traditionally been anathema to Republicans, particularly in the House, where lawmakers have tried for several years to pass 12 individual, single-subject spending bills. It's not something that's been accomplished in years, however. And with Republicans having spent months working on President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful" policy bill, GOP lawmakers have acknowledged they've been left with precious little time. Many of those lawmakers suggested some sort of short-term CR could be likely to give appropriators more time to reach a deal while avoiding a temporary shutdown. "I mean, we seem to be having trouble getting the appropriations bills moved through, and so we're going to have to do something," Rep. Lloyd Smucker, R-Pa., told Fox News Digital. "And I think if we're doing a CR that keeps funding levels close to where they are now, a lot of members of the conference would support that." One source close to the House Appropriations Committee told Fox News Digital they believe a short-term CR is a likely scenario, but did not mention the prospects of a year. "I don't know that we're there yet, but if that's the option available, we certainly can't afford any type of government shutdown – especially under full control by Republicans," another member, Rep. Scott Fitzgerald, R-Wis., told Fox News Digital. Meanwhile, a small group of conservatives is warning they're dedicated to opposing any form of CR. "I'm not voting for a September 30th CR. That is totally unacceptable," Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., wrote on X last week. "I'm giving everyone adequate notice." Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., pointed out FY2025 levels were set under the Biden administration. "Why would we want to do the Biden policies and budget?" Biggs asked. And many Senate Republicans scoffed at the idea of doing another government funding extension, let alone a year-long CR. Most want to actually give the appropriations process a shot rather than continue the status quo of last-minute government funding. "I have no interest in a year-long CR," Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., told Fox News Digital. "I think Congress needs to actually take the responsibility for looking at spending. I don't think having a CR, which is basically a continuation of a Biden era, is appropriate." Rounds and other appropriators want to see the process through, something that hasn't been accomplished since the late 1990s. But time is running thin for lawmakers, given that the House is already on recess and the upper chamber may stick around for a portion of August. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, argued that the appropriations process, which has been largely sidelined for years because of CRs, could still work, but warned that it could be undermined by another government funding extension or more rescissions packages from the White House. "We're going to have an opportunity to be on the floor with an appropriations bill before we go on break for August," she said. "So I refuse to say appropriations is 'pretty broken.'" So far, the Senate Appropriations Committee has finished work on six funding bills, and moved through a key hurdle for the House's funding bill for military construction and the VA last week. The House of Representatives has passed two of 12 individual appropriations bills, though the two already make up roughly half the discretionary funding Congress must lay out. Other Republicans similarly do not want to see another funding extension, and would rather focus on passing Trump's roughly $1.7 trillion budget that he submitted to lawmakers earlier this year. "Hopefully we don't have to go get to a CR, but if we get to a CR, what I don't want is, I don't want some blowout spending bill, which is what we have done since I've been here," Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fl., told Fox News Digital. Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., also preferred to tackle Trump's budget, but believed that lawmakers were already "late to the ball." "I would like to go through a regular order where we consider all 12 of these buckets within the appropriations bill, all 2,400 line items, piece by piece on the floor, and make everybody defend their bridges to nowhere," Marshall said. "I think that'll cut out a lot of the nonsense."
