New social supermarket in Kaikohe to address food insecurity
The new NISS supermarket in Kaikohe has been co-designed with community stakeholders and aims to enhance mana, build capability and strengthen natural support systems. The space includes a safe and inviting area where whānau can rest, enjoy a cuppa, and engage in kōrero.
The model also recognises the complex factors contributing to financial hardship and kai insecurity and will connect whānau to capability building opportunities such as financial literacy, growing and preparing healthy kai and training pathways.
The supermarket will operate on a points system - similar to the Te Hiku Pātaka - where whānau can shop for groceries based on their family size. In partnership with Foodstuffs and New World Kaikohe, the supermarket aims to build up to supporting around 50 whānau in need each week, enhancing community health and wellbeing.
The social supermarket will provide much-needed support to whānau facing economic hardship in and around the greater Kaikohe area.
It will provide greater access to food support for the community and will offer affordable kai, fresh produce, and access to wider community support, ensuring whānau experiencing food insecurity can access the essentials they need to live well and thrive. This initiative is a response to rising living costs and the growing need to strengthen Kaikohe's support networks.
''We're very excited to be partnering with Foodstuffs to open a social supermarket for the community. It's going to be more than just a social supermarket - it will be a place that nurtures health, economic stability, and social wellbeing for whānau. By working to integrate key services under one roof, we are laying the foundation for a stronger, more resilient community,' Eruera said.
Foodstuffs North Island, the co-operative behind the North Island's New World, Pak'nSave and Four Square stores, partners with community organisations to open social supermarkets across the country and has seen the positive difference they make.
'These stores are about offering dignity, choice, and wraparound support to people experiencing food insecurity,' Willa Hand, head of social supermarkets for Foodstuffs North Island, said.
'Partnering with Ngāpuhi Iwi Social Services means we're able to help provide whānau in Kaikohe with a supermarket experience that supports their immediate needs while also contributing to the long-term resilience of the community.'
New World Kaikohe will be the buddy store, providing ongoing training and operational support to ensure the success of the social supermarket.
Beyond groceries, the social supermarket will provide additional resources, including a whānau space where whānau can rest, enjoy a cuppa, and engage in meaningful kōrero.
There will also be a mahinga kai - a hub for sharing and distributing locally grown produce and a kāuta, a learning space for sharing mātauranga about kai preparation and encouraging healthy eating habits.
The NISS team is also exploring opportunities for the social supermarket to support skill development, training, and employment pathways for whānau and taitamariki, further contributing to the long-term wellbeing of the community.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
14 hours ago
- Newsroom
Facial recognition tech not a green light for surveillance
Analysis: The Privacy Commissioner's much-anticipated report into Foodstuffs North Island's trial of facial recognition technology (deemed an 'inherently invasive' tool) offers plenty to chew over. Although the inquiry found the trial legal and generally compliant with the Privacy Act, important questions remain, and the report recommends that the technology stay under active review. People who may have been paranoid about facial recognition technology being used to monitor their every move in supermarkets – what's purchased and so forth – can rest easy. The commissioner found the technology was only used for the very narrow purpose of deterring serious incidents of violence and high-value retail theft by matching customers against a store's 'watchlist' (the image database of people of interest). It was not used for any other purpose, including minor retail crime prevention. The report cautioned against any future 'mission creep' in this regard. Furthermore, although everyone entering a store with such technology had their face scanned, images that did not trigger a match against the store's watchlist were deleted almost instantaneously. Meanwhile, watchlist data was deleted after two years in the case of perpetrators (and three months for their accomplices). The number of people put on watchlists peaked at 1800 during the trial and was down to 1504 at the end. Crucially, watchlist data was specific to each store, meaning there was no master list shared within the Foodstuffs' network. This meant anyone who had been added to one store's watchlist could still shop elsewhere, including at a store without facial recognition technology. Just as importantly, the criteria for being added to a watchlist were strict: either a conviction or a trespass notice was required. There was also de-linkage from other incident reporting systems, and watchlists were compiled manually. A two-camera/two-staff fail-safe system was adopted for positive matches, and the commissioner's report found no bias in how watchlists were compiled as well as used. Children and young people were excluded from watchlists. Meanwhile, Foodstuffs also maintained record keeping for judging the effectiveness of the facial recognition trial. A 16 percent decrease in serious incidents and an estimated 21 percent decrease in shoplifting in the participating stores was recorded. In addition, 115 serious incidents were avoided (including 65 people deterred from entering and 50 others through staff intervention). However, some scepticism was expressed because of qualitative limitations in the overall data set (especially data from non-participating stores which operated as the control group). The report documented at least two instances of misidentification, resulting in harm. Partly as a result, the accuracy rate required for positive matches was increased from 90 percent to 92.5 percent, although this still needed to be implemented. The Office of the Privacy Commissioner's Māori Reference Panel had opposed facial recognition technology in principle but gave advice enabling further safeguards to be adopted. Finally, the report cautions that its findings are 'not a green light for more general use of facial recognition technology'. This is a salutary reminder that decisions to employ it should not be taken lightly. Few small and medium-sized businesses will have the resources of Foodstuffs. The trial succeeded because of its investment in human time and effort. Technology, ultimately, is no substitute for this.
RNZ News
6 days ago
- RNZ News
Supermarket sector competition reports like Groundhog Day
Supermarket sector competition reports are like Groundhog Day. Photo: 123RF Analysis - Compare the following two statements: "Some of the signs I am seeing is that suppliers are very fearful of repercussion, there's a lack of trust." And... "My concern is that the power imbalance between the major supermarkets and small suppliers creates a reluctance among suppliers to push back." They are both from Grocery Commissioner Pierre van Heerden - the first from August 2024 , the second June 2025 . The nine months between the statements have produced another round of research, recommendations, and call for submissions with the aim of getting better deals for suppliers and consumers, forcing better behaviour and greater competition between the dominant Foodstuffs and Woolworths chains. The Commerce Commission's original market study was ordered in 2020, the final report published in March 2022, and law changes came into effect in 2023. The regulator looked to assist the transition through educating suppliers, offering them sample contracts to put to the supermarket chains, setting up a whistle blowing facility for those wanting to report bad behaviour, and a stern message to Foodstuffs and Woolworths to behave and play nice or risk the Grocery Commissioner's wrath. And yet the latest report concludes much as the first report - the grocery sector is not competitive and the duopoly keeps throwing its weight around, while the small suppliers remain intimidated. Grocery Commissioner Pierre van Heerden. Photo: The Grocery Commissioner has sought to engage with the two big chains and change attitudes. They have conceded most of the easy ground such as ending land banking, accepting the mandatory code of conduct, and agreeing to look at freeing up their wholesale arrangements. But clearly the original reforms have failed to cut through, hence the move to now strengthen the Grocery Supply Code to stop retailers charging suppliers for stocking shelves or for past-their-best by date groceries in the retailer's control; require retailers to reimburse suppliers if they buy stock at promotional prices, but later sell them at higher prices; and prohibit retailers from retaliating against suppliers who assert their rights under the code. van Heerden told RNZ that he had the resolve and the resources to take legal action when justified , but that bringing about change in the sector takes time. To date, the regulator has gone for the relatively low hanging fruit of misleading prices and advertising . The challenge now is to bring about real change in supermarket actions. A prosecution or two may be needed. The wild card in the supermarket debate is what will the government do. Finance Minister Nicola Willis entered the debate verbal guns blazing in March saying the government was looking at all options to bring greater competition to the grocery sector. She said that could be done either by encouraging a major new player into the sector or possibly a 'nuclear option' of breaking up or restructuring the existing chains. The government has issued a formal request for information (RFI) to accelerate improved competition, and advise on potential regulatory and legislative changes, and whether structural changes would be needed. That was an option which the Commerce Commission shied away from as being too difficult, commercially and legally. Going after supermarket chains assessed as profiteering from consumers reads well in headlines, but will the talk be turned into a walk? Or will it be down to van Heerden to make progress slowly, one supermarket aisle at a time? Gyles Beckford is RNZ's business editor. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
National Business Review
6 days ago
- National Business Review
ComCom seeks crackdown on supermarket supplier rebates
Retail 3 mins to read 3 ComCom seeks crackdown on supermarket supplier rebates A draft report on the Grocery Supply Code finds Foodstuffs and Woolworths receive subsidies from their suppliers of more than $5b a year. The Commerce Commission report reviews the function of Grocery Supply Code since its introduction in 2023.
