UWEC places in top ranking for large public military-friendly schools
As part of an annual survey from Viqtory Media, UW-Eau Claire's gold designation means they landed in the top 20 percent of schools dedicated to making a lasting impact on the military community. The university ranked high in several categories, including support and retention, admissions and orientation, graduation and career outcomes, financial aid and loan repayment, and culture and commitment.
Miranda Cross-Schindler, military and adult services manager at UWEC, said, 'Third year in a row ... is always confirmation that we are doing everything that we should be doing to serve military connected students.
'What was more exciting this year is that we not only got gold, but we are ranked in the top 10 in the 'large public' section, which is wonderful and great; another acolyte that we are doing the best that we can above our peer schools and just confirmation that we are listening to the needs of students. These needs change as time goes on, so we have to be reactive and be responsive to what this population needs and deserves to be able to succeed at school.'
Alongside other large public universities, UWEC placed eighth overall. With 326 total military students and 184 spouses or military dependents attending the university, and possibly more receiving services, Cross-Schindler said she hopes the designation is a testament to the fact that this university really cares about understanding and serving the military-connected population.
Cross-Schindler said their university has been working with staff to ensure they know what students can get in regards to federal GI Bill benefits, which ultimately makes the students that are eligible better prepared for school.
'Our faculty and staff who support the students —we couldn't do it without them all working together,' she said. 'This is a population that has academics interrupted by active duty orders and deployments. We really work as a team together to make sure the students have a seamless transition out of the classroom to focus on military service and coming back.'
Based on student feedback, their Veteran Resource Center is something that is positively reflected on. As a place welcome to veterans on campus, the space has offered socialization and housed their offices for students to stay informed about benefits and resources.
Moving forward Cross-Schindler said that it is their interest to keep, maintain and hopefully improve their ranking, with some of the biggest metrics to focus on being graduation, career outcomes, military support and retention.
'It is a goal for the university to maintain and, if not, improve,' she said. 'I think one of the things moving forward is looking at onramps for these returning adult learners and looking at more online course offerings so we can meet these students where they are at no matter what step in their life they are at.
'It makes me very happy and I feel very fortunate to be able to witness this first hand — not only as someone who has served in the military, but someone who serves in this role now.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
10-07-2025
- Boston Globe
Trump's attack on Harvard underscores existential risk of weaponizing college accreditation
As a higher education researcher and a former Harvard College dean who has experienced and contributed to the accreditation process, I believe this is an existential threat to an essential mechanism that has shaped the character of American higher education: pluralistic, decentralized, and, until recently, largely insulated from direct political control. Advertisement Since our country's founding, America's colleges and universities have been defined by institutional autonomy. This is the result of a social compact by which, in return for a commitment to serving society, institutions have been overseen by a decentralized self-regulation system that has allowed variety to flourish, innovation to emerge, and legitimacy to be earned — through professional norms, not external mandates. Today, that social compact is fraying. Accreditation, once an esoteric, peer-driven mechanism for ensuring institutional integrity, has become another proxy battlefield in the nation's higher education wars. Advertisement Accreditation was never intended to be a lever of state power, and it wasn't meant to evaluate schools on narrow economic criteria such as the immediate starting salaries of its graduates. Instead, it grew from the American tradition of voluntary civic self-organization in service to the public good. Educational institutions collaborated to define, evaluate, and improve themselves without surrendering their independence to centralized authority. The accreditation system has sought not to impose uniformity from above but to cultivate shared standards from within, thereby earning public confidence. Accreditation emerged in the late 19th century in response to a fragmented educational landscape. Regional associations emerged to address inconsistent standards and expectations among high schools and colleges. Early efforts addressed basic but vital questions: What is a college? Who is qualified to teach? Accreditation became a civic mechanism for quality assurance, while avoiding direct government control over higher education's mission and governance. Including this principle of mission-based evaluation allowed American educational pluralism to thrive. Elite research universities, faith-based schools, small liberal arts colleges, technical institutes, and teaching colleges could all be recognized without being made uniform. Accreditation became a steward of institutional diversity, safeguarding the public interest while honoring difference. After World War II, this civic covenant shifted dramatically. The GI Bill democratized higher education by opening college doors to millions of veterans. But with expansion came opportunism. Unscrupulous schools and for-profit diploma mills sprang up to tap federal funds, prompting widespread concern over fraud and substandard instruction. Advertisement Some policy makers initially proposed the federal government take over accreditation. However, the example of authoritarian regimes in Europe, Japan, and the Soviet Union, where centralized ministries of education decimated academic freedom and politicized scholarship, made many Americans deeply wary of federal government intervention. Instead, Congress opted for a characteristically American solution: In 1952, it required the commissioner of education to identify 'nationally recognized accrediting agencies' that could serve as gatekeepers of federal funds. What had begun as a voluntary, peer-led process now carried the weight — and the risks — of official regulatory authority. So colleges, once supported by tuition and private donors (which presented their own problems of access and influence), became more financially dependent on federal dollars and subjected to federal regulation, making them increasingly susceptible to political interference. Accreditation thus became a double-edged sword. It conferred legitimacy and enabled access to public resources, but it also pulled accrediting agencies into a quasi-regulatory role they were never designed to fill. Today, accreditation is under threat from forces betraying its founding principles. Government officials have begun to wield accreditation as a political weapon, threatening schools' status over disputes related to diversity, discrimination, hiring decisions, curriculum content, or degree programs deemed to have 'low economic value.' Commercial lobbying for relaxed or no meaningful standards threatens to reduce accreditation to a market tool. Such interventions risk transforming peer-based educational evaluation into a mechanism for ideological or financial compliance. Rather than cultivating trust and academic integrity, these approaches may chill institutional missions, restrict curricular freedom, and undermine pluralism under the guise of accountability. Advertisement These interventions are not technical tweaks. They represent a growing effort to consolidate control over higher education in the hands of political actors or subordinate the sector to market forces, weakening the professional norms and pluralism that have long been the foundation of America's higher education system. Together, these political and commercial threats pose systemic risk. If accreditors are pressured to serve partisan or profit-driven agendas, the pluralism that distinguishes American higher education will collapse. Peer review will degrade into checklist compliance or ideologically driven oversight. Politicizing accreditation corrodes trust, undermines expertise, and imperils democratic norms. Accreditation must evolve. But it should do so deliberately, not disruptively. Its strength lies in peer review: iterative, imperfect, and slow by design. In an age of hot takes, such deliberation may seem outdated. But it is how, since the dawn of the scientific revolution, knowledge safeguards itself. Change must come from within, rooted in professional responsibility and review, not be imposed by political agendas or profit motives. America must defend what keeps higher education free. If we break it, we risk universities turning into instruments of politics or profit. Advertisement
Yahoo
19-06-2025
- Yahoo
Winnebago County public forum on UWO, Fox Cities Campus, future set for June 25 in Menasha
OSHKOSH – Community members will have a chance to shape the future of the UW-Oshkosh, Fox Cities Campus. Winnebago County will host a public forum June 25 seeking community input as the county prepares to take over ownership of the 43-acre campus at 1455 Midway Road, Menasha, on July 1. The forum is scheduled to run 5:30-7:30 p.m. on campus grounds and will seek the public's ideas 'regarding the future prospects for reinvigorating, repurposing, and redeveloping the buildings and outdoor spaces.' Read more: Oshkosh legislators to continue pursuit of full Municipal Services Payment program funding 'Considering the deep connections that many in the community have to the programs and facilities housed within the campus, this public forum offers the opportunity to share ideas regarding the county's direction forward on the site,' the county wrote in a recent statement. The facility's future has been in doubt since last June when UW-Oshkosh announced it was closing the Fox Cities campus at the end of the school year as a result of enrollment decline. Both Winnebago and Outagamie counties previously owned the land and its facilities before Outagamie County terminated its ownership agreement and agreed to terms of sale with Winnebago County. The Weis Earth Science Museum collection is being donated to the History Museum at the Castle in Appleton while the Menasha Joint School District is set to operate the University Childcare Center. The campus also includes the Barlow Planetarium, Communication Arts Center theater and gallery, and a branch campus building for UW-Platteville. Read more: What should be on your Oshkosh bucket list? Here's our guide to the 8 best things to do this summer. The Fox Cities facility is the sixth University of Wisconsin campus to shut its doors amid budgetary issues and declining enrollment following the decisions to close UW-Platteville Richland, UW-Milwaukee at Washington County, UW-Oshkosh Fond du Lac, UW-Green Bay Marinette and UW-Milwaukee at Waukesha. Contact Justin Marville at jmarville@ and follow him on X (formerly Twitter) at @justinmarville. This article originally appeared on Oshkosh Northwestern: Winnebago County to host public forum on future of Fox Cities Campus
Yahoo
08-06-2025
- Yahoo
Beckley family honors patriarch's legacy by establishing college scholarship
beckley – A Beckley family is honoring the legacy of its patriarch by helping students achieve their dreams of earning a college education. David Quesenberry, in partnership with the Beckley Area Foundation, recently established the Quesenberry Family Memorial Scholarship Fund in honor of his father, Amos Edward Quesenberry, who was known as an advocate for education. 'Having grown up with humble beginnings and with little means, he never knew if he would be able to achieve his lifelong dream of being a funeral director,' David Quesenberry said in a press release. From a very young age, Amos Edward Quesenberry had dreamt of one day becoming a funeral director. However, he wasn't able to achieve that goal until after he joined the U.S. Navy, served honorably and returned home to Beckley. Like many Americans of 'The Greatest Generation,' he took advantage of one of his military benefits and went to mortuary school. 'Thanks to the GI Bill, Amos was afforded the opportunity to attend mortuary school, and go on to start Rose and Quesenberry Funeral Chapels,' David Quesenberry said. Humble Beginnings Born in the spring of 1921, Amos Edward Quesenberry was 2 years old when his father, a coal miner, lost his eyesight in a coal mine explosion, 'and the large family fell on hard times.' From a very young age, Amos Edward Quesenberry did his part to help out his family by working odd jobs. He also went hunting and fishing to help provide food for his family. Yet, through all of the adversity, he never gave up on his dream of becoming a funeral director. Amos Edward Quesenberry loved his father and went on to follow his lead by going to work in the coal mines. As a 20-year-old, while coming out of the mines one afternoon, he learned about the breaking news of Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor. Like many young men and women of that era, he enlisted in the military because he wanted to help his country. After basic training he was deployed to the European Theatre where he served aboard the USS Mallory while World War II escalated around the globe. In the winter of 1943, three ships, including the USS Mallory, were torpedoed and sank in the icy waters of Iceland. 'Amos was one of eight men that survived the attack on the USS Mallory, having spent days on a raft praying.' Shortly after his rescue, the U.S. Navy honorably discharged Amos Edward Quesenberry. Post War Still determined to fulfill his childhood dream of becoming a funeral director, Amos Edward Quesenberry used his GI Loan to attend what was known at the time as The United States College of Embalming in New York City. As the years passed, the college grew in stature, and its name would change to the Renouard Training School for Embalmers. While attending school, Amos worked long hours at a Jewish grocery store where he delivered groceries. 'While away at school, Amos never forgot about his community and the relationships he had forged with so many of its members,' David Quesenberry said. 'Upon returning to Beckley, he knew his life of service would continue.' That's when he founded Rose and Quesenberry Funeral Chapels. 'He found a way to give back by helping his community when it came to the loss of their loved ones. In the beginning, Amos would take forms of payment such as money, eggs, and baked goods,' David Quesenberry said. He said his father taught him early in his life how to respect people from different backgrounds and to live by the Golden Rule of treating others as you wish to be treated. 'David never forgot that and, till this day, continues that moral code. The foundation that Amos built, the community that he loved, was the driving force for the Quesenberry Family Memorial Scholarship,' states the press release. Established in the fall of 2024, the scholarship is available to Shady Spring High seniors who reside in Raleigh or Summers counties. Students must have a grade point average of 2.0 or higher and will be attending a four-year college or university in West Virginia. The need-based scholarship, which is renewable annually, does not require a written essay. Students who will be high school seniors in the fall of 2025 are encouraged to apply. More information is available online here.
