Peru court rules in favor of Kichwa territorial rights in the Amazon
The decision affirms that Indigenous stewardship is fully compatible with conservation goals, setting a powerful precedent for rights-based forest protection in Peru, according to the Kichwa people and lawyers involved in the case.
The ruling, issued on May 15 but made public on Wednesday, came after a legal challenge by four Indigenous organizations on behalf of Kichwa communities in the San Martín region. The communities say the state denied their ancestral presence for decades, creating protected areas without consultation or consent.
'The ruling validates their historical presence and their right to demand respect for those territories,' Cristina Gavancho, legal adviser to the plaintiff organizations, told The Associated Press on Thursday. 'It recognizes that in doing so, they not only contribute to conservation but must be involved in any state-led measures to implement it.'
Environmentalists say the case could reshape how Peru approaches forest protection, especially in contested areas like Cordillera Azul National Park — home to one of the world's largest forest carbon offsetting projects.
SERNANP, the Peruvian government agency responsible for protected natural areas, didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.
Gavancho said that the ruling could have global relevance, as it reinforces growing international recognition of the role Indigenous peoples play in conservation. She noted the decision aligns with international biodiversity targets and signals a shift away from top-down conservation models.
'Conservation isn't just about creating protected areas — it's also about recognizing and protecting Indigenous territorial rights,' she said.
Wiler Saurin, vice president of the Indigenous coalition CODEPISAM in Peru's San Martín region, said that the ruling is a major victory in the long struggle for recognition of ancestral lands. He emphasized that protected areas in San Martín were established without free, prior and informed consent from the Kichwa, Shawi, and Awajun peoples.
Saurin, from the Kichwa community, told the AP by telephone that the court decision affirms Indigenous territorial rights and underscores that conservation can't happen without Indigenous inclusion.
'You can't do conservation from a desk, you can't do conservation from an office earning a good salary — it has to be done by working with the communities who have ancestrally occupied these territories,' he said.
___
The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Lebanon releases Israeli citizen held in detention for a year
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — An Israeli citizen detained in Lebanon has been returned to Israel after more than a year in detention, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said on Thursday. There was little information given about the man, identified as Salah Abu-Hussein, an Arab citizen of Israel. His imprisonment had not garnered public attention in Israel or Lebanon. Israeli media reported that the man's family had reported him missing around a year ago and was unaware he was in Lebanon. Four Lebanese security and judicial officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the case, said the man had entered the country illegally by crossing the land border between the two countries and was then caught by Lebanese security officials. At the time of his crossing, Israeli forces and the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah were engaged in ongoing low-level clashes in the border region, which escalated into a full-scale war in September 2024. It was halted by a U.S.-brokered ceasefire two months later. Abu-Hussein's release was negotiated in secret over the past few months in cooperation with the Red Cross, according to Gal Hirsch, Netanyahu's coordinator for the Hostages and the Missing, who is also Israel's point of contact for the hostages in Gaza. On Thursday, Lebanese Authorities handed Abu-Hussein to Hirsch at the Rosh Hanikra crossing between Lebanon and Israel, which is not open to the public. Lebanon and Israel do not have diplomatic relations and Israeli citizens are prohibited from entering Lebanon under Lebanese law, with rare exceptions for Palestinians holding Israeli citizenship. Netanyahu hailed the return of Abu-Hussein. 'This is a positive step and a sign of things to come,' he said after Abu-Hussein returned. There was no official comment from the Lebanese government on his release. A group advocating for Lebanese citizens held in Israeli prisons denounced the move. The Representative Committee of Lebanese Prisoners and Freed Prisoners said in a statement that 19 Lebanese citizens are imprisoned in Israel and called the release of the Israeli citizen by Lebanon 'blatant betrayal.'


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Ex-Biden White House spokesman says he only saw 46th president twice in two-plus years of service
WASHINGTON — Former White House spokesman Ian Sams spoke with his boss, President Biden, just two times during his more than two years in the administration, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) told reporters Thursday. 'One of the most shocking things to me,' Comer said, is that Sams 'communicated with Joe Biden two times, he saw Joe Biden, talked to Joe Biden — two times.' 'In fact, [former special counsel] Robert Hur spent more time with Joe Biden than Ian Sams,' added Comer after sitting in on a transcribed interview Sams gave committee staff. The House investigation into the purported coverup of Biden's mental state is in full swing. AP The former Biden official served as a spokesman for the White House Counsel's Office from mid-2022 to August 2024, when he left to serve as a senior adviser to Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. 'It raises serious concerns and serious questions about who was calling shots at the White House,' Comer explained. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters 'If the White House spokesperson was being shielded from the president of the United States, who was operating the Oval Office?' Former Spokesman Ian Sams says he only saw the president twice in two years of service. Getty Images Thursday's interview was the 11th with a former Biden aide centered on the purported cover-up of the 46th president's decline, which Republican investigators believe may have involved the improper wielding of executive authority. 'There were very few people around Joe Biden, especially at the end,' Comer said, 'and that's when the majority of the pardons and executive orders were signed with that autopen.'


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
New York appeals court tosses Trump's massive civil fraud judgment
The judges, however, declined to overturn the verdict in the case, leaving open the possibility Trump will appeal. A Manhattan trial judge found that Trump and other defendants — including his adult sons — fraudulently inflated his net worth. | Evan Vucci/AP By Erica Orden 08/21/2025 12:13 PM EDT NEW YORK — An appeals court on Thursday tossed a roughly $500 million civil fraud judgment against President Donald Trump and his family business, marking a significant victory for the president in a case that he repeatedly derided as a political stunt by state Attorney General Tish James. The court, however, declined to overturn the fraud case against Trump, leaving open the possibility that he will seek to appeal the verdict to New York's highest court. And the three separate opinions issued Thursday by the appeals court revealed disagreement within the five-judge panel that one judge described as 'profound.' 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' one of the judges, Peter Moulton, wrote.