logo
Ani Feinberg: My evacuation from Israel was a stark reminder of my American privilege

Ani Feinberg: My evacuation from Israel was a stark reminder of my American privilege

Chicago Tribune01-08-2025
In June, I was one of 1,500 young Americans evacuated from Israel to Cyprus.
Our ship, the Crown Iris, departed from Ashdod, a port city between Tel Aviv and the Gaza Strip. Thirty-seven miles south, families were starving. Twenty-six miles north, others raced to bomb shelters. Cruising away from war, I was forced to confront the Crown Iris problem: how easily American privilege lets us float above human suffering, shielded by distraction and comfort.
I went to Israel on a Birthright Israel trip, hoping to deepen my understanding of Judaism's ties to the land and learn firsthand about the Israel-Hamas conflict. Initially, the trip unfolded as expected: panoramic hikes, spirited volunteer work and nightly bonding. Then Israel struck Iran — and everything changed.
Over five days, I sheltered from missile attacks a dozen times — the scariest in broad daylight, sprawled on the grass in Jerusalem's Sacher Park. As sirens wailed, my friends and I had five minutes to sprint to a bomb shelter, weaving through panicked parents who clutched children in both arms.
When Birthright offered me a seat on an evacuation boat, one escorted by the Israeli navy, I accepted immediately.
What followed wasn't just an evacuation — it was a stark reminder of my privilege.
On June 17, I expected to board a tense, bare-bones vessel. I couldn't sleep the night before, anxious about spending 20 hours packed like a sardine. Instead, I boarded the Crown Iris: a 10-deck cruise ship with a casino, water slide, gym and three full-service restaurants.
As we crossed the Mediterranean, I read my Kindle in the sun, played my first game of roulette and drank one too many espresso martinis — trying to drown a gnawing sense of guilt.
Because while I was safe on a floating resort, I couldn't stop thinking about those left behind.
My friend Amit, a 22-year-old Israeli soldier. The Israeli girls I gossiped with on a kibbutz near the Golan Heights. The Druze families in Haifa who opened their homes to us. Thousands of Iranians fleeing airstrikes in Tehran. And the 2.2 million Palestinians in Gaza, where food and aid have become weapons of war.
Of course, not everyone wants to leave in wartime. For many, staying is a necessity — and a reflection of identity and resilience. This is their home. But that only made me more unsettled. I had the means, the passport and the choice. Most people don't.
At 5 a.m. the next day, I stood at the edge of the ship deck, journal in hand, trying to make sense of how 1,500 young Americans literally cruised away from a war zone — and why so many of us were OK with it.
Hours after docking, videos from the ship spread like wildfire: passengers dancing around the pool, cocktails sloshing, a playlist that screamed spring break. The backlash was swift and justified. People called the scene tone-deaf, callous and insensitive. It was a painful metaphor for everything that felt wrong about the evacuation, making visible what many of us were already reckoning with internally: We get to forget.
We live in the most connected age in human history — yet we've never been more detached from global realities. Young Americans can scroll on their phones for hours without seeing a single post about Israel, Iran, Ukraine, Taiwan or any geopolitical flashpoint. Digital silos have become the everyday Crown Iris, gently steering us away from the world beyond our own feeds.
It's tempting to blame our detachment on political disillusionment — the feeling that our individual actions don't matter — or on 'America First' ideologies that say we should prioritize our own interest. But the scarier truth is that those who could speak up, who have the safety and platform to do so, are simply too insulated to notice.
If the history of U.S. foreign policy has taught us anything, it's that ignorance has consequences. It paves the way for unnecessary shows of force and enables leaders to posture rather than lead — to offer just enough aid, weapons or diplomatic lip service to soothe public conscience without actually fixing anything.
To be clear: I don't believe the solution to the Crown Iris problem is to put everyone on a rusty fishing trawler. I also don't believe it is the sole responsibility of organizations like Birthright to make us perceptive, empathetic individuals.
As a collective generation, we need to cultivate more spaces where dissonance isn't avoided but used as a mirror. We need to acknowledge when we're cruising away, literally and figuratively. That means asking hard questions and searching for real context, without fear of provocation. That means resisting passive consumption and using our digital tools with intention.
American privilege isn't going anywhere. But to any young person with the freedom to disconnect, you have the responsibility to engage. Identify which lawmakers drive the issues that make you tick, and organize collective outreach. Vote in every election — not just the big ones — because democracy adds up. Volunteer with international nongovernmental organizations, so change doesn't rest solely in the hands of governments. The first step is naming your privilege. The second is mobilizing it.
So let's decide to push ourselves and push each other. Because no cruise lasts forever.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No food, no water, a broken leg: How an American hiker survived a week in Norwegian wilderness
No food, no water, a broken leg: How an American hiker survived a week in Norwegian wilderness

Boston Globe

time2 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

No food, no water, a broken leg: How an American hiker survived a week in Norwegian wilderness

Luhn and his wife, Veronika Silchenko, traveled to Norway in July for a vacation with his family. After realizing that they were staying near a national park with the country's third-largest glacier, Luhn, an American climate journalist and an experienced hiker, decided to extend his trip to hike to it. Advertisement On July 31, Luhn texted his itinerary to Silchenko, who had returned to their home in England, and then set off on a backpacking trip, heading into Folgefonna National Park from Odda, a nearby town. Silchenko did not expect to hear from him for a few days because of spotty phone service in the park. Luhn planned to complete his hike on Aug. 4, catch a bus to Bergen, and make his flight back to England. 'That was the plan,' Luhn said. 'I didn't get that far into it before disaster struck.' Early in the hike, things started going wrong. (This, Luhn said, is when he began making bad decisions.) The sole of his left boot started coming off after a few hours. He decided to tape the sole with athletic tape, which compromised the boot's traction. Advertisement 'I should have turned back and gone into Odda and bought some new boots,' Luhn said. Instead, he kept going. He passed gorgeous views and reached a height of nearly 4,000 feet. 'It was very steep terrain but I kept pushing through, and I made another bad decision,' he said. After 10 p.m., Luhn found a good camping spot. But instead of pitching his tent, he decided to press ahead. Luhn also said he had not brought a GPS tracker. It was getting late and the terrain was steep. Then, Luhn took a misstep — and slipped and fell. 'I remember the terrible feeling of that fall beginning,' he said. He started picking up speed, and his backpack hit the rocks, causing his gear to fall out. 'I was spinning around really quickly and started bouncing around, like a pinball heading down the mountain,' Luhn said. He landed on a rock, breaking his femur, fracturing his pelvis and a couple of spinal vertebrae, severely scratching his hands and hitting his head. Then, he said, he must have passed out. Luhn woke up on Aug. 1 aware that he was in a very bad situation. His water bottle had fallen out of his bag during his fall, so he had nothing to drink. His iPhone had fallen out of his pocket. He tried yelling to Siri to call emergency services, but his phone either was too far away or had been set to airplane mode (another mistake, Luhn said). He could barely move. He realized two things: Nobody would know to search for him until Monday, when he was scheduled to return to England. And he was not going to be able to get out of there on his own. Advertisement 'I am going to need to stay here and just pull through until at least someone gets worried about me,' he recalled thinking. And then, 'A lot of things were going to have to go right for me to survive.' By Saturday, Luhn's mouth was so dry that it was impossible to eat the granola bars and peanuts that had not fallen out of his backpack. He could think of only one solution: He drank his own urine to stay hydrated. It was not until a storm moved in on Sunday — weather that would hamper the search for him — that he could drink water again. He slurped rain from the creases of his sleeping mat and sucked on a wet bandanna. On Monday and Tuesday, as the rain continued, Luhn started to lose hope. He was wet and cold. His feet were starting to lose circulation. But unbeknown to him, his prediction had been correct: When he didn't show up for his flight, Silchenko alerted the authorities, and by Monday night a major rescue mission had begun. More than 50 rescue workers from the Norwegian Red Cross, using dogs, drones, and experienced climbers, were looking for Luhn, in a search that took nearly two days. On Wednesday, Aug. 6, after his coldest night yet, the sun briefly broke through. 'Right about then, I heard a helicopter,' Luhn said. Advertisement Though he couldn't stand, he started waving. After about 45 minutes, the helicopter left. 'I thought: OK, well I may have just missed my only shot,' Luhn said. Luhn wrapped his red bandanna around a tent pole in the hope that he would be seen. About 45 minutes later, a helicopter returned and Luhn started waving again. 'Finally, the side door of the helicopter opened and a guy waved at me,' he said. 'That was the moment that I knew that I was going to be able to make it through.'

American Airlines Called Out After Embarrassing Mistake
American Airlines Called Out After Embarrassing Mistake

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

American Airlines Called Out After Embarrassing Mistake

It's not uncommon for an airline to promote international flights with photos or iconic imagery from the destination, like the Eiffel Tower for a flight to Paris, the Colosseum for a flight to Rome. However, some basic fact-checking should probably be done first. This week, American Airlines used some beautiful imagery of a castle to promote its new flight to Prague in the Czech Republic. The only problem is that the castle the airline used in its advertising is actually located nowhere near Prague. American Airlines Launches New Flight to Prague Earlier this month, American Airlines officially announced a new flight from Philadelphia to Prague, along with a new flight to Budapest, Hungary. 'Customers continue to tell us that Europe is where they want to go each summer and these new routes make it even easier to cross the Atlantic in 2026," American's Senior Vice President of Network and Schedule Planning said in a statement earlier this month. 'We are excited to grow our network to new destinations like Prague and Budapest and offer even more premium travel experiences on our flights to Tokyo.' The new flight will begin in May of 2026, but the airline has already begun advertising the new flight. American Airlines Begins Advertising Prague Flights After American Airlines announced the new flight to Prague, it immediately began advertising the route across multiple channels, including a full database e-mail blast, which was captured in a screenshot by Gary Leff of View From the Wing. "Vacation in Prague: Wander through Prague's timeless beauty with castles, cafés and cobblestone streets," the advertisement reads. Those words accompanied a photograph of Český Krumlov Castle, which is undeniably beautiful. However, it isn't in Prague, as the language suggests. In fact, it isn't even particularly close to Prague. An Embarrassing Mistake As Leff pointed out, the castle is actually located in the South Bohemian Region of the Czech Republic. "American's marketing of 'Prague's timeless beauty' and Prague's 'castles and cobblestone streets' do not show either. Instead, that's Český Krumlov Castle complex overlooking the Vltava River, with the town's historic center and signature red-tiled rooftops," Leff wrote for View From the Wing. Further, Leff pointed out that the ad makes even less sense, considering Prague isn't even the closest or most convenient airport to the castle, and American already operated a flight to a city that is just as close to the castle as Prague. "Prague isn't even the closest airport to Český Krumlov, since Linz (with good air connections via Frankfurt, train from Vienna, and plenty of low cost carrier service especially seasonally) is much closer. (Salzburg is just as straightforward a journey though it's a few kilometers farther away. Munich is about half an hour farther away – American already offered equally convenient service to Český Krumlov!)," Leff wrote. More than that, there is a castle in Prague that would have made much more sense for American Airlines to use in its marketing. "If American wanted an image of a castle for their Prague service, then maybe use… Prague Castle? That's the most the most significant Czech monument. It's one of the city's main landmarks, visible from much of central Prague, and the office of the President of the Czech Republic. And it's actually in Prague!" Leff wrote. Clearly, Southwest should have verified the location of the castle in the marketing before rolling it out. American Airlines Called Out After Embarrassing Mistake first appeared on Men's Journal on Aug 17, 2025 Solve the daily Crossword

Fewer people are drinking — and that's changing how they travel
Fewer people are drinking — and that's changing how they travel

CNBC

time3 hours ago

  • CNBC

Fewer people are drinking — and that's changing how they travel

Peter Shankman, an American, said he looked forward to free drinks when he flew business class for work. The entrepreneur would have a drink, then a few more, sleep, then land. All was well, he said. Until it wasn't. "Eventually, I realized that I wasn't fine," he said. "I was tired, cranky … [it] wasn't the way to live." So, he said, he quit drinking — at first just on planes, then altogether. "I like myself better when I don't drink," Shankman said. "I get up earlier. I work out. I don't eat like crap." A single dad, Shankman said he's now in the gym by 5:00 a.m. and back home to send his daughter to school at 6:30 a.m. On work trips, he exercises and sleeps better than before. "The change in me is massive," he said. "I'm dropping weight, I'm just happier overall." Shankman is part of a large contingent of people who are drinking less or quitting alcohol completely. Only 54% of Americans now say they consume alcohol, according to a Gallup poll released in August — the lowest number recorded since the company began tracking consumption habits in 1939. In another first, a majority of adults (53%) say drinking, even in moderation, is bad for one's health — up from 28% in 2018, the survey showed. For Jonathan Ayala, a real estate marketing strategist, giving up alcohol meant more energy and better sleep, but also "more money left in my budget for experiences that matter." "In the past, I wouldn't have imagined taking a trip without drinking," he said. But now, "I find myself waking up earlier for hikes, markets or cultural tours. I end up seeing more of the place I came to visit, which has made my travels feel richer and more intentional." Ayala also said going alcohol-free has changed where he travels too. "I'm more drawn to destinations with strong food cultures, wellness offerings, or outdoor adventures, rather than places where nightlife is the main attraction," he said. Travel blogger Jo Raby told CNBC Travel she and her husband's vacations once revolved around food and drinks, including wine tastings and bourbon tours. Now, they opt for outdoor trips that involve white water rafting, hiking, biking and kayaking as well as off-the-beaten path destinations, instead of trips to all-inclusive hotels or beach resorts. However, they don't shy away from events that involve drinking, she said. As big music fans, they still enjoy live performances, and they even joined a tapas and wine tour in Granada, Spain. "In Spain, it took a little more explaining to get the point across that we were not going to be able to consume any alcohol at all — not even a 'little bit,'" she said. Eventually "they produced an [non-alcoholic] version for us to try, cracking it open very obviously for the first time!" Seasoned traveler Robert Minchak said his decision to stop drinking four years ago hasn't changed where he travels, only what he drinks while there. "I skip the wine — but I haven't stopped visiting vineyards," he said, adding that he's also visited breweries and eaten at Michelin-starred restaurants during trips to Europe, North America and South America. He's also in better health ("no meds for acid reflux") and has better relationships in his life. "Family and friends notice a calmer, kinder me," he said. Though the health and cost benefits are plenty, some travelers find that going alcohol-free comes with its own set of challenges. For Raby, "it definitely feels strange to be in settings where the majority of people are drinking, and this has taken a lot of work on our parts from a mental aspect to adjust," she said. Ayala said he sometimes feels he doesn't get the full travel experience in some locations. "The main downside is that in some destinations, nightlife is such a big part of the culture that skipping it can feel like missing out," he said. He also said not drinking can complicate group trips, and that reactions from fellow travelers have been mixed. "Some are supportive or even curious about trying it themselves, while others are puzzled or assume it means I'm less fun," he said. "I've learned to frame it as a choice that actually helps me get more out of the trip, which usually shifts the conversation in a positive way." Paul Sendou, a French expatriate based in Singapore, said most of his friends have been understanding of his decision to reduce his drinking from four times a week to twice per month. However, he said his lifestyle led him to cancel one trip with "two very party-oriented friends," he said. To Sendou, the trade-off is worth it. "I'm more myself, more confident, clearer on what I want with myself and others," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store