
Bipartisan outreach will help India's case against Pakistan
The government's decision to include Opposition leaders in the seven delegations being sent to countries across the globe is significant and sagacious. This step underscores a refreshing and much-needed bipartisan approach to foreign policy, national security, and global image management. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, an articulate debater and former diplomat, will lead the most important delegation to the United States, Panama, Guyana, Brazil, and Colombia. This initiative could reshape how the world views India's internal cohesion and foreign policy maturity. It should be mentioned that this is not the first time that such a bipartisan initiative has taken place. In 1994, the then prime minister P V Narasimha Rao asked the leader of opposition Atal Bihari Vajpayee to head a delegation to the United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) in Geneva to counter Pakistan. After the Mumbai attacks in November 2008, Manmohan Singh sent multi-party delegations to different continents with evidence on Pakistan's links to the terror attacks. Such inclusive diplomatic initiatives send a powerful message to both friends and foes alike that the country's political class stands united when it comes to matters of national defence and security.
Operation Sindoor, launched in response to the egregious Pahalgam terror attack, has become a rallying point for all political parties. Indian leaders have shown that they don't allow partisan politics to ignore national interests. It tells the world that Indian democracy, though noisy and diverse, knows when to close ranks to protect its integrity. Also, these delegations will help counteract the wave of anti-India propaganda that has been gaining ground globally. Pakistan, along with several interest groups in the West, has often painted India in negative hues, while accusing the country of religious intolerance, human rights violations and authoritarianism. These narratives, whether promoted through social media, academic forums, or political lobbying, have the potential to considerably damage India's diplomatic and economic interests. Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his government have frequently been targeted in such campaigns, often being portrayed as anti-Muslim or Rightwing extremists. When leaders from the Opposition, many of whom are vocal critics of the Modi administration, join the government in representing India abroad, it helps debunk such accusations. A united political voice cuts through propaganda and presents a more nuanced, authentic picture of the Indian state and society.
This bipartisan outreach can also have a positive effect on domestic political culture. Indian politics has, of late, become increasingly confrontational and polarised, with debates degenerating into personal attacks and ideological rigidity. The act of working together as a cohesive unit on sensitive and strategic matters can help build mutual respect and encourage more constructive political engagement at home. When leaders from different political ideologies cooperate on international platforms, it sends a signal that political rivalry need not be equated to enmity. This could, in turn, tone down the toxicity in Indian politics and create space for more mature and issue-based discourse. The government's move to send mixed delegations composed of both ruling party and Opposition leaders is a commendable and visionary step. It aligns diplomatic engagement with democratic values, leverages the country's political diversity, and sends a powerful message of unity and resolve to the global community. If this collaborative spirit is nurtured, it could lay the foundation for a more balanced, credible, and effective Indian foreign policy—one that represents the entire nation and its people, and not just the ruling government.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Lawyers don't need to wear black coats in summer: Delhi Bar Association
In a major relief to lawyers practising in the Capital amidst the scorching heat, the Delhi Bar Association (DBA) has decided that advocates will be exempt from wearing black coats, their usual dress code, from May 16 to September 30. Rules framed under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act, 1961, prescribe a dress code for all practising advocates. This comprises a black buttoned-up coat, chapkan, achkan (a knee-length upper garment with long sleeves, side slits and a standing collar), black sherwani and white bands with advocate's gown for men advocates. Women advocates have to wear a black and full or half-sleeve jacket or blouse, white collar, stiff or soft, and white bands with advocates' gowns or sarees and long skirts (white or black without any design). 'All the members are hereby informed that advocates are exempted from wearing a black coat during summer (from May 16 to September 30) as per amendment in rules under Section 49(1)(gg) of the Advocates Act,1961,' DBA said in a circular dated May 24. 'Therefore, the members are at liberty to appear in the Courts subordinate to the Delhi High Court without wearing a black coat… The members are, however, advised to adhere to other rules of the dress code…,' the circular issued by Vikas Goyal, Secretary, DBA, said. DBA also said the district and sessions judges of various court complexes across Delhi have been informed of this decision. 'This is a very good step. The weather is very erratic and humid. In June, the heat will be way worse. This should be done by all Bar Associations and Councils across North India,' said Advocate Dhir Singh Kasana, former Saket Bar Association secretary. 'Indian district courts lack proper infrastructure in terms of fans, air conditioners, unhygienic washrooms, and sitting rooms, coupled with rising temperatures, it has become a daily physical and mental challenge for the advocates to wear black coats during court hours, especially in summer…This move is a welcome step towards the welfare of the advocates practising at district courts,' Advocate Paras Jain, who practices in Delhi, said. On February 27 this year, the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa (BCMG) issued a circular stating that advocates need not wear black coats from March 1 to June 30 every year. Similarly, Bhopal's Bar Council gave a similar exemption to lawyers from April 15 to July 15, 2025.


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Are we frittering away the gains of post-Pahalgam political consensus?
Are we frittering away the gains of post-Pahalgam political consensus? While all-party delegations project the face of a united India on foreign shores, divisive rhetoric and internal bickering back home are doing quite the opposite


Hans India
34 minutes ago
- Hans India
Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage
The political class will do better if it stops desisting from trying to derive electoral mileage from the highly successful Operation Sindoor that was executed recently. The military aspects of the operation have been largely praised (even by objective western experts), but the political aftermath has proven far more complex. The ruling party has come under scrutiny for allegedly using the operation's success to enhance its nationalistic image ostensibly for electoral gains. On its part, the Opposition has done little better. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge called for a special parliamentary session to discuss the operation in detail. He raised concerns about inconsistencies in official narratives, particularly surrounding reports regarding the number of Indian aircraft lost during the strikes. He also accused the government of 'misleading the nation.' His statement came after the Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan acknowledged the loss of some Indian aircraft but emphasised that the armed forces had adapted quickly to changing tactical scenarios, ultimately achieving the mission objectives. Chauhan categorically refuted Pakistan's assertions of shooting down multiple Indian jets, labelling them as propaganda meant to distort facts. His remarks highlighted the critical role of clear and truthful communication in sustaining public trust and countering misinformation. The political discourse triggered by Operation Sindoor reflects a broader tension between safeguarding national security and navigating partisan interests. While it is natural for political parties to discuss significant national developments, it is imperative that such dialogues remain constructive and rooted in the national interest. Exploiting military operations for electoral advantage not only undermines the integrity of the armed forces but also erodes public confidence in the nation's democratic institutions. As India continues to assess the long-term implications of Operation Sindoor, there is a pressing need for political maturity and a unified stance on issues of national security. Recognising and honouring the courage and competence of the armed forces should transcend political divides. National security must remain above the realm of party politics, treated with the seriousness and dignity it deserves. Also, our political leaders must come to terms with a sobering reality: Operation Sindoor, while tactically successful and symbolically significant, was not a war that we won—nor even a full-scale battle. At best, it was a well-executed skirmish, a calibrated military response to the horrifying Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 innocent lives. Its importance lies not in territorial gains or dramatic military victories, but in the message it has sent loud and clear-Pakistan will have to pay a heavy price for supporting and harbouring terrorist outfits. Precision strikes on terrorist camps disrupted their operations and showcased India's strategic capabilities. However, this operation must not be mistaken for closure. The war on terror is a long and evolving struggle, requiring constant vigilance, strategic foresight, and, above all, national unity. True victory will come not with a single strike, but through sustained efforts to dismantle the networks of extremism to be assured of lasting peace and security. Operation Sindoor stands as a testament to India's strategic capability and resolve in the face of terrorism. However, its legacy will be defined not just by military precision but by the manner the nation's political leadership chooses to engage with it. By fostering transparency, encouraging responsible dialogue, and prioritising unity, India can ensure that such operations serve their true purpose—protection and security of all its citizens.