
Japan marks 80th anniversary of WWII surrender as concern grows about fading memory
In a national ceremony Friday at Tokyo 's Budokan hall, about 4,500 officials and bereaved families and their descendants from around the country will observe a moment of silence at noon, the time when the then-emperor's surrender speech began on Aug. 15, 1945.
Just a block away at Yasukuni Shrine, seen by Asian neighbors as a symbol of militarism, dozens of Japanese rightwing politicians and their supporters came to pray.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba stayed away from Yasukuni and sent a religious ornament as a personal gesture instead of praying at the controversial shrine.
But Shinjiro Koizumi, the agriculture minister considered as a top candidate to replace the beleaguered prime minister, prayed at the shrine. Koizumi, the son of popular former Prime Minitser Junichiro Koizumi whose Yasukuni visit as a serving leader in 2001 outraged China, is a regular at the shrine.
Rightwing lawmakers, including former economic security ministers Sanae Takaichi and Takayuki Kobayashi, as well as governing Liberal Democratic Party heavyweight Koichi Hagiuda, also visited the shrine Friday.
The shrine honors convicted war criminals, among about 2.5 million war dead. Victims of Japanese aggression, especially China and the Koreas, see visits to the shrine as a lack of remorse about Japan's wartime past.
As the population of wartime generations rapidly decline, Japan faces serious questions on how it should pass on the wartime history to the next generation, as the country has already faced revisionist pushbacks under former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his supporters in the 2010s.
Since 2013, Japanese prime ministers stopped apologizing to Asian victims, under the precedent set by Abe.
Some lawmakers' denial of Japan's military role in massive civilian deaths on Okinawa or the Nanking Massacre have stirred controversy.
In an editorial Friday, the Mainichi newspaper noted that Japan's pacifist principle was mostly about staying out of global conflict, rather than thinking how to make peace, and called the country to work together with Asian neighbors as equal partners.
'It's time to show a vision toward 'a world without war' based on the lesson from its own history,' the Mainichi said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
India plans sweeping consumption tax cuts by October to boost economy
NEW DELHI, Aug 15 (Reuters) - India's government will slash the consumption tax it charges consumers and businesses by October, a top official said on Friday, hours after Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced sweeping tax reforms to boost the economy in the face of a trade conflict with Washington. The federal government will propose a two-rate structure of 5% and 18%, doing away with the 12% and 28% tax that was imposed on some items, said the government official, who declined to be named as the plans are still private. The plan is to bring "99%" of all the items that are in 12% category to 5%, the official said. That tax slab includes butter, fruit juices, and dry fruits, and any cuts to the basket could benefit the likes of Nestle (NESN.S), opens new tab to Hindustan Unilever ( opens new tab to Procter & Gamble (PG.N), opens new tab. The tax cut plan comes amid growing tensions between New Delhi and Washington on steep U.S. tariffs on Indian goods. Modi on Friday made a public appeal to promote domestic products, and his supporters have been calling for boycott of American products. Addressing the nation on its 79th independence day, Modi earlier said that the goods and services tax would be reformed and taxes lowered by Diwali, the Hindu festival of lights, set to be celebrated in October this year. "This Diwali, I am going to make it a double Diwali for you. Over the past eight years, we have undertaken a major reform in goods and services tax. We are bringing next-generation GST reforms that will reduce the tax burden across the country," Modi said. The final decision will be taken by the GST (goods and services taxes) Council, which is chaired by the finance minister and has all the state's finance ministers as members, the official said. The council is set to meet by October. Citi estimates that about 20% of items - including packaged food and beverages, apparel and hotel accommodation - fall under the 12% GST slab, accounting for 5-10% of consumption and 5-6% of GST revenue. If most of these are moved to the 5% slab and some to the 18% slab, it could lead to a revenue loss of around 500 billion rupees, or 0.15% of GDP, potentially taking the total policy stimulus for households in the current 2025-26 financial year to 0.6%-0.7% of GDP, the brokerage said.


Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Companies and products covered by India's consumption tax regime
NEW DELHI, Aug 15 (Reuters) - Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government on Friday announced a plan to lower rates and simplify its goods and services taxes (GST) by October, a move to boost domestic demand amid U.S. tariff headwinds. Modi's announcement comes as India moves to simplify its GST structure, with a group of ministers preparing a report that will consider merging tax categories and lowering rates on some products. The country currently levies GST at 5%, 12%, 18% and 28% on most goods and services, excluding gold and silver, and applies an additional levy on so-called demerit items such as cigarettes and high-end cars. Below are current tax rates of the different categories, and products and companies that could be affected: * Cars made by likes of Maruti Suzuki ( opens new tab, Hyundai ( opens new tab and Tata Motors ( opens new tab are currently subject to a tax rate of 28%. Big and luxury cars have to pay higher additional levies than smaller cars. * Consumer durables such as air conditioners and refrigerators fall in this tax category and any move could benefit sales of Samsung ( opens new tab and LG Electronics ( opens new tab * Cigarettes, along with aerated drinks, attract additional levies. Horse racing clubs and gambling services, 5-star hotel accommodation also fall under this category. * Personal care items like hair oil, toothpaste, ice cream, shampoos and deodorants. * Mobile phones and industrial chemicals are also subject to this tax rate. Tax changes here could affect Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab and Xiaomi ( opens new tab * Health and life insurance products THE 12% CATEGORY Most products in this category are likely to become cheaper, a government source has said. Consumer majors like Nestle (NESN.S), opens new tab to Hindustan Unilever ( opens new tab to Procter & Gamble (PG.N), opens new tab retail many products at this tax rate, which covers: * Processed & packaged foods - butter, processed foods * Dry fruits such as almonds * Fruit juices, packed coconut water * Ready-to-eat vegetable/fruit preparations, pickles, jam, jelly THE 5% GST CATEGORY * Household essentials like sugar, tea, edible oils, milk * Footwear and clothes priced below $10 * Certain life-saving drugs


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Munich 1938 tells us Trump must not give anything away at Putin summit
Donald Trump meets Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15 for their first summit of Trump's second term. Their topic of discussion will be the war in Ukraine. The pair may decide the fate of the country, which Putin began to illegally occupy in 2014 and which Russian forces invaded in an outright war of aggression in February 2022. Trump has hinted that he could agree, in a two-way summit without the involvement of the Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, to the handing over of Ukrainian territory to Russia. If he does, this would bear close resemblance to an act of betrayal which took place in Munich on September 30 1938, and, ominously, is now understood as a key step on the road to the Second World War. The deal struck by the then British prime minister, Neville Chamberlain, and his French counterpart, Édouard Daladier, with the German leader Adolf Hitler handed Hitler territory in Germany's neighbour, Czechoslovakia, in return for what Chamberlain erroneously boasted would be 'peace in our time'. Within months, Nazi Germany would take control of much of the rest of Czechoslovakia, and in less than a year, the whole of Europe would be at war. Similar to the Trump-Putin summit's exclusion of Zelensky, the Czech leader Edvard Beneš was not included in the Munich summit. There had already been ample indication of Hitler's bad faith in the spring and summer of 1938. Hitler had begun issuing increasingly strident complaints about alleged Czech mistreatment of the German-speaking minority in Sudetenland, a territory which had been handed to the newly formed state of Czechoslovakia after the First World War, but which contained 3 million ethnic Germans. By May, Hitler was openly talking about destroying Czechoslovakia, and on September 12, he made a speech vowing to 'solve the question' once and for all. In response, Chamberlain flew to see Hitler at Bad Godesberg, where they agreed that Germany would take control of all areas of the Sudetenland with a greater than 50% concentration of Germans. The British prime minister persuaded the Czech president Edvard Beneš to accede to this demand, but within days Hitler had reneged, saying he would have the whole territory by October 1. This prompted Britain and France to accelerate their rearmament efforts. Chamberlain ordered the British fleet to put out to sea and on September 25, France ordered its army to mobilise. The next step was choreographed with the help of Italy's fascist dictator Benito Mussolini who – in the knowledge that Italy was not ready for a European war at that stage – set up another conference for September 29-30 in Munich. Britain and France agreed to travel to meet Hitler, who at that stage was aware that there was little appetite for war either among the German people or his own generals. Beneš, meanwhile, was preparing his people to resist the German threat. Troops were sent to the borders between Sudetenland and Germany, where Czechoslovakia had built considerable fortifications. Chamberlain and Daladier duly met Hitler in Munich, where over two days an agreement for the occupation of Sudetenland was thrashed out and a four-page document signed by the three leaders and Mussolini. No Czech official was involved in either the negotiations or the signing of the agreement. On hearing of the deal, Beneš said: 'Munich is a betrayal that will be its own punishment,' adding: 'Britain and France think they will save themselves from war and revolution at our expense, but they are wrong.' He stepped down a few days later. Relief – but a disastrous outcome At the time, the British press cheered Chamberlain as a hero and the agreement as a diplomatic triumph. It's important to remember that at that stage, just 20 years after the catastrophic Great War had finished, there was very little appetite for another major conflict in Europe. As The Times, which was in lockstep with the government on this issue, explained in an editorial 'feelings were running so high' that the separation of the Sudetenland from Czechoslovakia 'without a plebiscite seemed the only solution'. The newspaper's editor at the time, Geoffrey Dawson, was a convinced supporter of Chamberlain, so closely connected to the British Government that he has been described as 'an ex officio member of the Cabinet'. Hitler's gamble had paid off. His troops occupied the Sudetenland on October 1, 1938, securing for Germany the extensive border fortifications that Czechoslovakia had prepared for its own defence. Within a matter of months, Germany was ready to execute the second part of Hitler's plan for Czechoslovakia. On March 15, having used the same strategy of reporting the mistreatment of ethnic Germans in Bohemia and Moravia, Hitler summoned Emil Hácha, a quietly spoken lawyer who had been drafted in to replace Beneš after Munich. Informing the new Czech leader that the order had already been given to the Luftwaffe to launch bombing raids over Prague and other big cities, the German leader forced Hácha to agree to accept an agreement whereby his country would become a German protectorate. Chamberlain's efforts to appease Hitler may have secured time for Britain to rearm and prepare for war. However, this had not been Chamberlain's objective. He believed that by offering the Nazi regime what it wanted, he could secure an enduring peace. In fact, his concessions encouraged Hitler's belief that threats of force could secure territorial gains. The concern now must be that if Donald Trump accedes too readily to Putin's territorial demands, Ukraine may suffer the same fate. Trump has already talked of 'land swaps'. If he agrees to allow Russia to annex what is left of the Donbas, it will mean that a vital area of territory where Ukraine's armed forces have been holding Russia at bay since 2014 will be handed to Russia. This would leave the way clear for a resumption of hostilities at a later date, this time without the barriers of Ukraine's fortified defensive line. Ukraine – and Europe – will be hoping that Trump can hold his nerve when he meets Putin in Alaska on Friday.