logo
Ryanair's changed policy on minors leave children's travel plans up in the air

Ryanair's changed policy on minors leave children's travel plans up in the air

Irish Times22-07-2025
This time last year a 14-year-old travelling with a sibling or friend over the age of 16 – maybe as part of a language exchange programme – was welcomed on board
Ryanair
flights without any difficulties.
This year, however, they might find themselves being escorted off the plane as a result of a change in the company's policies that may have gone undetected by many families who are hoping to send their little ones away in the weeks ahead.
It certainly went undetected by two readers who contacted this page within days of each other earlier this month.
'I wonder if you could advise on a consumer issue,' begins the mail from Andrea.
READ MORE
'Prior to June of this year, a passenger aged under 16 was permitted to travel with another passenger aged 16 or older with Ryanair. It appears this policy changed in or around June this year and now under 16s must be accompanied by someone aged over 18,' she says.
Before we continue and out of fear of enraging Ryanair early on, we should point out that Andrea is incorrect to say this change happened 'in or around June this year', and we will elaborate on that presently.
For now, back to Andrea's story.
'This past Saturday, we were due to receive three students from Valencia, flying together on Ryanair, two aged 17 and one aged 15. But when they went to check in, they were advised that the 15-year-old was not allowed to travel, even though at the time of booking the tickets, Ryanair's policy would have allowed this. How is this allowed to happen? Surely Ryanair should have been obligated to inform affected passengers of this policy change in advance of their travel dates and offer refunds? It seems outrageous that they were not informed of the policy change,' she says.
She points out that the 15-year-old's parents were 'forced to purchase an Aer Lingus flight from Alicante so that she could get to Dublin to start her course. Do they have grounds for any recourse from Ryanair here? It must be some kind of breach of contract. Or would it be a case of trying to claim on their travel insurance? It is very difficult to find information on the policy change on Ryanair's website- all that seems to be available now is their new policy, so it is very difficult to find out even when the policy changed.'
At around the same time we also heard from Michele.
'I am mum of four children ranging from 18 to seven,' she begins.
'For the past three years I have sent my older children to a group in Spain called Pueblo Ingles. They fly to Madrid get picked up and stay overnight, then bus it out to Salamanca to teach English to Spanish children. It's volunteer-based.
She says that the first year she sent her 16-year-old son and her 14-year-old daughter and two friends aged 15 and 13 and they all flew without issue.
The second year she sent her son – who was then 17 – with her daughter and her daughter's friend, both of whom were under 16 at the time of the flight.
'This year I sent my daughter who is now 17 and her sister who is 13. It was to be the older girl's last year and the younger girl's first,' she explains.
'I used my Ryanair app when I booked the flights and nothing was said regarding age. I booked their 20kg baggage, I booked the seat allocation there and back. I checked them in online, nothing was ever said about the age of the travellers,' she writes.
She left her home in Waterford at 8pm on a Wednesday night, stayed with family close to the airport, woke at 5am and drove to Dublin Airport, terminal 1, parked the car and checked and tagged the bag.
'I walked the girls to security, said goodbye and left and drove back towards Waterford. My 17-year-old daughter called me at 7.30am. Ryanair wouldn't let her board with the 13-year-old. In fact, they said she could board but leave the 13-year-old there to call her mother,' Michele writes.
'They did this in front of the other passengers. They shamed and embarrassed my children as if they had done wrong. They didn't offer them assistance or walk them down to get their bags, they just said 'I've unboarded you now and your bag has been removed from the plane'. My children had to walk down crying and ask an airport worker where their bag might be,' she says.
'I went back to Dublin Airport through M50 toll back to the car park to collect two traumatised girls. I was given an email to complain to but it bounced back saying it didn't exist. Then I called their complaints number and spoke to a human that was close to a robot. He just kept repeating their policies and said I wouldn't get any refund because it was my own fault, I could have linked the girls flight to another adult on the plane, that adult being a mystery stranger I hadn't met yet. I always fly Ryanair and have never complained about them because cheap is cheap, you know what you're getting when you book with them. But the fact that I had done this two years previous with no problem and the fact that they humiliated my kids so publicly, I'm angry.'
We got in touch with Ryanair and will publish the response that came from its PR department in full.
'There hasn't been a 'recent' policy change ('June this year') as you wrongly claim,' it begins.
Pricewatch made no such claim, we were quoting our reader and seeking information, but that is by the by.
'We changed our 'minors' travel policy in September last year. Prior to that change we allowed under 16's to travel with an over 16 'adult'. However, in a number of EU countries (notably Spain, Poland, Greece and Germany) we were notified that this is not allowed, as they require an U16 'minor' to be accompanied by an 'adult', who must be over 18, not over 16. They do not accept over 16's as an adult, whereas Ryanair does.
'To avoid any confusion, and the risk of such minors being detained by immigration in these countries, we changed our policy to bring it into line with the requirements of these countries, that an U16 minor must – since Sept 2024 – be accompanied by an adult over 18 years of age.'
The statement points out that the first booking we highlighted was made in March 2025 'over six months after this policy change' while the second booking 'was made in May 2025, more than eight months after this policy change. This 'minor' travel policy was clearly set out on our website at the time of both of these bookings.'
'We will not take any risks when it comes to accompanied minors travelling with adults, and we must ensure that we comply with the most stringent standards governing travel for minors, to ensure we avoid such minors getting stuck, or worse still, denied entry at immigration points at EU airports.'
So, there you have it. There has been a policy change – albeit in September 2024 and not June 2025. We can't possibly quibble with the reasoning Ryanair has outlined for the changes, although readers might question how it has been advertised and managed.
Unlike Ryanair, we understand that not everyone who makes a booking or pays for a service reads the terms and conditions in detail before clicking the buy now button. And we understand that people are even less likely to read those terms and conditions in detail if they are using a service or booking flights in a fashion similar to how they have done it in the fairly recent past.
For our part we shall treat this as a public service announcement and one anyone planning to book a flight for a 16- or 17-year-old and someone under that age will do well to heed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fáilte Ireland appoints Caroline Bocquel as new CEO
Fáilte Ireland appoints Caroline Bocquel as new CEO

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Fáilte Ireland appoints Caroline Bocquel as new CEO

Fáilte Ireland has appointed Caroline Bocquel as its new chief executive. Ms Bocquel, the first woman to led the State tourism agency, will step into the role in November. Paul Kelly , who had led Fáilte Ireland for eight years, stepped down in March to take over as chief executive of the Royal Dublin Society (RDS) . Ms Bocquel, an executive with 20 years' experience, most recently served as chief executive of Bord Iascaigh Mhara (BIM), the State agency responsible for the development of the Irish seafood sector. She has been in that position since January 2023, having previously served as BIM's director of corporate services. She is the chairwoman of the audit and risk committee at the Irish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and formerly served as the chief financial officer of aid agency, Goal Global. READ MORE Ms Bocquel said she was honoured to be appointed to the position, describing Fáilte Ireland as 'central to one of Ireland's most vital industries'. 'Tourism supports hundreds of thousands of jobs in communities nationwide, and its sustainable growth is essential to our economic and cultural future,' the incoming chief executive said. She outlined her aim of working to 'ensure Ireland continues to offer world-class experiences while building a resilient, innovative and inclusive tourism sector'. Minister for Enterprise, Peter Burke , said he was 'happy' to approve Ms Bocquel's appointment, adding that 'tourism is of critical importance to the Irish economy'. Mr Burke said Ms Bocquel 'has the strategic skills, development mindset and governance experience needed to support the sustainable growth of our tourism economy into the future'. 'I am confident that Caroline and her team will work closely with the industry and my officials as we develop and support the Irish tourism sector together,' the minister said. Ruth Andrews , chairwoman of the Fáilte Ireland, said the appointment came following 'a highly competitive recruitment process'. Before Ms Bocquel formally assumes the role in November, Paul Keeley, the director of regional development, will serve as interim chief executive.

A letter from Michael O'Leary: ‘MetroLink is a mad, bad project'
A letter from Michael O'Leary: ‘MetroLink is a mad, bad project'

Irish Times

time18 hours ago

  • Irish Times

A letter from Michael O'Leary: ‘MetroLink is a mad, bad project'

Sir, – Unbelievable!! Only an Irish Times columnist (with no known experience in transport) could waste her half-page column, slagging off Dermot Desmond and myself for criticising the Dublin MetroLink, without once mentioning the projected cost of approximately €20 billion!! Being criticised by Irish Times columnists is always a great compliment. In what crazy country could we seriously consider wasting approximately €20 billion of taxpayer money on a railway line, serving a narrow strip of the north Dublin population from Swords to St Stephen's Green, all of whom are well served currently by bus connections? The cost/benefit of this insanity has never been published, because it cannot be justified. Dermot Desmond's transport view should carry significant weight, given his very successful rescue, redevelopment and sale of London City Airport for approximately $1 billion in 2006. My own, (less?) humble view is based on almost 40 years' experience of growing, what is now the world's largest passenger airline. READ MORE But sadly we are both guilty of 'being rich', so therefore dismissed by The Irish Times 'experts', who know so much more about transport. I wouldn't quibble with a MetroLink from Swords to St Stephen's Green if it was free, but there are far better uses of taxpayer funds, than this white elephant. Muddled thinking, free of any cost/benefit analysis, such as that displayed by Justine McCarthy, is how you deliver a children's hospital (which should have cost €200 million) at a final cost of €2.5 billion and rising. My criticism of the MetroLink is based on the fact, that very few passengers at Dublin Airport will ever use it. It takes passengers into St Stephen's Green, so some small minority of inbound visitors might use it, but the vast majority of Irish originating passengers, who need to get to Dublin Airport early in the morning, or are travelling to/from outside the D2 / D4 area, won't use it. Dublin Airport is just 9km from the centre of the city, and is well served by competitively priced bus connections, which takes passengers to the city centre, and to points all over Ireland at low fares. These passengers won't switch to a €20 billion metro. Your columnist claims that I 'opposed the second terminal at Dublin Airport in 2010. I didn't. Dublin needed a second terminal l and I offered to build it on the North Apron for just €200 million, as Ryanair had proposed. I simply pointed out that the Dublin Airport Authority (DAA), wasted €2 billion, building Terminal 2 in the wrong place (a cul-de-sac) and with no ability to future expand. Now that the second runway has opened on the north apron, the chronic congestion in the T2 cul-de-sac bedevils the T2 airlines on a daily basis. I note Ms McCarthy failed to offer her opinion on the Dublin Airport second runway (a project which I also supported), yet which the airlines and our passengers are prevented from using, by a 2007 (Road Traffic) Planning restriction. We elected a new government last November which promised to remove this cap 'as soon as possible', which would enable the airlines at Dublin to grow traffic, new routes, tourism and jobs. Sadly, eight months later the Government has failed to take any action to scrap this cap. More inexcusable delay and inaction from our political class. To summarise, both I and Dermot Desmond believe, wasting €20 billion on a Dublin Airport metro, is an unjustifiable waste of scarce taxpayer funds. I object because the majority of Dublin Airport passengers won't ever use this vastly overpriced service. Dermot correctly suggests that Al and electric road transport will solve the problem at a fraction of this €20 billion over the next decade. The fact that an unqualified Irish Times columnist considers that 'two rich men' are wrong, only renews my faith that this MetroLink is a mad, bad project. Add some more buses to service the citizens of Swords, Ballymun, Collins Avenue, and Glasnevin, and The Irish Times could save Irish taxpayers (me included!) about €19.9 billion rather than squandering these funds, as we have on the world's most expensive, and least efficient, Children's Hospital. If the next time Ms McCarthy wants to offer an opinion on government transport projects, perhaps she could address the cost benefit of the project, rather than slagging off two successful – albeit opinionated – business people. We won't always be right, but we will be right, far more often than the misguided, anti-business Irish Times 'chatterati'. – Yours, etc, MICHAEL O'LEARY. Chief Executive, Ryanair, Dublin.

Iarnród Éireann appoints Shannon Airport Group CEO Mary Considine as its new CEO
Iarnród Éireann appoints Shannon Airport Group CEO Mary Considine as its new CEO

Irish Times

timea day ago

  • Irish Times

Iarnród Éireann appoints Shannon Airport Group CEO Mary Considine as its new CEO

Shannon Airport Group chief executive Mary Considine is to leave her role to become CEO of Iarnród Éireann later this year. Ms Considine will succeed Jim Meade at Iarnród Éireann following his retirement. She will leave her job at Shannon Airport Group after six years at the helm. The Shannon group's deputy chief executive Ray O'Driscoll will assume the role of chief executive on an interim basis as a recruitment process takes place. Ms Considine is currently a director of Ibec and sits on its audit and risk committee, while she is also a director of Limerick Chamber of Commerce, as well as a trustee and governing authority member of Mary Immaculate College in Limerick. READ MORE Her tenure at Shannon Airport Group was marked by the Covid-19 pandemic, and she has been credited with leading its recovery from the crisis to deliver its highest passenger levels in 15 years. [ Shannon Airport traffic increases 7% in first six months of 2025 Opens in new window ] 'She led the restructuring of the group to position it for growth, providing vital strategic national infrastructure, enabling essential air connectivity for the country, developing high quality commercial property solutions and growing the economic impact of our activities,' Shannon Airport Group said. Iarnród Éireann chairman Steve Murphy said Ms Considine would lead the company's 5,300-strong team and work to realise its ambition of delivering an €8 billion national programme of capital investment projects, which is aimed at doubling current passenger numbers by 2030. She will also be charged with progressing the group's port development and plans for an offshore renewable hub at Rosslare Europort in Co Wexford. 'Our railway, at the heart of Ireland's sustainable transport network, as well as Rosslare Europort, are critical national assets, and I look forward to meeting and working with the team at Iarnród Éireann to deliver on the company's huge ambition during such a transformative era,' said Ms Considine.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store