
Immigration concerns top of mind for Cal State LA students on first day of class
Administrators say they're focused on providing a "safe and inclusive environment for all students, faculty, and staff, regardless of their immigration status" as class kicks off. The university has provided a list of resources on its website that includes legal support and rights that students should know if contacted by federal immigration enforcement officers.
The university is allowing students to take online classes if they feel uncomfortable leaving their homes.
"I know some people that have a lot of anxiety coming to school and they don't even have rides to school anymore because their parents don't want to drive them," said Valerie Perez, a student at the university.
Still, some students have expressed concern as they began to trickle onto campus Tuesday morning.
An ongoing legal battle between the Trump administration and California leadership could determine the future of immigration raids in the state. An appeals court recently upheld a previous ruling that immigration enforcement officers cannot target certain groups without first having a reasonable suspicion that they could be unauthorized immigrants.
Reasonable suspicions can't be based on race, ethnicity, languages spoken or their location, the ruling states. CSULA's student population was 75% Hispanic in the spring 2025 semester, according to the university's own statistics.
Despite the ruling, immigration raids have continued in the L.A. area, and those on campus who oppose the immigration enforcement tactics of President Trump are aware that their classmates could potentially be targets.
"It's a terrible thing that's happening but I can't really do much to help or prevent it," said student Aaron Garcia.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California voters will decide redistricting in November, escalating battle with Trump and Texas
Ratcheting up the pressure in the escalating national fight over control of Congress, the California Legislature on Thursday approved November special election to ask voters in November to redraw the state's electoral lines to favor Democrats and thwart President Trump's far-right policy agenda. The ballot measure, pushed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other state and national Democratic leaders, is the latest volley in a national political brawl over electoral maps that could alter the outcome of the 2026 midterm elections and the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives. If voters approve the redrawn lines on Nov. 4, Democrats in the Golden State would see the odds tilted further in their favor, while the number of California Republicans in the House could be halved. Newsom initially said that new electoral districts in California would only take effect if another state redrew its lines before 2031. But after Texas moved toward approving its own maps this week that could give the GOP five more House seats, Democrats stripped the so-called "trigger" language from the amendment — meaning that if voters approve the measure, the new lines would take effect no matter what. The ballot measure language, which asks California voters to override the power of the independent redistricting commission, was approved by most Democrats in the Assembly and the Senate, where they hold supermajorities. California lawmakers have the power to place constitutional amendments on the statewide ballot without the approval of the governor. Newsom, however, is expected later Thursday to sign two separate bills that fund the special election and spell out the lines for the new congressional districts. Democrats' rush to the ballot marks a sudden departure from California's 15-year commitment to independent redistricting, often held up as the country's gold standard. The state's voters stripped lawmakers of the power to draw lines during the Great Recession and handed that partisan power to a panel of independent citizens whose names are drawn in a lottery. The change, Democrats said, was forced by an extraordinary change in circumstances: After decades of the United States redrawing congressional lines once a decade, President Trump and his political team have leaned on Republican-led states to redraw their district lines before the 2026 midterm elections to help Republicans retain control of the House. 'His playbook is a simple one: Bully, threaten, fight, then rig the rules to hang onto power," said Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas. "We are here today because California will not be a bystander to that power grab. We are not intimidated, and we are acting openly, lawfully, with purpose and resolve, to defend our state and to defend our democracy.' Republicans in the state Assembly and the state Senate criticized Newsom's argument that Democrats must "fight fire with fire," saying retaliation is a slippery slope that would erode the independent redistricting process California voters have chosen twice at the ballot box. "You move forward fighting fire with fire, and what happens? You burn it all down," said Assembly Minority Leader James Gallagher (R-Yuba City). He said Trump was "wrong" to push Gov. Greg Abbott to redraw Texas' lines to benefit Republicans, and so was California's push to pursue the same strategy. State Senate Majority Leader Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), who co-authored the bill drawing the proposed congressional districts, said Democrats had no choice but to stand up, given the harm the Trump administration has inflicted on healthcare, education, tariffs and other policies that affect Californians. 'What do we do? Just sit back and do nothing?" Gonzalez said. "Or do we fight back and provide some chance for our Californians to see themselves in this democracy?" Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones (R-Santee) said the effort is "a corrupt redistricting scheme to rig California's elections" that violates the "letter and the spirit of the California constitution." "Democrats are rushing this through under the guise of urgency," Jones said. "There is no emergency that justifies this abuse of process.' Three Assembly Democrats did not vote in favor of the constitutional amendment. Jasmeet Bains (D-Delano), who is running for Congress against Rep. David Valadao (R-Hanford) in the San Joaquin Valley, voted no. Progressive Caucus chair Alex Lee (D-San Jose), and Dawn Addis (D-Morro Bay), did not vote. Democrats will face an unusual messaging challenge with the November ballot measure, said Matt Lesenyie, an assistant professor of political science at Cal State Long Beach. The opponents of mid-decade redistricting are stressing that the measure would "disadvantage voters," he said, which is "wording that Democrats have primed Democrats on, for now two administrations, that democracy is being killed with a thousand cuts." "It's a weird, sort of up-is-down moment," Lesenyie said. How did we get here? Trump's political team began pressuring Abbott and Texas Republicans in early June to redraw the state's 38 congressional districts in the middle of the decade — which is very uncommon — to give Republicans a better shot at keeping the House in 2026. "We are entitled to five more seats," Trump later told CNBC. Some Texas Republicans feared that mid-decade redistricting could imperil their own chances of reelection. But within a month of the White House floating the idea, Abbott added the new congressional lines, which would stack the deck against as many as five Texas Democrats in Congress, to the Legislature's special session in July. By mid-July, Newsom was talking about California punching back. In an interview with the progressive news site the TN Holler, Newsom said: "These guys, they're not f—ing around. They're playing by a totally different set of rules." Democrats in Texas fled the state for nearly two weeks, including some to California, to deny Republicans the quorum they needed to pass the new lines. Abbott signed civil arrest warrants and levied fines on the 52 absent Democrats while they held news conferences in California and Illinois to bring attention to the fight. While the Texas drama unfolded, consultants for the campaign arm of House Democrats in California quietly drew up maps that would further chop down the number of Golden State Republicans in Congress. The proposed changes would eliminate the district of Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Corona) and dilute the number of GOP voters in four districts represented by Reps. Doug LaMalfa, Kevin Kiley, David Valadao and Darrell Issa. The Democrats agreed to return to Texas last week and pointed to California's tit-for-tat effort as one measure of success, saying the Golden State could neutralize any Republican gains in Texas. Since then, other Republican-led states have begun to contemplate redistricting too, including Indiana, Florida and Missouri. Trump's political allies are publicly threatening to mount primary challenges against any Indiana Republican who opposes redrawing the lines. In California, the opposition is shaping up as quickly as the ballot measure. California voters received the first campaign mailer opposing the ballot measure a day before the Legislature voted to approve it. A four-page glossy flier, funded by conservative donor and redistricting champion Charlie Munger Jr., warned voters that mid-decade redistricting is "weakening our Democratic process" and "a threat to California's landmark election reform." Republicans have also gone to court to try and stop the measure, alleging in an emergency petition with the state Supreme Court that Democrats violated the state Constitution by ramming the bills through without following proper legislative procedure. The high court Wednesday rejected the petition. A wave of legal challenges are expected, not only in California but in any state that reconfigures congressional districts in the expanding partisan brawl. Assemblymember Carl DeMaio (R-San Diego) said Thursday morning that a lawsuit challenging the California ballot measure would be filed in state court by Friday evening. He said Republicans also plan to litigate the title of the ballot measure and any voter guide materials that accompany it. And, he said, if voters approve the new lines, "I believe we will have ample opportunity to set the maps aside in federal court." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Villanova University issues alert for active shooter on campus
Villanova University issued a warning for an active shooter on its Pennsylvania campus on Thursday. The school told students to stay clear of Law School Scarpa Hall. "Police on scene. Move to secure location. Lock/barricade doors. More info to follow," it said in an active shooter incident warning on its website. "Police continue to search area. Remain sheltered in place until further notice," it added. MORE: 3 Utah officers shot, 2 fatally, answering domestic disturbance call: Police The Radnor Township Police Department said it was on the scene at Villanova University for an active shooter report. "All nearby residents and students are asked to SHELTER IN PLACE AT this time," it said on X. Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro said local and federal law enforcement are on site responding to the reports of an active shooter. "Avoid the area and follow the direction of local authorities," he said on X. "We will share additional information as it becomes available." The campus is located approximately 12 miles northwest of Philadelphia's Center City. This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hulk Hogan's death may have been result of ‘severed' nerve, medical malpractice
As questions continue to surround the cause of Hulk Hogan's death last month, Florida law enforcement sources are saying it may have been the result of medical malpractice. Hogan's 46-year-old widow, Sky Daily, confirmed to TMZ on Thursday that his phrenic nerve — which enables the lungs to inhale and exhale air — was 'compromised' during a recent operation. Daily also confirmed that an autopsy has been performed, but declined to reveal its results. Her remarks followed the outlet's report that an occupational therapist who was at Hogan's home when he stopped breathing told Clearwater police that a surgeon had 'severed' Hogan's phrenic nerve. The therapist's claims of medical malpractice were recorded by the officers who responded to the scene, though sources told TMZ the police report is on 'lockdown.' In a statement to the outlet on Thursday, Clearwater police confirmed the investigation into Hogan's death is ongoing. 'The unique nature of this case has required us to interview multiple witnesses and seek medical records from a variety of providers, and our detectives continue to do that,' they said. 'All of this takes time.' Hogan was pronounced dead on July 24 in Clearwater, Florida, after medics were dispatched to his home in response to a cardiac arrest. The 71-year-old's cause of death was later confirmed to be a heart attack, though documents obtained by Us Weekly also said he had a history of leukemia CLL. The latter took estranged daughter Brooke by surprise, given her knowledge of his medical history. She said she had been present for almost all of her dad's surgeries in previous years and reviewed his blood work each time, but was never given any indication he had cancer. Like authorities, Brooke said there were 'no signs of foul play or anything suspicious' about her father's death. Still, she was calling for an autopsy to be performed so the family could be certain about Hulk's 'very complicated medical history.' Earlier this month, Daily said the family was looking to answer 'every question about his medical care' prior to him being cremated.