Trump threatens 'severe consequences' if Putin blocks Ukraine ceasefire ahead of talks
Trump did not specify what the consequences could be, but he has warned of economic sanctions if his meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday proves fruitless.
The comments by Trump and the outcome of a virtual conference with Trump, European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy held on Wednesday could provide encouragement for Kyiv after fears the Alaska summit could end up selling out Ukraine by carving up its territory.
However, Russia is likely to resist Ukraine and Europe's demands strongly and previously has said its stance had not changed since it was first detailed by Putin in June 2024.
When asked if Russia would face any consequences if Putin does not agree to stop the war after Friday's meeting, Trump responded: 'Yes, they will.'
Asked if those consequences would be sanctions or tariffs, Trump told reporters: 'I don't have to say. There will be very severe consequences."
But the president also described the aim of the meeting between the two leaders in Alaska as "setting the table" for a quick follow-up that would include Zelenskiy.
"If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Trump said.
"I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelenskiy and myself, if they'd like to have me there."
Trump did not provide a time frame for a second meeting.
Red lines
European leaders and Zelenskiy had earlier spoken with Trump in a last-ditch call hosted by Germany to lay out red lines ahead of the Alaska meeting.
"We had a very good call. He was on the call. President Zelenskiy was on the call. I would rate it a 10, very friendly," Trump said.
French President Emmanuel Macron said Trump agreed Ukraine must be involved in any discussions about ceding land, while Zelenskiy said Trump had supported the idea of security guarantees in a post-war settlement.
"President Trump was very clear that the United States wanted to achieve a ceasefire at this meeting in Alaska," Macron said.
"The second point on which things were very clear, as expressed by President Trump, is that territories belonging to Ukraine cannot be negotiated and will only be negotiated by the Ukrainian president."
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who hosted the virtual meeting, said the principle that borders could not be changed by force must continue to apply.
"If there is no movement on the Russian side in Alaska, then the United States and we Europeans should ... increase the pressure," he said.
"President Trump knows this position. He shares it very extensively and therefore I can say: We have had a really exceptionally constructive and good conversation with each other."
Trump and Putin are due to discuss how to end the three-and-a-half-year-old conflict, the largest in Europe since World War Two. Trump has previously said both sides will have to swap land to end fighting that has cost tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions.
Russia makes sharp advance into Ukraine
On a day of intense diplomacy, Zelenskiy flew to Berlin for the virtual conferences with European leaders and then with Trump.
He and the Europeans worry that a land swap could leave Russia with almost a fifth of Ukraine, rewarding it for nearly 11 years of efforts to seize Ukrainian land, the last three in all-out war, and embolden Putin to expand further west.
Russian forces have made a sharp thrust into eastern Ukraine in recent days in what may be an attempt to increase the pressure on Kyiv to give up territory.
"I told the US president and all our European colleagues that Putin is bluffing (about his stated wish to end the war)," Zelenskiy said. "He is trying to apply pressure before the meeting in Alaska along all parts of the Ukrainian front. Russia is trying to show that it can occupy all of Ukraine."
A source familiar with the matter said the call with Trump discussed possible cities that could host a three-way meeting, depending on the outcome of the talks in Alaska.
Wary of angering Trump, European leaders have repeatedly said they welcome his efforts, while stressing that there should be no deal without Ukraine's participation.
Trump's agreement last week to the summit was an abrupt shift after weeks of voicing frustration with Putin for resisting the US peace initiative. Trump said his envoy, Steve Witkoff, had made "great progress" at talks in Moscow.
A Gallup poll released last week found that 69 per cent of Ukrainians favour a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. But polls also indicate Ukrainians do not want peace at any cost if that means significant concessions.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Alexei Fadeev earlier said Moscow's stance had not changed since last year.
As conditions for a ceasefire and the start of talks, Putin had demanded Ukraine withdraw its forces from four regions that Russia has claimed as its own but does not fully control, and formally renounce plans to join NATO.
Kyiv swiftly rejected the conditions as tantamount to surrender.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
15 minutes ago
- The National
Trump says DC residents 'feel so safe' with National Guard posted
US President Donald Trump on Thursday said Washington residents "feel so safe already", after he ordered federal agents and members of the National Guard to patrol the streets in support of local law enforcement. The White House has said the move was needed amid a surge in violent crime, although city officials say crime has been decreasing in recent years. "I had calls from many, many friends, including Democrats, a lot of Democrat friends ... and they were thanking me so much for what I'm doing in DC," Mr Trump told reporters from the Oval Office. "So we will have crime under control very shortly in DC." Mr Trump said Washington officials and police had "fudged" the crime statistics to make it seem as if violent incidents were going down. "We're going to be getting the criminals the hell out of here. People are so happy to see our military going into DC and getting these thugs out of there," he said. The federal intervention is supposed to last 30 days but Mr Trump has said he will have Republicans in Congress push for extensions. A significant rise in the number of troops and federal agents could be seen on the streets on Thursday after the White House said the day before that more would be on patrol. It has said that more arrests are being made and homeless people are being forced to remove their tents from public spaces. The Pentagon says the 800 National Guard members who have been activated will have missions that include monument security and community safety patrols. They will not be armed, according to the Pentagon, and the White House said they will help with crowd control but will not be making arrests. National Guard Maj Micah Maxwell said troops will assist federal and local law enforcement in a variety of roles, including traffic and crowd control. The Guard members have been trained in de-escalation tactics as well as the proper use of crowd control equipment, Maj Maxwell said. Mr Trump has described the residents of Washington as "happy" to see troops and agents on the streets, but a viral video shows a man confronting a law enforcement officer and hitting him with a sandwich. The man was charged with a felony and fired from his job at the Justice Department.
Al Etihad
44 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
RSDI builds global bridges while advancing regional security dialogues
15 Aug 2025 00:35 SARA ALZAABI (ABU DHABI)Aiming to connect the Gulf region with its global security partners, Rabdan Security and Defence Institute (RSDI) has been building its influence through high-level dialogues, tailored policy briefs, and its pilot projects in the pipeline. RSDI, a UAE think tank focused on the ever-evolving landscapes of defence and security, is committed to enhancing regional understanding and fostering long-term collaboration. It produces nuanced analyses grounded in Middle Eastern perspectives, delivering actionable insights to policymakers and the international community. Explaining its strategies in an interview with Aletihad , Dr. Wan Zokhri Bin Wan Idris, Interim Manager of RSDI, said the institute positions itself as 'a neutral and trusted convenor.' 'RSDI can present findings and results in ways that acknowledge different narratives, without taking sides, especially in sensitive geopolitical matters,' Idris said. He stressed the importance of recognising diverse perspectives and encouraging open dialogue. This approach, he added, is supported by a knowledge base built on collaborative research and data-sharing platforms. Given the UAE's partnerships with both Western and Asian powers and its role in humanitarian and conflict mediation, the institute is well-positioned to serve as a bridge between regional stakeholders and the global community, Idris said. Central to this strategy is RSDI's collaboration with reputable institutions such as the Middle East Institute in Washington, he added. As part of its engagement efforts, RSDI recently hosted a high-level panel examining the possible impact of US President Donald Trump's return on US-China dynamics and regional security frameworks. Discussions pointed out that the renewed Trump presidency would open new avenues for US–East Asia cooperation, particularly in sectors like semiconductors and renewable energy. Building on its foundation of dialogue and collaboration, RSDI is expanding its impact through a series of pilot initiatives designed to deepen regional security cooperation. 'In 2025, we are set to launch the Annual Middle East Security (AMES) Conference, a collaboration with TRENDS Advisory and Research. Then in 2026, we plan to launch the Middle East Defence Outlook Conference (MEDOC) as an avenue for researchers, policymakers, decision-makers to convene and discuss defence modernisation in the region.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
I've lived in Washington for 30 years – the last thing the city needs is troops
Donald Trump's second term is demonstrating how foolhardy Congress has been over the past 60 years to endow the US presidency with effectively unchecked powers to meet any declared 'emergency'. But surely no president would routinely and groundlessly declare emergencies willy-nilly whenever he wants to act unilaterally and without oversight. And if one ever did, the Senate would certainly restrain that White House forthwith. Right? That's not exactly how it appears to be playing out. And his recent predecessors, including Barack Obama and Joe Biden, were not immune to the allure of unilateralism either. Mr Trump's latest dive into the warm waters of faux emergency has now allowed him to unilaterally seize control of the Washington, DC, Police Department and deploy 800 District National Guard troops to additional policing duties. It's preposterous because the magnificent city in which I have lived since 1998 bears no resemblance whatsoever to the President's depictions of it. He describes our gorgeous metropolis (I wouldn't live anywhere else on the East Coast) as 'a national disgrace' beset with 'violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals' and overrun by 'roving mobs of violent youth'. He also mischaracterised it as, 'horribly run, graffiti stained' and 'too dangerous' to visit. There are violent crimes here, but rates are at a 30-year low. There was a deadly insurrection on January 6, 2021, but all the malefactors have been summarily pardoned. DC is strikingly beautiful, filled with gorgeous parks, magnificent monuments, endless (mostly free) world-class museums and similar institutions of art and learning. As for being horribly run, the city was graded first in financial health out of 73 cities examined in a 2023 report by the non-partisan think tank Truth in Accounting. It has a surplus of $2.5 billion, and $9,000 for every citizen, and meets virtually 100 per cent of its pension and healthcare obligations. There is, however, inequality between the financial condition of African Americans compared to white and other communities. That's virtually ubiquitous in the US, given the history of slavery, segregation (the city only fully desegregated by the early 1960s and gained a measure of independence from Congress – like electing our own mayor – in 1973). Not all discrimination has been eliminated by any means. Plus, there is the ongoing impact of past abuses on present perceptions, where people live and services in those areas, as well as generational wealth, or lack thereof, within families. Mr Trump appears to want to scrub that bloodstained history pearly white. He is seizing control of the Smithsonian Institution, a national treasure, and focusing on eight of its superlative, and free, museums. He vows to rid them of 'divisive or ideologically driven' material and anything that could be construed as 'narratives that portray American and western values as inherently harmful or oppressive', especially given that the 250th birthday of the Declaration of Independence is next year. Any consideration of the irony of a group that included many committed slaveholders declaring that 'all men are created equal' will presumably be impossible or forbidden. The President insists on a sanitised history, particularly regarding race. This is dangerous. In my nearly 30 years in DC, I have seen little violent crime – though it certainly happens – or much that the President describes. According to the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia, violent crime is down by 26 per cent this year compared to the same point last year, and robbery is down by 28 per cent. And while the number of homicides in 2023 – 274 – was the highest in two decades, it was not for 'ever', as Mr Trump suggested. That figure has also dropped in subsequent years. Yet, the US President has declared a 'public safety emergency' that allows him to take over the DC police and station the National Guard. Washington certainly could use more police officers, but there is no emergency or anything similar. Moreover, the 'big beautiful budget bill' he recently squeaked through Congress punishes this city of 700,000 people with a $1.1 billion funding cut. It's a huge blow to housing, sanitation, public schools and transportation, and – you guessed it – police and emergency services. Mr Trump's executive order is not about crime but power. He is doing this to demonstrate that he can – not to free the city from the 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam, squalor, and worse'. Mayor Muriel Bowser sought the President's good graces by removing the unmistakable yellow painted words 'Black Lives Matter' on H Street immediately facing the White House. But she appears taken aback and is protesting the executive order, thus far in vain. Mr Trump will have control for at least 30 days, and longer if Congress agrees. Most alarmingly, The Washington Post reports that Mr Trump's team is planning to form a 'Domestic Civil Disturbance Quick Reaction Force'. That would provide him a potent domestic fighting force, a crucial and essential step in building strongman rule. The ultra-right-wing German political theorist Carl Schmitt viewed states of emergency – which many strongmen employed to seize permanent extra-constitutional powers – as crucial tests of true sovereignty and genuine authority. The power to unilaterally declare, and act upon, 'states of exception' demonstrates that a real sovereign can sweep aside traditional legal, moral or other constraints in a previously functional democratic order like the Weimar Republic, which Schmitt detested. Mr Trump's misuse of emergency powers illustrates this precisely. Since the end of the Second World War, time and again Congress has pondered the legitimate need for a robust executive that can act decisively in genuine states of sudden emergency, like nuclear war. They never imagined that the power would be used in conjunction with executive orders, often providing the president virtually unchallengeable authority. Like his administration's attempt to seize control of universities, intimidate media and law firms, and remove other crucial constraints on executive power, the de facto seizure of Washington DC's police is likely to be replicated in other Democratic-run cities with a large African-American population. This was already previewed in Los Angeles. As a proud, almost-30-year resident of DC (I have lived longer here than in Beirut, Amherst, Miami and London, in that order), I can do no better than quote the love letter to the city by the funk band Parliament in 1975:
