Responsible funding for higher education is vital for Nebraska's future
Dual enrollment programs are helping Nebraska high school students earn college credit and in some cases associates degrees before graduation. Shown is the downtown Lincoln campus of Southeast Community College. (Aaron Sanderford/Nebraska Examiner)
Higher education is a key ingredient for a strong Nebraska. As Nebraskans with longstanding experience in our state's educational community, we underscore the need for state government to responsibly fund higher education as lawmakers set the upcoming two-year budget.
The NU system is under pressure with potential cuts on state and federal levels. Shown here is the University of Nebraska at Omaha campus. (Cindy Gonzalez/Nebraska Examiner)
The University of Nebraska, Nebraska state colleges and Nebraska community colleges are linchpins for our state's future. As our elected leaders set the two-year budget, they have an important responsibility to see that these educational institutions receive the funding needed to serve Nebraska students.
Consider the stakes: The 21st-century economy requires ever-higher levels of education and training for Nebraska workers. The economic competition from other states is fierce. Workforce quality will be a key determinant of whether Nebraska's economy achieves needed innovation and sustained growth in coming years.
This is why chambers of commerce across the state have expressed support for proper state funding of higher education. It's why the Nebraska Farm Bureau has said our communities, rural and urban, benefit when our higher education efforts are not only planned well but also properly funded.
Value for Nebraska
Nebraska's higher educational institutions — NU, state colleges and community colleges — are working together to meet the state's evolving workforce and higher education needs, and Nebraska students are taking advantage of what our institutions of higher education have to offer:
2030 attainment goal. In 2022, the Nebraska Legislature set a landmark state educational attainment goal. By 2030, lawmakers said, 70% of Nebraskans aged 25 to 34 should have a degree, certificate or credential with value in the workforce. It was a sensible goal, adopted by the University of Nebraska, the Nebraska State College System, Nebraska's community colleges, the State Board of Education, and the Nebraska Postsecondary Coordinating Commission. At present, Nebraska has achieved a figure of 58.8% — higher than the national rate of 56.8%.
Retention rate. The full-time freshmen retention rate has increased for our Nebraska institutions. In fall 2013, the retention rate was 71.3%. A decade later, it had risen to 76.4%.
Collaborative agreements. Students' individual academic needs vary widely, and it's important for our higher ed institutions to work together to find the best ways to meet those needs — and, indeed, they are. NU and Nebraska's state colleges and community colleges have achieved a range of cooperative partnerships with each other to provide students with flexibility and opportunity. A key example is the articulation agreements NU has with most Nebraska state colleges, community colleges and the Nebraska College of Technical Agriculture. A student can pursue two years of state college or community college study, then transfer credits and complete his or her studies at an NU institution.
Thanks to this cooperation among our institutions, students can pursue the instructional path to fulfill their career aspirations and complete their degree on a schedule that works best for them. The partnerships also include Nebraska private-sector companies, industry associations and agricultural producers. This ongoing consultation helps Nebraska higher ed institutions align their instruction with real-world need and develop training and credentialing with high value for employers.
Benthack Hall at Wayne State College in 2021. (Courtesy of Geoff Johnson)
In all these ways, Nebraska higher ed institutions have made clear they stand ready to raise their educational achievements through forward-looking strategic planning, ongoing partnerships, standards of excellence and sound fiscal stewardship. But to do that, our state policy-makers must meet an obligation of their own.
In the upcoming biennial budget, they must responsibly fund higher education.
No question, our elected leaders have a tough job in the face of competing demands, but a central priority must include sound financial support for our public university system, state colleges and community colleges. Our state's business leaders have underscored the need for proper support of Nebraska higher education, and so have our agricultural leaders.
As Nebraskans with deep experience in our state's educational community, we underscore this key responsibility for state policymakers to help secure a stronger future for Nebraska students and communities.
Greg Adams, a retired public educator from York, is a former speaker of the Nebraska Legislature, chair of the Legislature's Education Committee and former executive director of the Nebraska Community College Association. Ken Bird is the retired superintendent of Westside Community Schools in Omaha and former CEO of the Avenue Scholars program.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen announces reelection bid
Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen hosts a news conference announcing his bid to seek a third four-year term in 2026. June 6, 2025. (Zach Wendling/Nebraska Examiner) LINCOLN — Nebraska Secretary of State Bob Evnen is seeking reelection as the state's chief elections officer. In his campaign kick-off event Friday, the secretary of state touted the state's elections as the nation's most 'secure or accurate.' But he said he wonders whether any non-citizens might have gotten on the voter rolls. Evnen appeared to be trying to balance defending the state's elections his office administers and echoing the concerns of some Republicans and President Donald Trump over election integrity since the 2020 presidential election, national framing that some election experts have warned could undermine trust in elections. 'There is more work to be done, and we must continue to focus on being proactive in the future,' Evnen said. 'Threats to election security are not static.' U.S. Sen. Deb Fischer, R-Neb., and Lt. Gov. Joe Kelly joined Evnen's reelection announcement, as well as a handful of Nebraska state senators. Evnen is running for his third term as secretary of state, but this race follows his closest contest to date, a 2022 GOP primary in which he faced two populist Republican challengers who combined to hold him under 50% of the vote. He won the general election without any major party opponent. His office, in addition to overseeing elections, also handles business registrations and international relations. Kelly emphasized that the country has seen 'some very poorly orchestrated elections,' but 'not in Nebraska.' 'We've been so lucky to have Bob Evnen,' Kelly said. Kelly and other speakers praised Evnen for how he has represented Nebraska when speaking to other counties about trade opportunities with the state, and for his handling of elections. Nebraskans passed a state constitutional amendment in 2022 requiring the Legislature to implement voter ID in Nebraska. Nonpartisan poll watchers have praised Evnen's office for its implementation of the law, and Fewer voters were turned away under the law than in other states with similar laws. Evnen, in talking about the voter rolls and what he described as the risks of non-citizens voting, said years of the U.S. having an 'open border' left him questioning 'whether some of those people ended up on voter rolls.' Election watchdogs have said that framing from some Republicans is based on the 'myth' of widespread voting by non-citizens. The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, analyzed election conduct from 2003 to 2024 and found 24 instances nationally of noncitizens voting out of millions of votes cast. Evnen also reemphasized his support for Trump's executive order overhauling the administration of U.S. elections. The secretary signed on to a joint letter with 19 other Republican secretaries of state this year that requested more access to federal immigration data to help verify voter registrations. Evnen told KETV earlier this year that he would like to investigate whether 46 Nebraskans who have voted over the past several elections are U.S. citizens. When the Nebraska Examiner asked the Secretary of State's Office earlier this year how many non-citizens had been removed from voter rolls or voted in past elections, a spokesperson said the agency has not 'removed anyone due to their status as a non-citizen, nor do we believe that there are many such people registered to vote.' Evnen's office, in the regular course of business, removed 13,550 voters from the voter rolls after the November 2024 election – most due to death or relocation from the state. Such removals are routine and required by federal and state law. Evnen said Friday that his office is working with the Nebraska Attorney General's Office to establish a process to confirm the citizenship of people registered to vote in Nebraska. Current Federal law doesn't require proof of citizenship to register — but it bans noncitizens from voting in elections. Other states, such as Wyoming and Louisiana, have passed state laws requiring anyone registering to vote to provide proof of citizenship. Those bills align with the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act, which the U.S. House passed in April. The SAVE Act would require proof of citizenship in federal elections. If the SAVE Act passes the Senate and becomes law, it would codify parts of the Trump executive order that Evnen calls a 'new and hopeful chapter.' 'The President's executive order all but points to Nebraska as the model for how free and fair elections should be conducted,' Evnen said. Evnen has talked about potentially requesting more time from the Legislature to verify signatures on petition drives for ballot measures after questions were raised about the validity of some signatures gathered for recent petitions, including ones targeted in a lawsuit aimed at stopping medical marijuana. Legislation seeking to provide more time fell short this year. Evnen also said Friday that he is 'proudly pro-life and pro-Second Amendment' — topics beyond the scope of his office that could signal that the Secretary of State has bigger aspirations. He said he expected a challenger in 2026, whether from his right flank, a Democrat or both. 'If one is going to run for office, the only safe assumption to make is that one will have an opponent,' Evnen said. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Nu Holdings' Relentless Customer Surge Redefines Fintech Growth
Nu Holdings Ltd. NU is not just growing, it is accelerating growth at a remarkable pace. In the first quarter of 2025 alone, the digital banking powerhouse added a staggering 4.3 million customers, bringing its total to 118.6 million. That is a 19% year-over-year leap and proof that NU's grip on Latin America's financial future is tightening with force. This impressive customer growth is fueling real financial momentum. Nu's average revenue per active customer (ARPAC) was a solid $11.2, only slightly down from last year's $11.4, a testament to the ability to sustain strong monetization even as it rapidly expands into new markets. With nearly 100 million monthly active users on the platform, NU is proving that it can grow at scale while continuing to unlock meaningful revenue opportunities across the ecosystem. In a sector where many fintechs chase growth without profit clarity, Nu is showing that customer expansion and financial discipline can coexist. While continuing to innovate and diversify offerings, the company is not only expanding reach but also cementing itself as a long-term player in the digital finance revolution sweeping across emerging economies. Peer Pressure? While Nu continues to surge ahead in Latin America, U.S.-based peers like SoFi Technologies SOFI and Block XYZ are taking different routes to growth. SoFi is focusing on deepening customer relationships through bundled financial services like lending, investing and banking. Its strategy seems to emphasize lifetime value over rapid user expansion. Meanwhile, Block is sharpening its dual ecosystem approach, serving both individual users through Cash App and small businesses via Square. While both SoFi and Block are evolving steadily, Nu's pace and scale of customer acquisition in emerging markets underscore a distinct momentum that sets it apart in the global fintech landscape. NU's Price Performance, Valuation, Estimates The stock has surged 17% year to date, significantly underperforming the industry's 25% growth. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research From a valuation standpoint, NU trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 18.93, which is well above the industry's 9.36. It carries a Value Score of D. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NU's earnings has been on the decline over the past 60 days. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research NU stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #4 (Sell). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) : Free Stock Analysis Report SoFi Technologies, Inc. (SOFI) : Free Stock Analysis Report Block, Inc. (XYZ) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Appellate court upholds decisions favoring Summit over county pipeline ordinances
The Roman L. Hruska Federal Courthouse in Omaha, where the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held its hearing on the pipeline cases on Nov. 20, 2024. (Photo by Aaron Sanderford/Nebraska Examiner) A federal appeals court on Thursday upheld lower court decisions barring counties from imposing safety standards on a pipeline subject to federal safety standards. The cases involved Summit Carbon Solutions, the company proposing to build a carbon sequestration pipeline through the state, and county supervisors from both Story and Shelby Counties. Summit sued the counties in 2022 for enacting ordinances that required county-specific setback requirements and other regulations the company argued were preempted by federal pipeline safety laws. A federal judge ruled in favor of Summit in Dec. 2023 and issued permanent injunctions, stopping the counties from enforcing the regulations, which would have impacted the carbon sequestration pipeline and other pipelines. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE The county supervisors appealed the decision and presented oral arguments in November 2024 to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The counties argued that local land use and zoning regulations are not 'preempted standards' under the Pipeline Safety Act. Writing for the appeals court, U.S. Circuit Judge Duane Benton wrote held that the county ordinances 'focus' on safety and 'repeatedly' mention safety risks associated with the pipeline, which 'undermines' the Pipeline Safety Act's goal of preempting state regulations on safety. 'This holding does not prohibit local governments from considering safety, nor prevent them from enacting all zoning ordinances, as the counties suggest,' Benton said in the opinion. 'This court emphasizes the distinction between safety standards — which the PSA preempts — and safety considerations — which the PSA does not preempt.' The county ordinances also included emergency response requirements and abandonment provisions which the court ruled were also preempted by federal regulations. Circuit Judge Jane Kelly, however, dissented on those elements and wrote she does not believe that PSA preempts setback and abandonment provisions. Kelly said that while the counties' setback requirements are 'animated in part by safety considerations' they do not have the 'direct and substantial' effect on safety that is reserved for federal regulation. Kelly also wrote that per her understanding, the Pipeline Safety Act 'does not cover pipelines that have been abandoned' and therefore the Shelby County abandonment provision is not 'expressly preempted.' The court affirmed the lower court's decision in both cases, but ordered the federal court for the Southern District of Iowa to reconsider an additional ordinance that's at issue in the Story County case. Jason Craig, the attorney representing the counties, did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the decision. Sabrina Zenor, on behalf of Summit Carbon Solutions, said the ruling 'confirms' pipeline safety regulation set by the federal government and the Iowa Utilities Commission's role in route and permit decisions. 'This supports a consistent, lawful permitting process for critical infrastructure projects like ours,' Zenor said in a statement. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE