
Trade talks between Canada and US end over digital tax, Trump says
Prime Minister Mark Carney says he did not speak Friday with Donald Trump before the U.S. president announced a sudden end to trade negotiations in response to Ottawa's plans to push ahead with a digital services tax at the end of the month.
On his platform Truth Social, Trump wrote that he was "terminating all discussions on trade with Canada" because of the tax, set to apply this Monday to major American online companies such as Amazon, Google and Airbnb.
Trump wrote Friday afternoon that Washington will notify Canada about new tariff rates required "to do business with the United States" within the next week.
An hour later, Carney told reporters he had not spoken with Trump that day.
"We'll continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interests of Canadians," the prime minister said.
Trump called the proposed tax a "direct and blatant attack on our country."
Carney has been negotiating in private with Trump and said earlier this month the two governments are pursuing a deal to end the president's stop-and-go tariff war. At the G7 summit in Alberta, Carney and Trump agreed to work on reaching a deal by mid-July.
Prime Minister Mark Carney says he did not speak Friday with Donald Trump before the U.S. president announced a sudden end to trade negotiations in response to Ottawa's plans to push ahead with a digital services tax at the end of the month.
The digital services tax is a three per cent levy on revenue from Canadian users of digital services such as Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb. It takes effect on June 30 but is retroactive for three years. The initial bill facing American companies is expected to be close to $2 billion.
The United Kingdom kept a similar tax in a trade deal with the U.S. that was signed last week at the G7 summit in Alberta. Trump said similar measures by the European Union would be part of the broader trade talks the U.S. is having with the bloc.
In the Oval Office, Trump said Canadians are great people but their government has unfair policies. "Canada has been a very difficult country to deal with over the years," he told reporters.
Trump added that Ottawa has less leverage than Washington.
"Economically we have such power over Canada. I'd rather not use it, but they did something with our tech companies," he said.
"It's not gonna work out well for Canada. They were foolish to do it. And so I said we're going to stop all negotiations with Canada right now, until they straighten out their act."
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre did not weigh in on whether Canada should scrap the digital sales tax. Instead, he suggested Canada should cut its own domestic taxes and levies to unleash more economic growth.
"Disappointed that trade talks have halted. Hopefully they resume quickly. As always, Conservatives are ready to help get a good deal for Canada. We must put Canada First," Poilievre wrote on the platform X.
In a written statement, NDP trade critic Heather McPherson said Canada should invest in employment insurance and sustainable jobs to protect workers from Trump's whims.
"Appeasement doesn't work. Betting on having a unique relationship with Trump doesn't work. Negotiations in secret doesn't work. Standing up for Canadian jobs and communities does," she wrote.
In a post on the platform X, Bloc Québécois Leader Yves-François Blanchet blamed Carney for Canada's failure to get the tariffs lifted and suggested he has been distracted by legislation to fast-track the approval of major projects like oil pipelines.
The Canadian Chamber of Commerce has urged Ottawa for months to scrap the tax, citing increased costs and the risk of U.S. retaliation.
"Negotiations go through peaks and valleys. With deadlines approaching, some last-minute surprises should be expected," chamber head Candace Laing said in an email.
"The tone and tenor of talks has improved in recent months, and we hope to see progress continue. We respect that Team Canada is conducting these negotiations at the table, and we need to give them the space to navigate.'
The Canadian Press has asked the office of Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne for comment but has not yet received a response.
The Business Council of Canada has called on Ottawa to suspend the tax.
'Canada should put forward an immediate proposal to eliminate the DST in exchange for an elimination of tariffs from the United States,' wrote the group's CEO Goldy Hyder, adding Trump's decision is the 'unfortunate development' the group had warned about.
Earlier this month, 21 members of the U.S. Congress wrote to Trump saying the digital services tax could inspire other "discriminatory cash grabs" that largely target American companies.
But on Thursday, congressional Republicans agreed to remove a so-called "revenge tax" provision from Trump's major tax cut bill, in response to a request from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent.
That provision would have allowed Washington to impose taxes on companies and investments from countries charging what it called "unfair foreign taxes" on American firms.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
New laws against blocking access to places of worship, schools coming, Fraser says
OTTAWA — Justice Minister Sean Fraser says the Liberal government will press ahead with plans for new criminal provisions against blocking access to places or worship, schools and community centres. The measures, promised during the recent federal election campaign, would also create a criminal offence of wilfully intimidating or threatening people attending events at these venues. The minister's statement comes as civil libertarians point to existing provisions intended to curb such behaviour and push back against the idea of new measures that could infringe on freedom of expression and assembly. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Tensions have risen in Canadian communities over public protests, many prompted by the ongoing hostilities in the Middle East. Several Canadian municipalities have taken steps recently to mandate 'bubble zones' that restrict protest activity near such places as religious institutions, schools and child care centres. 'It's not lost on me that there will be different levels of government that try to address this challenge in different ways,' Fraser said, adding that the federal government has an opportunity _ where behaviour crosses a criminal threshold — to legislate in that space. 'We clearly have seen challenges when it comes to certain religious communities in Canada who are facing extraordinary discrimination — antisemitism, Islamophobia, and other forms of hate,' Fraser said in a recent interview. 'People need to know that in Canada they are free to pray to the God of their choice and to, at the same time, freely express themselves, but not to the point where you threaten the protected Charter rights of a religious minority.' James Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University, said he questions the need for new provisions and suggests politicians are proposing penalties simply to appear to be doing something. He said existing laws against mischief, nuisance and interfering with religious celebrations can be used to deal with the kinds of behaviour the federal government wants to address. 'I haven't heard a single thing that isn't already illegal, so it's a waste of time. It adds confusion to the Criminal Code and it suggests that they're only engaged in performative activity,' Turk said. 'They want to be seen to be doing something about this pressure they're under.' Anais Bussieres McNicoll, director of the fundamental freedoms program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, also said she wonders about the scope of the proposed new federal provisions 'and if they are necessary or simply duplicative of existing criminal offences.' Bussieres McNicoll said it's important to remember that a protest might be disruptive but also protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of peaceful assembly. 'As a parent myself, I know that any protest can be sometimes scary for a child. We're talking about loud voices, huge crowds, emotions are running high,' she said. 'So I believe it's part of my role as a parent to teach my child about what living in a democracy means, why we need protests, why we need space in our society for strong language — including language that we disagree with — and to teach my child about what we can do if we personally disagree with speech that we hear.' Richard Robertson, director of research and advocacy at B'nai Brith Canada, said that while the organization welcomes the planned new federal provisions, additional federal measures are needed. B'nai Brith wants national 'vulnerable infrastructure legislation' that would prohibit protests within a certain distance of a place of worship or school, or perhaps during specific time periods, if they interfere with someone's ability to attend the institutions, Robertson said. 'That would remove the need for municipalities and provinces to adopt legislation, and it would send a clear message that across Canada, individuals do not have the right to prevent others from accessing their houses of worship and their community centres and cultural institutions.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .


Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
More homeowners retiring with a mortgage
Royal LePage president and CEO Phil Soper Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page. Home price appreciation over the past 25 years described as a 'double-edged sword' for today's retirees This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Three in 10 Canadians who plan to retire this year or next will carry a mortgage on their primary residence into retirement, while 47 per cent of those nearing retirement don't plan to downsize within two years of ending full-time employment. Those findings of a recent Royal LePage survey conducted by Leger paint a picture that's starkly different from previous generations. For starters, the trend of carrying a mortgage into retirement appears to be growing, with just half as many senior households carrying mortgage debt compared to a decade ago. According to Statistics Canada, 14 per cent of households with income earners aged 65 and over had a mortgage in 2016, up substantially from eight per cent in 1999. Meanwhile, 45 per cent of survey respondents say their mortgage is currently paid off, while another six per cent say their mortgage will be paid off before retirement. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Royal LePage President and CEO Phil Soper describes home price appreciation over the past 25 years as a 'double-edged sword' for today's retirees. ' On one hand, it has delivered unprecedented financial gains,' he says. 'On the other, this generation is far more likely to have carried mortgage balances that would have been unimaginable to their parents or grandparents.' According to Royal LePage research, they're also more likely to have provided financial assistance to their children to help them buy a home. While previous generations may have viewed mortgage-free retirement as the 'only option,' today's retirees tend to be more 'open-minded,' Soper notes. 'Traditional employment income may have dried up, but many are still comfortably managing their expenses and servicing mortgage payments with income from investments, part-time work or a working spouse.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. That picture the survey paints is different from previous generations in other ways as well. For one, the average age of retirees in Canada has been increasing gradually, from 64.3 in 2020 to 65.3 in 2024. At the same time, Canadians are entering the housing market later, increasing the odds of future generations of retirees carrying a mortgage further into retirement. 'Compared to their grandparents, today's retirees are enjoying about fifty per cent more years after turning 65,' Soper says. 'They're working longer, staying active and in many ways, continuing the lives they led during their working years – just without the job. It's no surprise their attitudes toward home ownership have evolved with the times. With people buying their first homes later and working longer, it's increasingly common for Canadians to carry a mortgage well into retirement, often by choice rather than necessity.' Of those Royal LePage experts who say a majority of people nearing or entering retirement are downsizing, 43 per cent say that standard condominiums are the most popular property type among this cohort, followed by adult living communities that cater to those aged 55 and up (25 per cent) and detached properties (16 per cent). NHL Sunshine Girls Sunshine Girls Toronto Raptors Columnists


Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
New laws against blocking access to places of worship, schools coming, Fraser says
Published Jun 28, 2025 • 3 minute read Newly-appointed Minister of Justice Sean Fraser in his new office at the Justice building on Parliament Hill Wednesday. Photo by JULIE OLIVER / Postmedia OTTAWA — Justice Minister Sean Fraser says the Liberal government will press ahead with plans for new criminal provisions against blocking access to places or worship, schools and community centres. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The measures, promised during the recent federal election campaign, would also create a criminal offence of wilfully intimidating or threatening people attending events at these venues. The minister's statement comes as civil libertarians point to existing provisions intended to curb such behaviour and push back against the idea of new measures that could infringe on freedom of expression and assembly. Tensions have risen in Canadian communities over public protests, many prompted by the ongoing hostilities in the Middle East. Several Canadian municipalities have taken steps recently to mandate 'bubble zones' that restrict protest activity near such places as religious institutions, schools and child care centres. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'It's not lost on me that there will be different levels of government that try to address this challenge in different ways,' Fraser said, adding that the federal government has an opportunity _ where behaviour crosses a criminal threshold — to legislate in that space. 'We clearly have seen challenges when it comes to certain religious communities in Canada who are facing extraordinary discrimination — antisemitism, Islamophobia, and other forms of hate,' Fraser said in a recent interview. 'People need to know that in Canada they are free to pray to the God of their choice and to, at the same time, freely express themselves, but not to the point where you threaten the protected Charter rights of a religious minority.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. James Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University, said he questions the need for new provisions and suggests politicians are proposing penalties simply to appear to be doing something. He said existing laws against mischief, nuisance and interfering with religious celebrations can be used to deal with the kinds of behaviour the federal government wants to address. 'I haven't heard a single thing that isn't already illegal, so it's a waste of time. It adds confusion to the Criminal Code and it suggests that they're only engaged in performative activity,' Turk said. 'They want to be seen to be doing something about this pressure they're under.' Anais Bussieres McNicoll, director of the fundamental freedoms program at the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, also said she wonders about the scope of the proposed new federal provisions 'and if they are necessary or simply duplicative of existing criminal offences.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Bussieres McNicoll said it's important to remember that a protest might be disruptive but also protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of peaceful assembly. 'As a parent myself, I know that any protest can be sometimes scary for a child. We're talking about loud voices, huge crowds, emotions are running high,' she said. 'So I believe it's part of my role as a parent to teach my child about what living in a democracy means, why we need protests, why we need space in our society for strong language — including language that we disagree with — and to teach my child about what we can do if we personally disagree with speech that we hear.' Richard Robertson, director of research and advocacy at B'nai Brith Canada, said that while the organization welcomes the planned new federal provisions, additional federal measures are needed. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. B'nai Brith wants national 'vulnerable infrastructure legislation' that would prohibit protests within a certain distance of a place of worship or school, or perhaps during specific time periods, if they interfere with someone's ability to attend the institutions, Robertson said. 'That would remove the need for municipalities and provinces to adopt legislation, and it would send a clear message that across Canada, individuals do not have the right to prevent others from accessing their houses of worship and their community centres and cultural institutions.' — With files from Anja Karadeglija NHL Sunshine Girls Columnists Sunshine Girls Toronto Raptors