Seven men used teenage girls as ‘sex slaves' in Rochdale
Seven Asian men have been convicted of the sexual exploitation of two white teenage schoolgirls in Rochdale.
The abusers preyed on the vulnerabilities of the victims to groom them as 'sex slaves' from the age of 13 on various dates in the Greater Manchester town between 2001 and 2006.
Both girls had 'deeply troubled home lives' and were given drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, places to stay and people to be with, Manchester Minshull Street Crown Court heard.
Soon after, they were expected to have sex 'whenever and wherever' the abusers and other men wanted in filthy flats, on rancid mattresses, in cars, car parks, alleyways and disused warehouses.
Jurors deliberated for three weeks before delivering their unanimous guilty verdicts on Friday.
Three of the abusers, Mohammed Zahid, 64, Mushtaq Ahmed, 67, and Kasir Bashir, 50 – all born in Pakistan – were stallholders on the town's indoor market.
Father-of-three Zahid, known as Boss Man, gave free underwear from his lingerie stall to both complainants and also money, alcohol and food in return for the expectation of regular sex with him and his friends.
In 2016, Zahid was jailed for five years in an earlier grooming gang case after he engaged in sexual activity in 2006 with a 15-year-old girl who he met when she visited his stall to buy tights for school.
Bashir did not attend the current trial, and jurors were ordered not to speculate why, but it can be revealed that he absconded while on bail before the trial got underway.
It can also be reported that Mohammed Shahzad, 44, Naheem Akram, 48, and Nisar Hussain, 41, were remanded in custody with their bail revoked in January before the jury was sworn in.
Police received intelligence that the three Rochdale-born taxi drivers were planning to leave the UK and had already paid a deposit for their transport, the court heard.
All three denied the accusation, but Judge Jonathan Seely said the court was not prepared to take a risk that they too would abscond.
A seventh defendant, Pakistani-born Roheez Khan, 39, also featured in another previous Rochdale grooming trial in 2013 when he was one of five men convicted of sexually exploiting a 'profoundly vulnerable' 15-year-old girl in 2008 and 2009.
Khan was jailed for six-and-a-half years for engaging in sexual activity with a child and witness intimidation.
The convictions are the latest under Operation Lytton, the most recent in a series of major investigations either launched, aborted or relaunched by Greater Manchester Police to deal with gangs acting 'in plain sight' decades earlier.
Operation Augusta was first launched in 2004/5 into grooming in south Manchester by Asian men after the death of Victoria Agoglia, 15, on September 29 2003.
She was in care but died after being injected with heroin by a man more than 30 years her senior, and had reported being raped.
GMP identified 97 grooming suspects and 25 child victims, all under the care of Manchester city council, but at a joint police and council meeting in 2005, bosses decided to abruptly shut down the operation. Minutes from the meeting taken by the police and the council both disappeared. Two senior officers in the meeting were later promoted to chief constables, Parliament heard.
More grooming gang offences in Rochdale were investigated in 2008 but the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) made the decision not to proceed to trial on the basis that it viewed the main victim as 'unreliable'.
GMP later launched Operation Span, investigating offences between 2010 and 2012.
It resulted in the conviction of nine men from Rochdale following a high-profile trial at Liverpool Crown Court ending in May 2012.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GCHQ inter took top secret data home, court told
A GCHQ intern endangered national security, risked exposing 17 colleagues, and 'threw away' thousands of hours of work when he took Top Secret data home, a court has heard. Manchester University computer science student Hasaan Arshad, 25, was in 'flagrant breach' of tight security rules when he used his mobile phone to remove material from a computer system and transfer it to his private computer on August 24 2022. Arshad, from Rochdale, Greater Manchester, pleaded guilty to an offence under the Computer Misuse Act which carries a maximum penalty of life in prison. He also admitted two charges of making an indecent photograph of a child in relation to 40 category A images and four category B images found on his personal phone following his arrest. He appeared at the Old Bailey yesterday, Friday to be sentenced by Mrs Justice McGowan. The court was told that part of the hearing – including a detailed assessment of the harm caused – would be outlined behind closed doors in the absence of the press and public. However, the court was told that Arshad's actions 'lost a tool' being developed at GCHQ, risked exposing the identities of 17 GCHQ colleagues, and undermined the trust of partners. Opening the facts in open court, prosecutor Duncan Atkinson KC said: 'His actions created a significant risk of damage to national security for reasons that can only be fully explained in a private hearing. 'In short, however, his actions compromised the security and utility of the material and the role it played in the national interest, and he also in the process put the safety of intelligence agency personnel at risk.' The Government Communications Headquarters – known as GCHQ – is the UK's intelligence, security and cyber agency and plays an important role in keeping the country safe, in conjunction with MI5 and the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6). The highest levels of security are needed for GCHQ to carry out its work to gain information about threats to the UK from 'hostile states or terrorists' by using lawful covert tools and techniques, the court was told. Mr Atkinson said: 'Put bluntly, if hostile states or terrorists were aware of how GCHQ was able to gather intelligence about their plans, they would be able to prevent the intelligence community in the UK from learning of those plans at a stage and to an extent that allows the intelligence community to thwart them.' At the time of the offence, Arshad was coming to the end of an industry year placement with a technical development team which required him to work at a secure GCHQ site near Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, and use computer systems. The court heard he was part of a team that worked on the development of 'tools and techniques' to obtain information about threats to the UK. Arshad had undergone GCHQ induction and was required to sign the Official Secrets Act. Former GCHQ intern Hasaan Arshad pictured previously leaving the Old Bailey (Image: Ben Whitley / PA) It was made 'abundantly clear' to Arshad that his access to top secret material had to be in controlled circumstances at 'an extremely secure location', Mr Atkinson said. He went on: 'In flagrant breach of those obvious and necessary restrictions, the defendant used a mobile handset provided for his use whilst on his work placement but with strictly confined scope as to its permitted use, to remove Top Secret material from the top secret network of the technical development team to which he had been attached. 'He then transported that material from the secure location where he had been working to his home, risking it falling into the wrong hands or being lost, and downloaded it onto a removable hard drive which formed part of IT system that he used at his home address. 'This home computer system wholly failed to match the necessarily exacting security requirements of GCHQ's systems, and therefore exposed this Top Secret material to the vagaries and risks of an unsecure computer system connected to the internet at an insecure location. 'This significant security breach compromised lawful intelligence related activity that was being undertaken in the national interest. In doing so, he threw away many thousands of hours of work, and significant sums of taxpayers' money.' Mr Atkinson said his actions had damaged 'confidence in UK security' because the data included the identities of a 'significant number' of GCHQ colleagues and put others' safety at 'direct risk'. Following his arrest, the defendant admitted removing data without authorisation 'out of curiosity'. He said in a statement that he had no intention to hand over the data to anyone else. He told police: 'I would like to apologise for my actions. I removed the data simply out of curiosity. 'I'm sorry for my actions and I understand the stupidity of what I have done.' Arshad said he 'went out of my way' to ensure the data was stored locally and not in the cloud. Asked if he had breached the level of trust and confidence by removing the sensitive data without authority, he replied: 'No comment.' Mitigating, Arshad's lawyer Nina Grahame KC said the defendant had been 'reckless' 'thoughtless and naive'. His internship had involved working on a 'specific project' which he had been unable to complete before the end of the placement, she explained He took the data home because he wanted to 'continue and complete the most exciting and challenging work the defendant had ever undertaken' in the hope of gaining future employment at GCHQ, Ms Grahame said.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil does not have to be released despite judge's order, Trump administration argues
Mahmoud Khalil's hopes of being freed on bond as he continues fighting the Trump administration's efforts to deport him were dashed Friday, despite a judge saying the government could no longer hold Khalil on the premise that his presence in the country is against the national interest. The administration was given until 9:30 a.m. Friday to file an appeal, or else the preliminary injunction would go into effect. No appeal was filed Friday, and attorneys for the Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate student demanded his release. 'The deadline has come and gone and Mahmoud Khalil must be released immediately. Anything further is an attempt to prolong his unconstitutional, arbitrary, and cruel detention,' Khalil's legal team said in a statement Friday morning. Judge Michael Farbiarz gave the government a new deadline of 1:30 p.m. to respond to the demand of Khalil's attorneys that he be immediately released. Farbiarz said the determination by Secretary of State Marco Rubio that Khalil's presence in the country had 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States' was likely unconstitutional. But attorneys for the Department of Justice said the judge's decision did not prevent them from continuing to hold Khalil on a second claim – that he failed to give required information in his application to become a legal permanent resident of the US, in their response letter to the judge on Friday. Farbiarz appeared to throw cold water on that reasoning in his order earlier this week, writing, 'The evidence is that lawful permanent residents are virtually never detained pending removal for the sort of alleged omissions in a lawful-permanent-resident application that the Petitioner is charged with here.' But the judge did not specifically strike down that charge as a reason for detaining Khalil, and the Trump administration is seizing on that distinction. 'While the Court made a factual finding that it was unlikely that Khalil would be detained on another basis … the Court never held that it would be unlawful for Respondents to detain Khalil based on another charge of removability,' the Department of Justice attorneys wrote in their response. Khalil has not been charged with a crime. The Syrian-born Palestinian refugee is one of several foreign nationals the Trump administration has accused of posing a national security threat due to alleged ties to terrorist organizations – a claim his attorneys have repeatedly disputed. The administration has relied on an obscure section of US law to argue that Khalil should be deported because his presence in the United States threatens the administration's foreign policy goal of combatting antisemitism. His lawyers, meanwhile, challenged the legality of Khalil's detention and contend he was targeted for his pro-Palestinian views in violation of his constitutional rights. They argue the government's evidence is insufficient and based solely on a letter from Secretary of State Marco Rubio that does not allege criminal activity. CNN's Gloria Pazmino contributed to this report. This is a developing story and will be updated.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Apopka sisters fight for parents' return after deportation
An Apopka family is distressed after their parents were sent back to Guatemala. The two American-born daughters spoke out today, asking for their parents to be allowed to come home. This story shows how tough immigration rules can be for families. The parents, Esvin Juarez and Rosmeri Miranda, were recently deported. Esvin, who owns a small business and has four American kids, was held by immigration officers and then sent away. Rosmeri was also held and is now deported. The family says Esvin was even trying to get a special visa for crime victims, because he was attacked in 2021. Beverly Juarez, one of the daughters, shared her family's history in the U.S. 'My mom and my dad are Guatemalans who have been together for over 20 years,' she said. 'They came into the country illegally a long time ago. They missed a court date because they were scared, and then they were ordered to leave.' Beverly explained that her dad had been working with immigration officials since 2010 to try and become legal. Groups like the Immigrants Are Welcome Here Coalition and Hope CommUnity Center are supporting the family. Felipe Sosa, who runs the Hope CommUnity Center, said the family wants a fair chance. 'What we are asking for is simple and lawful: a stay of deportation so this family can have a full and fair chance to present their case,' Sosa explained. This means they want the deportation stopped so a judge can hear their full story. However, not everyone agrees with the family's plea. U.S. Congressman Randy Fine supported the deportations. He said, 'I think it's a great day. Two more illegal immigrants sent home.' He believes the parents are fully responsible for the situation. 'The only people who bear any responsibility for this situation are the illegal immigrant parents who did this, he added.' State Senator Carlos Guillermo Smith stood with the Juarez family, saying, 'Today we are all the Juarez family because we are all immigrants.' The family and their supporters hope that officials will show understanding and allow the Juarez parents to reunite with their children. Their story highlights the real impact of immigration rules on families. Click here to download our free news, weather and smart TV apps. And click here to stream Channel 9 Eyewitness News live.
