
Russia says it must be part of international talks on Ukraine's security
Russia's foreign minister, Sergei Lavrov, said on Wednesday that Moscow must be included in any talks on Ukraine's security guarantees, dismissing European diplomacy as 'aggressive escalation' and a 'clumsy effort to sway Trump'.
'To discuss security guarantees seriously without Russia is a road to nowhere,' Lavrov said during a working visit to Jordan.
Lavrov also said that China, Russia's ally in the war, should be among Ukraine's security guarantors – reviving a proposal first put forward by Russian negotiators during talks in Turkey in spring 2022.
European leaders have begun exploring post-conflict security guarantees for Ukraine, following Trump's pledge to help protect the country under any deal to end Russia's war.
Russian officials have repeatedly said Moscow would not accept the deployment of European forces to Ukraine, one of the key security guarantees under discussion.
Kyiv is likely to view with scepticism any prospect of China, a supporter of Russia during the war, acting as a security guarantor.
Lavrov, meanwhile, avoided any direct reference to a possible Putin-Zelenskyy summit, highlighting the Kremlin's apparent plans to delay any concrete planning of a meeting.
Trump announced this week he had 'begun the arrangements' for the first meeting between the two leaders since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion.
Trump later claimed he had set up a bilateral meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy, explaining: 'I thought I'd first let them meet.'
Opening direct talks with Zelenskyy would cut against the storyline Putin has cultivated since the 2022 invasion – portraying Ukraine's president as an illegitimate figure and a mere puppet of the west.
Putin, who almost never refers to Zelenskyy by name and instead speaks of the 'Kyiv regime', has repeatedly cast doubt on whether his Ukrainian counterpart even holds the authority to sign a peace agreement. 'You can negotiate with anyone, but because of his illegitimacy, he [Zelenskyy] has no right to sign anything,' Putin told Russian officials earlier this year.
But Trump's promise of a meeting puts Putin in a difficult spot: rejecting it risks tension with the US president, while agreeing to one would elevate Zelenskyy to equal status and confront Putin with a media-savvy rival ready to meet almost without preconditions.
Moscow has shown scant sign of preparing for such an encounter.
Lavrov cautioned on Wednesday that any contact between the two leaders would need to be arranged 'with the utmost care', while other Russian officials dismissed Zelenskyy as a lightweight unworthy of serious attention.
But, as often is the case, Moscow has avoided closing the door entirely, hinting that the Putin–Zelenskyy encounter could take place, while giving no sign that it is actually on the horizon.
Several countries have offered to host a possible Putin-Zelenskyy meeting, including the Vatican, Switzerland and Hungary.
Sign up to Headlines Europe
A digest of the morning's main headlines from the Europe edition emailed direct to you every week day
after newsletter promotion
The Russian leader reportedly suggested to Trump that his counterpart travel to Moscow for talks – an idea Russia knew Kyiv would reject because of the obvious risks to Zelenskyy's safety.
Analysts suggested that the Russian leader would probably only meet Zelenskyy to accept Russia's maximalist conditions, which would equal Ukraine's capitulation.
'Putin will not meet Zelenskyy under the current circumstances,' said Tatiana Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. 'He has repeatedly stated that such a meeting would only be possible if there were well-prepared grounds, which in practice means Zelenskyy's acceptance of Russia's terms for ending the war.'
Figures close to the Kremlin have emphasised that Putin sees no need to rush into a meeting with Zelenskyy.
'Simply put, Putin only sees value in a meeting with Zelenskyy if it ends with a capitulation,' wrote the nationalist commentator Alexei Mukhin. 'If Zelenskyy is unwilling to sign one, the Kremlin will keep 'working on' the idea of a meeting until he is,' Mukhin added.
Putin now faces a situation reminiscent of earlier moments when Trump pressed him to agree to a ceasefire. At the time, he managed to manoeuvre around the pressure, and analysts believe he is likely to take a similar approach now – downplaying the prospect of talks without rejecting them outright.
The key question is whether Trump will seek to put pressure on Kyiv to accept some of Russia's demands to clear the way for a meeting between the two leaders.
Russia's leadership on Wednesday showed no sign of compromise. Lavrov said the US was beginning to gain a clearer understanding of the 'root causes' of the war – a phrase Putin has used to describe demands ranging from Ukraine's formal renunciation of Nato membership to its 'demilitarisation' and 'denazification', a vague formula that in practice would mean removing Zelenskyy.
The Russian foreign minister also pointed to the April 2022 talks in Turkey between Russia and Ukraine as a model. Those failed negotiations centred on Moscow's demands for Ukraine's disarmament, political neutrality and the abandonment of its ambition to join Nato.
Meanwhile, Russian officials told Reuters that Moscow was preparing to raise taxes and cut spending to sustain high defence outlays and keep the war effort going.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
3 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Ukraine war briefing: Zelenskyy reveals huge Flamingo cruise missile as no peace in sight
With both sides in the Russia-Ukraine war preparing for further fighting, Ukraine was test-launching a new long-range cruise missile, Zelenskyy said. Ukraine's president announced the huge missile, known as Flamingo, could strike targets as far as 3,000km (1,864 miles) away. 'The missile has undergone successful tests. It is currently our most successful missile,' Zelenskyy told reporters. Mass production could begin by February, he added. Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Thursday that large Russian attacks in various parts of Ukraine showed Moscow was avoiding negotiations about ending the more than three-year-old war. The latest offensive included 574 drones and 40 missiles, said Ukraine's president, and was one of the largest yet. A missile strike on the US-owned electronics firm Flex in Ukraine's far-west Zakarpattia region was a 'telling' indicator of Russian intentions in peace initiatives led by Donald Trump, Zelenskyy said. 'Now the signals from Russia are simply, to be honest, indecent. They are trying to back away from the need to hold meetings. They don't want to end the war. They carry on with massive strikes.' 'We believe [the Flex attack] was a deliberate strike precisely on US property here in Ukraine, on American investment,' Zelenskyy said. 'A very telling strike … at the very time when the world waits for a clear answer from the Russians on their move in talks to bring an end to the war.' Nineteen people were injured in the attack. Zelenskyy said both sides were preparing for further fighting, citing Russian troop build-ups and Ukraine's own preparations including the Flamingo missile rollout. While he has upended a years-long western policy of isolating the Russian leader, Trump has made little tangible progress towards a peace deal. On Thursday, the US president appeared to vent his frustration at Russia's obstruction, and suggested Ukraine should long since have been armed to 'fight back' against Russia, writes Pjotr Sauer. In a ramble on social media blaming his predecessor, Joe Biden, Trump said: 'It is very hard, if not impossible, to win a war without attacking an invader's country … There is no chance of winning! It is like that with Ukraine and Russia.' Trump signed off that there were 'interesting times ahead!'. Moscow attempted on Thursday to further deeply caveat any prospects for talks with Putin, or for peace on any terms other than Russia's. Sergei Lavrov, Putin's foreign minister, said putting European troops in Ukraine to guarantee its security was 'foreign intervention' and absolutely unacceptable for Russia. He insisted the Kremlin must have a veto over any postwar support for Ukraine. Trump set another timeframe – two weeks again – for assessing peace talks between Russia and Ukraine. 'After that, we'll have to maybe take a different tack,' Trump told the rightwing media outlet Newsmax. Trump has not met any of his promised or threatened deadlines for securing peace or acting against Russia, which have ranged everywhere from 24 hours to 10 weeks. In an attack on Ukraine's western city of Lviv, one person was killed, three wounded and 26 homes damaged, said the governor, Maksym Kozytskyi. Authorities in south-eastern Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region reported damage to businesses, homes and gas lines. A later shelling of the city of Kherson killed one person and wounded more than a dozen, a local official said. In the Russian-occupied part of Ukraine's Donetsk region, two people were killed and at least 21 wounded after a Ukrainian shelling, said a Russian-installed official. Kim Jong-un held a ceremony decorating North Korean troops who fought for Russia, state media KCNA said on Friday. The North Korean ruler has sent about 15,000 troops into the war, according to South Korea, with about 600 of them killed.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
It's been a confusing week - and Trump's been made to look weak
It's been a confusing week. The Monday gathering of European leaders and Ukraine's president with Donald Trump at the White House was highly significant. The leaders went home buoyed in the knowledge that they'd finally convinced the American president not to abandon Europe, and he had committed to provide American "security guarantees" to Ukraine. 0:49 The details were sketchy, and sketched out only a little more through the week - we got some noise about American air cover - but regardless, the presidential commitment represented a clear shift from months of isolationist rhetoric on Ukraine - "it's Europe's problem" and all the rest of it. Yet it was always the case that, beyond that clear achievement for the Europeans, Russia would have a problem with it. Trump's envoy's language last weekend - claiming that Putin had agreed to Europe providing "Article 5-like" guarantees for Ukraine, essentially providing it with a NATO-like collective security blanket - was baffling. 0:50 Russia gives two fingers to the president And throughout this week, Russia's foreign minister Sergei Lavrov has repeatedly and predictably undermined the whole thing, pointing out that Russia would never accept any peace plan that involved any European or NATO troops in Ukraine. "The presence of foreign troops in Ukraine is completely unacceptable for Russia," he said yesterday, echoing similar statements stretching back years. Remember that NATO's "eastern encroachment" was the justification for Russia's "special military operation" - the invasion of Ukraine - in the first place. All this makes Trump look rather weak. It's two fingers to the president, though interestingly, the Russian language has been carefully calibrated not to poke Trump but to mock European leaders instead. That's telling. 4:02 The bilateral meeting hailed by Trump on Monday as agreed and close - "within two weeks" - looks decidedly doubtful. Maybe that's why he went along with Putin's suggestion that there be a bilateral, not including Trump, first. It's easier for the American president to blame someone else if it's not his meeting, and it doesn't happen. NATO defence chiefs met on Wednesday to discuss the details of how the security guarantees - the ones Russia won't accept - will work. European sources at the meeting have told me it was all a great success. And to the comments by Lavrov, a source said: "It's not up to Lavrov to decide on security guarantees. Not up to the one doing the threatening to decide how to deter that threat!" The argument goes that it's not realistic for Russia to say from which countries Ukraine can and cannot host troops. 5:57 Would Trump threaten force? The problem is that if Europe and the White House want Russia to sign up to some sort of peace deal, then it would require agreement from all sides on the security arrangements. The other way to get Russia to heel would be with an overwhelming threat of force. Something from Trump, like: "Vladimir - look what I did to Iran...". But, of course, Iran isn't a nuclear power. Something else bothers me about all this. The core concept of a "security guarantee" is an ironclad obligation to defend Ukraine into the future. Future guarantees would require treaties, not just a loose promise. I don't see Trump's America truly signing up to anything that obliges them to do anything. A layered security guarantee which builds over time is an option, but from a Kremlin perspective, would probably only end up being a repeat of history and allow them another "justification" to push back. Image and reality don't seem to match Among Trump's stream of social media posts this week was an image of him waving his finger at Putin in Alaska. It was one of the few non-effusive images from the summit. He posted it next to an image of former president Richard Nixon confronting Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev - an image that came to reflect American dominance over the Soviet Union. That may be the image Trump wants to portray. But the events of the past week suggest image and reality just don't match. The past 24 hours in Ukraine have been among the most violent to date.


Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Trump administration reviewing 55,000,000 foreigners with visas for deportations
The Trump administration has started to review all 55million legal immigrants who hold US visas to see if they should be deported. US visa holders including tourists from around the world are under 'continuous vetting' for violations that could led to deportations, said the State Department on Thursday. 'We review all available information as part of our vetting, including law enforcement or immigration records or any other information that comes to light after visa issuance indicating a potential ineligibility,' stated the department said. The State Department is prepared to revoke visas of any individuals who have violated their terms. Officials are searching for visa holders who have exceeded their allowed stay, have committed criminal offenses, posed a threat to safety, and been involved in or support terrorist groups. The review includes looking at visa holders' law enforcement and immigration records in their mother countries, and even watching their social media accounts. Earlier this year, applicants were required to set their social media accounts to public when going for a visa interview. It is part of the Trump administration's push to heighten requirements and restrictions on applicants. Officials are using new tools to compile data on applicants of all statuses, including screening their social media profiles. 'As part of the Trump Administration's commitment to protect US national security and public safety, since Inauguration Day the State Department has revoked more than twice as many visas, including nearly four times as many student visas, as during the same time period last year,' the State Department said. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Vladimir Putin 'reveals his three demands' that will end Russia's invasion of Ukraine MORE: Mystery as six people found dead at a dairy MORE: Mum-of-three who ran Burger King restaurant all by herself gets fired