
This is the most useless phrase to put in an email, expert says: ‘It accomplishes nothing'
'Just checking in' is considered one of the worst phrases to put in an email and etiquette experts are begging you to stop.
As reported by Parade, according to modern-day etiquette, boundaries and relationship expert Jenny Dreizen, you might as well be shouting into the void if you're using that wording.
'This is a vague non-statement that is basically the same as saying, 'Pushing this to the top of your inbox,'' Dreizen, the COO and co-founder of Fresh Starts Registry, she told the outlet.
Dreizen also explained that it's not doing what you think it is.
The phrase, 'just checking in' in an email is all fluff, according to experts.
bodnarphoto – stock.adobe.com
''Just checking in' does not accomplish the task it seemingly needs to, which is to force the issue or expedite the to-do item,' she said.
'When we're using email as communication, we want to be as straightforward and direct as possible. This phrase accomplishes nothing while also coming off vaguely passive-aggressive.'
That doesn't mean every email has to be robotic or ruthless, but Dreizen argues that if you want results, you have to be clear.
She suggests swapping the fluffy 'just checking in' for something, like: 'Wanted to know how progress was going on [action item].'
'Writing emails to ensure people respond to your questions and/or get things done is an art,' Dreizen explained.
Speaking of wanting to get a point across in an email, some employees are shying away from being overly polite in their OOO responses — and are instead telling it how it is.
As reported in the Wall Street Journal, 62-year-old chairman and chief investment officer of Ritholtz Wealth Management, Barry Ritholtz has no problem being blunt in his automated replies.
'I am out of the office having way more fun than communicating with you,' his reply says, according to the Journal. 'I will likely forget to email you back.'
'During this time, I will be out of the office, not checking emails, avoiding texts, ignoring Slack, letting calls go to voicemail, off the grid, and generally unreachable. As such, my auto-responder is, well, auto-responding,' the rest of his email read.
And while some employees are taking the straightforward approach in their work communication, some female workers are choosing to 'sound like a man' in their emails to get what they want, despite experts warning against it.
'In 2025, we write emails like men and get promoted,' wrote content creator @FeliciaPr1ime in a social media post that garnered over 46,000 views.
While this is an empowering statement for many women, ''perpetuating gender stereotypes in the workplace could be 'harmful,'' said Danaya Wilson, CEO of BetterCertify, a professional training company in a report for WorkLife.
It's 'better to communicate directly, with brevity, and focus on information exchange, but we don't have to necessarily align this with masculinity anymore,' she added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 False Alarms That Sent the Stock Market Into a Frenzy (And How To Protect Your Money)
The stock market is often driven by emotion. Information breaks about a company struggling to reach profitability or wider economic news is communicated, and it can send the markets into hysteria. Pair that with social media, and it can cause real problems. Investors choosing to act on such emotion can create a real problem for their portfolios, particularly if the information isn't 100% accurate. Be Aware: Check Out: Protecting assets is essential for Americans as misinformation or lack of clarity rattles markets. Here are three times a false alarm brought turmoil to stocks and how to protect your money in those times. Hysteria in the market doesn't always mean it's a bad day for stocks. News around President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs is one example. After Trump's Liberation Day for tariffs, the market saw vast losses impacting investors. That was until an inaccurate X post claimed the White House was considering a 90-day pause of tariffs. The news brought jubilee, with markets spiking nearly 10%, or $2.4 trillion in value, according to the Wall Street Journal. Unfortunately, the information was incorrect. The tweet, attributed to Walter Bloomberg, was ultimately deleted. The Wall Street Journal states the source of the information remains uncertain. The rally was brief, with the market closing largely flat for the day, with the S&P 500 up roughly 100 points. Read Next: Artificial intelligence (AI) has taken the markets by storm. Tech stocks, in particular, have benefited from the explosion of AI. When Chinese startup DeepSeek introduced a new, free AI assistant that claims to use significantly less data, the market reacted swiftly. On Jan. 27, investors worldwide unloaded tech stocks out of fear that DeepSeek would quickly amass power. Nvidia led the losers, creating a loss of $593 billion, according to Reuters, which was a record single-day loss in terms of market cap for any listing on Wall Street. Other companies joined in monumental losses, with the Nasdaq closing down over 4% for the day. Things aren't as bleak for Nvidia today, with the stock trading at roughly the same price it did at the beginning of 2025. The Nikkei in Japan is a leading stock exchange worldwide. It experienced tumult in August 2024 over fears related to issues with Yen carry trade. Fear spiked that investors would need to sell holdings to cover losses tied to their yen trades. The result was a loss not seen since 1987, with the Nikkei falling 12% on Aug. 5, 2024, according to Reuters. The S&P 500 followed, losing 8% in a two-day period. Thankfully, the loss was short-lived, as Reuters notes that the S&P 500 recovered its losses within two weeks, and the Nikkei followed suit in a month. Protecting assets can be a challenge for many Americans during false alarms in the stock market. Selling stocks is an understandable knee-jerk reaction. Such action can easily derail years of planning, especially if it's on the heels of fake headlines. Diversifying your portfolio weekly and rebalancing it regularly are good ways to safeguard assets. Volatility in the market is normal, but proper due diligence is crucial before making rash decisions that could result in significant losses. If you have a financial advisor, consider speaking with them to verify you're on target with your investment plan. Social media and potentially false headlines can drive emotion. Before making fearful decisions, do research to verify validity before taking action that could lead to needlessly painful losses. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 7 Things You'll Be Happy You Downsized in Retirement Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck This article originally appeared on 3 False Alarms That Sent the Stock Market Into a Frenzy (And How To Protect Your Money) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
White House tries to water down Russia sanctions
Donald Trump is pressuring a US senator to weaken a Bill that would impose sweeping sanctions on Russia. White House officials hoping to mend relations with Moscow have been quietly contacting senator Lindsey Graham's office urging him to water down his Bill, which aims to cripple Vladimir Putin with huge sanctions. The Bill, backed by nearly the entire Senate, would impose 500 per cent tariffs on countries that continue to buy Russian oil and gas, which bankrolls Putin's war effort. Officials have been demanding the Bill include waivers that would allow Mr Trump to choose who or what was sanctioned, congressional aides told the Wall Street Journal. Other attempts to weaken the legislation include softening the language, replacing 'shall' with 'may' to avoid making the reprimands mandatory. Removing the mandatory nature of the sanctions would render the Bill effectively toothless and do little to hamper Putin's war machine, aides fear. 'We're moving ahead and the White House is included in our conversations,' Richard Blumenthal, senator and lead Democratic co-sponsor of the Bill, told the paper. Russia's war effort is funded by fossil-fuel exports. Moscow has adapted to existing sanctions with relative ease, turning to North Korea and China for support. Fearing the impact on pump prices, Joe Biden, former president, was unwilling to crack down on Russian energy exports. Mr Trump, has threatened to impose sanctions on Ukraine, as well as Russia, if the two sides fail to reach a peace agreement. 'Any sanction package must provide complete flexibility for the president to continue to pursue his desired foreign policy,' a White House official said. They added that the constitution 'vests the president with the authority to conduct diplomacy with foreign nations'. Speaking in the Oval Office alongside Friedrich Merz, German chancellor, on Thursday, the US president said that the Bill should not move forward without his express approval. 'They'll be guided by me. That's how it's supposed to be,' he told reporters. 'They're waiting for me to decide on what to do.' Last week, Mr Graham and Mr Blumenthal visited Ukraine where they applauded the country's drone attack that destroyed 40 aircraft deep inside Russian territory. However, they were ridiculed and accused of 'stirring up' the conflict by key allies of Mr Trump, including Steve Bannon. 'By trying to engage Putin – by being friendly and enticing – it's become painfully clear [Putin's] not interested in ending this war,' Mr Graham said earlier this week. '[Putin] needs to see and hear that message as well from us, from the American people,' said Mr Blumenthal. Both said that failing to act now could pull the US deeper into the conflict later. If Putin isn't stopped in Ukraine, Mr Blumenthal said, Nato treaty obligations could compel US troops into battle. Earlier this week, Russian negotiators tabled a long memorandum, resembling a complete capitulation for Ukraine, in a second round of direct talks with Kyiv in Istanbul. They demanded Ukraine must withdraw its troops from four eastern regions that Russia only partially occupies and that international recognition of Russian sovereignty over them and Crimea must be granted. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.


American Military News
a day ago
- American Military News
Iran orders ballistic missile materials from China for hundreds of missiles: Report
A new report claims that Iran has ordered thousands of tons of ballistic missile materials from China that could be used for hundreds of ballistic missiles. The report comes as Iran continues to negotiate with the United States regarding a nuclear program deal. The Wall Street Journal reported that Iran has ordered thousands of tons of ammonium perchlorate from China. The outlet noted that ammonium perchlorate is a chemical compound that is used in ballistic missiles. According to the Wall Street Journal, sources claimed that Iran is expected to receive China's shipments of ammonium perchlorate in the coming months and that the chemical compound could potentially be used in hundreds of ballistic missiles. The sources said Pishgaman Tejarat Rafi Novin Co., an Iranian company, purchased the ammonium perchlorate from Lion Commodities Holdings Ltd., a company based in Hong Kong. The New York Post reported that a portion of the ammonium perchlorate reportedly purchased from China will likely be used in ballistic missiles supplied to Iran-backed terrorist organizations in the Middle East, including the Houthis terrorist organization, which has repeatedly attacked military and commercial ships in the Red Sea and has carried out attacks against Israel. READ MORE: Russia funding new Iranian nuclear plants, Iranian official says In April, the Treasury Department announced that it was designating 'six entities and six individuals based in Iran and the People's Republic of China (PRC) for their role in a network procuring ballistic missile propellant ingredients on behalf of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).' The Treasury Department warned that the network of individuals and entities had helped Iran obtain materials used in ballistic missiles from China. 'Iran's aggressive development of missiles and other weapons capabilities imperils the safety of the United States and our partners, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said at the time. 'It also destabilizes the Middle East, and violates the global agreements intended to prevent the proliferation of these technologies. To achieve peace through strength, Treasury will continue to take all available measures to deprive Iran's access to resources necessary to advance its missile program.' In a public speech on Tuesday, Iranian Supreme Leader Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected a nuclear deal with the United States, saying, 'The rude and arrogant leaders of America repeatedly demand that we should not have a nuclear program. Who are you to decide whether Iran should have enrichment?' Following Iran's rejection of a nuclear deal with the United States, Trump issued a statement on Truth Social, warning that 'time is running out on Iran's decision pertaining to nuclear weapons.' Trump added, 'It is my opinion that Iran has been slowwalking their decision on this very important matter, and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!'