logo
Advanced colon cancer patients lived twice as long with a Pfizer combo therapy, trial finds

Advanced colon cancer patients lived twice as long with a Pfizer combo therapy, trial finds

Yahoo5 days ago

A combination drug treatment doubled survival time for patients with an aggressive form of colorectal cancer, according to late-stage trial data published Friday in The New England Journal of Medicine and presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology's annual meeting in Chicago.
The three-treatment combination included a standard chemotherapy drug, an antibody drug called cetuximab and a pill from Pfizer called Braftovi, which targets a cancer mutation called BRAF V600E.
The mutation shows up in about 10% of patients with colorectal cancer, said Dr. Lionel Kankeu Fonkoua, a gastrointestinal oncologist at the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center in Rochester, Minnesota. Patients with the mutation tend to survive for less than a year after diagnosis, and they often don't respond well to standard chemotherapy treatments, said Fonkoua, who wasn't involved with the new trial.
According to Pfizer, the risk of death for these patients is more than double compared with those without the mutation.
Braftovi was initially approved in 2020 to be used with cetuximab in this group of patients after other treatments had failed. The new trial looked at the drug combination as a so-called first-line therapy.
The Food and Drug Administration granted the treatment fast-track approval as a first-line approach in December on the condition that Pfizer provide additional data confirming its effectiveness. The agency often grants fast-track approval to treatments that address serious or life-threatening conditions, especially when there's an unmet medical need.
Dr. Christopher Lieu, a professor of medicine at the University of Colorado School of Medicine who wasn't involved with the research, called the results 'very impactful.'
'Patients are clearly living longer, and this represents the new standard of care for this specific subset of patients with this specific mutation,' Lieu said.
The trial included more than 600 patients with the mutation who had metastatic colorectal cancer.
Patients were randomized to get either the three-drug combination treatment or standard chemotherapy alone. Some of the patients in the latter group were also given bevacizumab, a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.
The trial found that patients who got the combination treatment lived, on average, about 30 months, compared with about 15 months for those who got standard chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab.
What's more, 47% of patients who got the combination treatment had no disease progression after two years, meaning their cancer didn't grow or spread.
The treatment was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety concerns that would've caused investigators to stop the trial.
'This is a really remarkable finding,' said Dr. Scott Kopetz, a professor of gastrointestinal medical oncology at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Texas and a co-principal investigator in the trial. 'When we bring this together with standard of care chemotherapy, we get really substantially prolonged survival for these patients that are really unprecedented for this disease type.'
More than 141,000 new cases of colorectal cancer are diagnosed in the U.S. each year, making it the fourth most common cancer, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About 52,900 people in the U.S. are expected to die from colorectal cancer this year, according to the American Cancer Society.
Laurie Ritchie, 61, of St. Louis, got the combination treatment in October 2023. Her results weren't included in the clinical trial analysis.
Ritchie had been diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer with the BRAF mutation — a diagnosis she describes as 'a huge shock.'
Previous colonoscopies hadn't detected cancer; by the time she was diagnosed, the cancer had already reached Stage 4. It eventually spread to her lungs and ovaries. Since she got the combination treatment, she said her blood tests have consistently shown no trace of cancer.
While she still worries about the cancer coming back, she says she's now focused on living fully — including going water skiing and downhill skiing.
'I've kind of learned to think of it as something in the trunk, not in the front seat,' she said. 'It still feels a bit like a ticking time bomb inside me, but I think the work I've done on my mental health has really helped me live with it.'
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Healthy Returns: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Gilead and other drugmakers release promising cancer drug data at ASCO
Healthy Returns: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Gilead and other drugmakers release promising cancer drug data at ASCO

CNBC

time7 hours ago

  • CNBC

Healthy Returns: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Gilead and other drugmakers release promising cancer drug data at ASCO

I'm back in New York City after spending the last weekend in Chicago for the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting. More than 5,000 research abstracts were presented or published at ASCO by pharmaceutical giants, biotech companies, researchers and oncologists. They included studies on existing drugs, experimental treatments, AI tools and ideas for improving patient care. Here are some data highlights and executive commentary from the larger companies I follow: AstraZeneca wins big (again) – The blockbuster drug Enhertu from AstraZeneca and Japanese drugmaker Daiichi Sankyo stalled the growth of a common type of breast cancer by more than a year in a large late-stage trial when used as an initial treatment. The results could expand the use of the drug and change the way the disease is treated for the first time in a decade. The study evaluated Enhertu in combination with a standard medicine called pertuzumab as a frontline treatment, meaning it was used in patients newly diagnosed with what's known as HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Patients who got the Enhertu combination lived for almost 41 months before their disease spread, while a group who received a standard three-drug treatment lived for about 27 months before the cancer advanced. David Fredrickson, executive vice president of AstraZeneca's oncology business, told CNBC that one in three patients who start treatment for this type of cancer are not able to receive a second type of therapy because their health worsened or they died. But the results show that the Enhertu combination could give "another third of patients a chance to potentially have a longer progression-free survival time and to benefit from a more effective frontline therapy than if you wait till a second one." Pfizer impresses in colorectal cancer – The company's pill Braftovi, combined with two other cancer treatments, doubled survival time for patients with an aggressive form of colorectal cancer compared to a standard treatment in a late-stage trial. It's good news for Pfizer, which has submitted the data to the Food and Drug Administration to expand Braftovi's approval label. The three-treatment combination included a standard chemotherapy, an antibody drug called cetuximab and Braftovi, which targets a cancer mutation called BRAF V600E. That combination also cut deaths by 51% and slashed the risk that the cancer would progress by 47% compared to a standard treatment during the trial. Pfizer's Chief Scientific Officer Chris Boshoff told CNBC that 10% to 15% of colorectal cancer patients have that specific mutation, and noted their survival rates are "particularly poor." "We're very proud of [the data] because for the first time, it really shows a true impact on survival for a disease that's very challenging to treat," he said. Gilead and Merck combo's breast cancer win — The popular drug Trodelvy from Gilead in combination with Merck's blockbuster immunotherapy Keytruda lowered the risk of an aggressive type of breast cancer worsening by 35% when used as an initial treatment in a late-stage trial. Gilead could benefit from higher sales of Trodelvy as it competes with Enhertu. The study examined patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer whose tumors express PD-L1, the protein targeted by drugs like Keytruda. Around 15% of breast cancer cases are triple negative, making them more aggressive and difficult to treat, according to Gilead. The findings suggest that the combination of Trodelvy and Keytruda "will likely become a new front-line standard of care in this setting," Dr. Jane Lowe Meisel, co-director of breast oncology at Emory University School of Medicine and a designated ASCO expert, said in a statement. A Merck, Daiichi Sankyo drug disappoints in lung cancer – Merck and Daiichi Sankyo on Thursday said they have withdrawn their U.S. application for an experimental treatment after it failed to prolong the lives of lung cancer patients in a late-stage trial. The drug, patritumab deruxtecan, is one of three so-called antibody drug conjugates that Merck has been working on with Daiichi Sankyo as it races to offset Keytruda's upcoming loss of exclusivity. The medication failed the trial's secondary goal of extending overall survival, which is defined as the length of time patients lived from the start of treatment. Those results, along with subsequent discussions with the FDA, led the companies to withdraw the application. But last year, the drug met the study's main goal of helping delay tumor progression compared to chemotherapy in patients who have been previously treated for non-small cell lung cancer with a mutation in a gene called EGFR. Marjorie Greene, Merck's head of oncology global clinical development, told CNBC that the "totality of the data couldn't support" the drug's application for approval. She called it a disappointment but noted that the company is learning from "what worked and what didn't work" and is still "fully investing" in refining the drug. Merck and Daiichi Sankyo plan on advancing the treatment into a late-stage development for breast cancer. Amgen's positive lung cancer data: The company's drug, Imdelltra, reduced the risk of death by 40% compared to chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer patients whose disease had worsened after an initial round of chemotherapy, according to data from a late-stage trial. Imdelltra also extended median overall survival by more than five months compared to the standard-of-care chemotherapy. Amgen said the trial results are intended to support last year's accelerated approval of Imdelltra by the FDA. BONUS: Bristol Myers Squibb inks deal with BioNTech – Bristol Myers Squibb on Monday said it has agreed to pay up to $11.1 billion to partner with BioNTech and develop its next-generation cancer immunotherapy. The drug could take on Keytruda and new treatments in development by Summit Therapeutics and Pfizer. BioNTech is running late-stage studies on the drug in lung cancer and plans to start a phase three trial in triple-negative breast cancer this year. Feel free to send any tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Annika at The FDA this week approved the first-ever AI platform for breast cancer prediction from Boston-based Clairity, marking a big milestone for women's health tech and potentially for women's health screening. I profiled Clairity's founder Dr. Connie Lehman three years ago, as part of a story on investment in Femtech. At the time, she told CNBC the accuracy of technology can help reduce over-screening for women who are presumed to be at risk, while helping to identify women who might otherwise not be monitored until they've already developed cancer. "By delivering validated, equitable risk assessments, we can help expand access to life-saving early detection and prevention for women everywhere," she said in the company's announcement of the approval. But to save lives, the next big step is to ensure women have access to the breakthrough technology as a preventive screening. The American Medical Association will first need to issue a billing code, which for some AI-driven tools has been slow to come. That code will be crucial to securing insurance coverage. Feel free to send any tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Bertha at Amazon Pharmacy on Tuesday announced new updates for caregivers and more than 50 million Medicare Part D beneficiaries. Launched in 2020, Amazon Pharmacy was formed out of the company's 2018 acquisition of the online pharmacy PillPack. The offering is now a full-service, digital pharmacy that can help support patients with both one-off and recurring prescriptions. Prime members in cities like Los Angeles and New York City are eligible for same-day medication deliveries. Amazon said that customers with Medicare insurance can now directly access PillPack's services, which means those with two or more prescriptions can have their medications sorted into individual tear-away packets labeled with the date and time. The company said these monthly shipments will reduce the need for patients to keep track of multiple pill bottles and help them stick to their routines, according to a release. Patients interested in accessing pre-sorted medications through PillPack can sign up by logging into Amazon Pharmacy. Amazon Pharmacy also introduced a new way for verified caregivers to help manage medications on behalf of their loved ones. Around one in every five adults in the U.S. are caring for an aging family member, according to AARP. Patients can invite trusted caregivers to help oversee their medications by submitting their phone number. The caregiver will receive a text with a link, have to confirm details about the patient in question, and then can begin managing the patient's medications through their own account. "These updates deliver what our customers have been asking for—simpler medication management for themselves and their loved ones," John Love, vice president of Amazon Pharmacy, said in a statement on Tuesday. Amazon's online pharmacy is a part of the company's multi-year effort to push into the health-care industry. The company acquired primary care provider One Medical for roughly $3.9 billion in July 2022. Read the full announcement here. Feel free to send any tips, suggestions, story ideas and data to Ashley at

ASCO 2025: GSK's Jemperli fails to show OS benefit in 1L advanced ovarian cancer
ASCO 2025: GSK's Jemperli fails to show OS benefit in 1L advanced ovarian cancer

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

ASCO 2025: GSK's Jemperli fails to show OS benefit in 1L advanced ovarian cancer

At the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting 2025, held from 31 May to 3 June in Chicago, Illinois, updated efficacy and safety data from the international, double-blind, randomised Phase III FIRST clinical trial were presented on 1 June. The trial evaluated the combination of GSK's Jemperli (dostarlimab), a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed cell death protein 1, and Zejula (niraparib), a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (PtCh) as a first-line therapy in patients with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer (OC). OC is a deadly gynaecological malignancy, with approximately 90% of cases classified as epithelial. According to GlobalData's Ovarian Cancer: Opportunity Assessment and Forecast report, the number of diagnosed incident cases of OC in the seven major markets (7MM: France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, the UK and the US) is expected to rise from 67,762 in 2025 to 71,308 by 2032. In the FIRST/ENGOT-OV44 study, a total of 1,138 patients with advanced OC were randomised (1:1:2) to experimental arm 1 (PtCh + placebo and placebo maintenance; dropped from the study due to PARP inhibitor approval), arm 2 (PtCh + placebo and Zejula maintenance; n=385), and comparator arm 3 (PtCh + Jemperli and Jemperli/Zejula maintenance; n=753). The efficacy of arms 2 and 3 (intention-to-treat population) was evaluated based on the primary endpoint - investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). The PFS showed a statistically significant difference between arm 3 and arm 2 (median 20.6 months versus 19.2; hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–0.99, P = 0.0351), with a median duration follow-up of 53.1 months. The key secondary endpoint, overall survival (OS), had reached 57% maturity and was not statistically significant (median 44.4 versus 45.4 months; HR 1.01, 95% CI, 0.86–1.19, P = 0.9060). In the maintenance period, treatment-related adverse events above Grade 3 were reported in 41.1% of patients in arm 3 and 37.2% in arm 2. The study concludes that adding Jemperli to PtCh and Zejula provides a statistically significant but clinically modest PFS benefit, with no improvement in OS for newly diagnosed advanced OC patients. The result was not unexpected, as immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited efficacy in OC, which is considered poorly immunogenic. At the end of 2024, Merck & Co's Keytruda (pembrolizumab) and AstraZeneca's Lynparza (olaparib) also failed to meet expectations in the KEYLYNK-001 study as a first-line therapy for OC, showing no OS benefit, similar to findings from the FIRST/ENGOT-OV44 study. Currently, no anti-PD-(L)1 therapies are approved for OC, and demonstrating a positive OS outcome is critical to gaining market share in this broad indication. A key difference between the two studies lies in patient selection. KEYLYNK-001 enrolled patients with breast cancer gene (BRCA) mutations, whereas the FIRST/ENGOT-OV44 trial included all-comers. To improve its chances of success, GSK made multiple modifications to the FIRST/ENGOT-OV44 trial design, including delaying readouts by several years. Initially, the primary endpoint was PFS in PD-L1-positive patients. In 2020, it was split into two groups, PFS in all-comers and PD-L1 expressers, before ultimately shifting the focus solely to all-comers. Another concern is the Jemperli and Zejula combination in the second-line setting for OC. A Phase III trial (NSGO-AVATAR) evaluating this combination was withdrawn due to a lack of financial support, suggesting GSK may not be optimistic about its prospects in the broader gynaecological cancer space. According to GlobalData's analyst consensus forecast, global sales for Jemperli and Zejula are projected to reach $2.56 billion and $1.26 billion, respectively, by 2030. In comparison, AstraZeneca's Lynparza and blockbuster PD-1 blocker Merck's Keytruda are expected to reach global sales of $2.4 billion and $22.71 billion, respectively. GSK acquired both Jemperli (co-developed with AnaptysBio) and Zejula through its $5.31 billion acquisition of Tesaro in 2019. After the FDA's accelerated approval in 2021 for patients with mismatch repair-deficient endometrial cancer as a second-line treatment, Jemperli has become a cornerstone of GSK's cancer portfolio alongside Zejula. In its most recent financial report, Jemperli sales increased 15% to $285 million in Q1 2025 due to broad-label expansion in first-line endometrial cancer regardless of biomarker status in the US. However, Jemperli holds a distinct advantage with its OS data over its main competitor, Keytruda, which also secured broad expansion in 2024. To expand Jemperli's success beyond endometrial cancer, GSK will need to wait for positive Phase III results from other ongoing clinical trials: GALAXIES LUNG 301, AZUR-2, MITO 33, JADE, ROCSAN and COSTAR Lung. "ASCO 2025: GSK's Jemperli fails to show OS benefit in 1L advanced ovarian cancer" was originally created and published by Clinical Trials Arena, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Exercise proves powerful in preventing colon cancer recurrence
Exercise proves powerful in preventing colon cancer recurrence

Yahoo

time9 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Exercise proves powerful in preventing colon cancer recurrence

New evidence has linked physical activity with improved colon health, underscoring the vital role of exercise in cancer prevention and care. The landmark international trial – the Challenge study – showed that structured exercise programmes can dramatically improve survival rates for colon cancer survivors. The study was unveiled at the meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Each June, cancer specialists from around the world convene in Chicago for the conference where new research is announced that pushes the boundaries of cancer treatment and this year's conference featured a wealth of exciting discoveries. Conducted across six countries and published in the New England Journal of Medicine, the Challenge study tracked 889 patients for several years following chemotherapy. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one received standard post-treatment care, while the other took part in a three-year coaching programme that included personalised exercise plans and regular check-ins with fitness professionals. The results were striking. Those in the exercise group experienced 28% fewer cancer recurrences and 37% fewer deaths. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. In the programme, people slowly built up how much they exercised, with most choosing to go on brisk 45-minute walks four times a week. Ninety per cent of the people who exercised stayed cancer free for five years, compared with just 74% of those who didn't. This study provides the first strong evidence that exercise not only correlates with better outcomes but directly improves survival rates in cancer patients. While earlier observational studies found a link between being active and better cancer outcomes, this first randomised controlled trial helps show causation, meaning that exercise can directly benefit the survival of cancer patients. We don't know yet if the same goes for other cancers like breast, prostate or lung, but it's a big step forward. The programme's success hinged on consistent support. Participants met with fitness coaches every two weeks at first, then monthly, which helped them stick to their routines even after treatment ended. While minor injuries such as muscle strains were slightly more common among those who exercised (19% compared to 12% in the control group), researchers emphasised that these issues were manageable and far outweighed by the significant survival benefits. In contrast to the encouraging findings on structured exercise, a separate study presented in Chicago has raised questions about the potential downsides of extreme endurance training. Researchers tracking marathon runners found a higher rate of polyps (small growths in the colon that can sometimes develop into cancer) compared with the general population. This unexpected finding has sparked a fresh debate about the effect of high-intensity exercise on long-term colon health. However, context is needed. The study did not find higher cancer rates among runners, and most of the detected polyps were low risk. Several possible explanations have been offered: endurance athletes may simply undergo more frequent screenings, leading to increased detection, or intense exercise might temporarily raise inflammation markers. Crucially, the overall risk of cancer remains lower in active people than in those who are more sedentary, reinforcing the well-established protective benefits of regular exercise. This apparent contradiction highlights the medical community's evolving understanding of the 'dose' of physical activity. While moderate exercise is consistently linked to significant health benefits, emerging data from endurance athletes suggests that extreme, high-intensity training may place different kinds of stress on the body's systems. Researchers also suggest that factors such as dehydration during long-distance runs, changes in gut function, or the use of certain nutritional supplements common among endurance athletes could play a role in polyp development. These findings don't diminish the well-documented benefits of physical activity, but instead point to the importance of personalised, balanced health strategies. For cancer survivors, the structured exercise study provides a message of practical hope. Participants aimed for the equivalent of about three hours of brisk walking per week, gradually increasing their activity levels over time. The programme's social support was key, with fitness coaches helping participants tailor their routines to match their abilities and recovery needs. Exercise is believed to affect key biological processes – including insulin sensitivity, inflammation and immune function – that play important roles in cancer development and progression. Ongoing research is analysing participants' blood samples to better understand these mechanisms and eventually create personalised exercise 'prescriptions' based on an individual's genetic profile. While the findings from marathon runners are less conclusive, they still offer practical takeaways. The research suggests that although vigorous exercise is generally beneficial, high-intensity athletes may face a higher risk of developing polyps and should therefore consider regular colonoscopies as a precaution. For the general public, these findings reinforce that combining moderate exercise with timely screenings offers the best protection against colon cancer, a disease that remains the fourth most common worldwide and is alarmingly increasing among young people. For both patients and athletes, these findings highlight a central truth: movement matters, but the right approach is crucial. Colon cancer survivors now have proven tools to reduce recurrence through structured exercise, while endurance enthusiasts gain motivation to pair their training with preventative care. As science continues unravelling the intricate dance between activity and biology, one message remains clear: whether recovering from illness or chasing personal bests, informed exercise combined with medical guidance is the most reliable path to long-term health. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Justin Stebbing does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store