logo
Quebec dials back emissions projections due to global uncertainty

Quebec dials back emissions projections due to global uncertainty

CTV News6 hours ago

The Quebec government is scaling back its projections for greenhouse gas emissions reductions due to the Trump administration.
A report published Thursday by the province's Environment Department says the current U.S. government has created a 'challenging environment for advancing climate action.'
It points in particular to U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to impose tariffs, which it says have slowed down business investment, including in decarbonization.
It also says the administration's attempts to challenge carbon pricing mechanisms in various U.S. states were 'exerting downward pressure on market prices.'
'The economic and political uncertainty caused by the new U.S. federal administration ... does not allow the deployment of measures as quickly and effectively as planned,' the report says.
The government now estimates that measures being adopted in Quebec to reduce emissions will account for 65 per cent of the cuts needed to reach the province's 2030 emissions target, down from a projected 67 per cent last year.
Quebec is aiming to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 37.5 per cent compared to 1990 levels by 2030. That's a drop of about 30 million tonnes from projected emissions in the absence of climate policies.
The new report is an annual update on the province's progress toward meeting that goal. It estimates that planned measures will cut emissions by 19.4 million tonnes in 2030, a slight drop from last year's projections.
The document also says the Canadian government's decision to scrap the federal consumer carbon price in April could harm the competitiveness of Quebec businesses.
'Uncertainty remains regarding the actions that will be taken by the federal government to combat climate change,' it reads.
Quebec has so far maintained its own cap-and-trade carbon pricing system, which is linked with California's system.
The report says Quebec's carbon price is a major driver of emissions reductions in the province, and revenue from the carbon market is an important source of funding for other climate measures in the government's plan.
The report highlights $10.1 billion in planned government spending over the next five years, much of it to reduce emissions from transportation, industry and housing.
It says new initiatives under development could lead to further emissions cuts and could get the province to between 67 and 72 per cent of its 2030 target.
Despite dialling back its projections, the government says greenhouse gas emissions dropped by 0.9 million tonnes in Quebec between 2022 and 2023, and have not returned to pre-pandemic levels.
The report also says there was a record number of electric-vehicle sales in Quebec in 2024, with more than 125,000 new registrations.
Zero-emission vehicle sales made up nearly 31 per cent of light-duty vehicle sales that year, it says, and there were 375,000 electric vehicles on the road in Quebec last December.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 19, 2025.
Maura Forrest, The Canadian Press

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China Mobile and ZTE win the Asia Mobile Award 2025 with AI-driven 5G cloudified core network
China Mobile and ZTE win the Asia Mobile Award 2025 with AI-driven 5G cloudified core network

Cision Canada

timean hour ago

  • Cision Canada

China Mobile and ZTE win the Asia Mobile Award 2025 with AI-driven 5G cloudified core network

China Mobile and ZTE have developed the innovative AI-driven green and energy-saving 5G cloudified core network project to reduce the energy consumption and improve the network performance and operation efficiency The AI-driven green and energy-saving 5G cloudified core network innovative and replicable solution helps operators reduce OPEX and CAPEX while achieving significant energy saving effect SHANGHAI, June 20, 2025 /CNW/ -- ZTE Corporation ( / a global leading provider of integrated information and communication technology solutions, in partnership with China Mobile, has earned "Best Mobile Innovation for Climate Action in Asia" award for their AI-driven green and energy-saving 5G cloudified core network innovation project at the Asia Mobile Awards(AMOs) during MWC Shanghai 2025. Energy conservation, emission reduction and green transformation in the communications industry are key issues in the global shift towards green and sustainable development. The innovative AI-driven green and energy-saving 5G cloudified core network project aims to significantly reduce the energy consumption of the 5G core network while enhancing network performance and operation efficiency through the innovative cloud-native architecture and intelligent energy-saving technology. Leveraging ZTE's leading Intelligent 5G core network solutions and China Mobile's extensive experience in green communications, this project successfully achieves energy efficiency optimization and carbon emission reduction of 5G core network, providing operators with efficient and environmentally-friendly 5G core network deployment solutions. The AI-driven green and energy-saving 5G cloudified core network innovation project not only helps operators reduce OPEX and CAPEX, but also provides replicable solutions for the sustainable development of global 5G core networks. To date, this project has been deployed across multiple provinces of China, achieving significant energy savings. Moving forward, ZTE will further its collaboration with China Mobile to promote the application of green and energy-saving technologies in a wider range of network systems. Both parties will work together with global partners to advance the green and intelligent development of 5G networks, with great commitment to the sustainable development of the global communications industry. ABOUT ZTE: ZTE connects the world with continuous innovation for a better future. The company provides innovative technologies and integrated solutions, and its portfolio spans communication networks, computing infrastructure, industry digital solutions, and personal and home smart terminals. Serving over a quarter of the world's population, ZTE is dedicated to leading globally in connectivity and intelligent computing, enabling communication and trust everywhere. ZTE is listed on both the Hong Kong and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges.

2 No-Brainer, High-Yield Stocks to Buy With $2,000 Right Now
2 No-Brainer, High-Yield Stocks to Buy With $2,000 Right Now

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

2 No-Brainer, High-Yield Stocks to Buy With $2,000 Right Now

The S&P 500 index (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) is trading near all-time highs and has a pretty miserly 1.2% or so dividend yield. If you are an income investor, that suggests that you have your work cut out for you right now. But there are great investment options with high yields out there if you take the time to look. Two no-brainer choices today, if you have $2,000 or $20,000 to invest, are Brookfield Renewable (NYSE: BEP)(NYSE: BEPC) and Chevron (NYSE: CVX). Here's what you need to know. Brookfield Renewable is positioned to grow Brookfield Renewable owns a globally diversified portfolio of clean energy assets. On the geographic front, its portfolio spans across North America, South America, Europe, and Asia. On the technology front, the business has exposure to hydroelectric, solar, wind, energy storage, and nuclear power assets. It is as close to a one-stop shop as you can get in the renewable energy space. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » The interesting thing here, however, is that Brookfield Renewable is not a regulated utility. It largely sells its power under long-term contracts to others, including both companies and utilities. This actually gives it a lot of room to grow as the world increasingly shifts from carbon-based fuels toward cleaner alternatives. For example, it recently inked a deal with Microsoft to provide around 10.5 gigawatts of power that the technology giant will use to support its data center build-out. Basically, Brookfield Renewable can grow as it sees fit without having to kowtow to regulators who may put limits on its investment plans. And this brings up another interesting fact: Brookfield Renewable is run by Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE: BAM). Brookfield Asset Management has an over-100-year history of investing in infrastructure on a global scale. And it plans to increase its clean-energy investments, where Brookfield Renewable is a key source of funding, by around 100% by 2030. Buying Brookfield Renewable lets you partner with Brookfield Asset Management on that growth. There are two ways to buy in here. Brookfield Renewable Partners has a 5.6% yield. Brookfield Renewable Corporation has a 4.6% dividend yield. Both represent the exact same entity and have the exact same dividend payment. The yield difference is because demand for the corporate share class is higher, which makes sense given that large institutional investors are often barred from owning partnerships. Either way you go, Brookfield Renewable appears well positioned to expand its business as the world goes green. And you can collect a fat yield that has been regularly increased if you buy in right now. A $2,000 investment will get you 75 shares of the partnership units and 60 shares of the corporate shares. Chevron is out of favor for two reasons Chevron is a globally diversified, integrated energy giant offering an attractive 4.7% dividend yield. The dividend has been increased for an incredible 38 consecutive years. That's incredible because oil and natural gas prices tend to be highly volatile, which means that Chevron's top and bottom lines tend to be volatile, too. However, Chevron has an ace up its sleeve in the form of a strong balance sheet. A low level of leverage allows it to take on debt during industry downturns so it can continue to support its business and dividend. When oil prices recover, as they always have historically, it pays down debt in preparation for the next downturn. In addition to this rock-solid financial foundation, Chevron's diversified business also helps. With investments in energy production (the upstream), energy transportation (the midstream), and energy processing (the downstream), the peaks and valleys of oil prices get muted to some degree. That said, Chevron is out of favor right now, which has led to the lofty yield. Part of the reason for that is generally weak energy prices. Those low prices are impacting the entire energy sector. But Chevron also has some company-specific issues. First, it is attempting to buy Hess, but the process has turned out to be more complicated than hoped. Second, Chevron has investments in Venezuela, a tenuous country in which to invest. Those assets have become a bit of a political football. Neither of these things is good, but they aren't likely to derail Chevron over the long term. The currently high yield is an opportunity for investors who can think long term. You may have to suffer through some near-term lagging performance, but if you buy now, you'll get paid well for waiting around. A $2,000 investment in Chevron will get you around 13 shares. Looking for yield, start with this pair of high yielders With lofty yields, Brookfield Renewable and Chevron should both be attractive to dividend investors. But the real key to the story here is that both have strong businesses to support those dividends. If you think in decades and not days, these two high-yield stocks could be no-brainer additions to your portfolio right now. Should you invest $1,000 in Brookfield Renewable right now? Before you buy stock in Brookfield Renewable, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Brookfield Renewable wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $659,171!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $891,722!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is995% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025

Letters to the editor, June 20: ‘On whom influences the U.S. President: depends on who he spoke with last'
Letters to the editor, June 20: ‘On whom influences the U.S. President: depends on who he spoke with last'

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Letters to the editor, June 20: ‘On whom influences the U.S. President: depends on who he spoke with last'

Re 'Plus-minus' (Letters, June 19): A letter-writer wishes Mark Carney 'would show more sympathy for his fellow Canadians' while dealing with 'this walking nightmare' who once again 'leads' our southern neighbour. It's unlikely any global leader could have done a more impressive job of deftly dealing with, arguably, the most dangerous person alive today. While he clearly had to treat him with kid gloves, Mr. Carney rose to the occasion by nimbly stepping in to regain control of a press conference that the U.S. President was hijacking with more of his bluster and lies. He also provided some sort of signal of his true feelings while delivering a deliciously subtle wink to Emmanuel Macron during a pivotal moment at the G7 summit. Apparently 'a nod is as good as a wink' … to a blind President. Jeffrey Peckitt Oakville, Ont. Re 'PMO won't say if Carney spoke with Modi about India's alleged role in killing of Canadian Sikh leader' (June 19): Inviting Narendra Modi to the G7 summit, despite India not being a member, could be seen as a good diplomatic gesture. However, we should not forget the treatment the Modi administration extended to Justin Trudeau. Without delving into the complexities of Canada-India relations during Mr. Trudeau's tenure, it was evident to me that how he was treated did not align with diplomatic protocols. The Modi administration has every right to disagree with the Canadian government's positions, but diplomatic protocols should never be compromised under any circumstances. Moving forward, Canada should navigate its relationship with India with a renewed focus on mutual respect and strategic co-operation. While historical grievances should not be ignored, diplomacy should be exercised with a forward-looking approach that prioritizes national interests and global partnerships. Mr. Modi's invitation should be seen as an opportunity to ensure that diplomatic missteps do not hinder future collaborations between the two nations. Anas Khan Beaumont, Alta. Re 'On Iran, Donald Trump has a legacy-defining choice to make' (June 19): On whom influences the U.S. President: depends on who he spoke with last. If it is the hardcore isolationist 'make America great again' types, then Iran will likely face Israel alone. If it is the hardcore Republican hawks, then the United States will likely attack Iran. Difficult to say which is better or worse given the current situation. Perhaps it will be a bit of both, with a light dusting of bunker busters on Iranian nuclear facilities and then leaving the remainder of fighting to the two combatants. Clay Atcheson North Vancouver Re 'At risk' (Letters, June 18): 'If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.' With apologies to John F. Kennedy, I offer the following amendments to his quote: If a free society cannot encourage the investment and growth endeavours of the few who are rich, it cannot save the many who are poor. I believe the contrary is valid and, in our slow-growth and low-productivity economy, necessary. Ted Brough Woolwich, Ont. Re 'Housing remedy' (Letters, June 17): I live in a historic downtown neighbourhood. Dotted through it are multiplex buildings, typically two storeys tall, built in the 1920s and 1930s that often have eight apartments with balconies. These apartment buildings sit on land equivalent to two single-family homes. Usually these buildings have humanely sized units, making them desirable to both renters and owners. If we can build units similar to what already exists in these neighbourhoods, wouldn't that be easier to sell to neighbours and planning departments? Almost every historic city centre I visit has examples of this kind of dense urban planning from 80 to 100 years ago. How can NIMBY residents and planners deny such an application for similar development? Maybe give developers a partial break on development charges when they commit to historically appropriate infill. There will always be pushback when proposed infill housing sticks out like a sore thumb. Why reinvent the wheel? Mary Peirson-Cabena Guelph, Ont. Re 'Canada's population growth slows to a crawl after moves to curb immigration' (June 19): For the first time in a long time, it feels like our government is finally getting a handle on this matter, reining in reckless policies that flooded the country with too many people too quickly. It's no coincidence there are now more houses for sale for longer periods of time, and not being snapped up within hours of being listed. In fact, our daughter and her partner managed to buy a house for under asking recently. Still a lot more work to do on this file, but it's a start. Graham Farrell Toronto Re 'AI adoption is upending the job market for entry-level workers' (June 18): The tech industry is rotten. I worked in software development for 33 years and I am so glad to be retired. When I look back and ask whether my industry has been a net benefit to humanity, I have to conclude that the answer is no. All these corporate types with stars in their eyes can forget that artificial intelligence is trained on human-generated input. That means AI companies steal the hard work and intellectual property of human beings, with no compensation. AI is also consuming ever more energy. AI data centres will likely consume more electricity than everything else, meaning higher prices for everyone else. AI-generated output is increasingly displacing human-generated output. If there are no good entry-level jobs, how do companies expect to train workers to move up? Who do companies expect to sell their products and services to if there are legions of unemployed or underemployed people? Dianne Skoll Ottawa Re 'Oilers can't keep up in Stanley Cup rat race' (Sports, June 18): More telling than the 32-year drought for a Canadian Stanley Cup champion is the fact that eight Canadian teams have made the finals in that time, and are now 0 for 8. The reason to me is obvious: too much pressure. A little indifference from Canadian fans would help. My dream is to see a purely Canadian league with a mix of international players and a more international outlook. Players would be paid well, but not exorbitantly. Media and fan pressure on players would be less because it would be one league among others. Don't assume a Canadian league wouldn't be competitive. A 'champions league' can determine the best team. Don't assume that National Hockey League clubs would dominate – we have plenty of evidence for the strength of international hockey. The NHL is a U.S. business; let them have it. Ed Janicki Victoria Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store