Explained: How much is the government paying to house asylum seekers in hotels?
Amid the demonstrations, misleading claims about the cost of accommodating migrants have been spreading widely online.
But what does it actually cost to house asylum seekers in hotels — and how are false figures shaping public anger?
Misleading figures spread online
One focal point has been the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf, East London, which has witnessed clashes between anti-immigration protesters and anti-racism demonstrators, leading to the arrest of two people on 8 August.
Social media posts and viral messages have claimed that housing asylum seekers in hotels costs the government between £200 and £500 per night. However, there is no evidence to support these figures.
One expert claims these kinds of falsehoods are 'most likely spread with a strategic purpose in mind'.
The real cost
The Home Office told The Independent that the Britannia Hotel costs £81 per night to house asylum seekers.
In March 2025, the average cost per night for a hotel room used to accommodate asylum seekers was £118.87 — down from £162.16 in March 2023. Across all hotels, this equates to around £5.77m per day, down from £8.3m per day the previous year.
Stephan Lewandowsky, Professor of Cognitive Science at the University of Bristol, told The Independent that false information spreads because divisive posts attract more attention from readers.
He said: 'Social media algorithms favour information that is outrage-evoking because it generates more audience engagement – hence making more money for the platforms – and in consequence disinformation often has an advantage over factual content and spreads faster and further. On top of that, the goal is, of course, to incite hatred and what better way to do that than to spread outrageous falsehoods.'
These misleading claims are not just a matter of numbers. Experts warn they could amplify public anger and stoke already high tensions.
'There is now very clear and strong evidence that online misinformation can cause real-world harms. For example, last year's riots in the UK targeted mosques based on the false rumour that the perpetrator of a heinous crime was a Muslim refugee – he was not, he was a native-born British citizen,' Mr Lewandowsky said.
Court ruling piles pressure on Starmer
Pressure is mounting on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer after Epping Forest District Council secured an interim High Court injunction to ban migrants from being housed at The Bell Hotel after weeks of protests at the site.
The council argued the site had become a 'feeding ground for unrest' following a spate of violent protests that left several police officers injured.
On 4 August, Starmer condemned the violence as 'far-right thuggery' and warned that those responsible would face the 'full force of the law.'
For now, one of many challenges for ministers will be to ensure the facts about the costs of asylum hotels are reaching the public.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
24 minutes ago
- Forbes
Kristi Noem Reportedly Wants First-Ever ICE Deportation Plane Fleet
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is looking to have Immigration and Customs Enforcement own and operate its own fleet of deportation planes, according to NBC News, which would be a major shift from the agency's reliance on chartering planes as the Trump administration seeks to conduct 1 million deportations per year. Noem is pushing for the acquisition of an ICE deportation fleet. (Photo by) Getty Images Noem wants ICE to use tens of billions of dollars in funding from President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' to purchase and operate a fleet, which would mark the agency's first move away from contracting with plane charter companies, NBC News reported. Jason Houser, ICE's former chief of staff, told NBC News that for the Trump administration to conduct 30,000 to 35,000 deportations a month, it would need to purchase about 30 planes, which would be a multibillion-dollar endeavor. Daily scheduled charter flights used by ICE have an average cost of $8,577 per flight hour, with special high-risk charter flights costing between $6,929 and $26,795 per flight hour depending on aircraft requirements, according to ICE estimates. NBC News noted ICE would need to staff planes with security, medics and pilots if it secures its own fleet, adding maintenance and compliance costs would also factor in. DHS did not confirm NBC's reporting when contacted by Forbes, while ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts : We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here . It does not appear so. Trump has vowed to carry out the largest deportation campaign in history, and his administration is pushing for 1 million deportations per year, according to multiple outlets. ICE deported nearly 150,000 people in the first half of this year, CBS News reported, citing internal government figures that suggest the agency could reach 300,000 deportations by the end of the year. $30 billion. That is how much money was allocated for ICE's removal operations, transportation costs, hiring programs and more in Trump's megabill. Key Background The Trump administration began a wave of deportation flights on Jan. 23, shortly after the president signed executive orders directing the military to the southern border, canceling migrants' advance appointments with border officials and suspending parole programs. A series of the flights were directed to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act, a law last enacted during World War II to make deportations without court orders. The legality of the El Salvador flights is still being challenged in court after a federal judge accused Trump's administration of contempt by carrying them out. As the administration has attempted to ramp up deportation flights, it has also increased the infrastructure needed to support the president's deportation push, creating new immigration detention centers or expanding dozens of pre-existing facilities to house migrants awaiting deportation. The 'Big Beautiful Bill' allocated $45 billion to expand ICE's detention facilities. Further Reading Contempt Proceedings Paused Against Trump Administration Over El Salvador Immigration Flights (Forbes) Everything To Know About Trump's 'Mass Deportation' Plans—ICE Chief Removed Amid Push For More Arrests (Forbes)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lucy Connolly set to be released from prison following jail term for hate tweet
Lucy Connolly, who was jailed for inciting racial hatred in the aftermath of the Southport terror attack, is reportedly set to be released from prison. Connolly, the wife of Conservative councillor Raymond Connolly, will be released on Thursday after being sentenced last year to 31 months in custody, the Telegraph reported. She had posted on X on the day of the murder of three children by Axel Rudakubana in Southport: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it.' She pleaded guilty to inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X and was jailed at Birmingham Crown Court in October last year. Her sentence has been criticised as being too harsh, but Sir Keir Starmer defended it earlier this year. The Prime Minister was asked in May about Connolly's case after her Court of Appeal application against her jail term was dismissed. Asked during Prime Minister's Questions whether her imprisonment was an 'efficient or fair use' of prison, Sir Keir said: 'Sentencing is a matter for our courts, and I celebrate the fact that we have independent courts in this country. 'I am strongly in favour of free speech, we've had free speech in this country for a very long time and we protect it fiercely. 'But I am equally against incitement to violence against other people. I will always support the action taken by our police and courts to keep our streets and people safe.' Connolly's post was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it. Lord Young of Acton, founder and director of the Free Speech Union, said: 'The fact that Lucy Connolly has spent more than a year in prison for a single tweet that she quickly deleted and apologised for is a national scandal, particularly when Labour MPs, councillors and anti-racism campaigners who've said and done much worse have avoided jail. 'The same latitude they enjoyed should have been granted to Lucy.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Majority of public back housing and developments in their area
A majority of people back the idea of new housing or developments where they live, new data has indicated. The poll of 2,005 people conducted by Public First in July found that 55% of respondents would 'generally support new buildings or developments or buildings being built in my local area'. The research found that Labour backers (72%) and young people aged 25-34 (67%) were most likely to be 'Yimby' (yes in my backyard). Reform backers (44%) and people in the East of England (44%) were the most likely groups to say that they generally oppose development in their locality, the poll found. Overall, 33% of people said that they would generally oppose development. Sir Keir Starmer has pledged to put 'builders not blockers first' and 'overhaul the broken planning system'. In December, the Prime Minister announced new mandatory targets for councils when it comes to housebuilding. He said at the time: 'Our plan for change will put builders not blockers first, overhaul the broken planning system and put roofs over the heads of working families and drive the growth that will put more money in people's pockets.' In its report, The Quiet Yes, released on Thursday, Public First argued that a 'more representative planning system' is needed. The policy research organisation recommended that councils bring in changes to surveys and research on public opinion on building plans and questions about how residents would want councils to spend certain money earmarked for development. Jack Airey, director of housing and infrastructure at Public First, said: 'Most people instinctively support new development, yet their voices go unheard. 'Our research finds the public understand the housing shortage and back new homes, but the planning system doesn't reflect that reality. 'Councils and Government should build on this majority view, creating a representative planning system that unlocks support for new homes and the infrastructure communities need.' Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary Angela Rayner has said that Labour are 'overhauling the broken planning system'. She said: 'With investment and reform, Labour is delivering the biggest boost to social and affordable housing in a generation, unleashing a social rent revolution, and embarking on a decade of renewal for social and affordable housing in this country.'
