
‘Democracy' is the new colonialism
The savannah no longer trembles under the boots of British redcoats. It shudders under the impact of slogans. 'Civic engagement' is murmured like a spell. 'Open society' is etched into blackboards where elders once traced cosmologies. The thunder of artillery has been replaced by keynote addresses. A revolution is rehearsed before it is broadcast. The new coup comes dressed for television. The old king disappears, replaced by a consensus candidate with a Yale degree and NATO approval. A constitution is unveiled like a luxury car: shiny, expensive, foreign. No one reads it. It reads them. The people applaud. Their applause is scheduled.
The tyrant's head is displayed: pixelated and streaming. Laugh tracks rise. Purple ink stains the skin like a holy mark, as if casting a vote could cleanse the past and summon salvation. A sacred document lies open, its pages humming with subclauses and subversion. Article 1: Surrender to the algorithm. Article 2: Sterilize the folk soul. Article 3: Criminalize memory. The priests of procedure nod. They light candles made from recycled narratives. They chant slogans curated by Silicon Valley. The TED talk tone becomes the new church service – blessed by click-through rates. Buzzwords are incanted: 'resilience,' 'visibility,' 'empowerment.' Words hollowed out and worn like medals.
The empire has remodeled. It is clad in linen. It carries clipboards. Its armies are task forces. Its tanks are now lettered agencies: USAID, UNHCR, OSCE. Smiles replace bayonets, and seminars replace firing squads. Democracy arrives on a private jet with an Instagram account. Its viceroys order oat-milk lattes while planning cultural transformations. A rainbow banner flies over every blasted zone. Baghdad bleeds beneath the missiles. Tripoli hums with foreign NGOs. Kiev hosts parades that mock its soil. Sacred ruins get rebranded. Temple stones are reused for embassy courtyards. The rituals change. The domination remains.
In a village, a woman sings an ancestral tune. A man offers a prayer in a dialect that has no Unicode. A stone is lifted to rebuild a shrine. These things cannot be allowed. A survey is conducted. A briefing is written. A donor threatens. The local minister corrects course. An election is held. The outcome is known. It always is. This is what they call consent. This is what they mean by freedom.
Uniformity parades as universality. Diversity becomes deletion. Identity is redesigned by foreign interns. Language becomes emoji. The dead are archived. Museums replace tombs. Grandfathers are described in footnotes written by their enemies. Tears fall in exhibition halls where relics of resistance are sanitized. The conquerors mourn – always in public, always with cameras. Their grief is a spectacle. Their mercy is management.
The liberal preacher wears a smile that has been photoshopped. He gives interviews about 'trauma' and 'tolerance.' He never wields a sword; he commissions reports. His gospel: guilt without end. His miracle: the regeneration of conflict. His sacraments are embargoes and media campaigns. He baptizes children in ideology. He breathes in incense made from treaties and sanctions. He sings a hymn with verses about gender fluidity and carbon offset credits. His voice, thin and sweet, drowns entire cultures in its syrup.
Yet across the map, the earth remembers. Forests speak in rustling defiance. Mountains echo with chants unscripted. The Danube shivers beneath steel bridges. The Volga murmurs secrets to the steppe. Across Eurasia, across Africa, across the zones marked 'developing,' something stirs. Trump does not rise as emperor; he crashes through the screen like a malfunction, an interruption in the broadcast. Serbia remembers its ruins. Iran cradles its martyrs. Russia bares its teeth. Hungary builds walls – not out of fear but out of fidelity to her own.
Multipolarity emerges, not like a plan but like a rite remembered. It does not wait for validation. It speaks in a hundred dialects, none requiring translation. It holds torches, not flashlights. It charts no global roadmap. It builds thresholds. It invokes gods buried under glass towers. It honors spirits banned from textbooks. In each land, new mythologies are forged from the ruins of development. The ballot box is abandoned, its promise of mechanical salvation discarded. In its place stands the stone of ancestral law, stained with sacrifice and inscribed with the unspoken codes of blood, land, and loyalty.
So let the ballots fall, let the slogans swirl like ash in the wind. Let the consultants keep writing. None of it halts the return. The sacred pulses again in veins unmapped by Western metrics. Democracy, once garlanded as deliverance, strips down and stands revealed: an agent of extraction, a theater of consent. Multipolarity does not debate it. Multipolarity replaces it – with stone, with flame, with song. The world moves again, towards the myth reborn.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
12 hours ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine's backers won't provide military personnel — Sunday Times
Members of the so-called 'Coalition of the Willing,' comprised of Kiev's European backers, will not be sending troops to Ukraine despite previously floating the idea, The Sunday Times has claimed, citing an anonymous source. Back in March, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that London was prepared to deploy 'boots on the ground and planes in the air, together with others.' Earlier this year, French President Emmanuel Macron had made a similar statement. The hypothetical contingent would be acting in a 'peacekeeping' capacity if and when Kiev and Moscow agree to a ceasefire. However, Germany, Poland, Spain, and Italy have all expressed reluctance or refusal to commit troops for the potential mission. Russia has strongly opposed the stationing of NATO military personnel in the neighboring country under any pretext. In an article on Saturday, the Sunday Times predicted that should the upcoming meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart, Donald Trump, result in a cessation of hostilities in Ukraine, Kiev would likely want to see 'international monitors on the ground.' However, according to the British newspaper, 'it is unlikely that the answer here will be the 'coalition of the willing'.'The publication quoted an unnamed UK defense official as acknowledging that 'no one wants to send their troops to die in Ukraine.' Back in May, the Financial Times, citing an anonymous source, reported that the coalition's plans for a deployment in Ukraine were 'dead' now that the US had refused to provide backing. A little earlier, The Times similarly claimed that the plan was unrealistic due to personnel shortages faced by European militaries. Last month, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov accused European NATO member states of pursuing a 'militaristic [and] confrontational' course. Back in April, Secretary of Russia's National Security Council Sergey Shoigu, who previously served as the country's defense minister, warned that the arrival of NATO troops in Ukraine could lead to a third world war. The Kremlin has repeatedly described the Ukraine conflict as a proxy war being waged against Russia by the West, with Kiev being used as an expendable battering ram.


Russia Today
14 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russia and US ‘very far from detente'
While Washington has recently moved toward fixing relations with Moscow, celebrations would be premature, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov has said. The diplomat added that Russia had earlier this month stopped abiding by a self-imposed moratorium on the deployment of intermediate-range missiles to 'cool hotheads in certain NATO capitals.' While the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty between Moscow and Washington collapsed in 2019, Russia had nonetheless continued observing the restrictions. During his first term in office, President Donald Trump pulled the US out of the accord, citing supposed Russian violations – a claim the Kremlin has denied. In an interview with broadcaster Rossiya-1 on Sunday, Ryabkov observed that 'some sprouts of common sense are appearing in the dialogue with the US, which have been sorely lacking in recent months and years.' However, the use of the term 'détente' would be wholly unwarranted at this point, the deputy minister stressed. Speaking of Russia's decision to lift a self-imposed moratorium on the deployment of intermediate-range missiles, Ryabkov argued that Moscow had no other choice in light of what the 'Americans and their allies, especially the European warmongers, are undertaking.' The Russian Foreign Ministry cited the 'disappearance of conditions for maintaining the unilateral moratorium' in explaining the decision earlier this month. The statement said the West was creating a 'direct threat' to Russian security, with the recent Talisman Sabre exercise in Australia being an example. The drills in mid-July featured the US Typhon mobile ground-based launcher, designed for firing Tomahawk cruise missiles, which have a range up to 1,800km, and SM-6 multipurpose missiles, with a range up to 500km. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated around the same time that Moscow reserves the right to deploy its own intermediate-range missiles 'when deemed necessary,' and would not announce it. Speaking last month, Trump hinted that he would like to resume negotiations with Russia to maintain the existing restrictions on nuclear weapons.


Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Israel's Gaza City plan sparks global condemnation and domestic protests
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his security cabinet approved a new plan on Friday on 'concluding the war' with the Palestinian militant group Hamas in Gaza, which has been dragging on for nearly two years. The plan involves the capture of Gaza City in the north of the Strip , one of the few areas of the Palestinian enclave that the IDF does not control, by Israeli security. Its governance will be handed over to unspecified 'Arab forces." The announcement has drawn widespread international condemnation over the potential implications of the looming attack on the densely populated area, as well as prompted domestic criticism from the Israeli opposition and mass protests. UN 'gravely alarmed' by Israeli move UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has strongly condemned the plan, warning it was bound to further aggravate humanitarian concerns in the enclave while risking fatal consequences for Israeli hostages who remain in the hands of Hamas. 'This decision marks a dangerous escalation and risks deepening the already catastrophic consequences for millions of Palestinians,' the office of Guterres said in a statement, adding that such a push will only lead to 'additional forced displacement, killings, and massive destruction.' A similar reaction was issued by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk, who urged West Jerusalem to drop the scheme immediately. 'The Israeli government's plan for a complete military takeover of the occupied Gaza Strip must be immediately halted,' he said in a statement. Palestinian factions united against occupation plan All the major Palestinian factions have condemned the Israeli announcement. Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the occupied West Bank, has branded it a 'complete crime,' meaning the continuation of 'genocide, systematic killing, starvation, and siege,' paving the way for an 'unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe.' Hamas, which has been the de facto authority of Gaza since 2007, warned the move would seal the fate of the surviving Israeli hostages and amounts to 'sacrificing' them. 'The decision to occupy Gaza confirms that the criminal Netanyahu and his Nazi government do not care about the fate of their captives,' the group said in a statement. Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a major militant faction and a longtime rival of Hamas, said the occupation plan marks 'a new chapter in the war of extermination.' The group demanded that the Arab nations and the West curb the looming escalation. West urges 'restraint' Multiple Western nations, save for the US, have condemned the plan to occupy Gaza City and urged Israel to reconsider it. While Washington effectively gave no reaction to the announcement, earlier in the week, US President Donald Trump said it was 'pretty much up to Israel' whether to fully occupy the enclave. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen urged Israel to 'reconsider' the move, while EU Council head Antonio Costa said the decision 'must have consequences for EU-Israel relations.' Multiple individual members of the bloc have condemned the Israeli announcement as well. For instance, Germany, arguably the second most important strategic ally of Israel after the US, has vowed to restrict its military cooperation with the country. 'Under these circumstances, the German government will not authorize any exports of military equipment that could be used in the Gaza Strip until further notice,' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has said. Occupation plan faces domestic backlash The announcement rocked the Israeli political landscape, with multiple opponents of Netanyahu scrambling to attack the prime minister and his plan. Yair Lapid, opposition leader and the head of the centrist Yesh Atid party, accused Netanyahu of caving in to pressure from far-right cabinet ministers and branded the move a 'disaster that will lead to many more disasters.' 'This is exactly what Hamas wanted: for Israel to be trapped in the territory without a goal, without defining the picture of the day after, in a pointless occupation that no one understands where it is leading,' Lapid said. The stance was echoed by Democrats Party chair Yair Golan, who said the move was bound to become a 'disaster for generations.' The decision was taken contrary to IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir's opinion and amounts to a 'death sentence for the hostages.' The cabinet's decision also reignited protests spearheaded by the relatives of the Israeli hostages, who remain in Hamas' custody. The demonstrators urged the government to wrap up the hostilities instead of widening the military operation and to secure the release of the surviving captives and the return of the bodies of the deceased through diplomacy.