logo
Britain must not recognise Palestinian statehood

Britain must not recognise Palestinian statehood

Telegraph25-07-2025
A seismic shift in the UK's foreign policy could dramatically emerge over the coming weeks as the Government considers whether to recognise a Palestinian state.
Faced with such a landmark decision, we must all hope that the Government is thoroughly stress testing the law of unintended consequences. The Mayor of London certainly hasn't, given his spectacularly one-sided and performative intervention which failed to even mention Hamas.
We are united in our desire for an end to the cycle of unbearable violence in the region, but make no mistake, this dramatic move would backfire by rewarding the extreme protest groups which are actively threatening our democracy and pose a clear and present security threat to the British public.
Advocating for the Palestinians is a legitimate cause, but there are countless examples of Islamist extremists and far-Left groups hurling abuse and threats at elected politicians, disrupting the public through criminal acts and intimidation, targeting Jewish places of worship and gathering and even shaping the outcome of elections. On so many occasions we have witnessed outright calls for the destruction of Israel as well as the verbal and physical targeting of 'Zionists' (a not-so-clever code word for Jews). It's the violence that led the government to proscribe Palestine Action, not the peaceful advocacy.
Ever since Hamas unleashed its heinous pogrom against Israel on that dark October 7 day, Britain's urban centres have been repeatedly turned into seething rivers of rage and intolerance far beyond the realms of freedom of speech – especially Sir Sadiq's increasingly lawless London. Calls for violent jihad and the flags of terror groups brazenly displayed. Shop windows smashed. Terror attacks on the Israeli Embassy in London thwarted. Universities and cultural events invaded and subverted. Actions once unthinkable have effectively been normalised. Ever more people drawn into unacceptable behaviour. They will rejoice should Labour prematurely recognise a Palestinian state.
Note, moreover, that 147 states have already recognised Palestine, without any improvement in the situation. The international law requirements for recognition of a state are a permanent population, defined territory, an effective government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. 'Palestine' meets none of these. A sham recognition will do nothing to change the facts on the ground. This Government has stoutly defended international law and should not contemplate its undermining by mob force and intimidation.
The sobering findings of the Commission on Antisemitism by Lord Mann and Dame Penny Mordaunt, alongside StandWithUs UK's report into rampant anti-Semitism at universities, should give the Government pause for thought before taking actions which could add to an already combustible situation. Rather, top of their agenda should be the implementation of the recommendations of that Commission.
Recent polling of Palestinians shows that a future Palestinian state is likely to be governed by Hamas rather than the deeply unpopular Palestinian Authority. Despite being proscribed as a terror group in the UK, the Government is risking presenting Hamas with the ultimate gift of statehood. Hamas' leaders have been clear about their intentions to repeat the October 7 massacre again and so the nightmare will tragically continue for Israelis and Palestinians alike.
It would also pose an enormous challenge to the UK's overstretched police forces and a major test for our exceptional security services. Their efforts to counter those that support terrorism at home would be compromised by the very legitimacy that the British government would bestow upon Hamas and hence its followers. British cheerleaders of Hamas can hardly believe their luck. Nor can Iran, whose fingerprints are visible on so much of this – its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps will be emboldened to plot even more terror attacks on UK soil. Public displays of anti-Semitism will become the norm.
The list of harmful consequences goes on. It would create a crisis in the UK's all-important relationship with the US at a time of global precarity, and send a signal to the likes of Iran, Russia and China – let alone terror groups – that violence pays. The increased likelihood of wars abroad and terrorism at home will cost British lives and taxpayers.
offered a state and turned it down. That is not what they want. They want the removal of Israel.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Helping starving Gazans from 3,000 miles away in Manchester
Helping starving Gazans from 3,000 miles away in Manchester

Channel 4

time6 minutes ago

  • Channel 4

Helping starving Gazans from 3,000 miles away in Manchester

Ghassan was sitting in his Manchester room when we arrived to meet him. He was answering phone calls from his team trying to work out how many families they could feed – 3,000 miles away in Gaza. Ghassan Ghaben, who is Palestinian and was born in Gaza, is the co-founder of Reviving Gaza, a mutual aid group set up to help displaced Palestinian families. He runs the group with his sister Amal, who's now based in Egypt, and a network of volunteers inside the strip. At first, their focus was on helping people survive the bombardment or displacement. But now, they're are simply trying to feed as many people as possible. In March, Israel cut off all supplies to Gaza. By May, some aid resumed but under new restrictions. The UN has since warned that the worst-case scenario of famine is currently unfolding in the Gaza Strip. Starvation is spreading and children under five are dying from hunger-related causes. Ghassan says: 'The Israelis don't wany any organisations working efficiently in Gaza and distributing food the way it should be distributed. They want chaos. Those big organisations are not able to do any work but for us it's different. We have the people from there and they have the contacts.' 'The Israelis don't wany any organisations working efficiently in Gaza and distributing food the way it should be distributed. They want chaos.' – Ghassan Ghaben The Israeli authorities deny they are blocking the flow of aid and say the UN are failing to distribute it. They also accuse Hamas of stealing it, but internal US government analysis also found no evidence of systematic theft of US-funded aid. But since May, the main way to get aid has been at the controversial US-Israel backed GHF sites. Not everyone is able to access aid distribution sites and prices have skyrocketed in Gaza's markets. So the Reviving Gaza team are stepping in, using money raised from donations to buy food that is too expensive for most Gazans – and then distributing it more evenly. Amal says they're focused on helping the most vulnerable 'orphans, mothers alone, and the elderly', those who have no way of accessing food. But with limited access to food and funds, they can only feed families day by day. Later in the afternoon, Ghassan calls Ola, one of the team's volunteers in Gaza. The 20 year old smiles as Ghassan calls but her smile hides the risks of the job. At least three Reviving Gaza volunteers have been killed, among them Frans Al Salmi – a talented artist and life-long friend of Amal's who was in charge of aid distribution in the north. 'I know she's not with me now but her soul is with me always. I open her messages everyday.' For Amal, Frans's legacy is about Gazans helping each other survive; one day at a time. Only 14 per cent of aid needed has entered Gaza since May, Israeli data shows 'Skin on top of bones': Gaza aid coming in, but not enough Should Israel be held accountable for Gaza aid queue deaths?

Newshour  Funerals held for Al Jazeera journalists killed in Gaza
Newshour  Funerals held for Al Jazeera journalists killed in Gaza

BBC News

time7 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Newshour Funerals held for Al Jazeera journalists killed in Gaza

The Israeli military says it targeted 28-year-old correspondent Anas al-Sharif, alleging he had "served as the head of a terrorist cell in Hamas", but has produced little evidence to support that claim. We speak to Al Jazeera's Managing Editor. Also in the programme: The Colombian Senator Miguel Uribe Turbay has died from wounds sustained when he was shot at a campaign rally in June; and mentally fit at 96 - we meet the man willing to have his mental arithmetic tested on a television gameshow. (Photo: Al Jazeera staff members gather at the network's studios, to remember their colleagues Anas Al-Sharif, Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and another colleague, who were killed in Gaza City by an Israeli strike. Credit: Reuters/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa)

Prince Andrew has no public future - and lack of royal status 'annoys him', author claims
Prince Andrew has no public future - and lack of royal status 'annoys him', author claims

Sky News

time33 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Prince Andrew has no public future - and lack of royal status 'annoys him', author claims

The author of a new book about Prince Andrew has called for "more accountability from the Royal Family and more transparency" after encountering what he claims was considerable secrecy while researching his book. Andrew Lownie has spent four years working on Entitled: The Rise And Fall Of The House Of York - a book unauthorised by Prince Andrew - and submitted hundreds of Freedom of Information requests to government departments. However, he has revealed to Sky News that all of his applications for information about Prince Andrew and his official work were knocked back. The royal household and the royal archive are already exempt from FOI requests. Image: Andrew Lownie Speaking ahead of the book's publication, which has already attracted considerable attention because of more lurid claims about the duke, Mr Lownie told Sky News: "Clearly there are details that people have picked up on and run with. And you know, that's inevitable in these sort of books." But he added: "If they're to earn our trust and support, they have to show that they are not hiding things - that they are behaving well." Mr Lownie said he was given a catalogue of reasons by the likes of the Foreign Office and the Department for Business and Trade as to why they couldn't help with information about Prince Andrew's public work as a trade envoy in the 2000s. Sky News was shown a selection of those response letters. "They blame everything from security reasons, to cost and man hours, to data protection, to my questions being too broad," the author said. But Mr Lownie believes it's in the interest of the Windsors to be more open if they want to guarantee long-term backing from the public, and he hopes his book may trigger more calls for greater transparency. Read more UK news: Met Police make 'most arrests in a decade' at protest Major incident as crews battle wildfire near Bournemouth Image: All of his applications for information were knocked back It comes as a new YouGov report found that Prince Andrew remains the most unpopular royal in the country, with 87% of people having a negative view of him. According to the survey, just 5% of people have a favourable view of the Duke of York. The poll also found the royals are less popular with a younger audience. Only 36% of 18 to 24-years-olds believe the monarchy is good for the country, compared with about 60% of Britons overall. The generational difference is underlined given 81% of over-65s think Britain should continue to have a monarchy, but this falls with each age group to just 41% of 18 to 24s. Stories about Prince Andrew continue to attract a huge amount of attention and regularly still make him a difficult distraction for the Royal Family. Mr Lownie says he got no sense of any appetite to reintroduce him into public life while doing his research. "I don't think he has any public future. I would say his private future is pretty limited too. I mean, he lives in Royal Lodge [on the Windsor Estate], he plays golf, watches TV, and presumably sees his grandchildren ... he's living the life of a retired man." Image: Lownie speaking to Sky's Rhiannon Mills But according to one member of staff, the removal of his royal and military titles has stung more than Prince Andrew has publicly shown. "What most annoys him is his lack of a royal status," Mr Lownie added. "That's what really sort of gave him his whole sense of identity. And that's, you know, it's not being able to put on his uniforms and strut around and being self-important." Buckingham Palace has not made any comments on the book as the Duke of York is no longer a working royal. Sky News approached the Duke of York's office but received no response.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store