Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's harassment claims denied in court
A federal judge on Tuesday denied Elon Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI's claims of a 'years-long harassment campaign' by the Tesla CEO against the company he co-founded in 2015 and later abandoned before ChatGPT became a global phenomenon.
In the latest turn in a court battle that kicked off last year, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Musk must face OpenAI's claims that the billionaire, through press statements, social media posts, legal claims and 'a sham bid for OpenAI's assets' had attempted to harm the AI startup.
Musk sued OpenAI and its CEO Sam Altman last year over the company's transition to a for-profit model, accusing the company of straying from its founding mission of developing AI for the good of humanity, not profit.
OpenAI countersued Musk in April, accusing the billionaire of engaging in fraudulent business practices under California law. Musk then asked for OpenAI's counterclaims to be dismissed or delayed until a later stage in the case.
OpenAI argued in May its countersuit should not be put on hold, and the judge on Tuesday concluded that the company's allegations were legally sufficient to proceed.
A jury trial has been scheduled for spring 2026.
(Reporting by Deborah Sophia in Bengaluru; Editing by Devika Syamnath)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Sun
3 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
Apple rejects Musk claim of App Store bias
A US judge has cleared the way for a trial in US court over claims that Elon Musk (R) has been on a campaign to damage ChatGPT maker OpenAI, run by co-founder Sam Altman (L) Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS, Sergei GAPON / AFP/File San Francisco (United States) (AFP) — Apple on Thursday rejected Elon Musk's claim that its digital App Store favours OpenAI's ChatGPT over his company's Grok and other rival AI assistants. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Musk has accused Apple of giving unfair preference to ChatGPT on its App Store and threatened legal action, triggering a fiery exchange with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman this week. 'The App Store is designed to be fair and free of bias,' Apple said in reply to an AFP inquiry. 'We feature thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria.' Apple added that its goal at the App Store is to offer 'safe discovery' for users and opportunities for developers to get their creations noticed. But earlier this week, Musk said Apple was 'behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation,' without providing evidence to back his claim. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'xAI will take immediate legal action,' he said on his social media network X, referring to his own artificial intelligence company, which is responsible for Grok. X users responded by pointing out that China's DeepSeek AI hit the top spot in the App Store early this year, and Perplexity AI recently ranked number one in the App Store in India. DeepSeek and Perplexity compete with OpenAI and Musk's startup xAI. Altman called Musk's accusation 'remarkable' in a response on X, charging that Musk himself is said to 'manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like.' Musk called Altman a 'liar' in the heated exchange. OpenAI and xAI recently released new versions of ChatGPT and Grok. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. App Store rankings listed ChatGPT as the top free app for iPhones on Thursday, with Grok in seventh place. Factors going into App Store rankings include user engagement, reviews and the number of downloads. Grok was temporarily suspended on Monday in the latest controversy surrounding the chatbot. No official explanation was provided for the suspension, which followed multiple accusations of misinformation including the bot's misidentification of war-related images — such as a false claim that an AFP photo of a starving child in Gaza was taken in Yemen years earlier. Last month, Grok triggered an online storm after inserting antisemitic comments into answers without prompting. In a statement on Grok's X account later that month, the company apologized 'for the horrific behavior that many experienced.' A US judge has cleared the way for a trial to consider OpenAI legal claims accusing Musk — a co-founder of the company — of waging a 'relentless campaign' to damage the organization after it achieved success following his departure. The litigation is another round in a bitter feud between the generative AI start-up and the world's richest person. Musk founded xAI in 2023 to compete with OpenAI and the other major AI players. Sunshine Girls Toronto & GTA Sunshine Girls World Columnists
CTV News
3 minutes ago
- CTV News
U.S. State Department targets Online News Act in human rights report
President Donald Trump speaks during an event in the Oval Office to mark the 90th anniversary of the Social Security Act, Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) OTTAWA — The U.S. State Department has released a new human rights report that takes aim at Canada's Online News Act. The bill, which requires Meta and Google to compensate news publishers for the use of their content, is cited in a section of the report on freedom of the press. Prime Minister Mark Carney indicated last week he is open to repealing the legislation. While Meta pulled news from its platforms in response to the 2023 law, news outlets are now receiving payments from a $100 million Google fund. Carney killed a digital services tax that would have applied to many large U.S. tech companies after U.S. President Donald Trump halted trade negotiations with Canada over the tax. Last week, a group of U.S. Republicans urged the Trump administration to push Canada to kill a separate bill that forces large streaming companies like Netflix and Amazon to make financial contributions to Canadian content and news. Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press
National Post
3 minutes ago
- National Post
Gold Reserve Provides Update on Adjournment of August 18, 2025 Sale Hearing
Article content PEMBROKE, Bermuda — Gold Reserve Ltd. (TSX.V: GRZ) (BSX: (OTCQX: GDRZF) ('Gold Reserve' or the 'Company') announces that the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (the 'Court') issued an order today in which it adjourned the start of the Sale Hearing from the currently scheduled August 18, 2025, to an as-yet unspecified future date. The Court also requested further briefing from the parties, and scheduled an in-person hearing on August 18, 2025, on this and related issues. Article content The Court stated its rationale for the adjournment as follows: Article content The Court reaches this conclusion reluctantly, but in the face of the following realities: a Sale Hearing held on August 18 would be directed to evaluating whether to accept the Special Master's recommendation to approve the Dalinar Energy bid, but the Special Master has recently received an unsolicited bid he is currently evaluating and which he may determine is a 'Superior Proposal' to Dalinar's (as defined in the Dalinar SPA); if the Special Master determines he has received a Superior Proposal, Dalinar is entitled to time to match it; although all discovery undertaken and briefing received to date is directed to the Dalinar bid, there is some possibility the Special Master may no longer be recommending approval of that bid, which could render a Sale Hearing focused on the Dalinar bid unnecessary. While Gold Reserve may be correct that the unsolicited bid presently being evaluated is 'a non-actionable underbid' (O.I. 2050 at 2) (emphasis omitted), the Court is not able to make a determination on this point in time to go forward with a Sale Hearing four days from now, especially since the Special Master has not yet completed his evaluation of the unsolicited bid. Article content The Court stated its 'inclinations as to appropriate next steps' as follows: Article content At this time, the Court's inclinations as to the appropriate next steps are to: (i) order the Special Master to determine, no later than August 25, whether he is adhering to his recommendation of the Dalinar bid or, instead, has received a Superior Proposal; (ii) order the Special Master to submit, no later than August 29, a proposed schedule for additional limited discovery, if any, necessitated by whatever decision he has made by August 25 and any additional, streamlined briefing; (iii) reschedule the Sale Hearing for some or all of the following dates: September 15-18, October 20-23; (iv) require any entity intending to participate in the Sale Hearing to request a specific, total number of hours it will use at the hearing for its examination of witnesses and argument (to include opening statements and closing arguments); and (v) provide a schedule and page limits for expedited post-hearing briefing and submission of proposed findings of fact. Article content The Court summarized its Order, and requested further briefing from the Special Master and parties on the foregoing inclinations, as follows: Article content ORDER: The Sale Hearing is CONTINUED to a date to be determined by separate order, after the Court receives additional input from the Special Master, Sale Process Parties, Additional Judgment Creditors, and any other interested entity. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Saturday, August 16 deadline for sur-replies in response to pending objections is VACATED. The Court will hold an in-person hearing on Monday, August 18, at 10:00 a.m. at the J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building, Courtroom 2A. The hearing is not an evidentiary hearing and all witnesses who were planning to testify are excused from appearing in Wilmington next week. The Special Master and Sale Process Parties shall, and any Additional Judgment Creditor or other interested entity may, (i) file opening briefs regarding the above inclinations, not to exceed 5 pages, no later than Saturday, August 16, at 12:00 p.m., and (ii) file response briefs, not to exceed 3 pages, no later than Sunday, August 17, at 5:00 p.m. Article content A copy of the Court's Order, the adjournment request, and the Company's opposition to the adjournment request will be posted shortly here. Article content A complete description of the Delaware sale proceedings can be found on the Public Access to Court Electronic Records system in Crystallex International Corporation v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, 1:17-mc-00151-LPS (D. Del.) and its related proceedings. Article content Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking statements Article content This release contains 'forward-looking statements' within the meaning of applicable U.S. federal securities laws and 'forward-looking information' within the meaning of applicable Canadian provincial and territorial securities laws and state Gold Reserve's and its management's intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or predictions for the future. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. They are frequently characterized by words such as 'anticipates', 'plan', 'continue', 'expect', 'project', 'intend', 'believe', 'anticipate', 'estimate', 'may', 'will', 'potential', 'proposed', 'positioned' and other similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions 'may' or 'will' occur. Forward-looking statements contained in this press release include, but are not limited to, statements relating to any bid submitted by the Company for the purchase of the PDVH shares (the 'Bid'). Article content We caution that such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other risks that may cause the actual events, outcomes or results of Gold Reserve to be materially different from our estimated outcomes, results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: the discretion of the Special Master to consider the Bid, to enter into any discussions or negotiation with respect thereto; the Bid will not be approved by the Court as the 'Final Recommend Bid' under the Bidding Procedures, and if approved by the Court may not close, including as a result of not obtaining necessary regulatory approvals, including but not limited to any necessary approvals from the U.S. Office of Foreign Asset Control ('OFAC'), the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission or the TSX Venture Exchange; failure of the Company or any other party to obtain sufficient equity and/or debt financing or any required shareholders approvals for, or satisfy other conditions to effect, any transaction resulting from the Bid; that the Company may forfeit any cash amount deposit made due to failing to complete the Bid or otherwise; that the making of the Bid or any transaction resulting therefrom may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; that, prior to or as a result of the completion of any transaction contemplated by the Bid, the business of the Company may experience significant disruptions due to transaction related uncertainty, industry conditions, tariff wars or other factors; the ability to enforce the writ of attachment granted to the Company; the timing set for various reports and/or other matters with respect to the Sale Process may not be met; the ability of the Company to otherwise participate in the Sale Process (and related costs associated therewith Article content ) Article content ; the amount, if any, of proceeds associated with the Sale Process; the competing claims of other creditors of Venezuela, PDVSA and the Company, including any interest on such creditors' judgements and any priority afforded thereto; uncertainties with respect to possible settlements between Venezuela and other creditors and the impact of any such settlements on the amount of funds that may be available under the Sale Process; and the proceeds from the Sale Process may not be sufficient to satisfy the amounts outstanding under the Company's September 2014 arbitral award and/or corresponding November 15, 2015 U.S. judgement in full; and the ramifications of bankruptcy with respect to the Sale Process and/or the Company's claims, including as a result of the priority of other claims. This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of the Company's forward-looking statements. For a more detailed discussion of the risk factors affecting the Company's business, see the Company's Management's Discussion & Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2024 and other reports that have been filed on SEDAR+ and are available under the Company's profile at Article content Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Gold Reserve or persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this notice. Gold Reserve disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, subject to its disclosure obligations under applicable rules promulgated by applicable Canadian provincial and territorial securities laws. Article content Article content Article content
