logo
A moment that changed me: I resolved to reduce my screen time – and it was a big mistake

A moment that changed me: I resolved to reduce my screen time – and it was a big mistake

The Guardian15 hours ago
I unlocked my iPhone screen at the precise moment that my weekly screen time notification appeared – accidentally dismissing it before I could take a screenshot – and promptly erupted into a rage. I had spent an excruciating week resolutely not looking at my phone, part of a month-long effort to whittle my daily screen time down from more than four hours a day to less than an hour, with the hope of improving my mental wellbeing (and possibly carving out a career as an inspirational speaker). But my efforts felt futile without being able to post evidence online about how offline I had become. I frantically Googled how to retrieve notifications (you cannot) and – briefly – considered re-creating my screen time report in Photoshop.
Over the past decade or two, my efforts at self-improvement have taken various forms: the year where I read 105 books; the period during which I gave up all forms of sugar including, misguidedly, fruit; and a dalliance with shamanism that, I'm sorry to say, included interpretive dance. Some might suggest I would be better off learning to cook, or drive, or type with more than one finger, but they can't reach me because I no longer look at my phone.
'Project Screen Time' began after I listened to a podcast in which a comedian claimed that you shouldn't look at social media within two hours of waking up, because it messes with your dopamine, or something. This is my favourite kind of advice: uncited, from the mouth of a layperson who can't remember how they acquired it. But I gave up opening Instagram first thing in the morning and … it worked. Miraculously, choosing not to sandblast my brain with pictures of other people's abs before I was fully conscious did improve my mood. Even better, I found that if I didn't look at my socials first thing, I could often resist until after lunch. As is typically the case when I embark on a new regime, this brief moment of clarity quickly became a frenzy.
I traded one obsession (looking at my phone) for another (not looking at it). In my second week, I was down to two hours of screen time a day. By my third, it was an hour and a half – and I became determined to get it below 60 minutes. Part of me was impressed that I could appear normal while quietly (nobly?) wielding this superpower. However, I was unable to keep my gift a secret. I soon began boring friends, acquaintances and service workers with tales of my herculean discipline.
Before long, my quest was disrupting my day in new ways. I resented having to open Maps on my phone, so I found myself getting lost while cycling to appointments. If I wanted to show someone a picture or a meme, I would ask to Google it on their phone, rather than my own. I refused to order Ubers after nights out (the painstaking process of watching a cab crawl towards my location while the minutes of screen time racked up was torturous) and instead offered to transfer the money (later, on my laptop) to whoever did.
I became increasingly frustrated that my screen time wasn't lower. I would get to 2pm having barely glanced at my phone and yet the data would claim I had used it for 36 minutes. I began to think conspiratorially. My screen time was displayed in a graph split into blue (social), turquoise (entertainment) and orange (productivity and finance). But the vast majority of the chart was made up of undelineated grey. What was the grey?!
Eventually, screen time was added to the list of subjects (including the music and lore of Taylor Swift and my attraction to Ron DeSantis) that I was forbidden from discussing at home. My lowest point arrived as I was showing a friend my weekly stats, which gives you a breakdown of how long you've spent on each app. He queried why 'Settings' was my third most-used application – and I had to admit it was because that was how I compulsively checked my screen time.
My tantrum over being unable to memorialise my lowest-ever screen report (51 minutes a day!) was a wake-up call; reducing my screen time had become its own form of phone addiction. Rather than escaping the need to seek validation from strangers online, I had happened upon a new way to earn their approval. But all was not lost. The realisation nudged me towards acceptance that I will probably never be a moderate person; I can't rely on any form of self-regulation (my latest regime – skincare – revolves around an LED mask that automatically switches off after 10 minutes, otherwise I fear I would be wearing it to the office like a DayGlo Hannibal Lecter).
In the end, I stopped trying to recapture my screen-time report, instead screenshotting the less aesthetic chart in my settings to post online. Within minutes, DMs flooded in from people congratulating me on my self-restraint and asking how I had managed to quit my phone. I replied to them all, dopamine flooding my brain's starved reward centre. That day, my screen time was three hours and 36 minutes.
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Botanic Tonics, Maker of feel free, Applauds Florida's Historic Ban on Synthetic 7-OH Drug Products
Botanic Tonics, Maker of feel free, Applauds Florida's Historic Ban on Synthetic 7-OH Drug Products

Reuters

time29 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Botanic Tonics, Maker of feel free, Applauds Florida's Historic Ban on Synthetic 7-OH Drug Products

BROKEN ARROW, OK, August 13, 2025 (EZ Newswire) -- Botanic Tonics, opens new tab, maker of feel free, today applauded Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier's announcement making Florida the first state to ban the sale of 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH) products. The historic action, announced at Tampa General Hospital alongside FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary, Florida Surgeon General Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD, and other medical and enforcement officials, targets synthetic drug compounds that can be "more potent than morphine" while preserving access to traditional botanical products. Florida Targets Synthetic Drug, Not Natural Kratom Leaf Florida's ban specifically addresses concentrated 7-OH products that cause serious side effects including liver toxicity and seizures. These synthetic compounds are chemically distinct from the trace amounts that occur naturally in traditional kratom leaf through centuries-old drying processes. The FDA has expressed concern about widespread availability of concentrated 7-OH products in gas stations, corner stores, and vape shops — products that contain synthetic levels far exceeding what occurs in nature. Commissioner Makary previously stated that kratom leaf poses no significant public risk, while concentrated 7-OH represents an entirely different safety profile. feel free CLASSIC: Setting the Safety Standard Botanic Tonics' feel free CLASSIC exemplifies the clear distinction Florida's action reinforces. The product does not contain synthetic 7-OH, the compound now banned in Florida. Instead, feel free CLASSIC contains only whole kratom leaf sourced from noble varieties traditionally consumed for centuries in Pacific Island cultures, combined with kava root in water. With over 129 million servings sold since April 2020 and fewer than 0.001% complaints, feel free CLASSIC maintains the strongest safety record of any kratom leaf product on the market. The product contains no synthetic ingredients, no alcohol, and no concentrates — only natural botanical ingredients with every batch tested to ensure safe alkaloid levels. Clinical Validation Demonstrates Safety feel free CLASSIC remains the only product of its kind with proper clinical validation through a double-blind, placebo-controlled study published in the peer-reviewed medical journal Cureus. The research found no significant adverse effects across all dose ranges, confirming the safety profile of traditional botanical ingredients when properly manufactured and tested. Independent toxicologists from the University of Florida have reviewed all evidence and confirm the product presents no unreasonable health risks. The FDA conducted its own clinical trial using the exact same kratom leaf found in feel free CLASSIC and concluded the product shows no evidence of significant risk to consumers. Regulatory Leadership Creates National Framework Florida's decision creates a framework that other states may follow, with lawmakers set to codify the ban during the January 2026 legislative session. The action builds upon the FDA's July recommendation to schedule synthetic 7-OH under the Controlled Substances Act and June warning letters to seven companies illegally distributing these products. Botanic Tonics has consistently advocated for regulatory frameworks that distinguish between synthetic derivatives and traditional kratom leaf ingredients with documented safety profiles. The company manufactures all products in its FDA-registered, cGMP-certified facility in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, using rigorous testing protocols that confirm product purity and natural alkaloid profiles. Consumer Education Remains Critical Florida's historic action validates the importance of consumer education about product distinctions in the marketplace. The difference between feel free CLASSIC and the synthetic 7-OH products now banned in Florida demonstrates why clear regulatory boundaries protect consumers while preserving access to traditional kratom leaf botanicals with proven safety records. Botanic Tonics remains committed to working with authorities at all levels to ensure consumers have access to safe, properly regulated botanical products backed by clinical evidence and manufacturing excellence. About Botanic Tonics Botanic Tonics is a plant-based, herbal supplement company headquartered in Broken Arrow, OK. Established in 2020, we produce kava-centric tonics under our feel free brand. Our signature product, feel free CLASSIC, is crafted with ancient functional plants to provide mood lift, chilled energy, and enhanced focus. Botanic Tonics' products are manufactured in an FDA-registered, cGMP-certified facility, and we actively support consumer safety regulations through transparent labeling and educational resources. Learn more at opens new tab. Disclaimer Warning: This product contains natural kratom leaf which, like caffeine and alcohol, may be habit-forming and harmful if consumed irresponsibly. Avoid if you have a history of substance abuse. When consumed as recommended, feel free CLASSIC has not been shown to cause any serious physical or social harm. Caution: Not for consumption by or sale to persons under the age of 21. May interact with certain medications — consult a licensed, qualified healthcare professional before use. Do not consume with excessive alcohol. This product is not intended for those who are sensitive to the active ingredients or women who are pregnant, nursing, or trying to become pregnant. To learn more, visit our Consumer Education page, opens new tab. Media Contact Botanic Tonicsmedia@ ### SOURCE: Botanic Tonics Copyright 2025 EZ Newswire See release on EZ Newswire

Mysterious tick-borne illness forces island getaway loved by the wealthy to go VEGAN
Mysterious tick-borne illness forces island getaway loved by the wealthy to go VEGAN

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Mysterious tick-borne illness forces island getaway loved by the wealthy to go VEGAN

Martha's Vineyard has been forced to go vegan due to an explosion of tick-borne illnesses this summer. The island, which sits off the coast of Massachusetts and serves as a getaway for celebrities and wealthy New Englanders, is known not only for its picturesque beaches but also its fresh seafood, meat and soft cheeses. However, these upscale staples have been ousted from menus at the island's busiest restaurants as a tick-borne disease that makes people allergic to animal products surges on the island. The lone star tick, or Amblyomma americanum, is an aggressive tick found in the Northeast, South and Midwest, distinguished by a signature white 'lone star' on its back. Just one bite from it can cause people to become deathly allergic to meat and dairy, a condition called alpha-gal syndrome. When a person eats these foods, the body detects alpha-gal molecules in them and attacks, leading to a life-threatening immune response. Cases of alpha-gal syndrome are 'skyrocketing,' experts have warned, with data from Martha's Vineyard Hospital showing 532 out of 1,254 tests, or 42 percent, resulting positive for the condition last year. This is a stark difference from just five years ago, when two out of nine total tests - 22 percent - were positive. Dr Ed Caldwell, an ear, nose and throat doctor and allergist on Martha's Vineyard, told 'I have it, my sister has it and I see on average three to four patients a day with it, which has rapidly increased from about one a week a couple of years ago. 'Martha's Vineyard has always been an epicenter for tick-related diseases but now has become an epicenter for alpha-gal sensitivity. This seems to be directly related to the expansion of the Lone Star tick here. 'The incidence of the number of people who have this allergy is expanding exponentially.' Alpha-gal syndrome is an allergy to alpha-gal, a molecule naturally produced in the bodies of most mammals except humans, as well as saliva of the lone star tick. When a tick bites, it transfers alpha-gal into a person's blood, which sets off an immune reaction. People with the condition then suffer severe allergic reactions when they eat products made from mammals like red meat and some forms of dairy like milk and cheese. Dr Maria Knobel, co-founder and medical director of Medical Cert UK, told 'In alpha-gal syndrome, a small amount of mammalian elements can set off a response hours after.' Typical symptoms of reactions include hives or rashes, nausea or vomiting, stomach pain, heartburn, diarrhea, trouble breathing, low blood pressure, dizziness or fainting and swelling of the lips, throat, tongue or eye lids. Dr Gerry Yukevich, an internist at Martha's Vineyard Medical, told this website: 'The rapidity of alpha-gal is astounding. 'Most often, the reaction comes between three and six hours after the meal, which makes it hard to connect to the that they may have contracted alpha-gal.' The CDC identified about 110,000 cases of alpha-gal syndrome from 2010 to 2022, the latest data available, though cases are not strictly tracked. The agency estimates roughly 450,000 Americans may actually be affected. Martha's Vineyard is already a hotspots for deer ticks, which spread Lyme disease, but one-eighth inch long lone star ticks can live in more areas like beaches and freshly mowed lawns, given them a wider reach. And because alpha-gal is naturally found in lone star tick saliva, a bite from all stages of the tick life cycle pose a risk. Lyme disease, on the other hand, only spreads from deer ticks to humans after a tick has had its first blood meal from an infected host. Carla Cooper, an ecologist on Martha's Vineyard, learned she had contracted alpha-gal syndrome in the summer of 2023 when she ate a hamburger and ice cream from a local restaurant and suddenly couldn't breathe. The shortness of breath persisted for weeks after. She told Martha's Vineyard Magazine: 'I couldn't walk to the end of my driveway.' Jannette Vanderhoop also developed an alpha-gal syndrome reaction from a hamburger. She told Martha's Vineyard Magazine that she can still have dairy, but Cooper has had to swear off both dairy and red meat. Vanderhoop, who cut out red meat and pork, said: 'My diet is definitely different. I'm so sick of chicken and turkey.' Restaurant owners on the island also have to be hypervigilant, Johnny Graham, founder of Revel Catering & Events, told Graham said: 'Running a busy catering company on Martha's Vineyard, we have seen a drastic upturn in requests for alpha-gal friendly menus in all departments, especially over the last two years. 'Cocktail parties, weddings, platter service, dinner parties, everything. 'We are in the midst of rewriting the entire library of menu items in our software database to acknowledge alpha-gal friendly items right alongside other dietary restrictions such as peanuts, gluten intolerance, dairy free, vegan, etc.' The condition can even make grocery shopping in general more difficult. Dr Knobel told this website: 'Food manufacturers occasionally alter a recipe without notice and I have found vegetable soup mixes that suddenly contained beef extract. 'This may put an individual in great danger when he/she orders a dish he/she has already consumed before and has confidence that it has not been contaminated.' She urges restaurants to keep a running list of all ingredients used by all food suppliers and review it monthly to see if anything additional that is meat or dairy-based has been added, similar to measures Graham has put in place. Dr Yukevich told this website: 'One of our main efforts now is to educate the public on how prevalent this problem is and how they should take precautions in avoiding tick bites and get medical attention immediately if they detect a sensitivity to meat or dairy products in their diet.'

US judge blocks Trump religious exemption to birth control coverage
US judge blocks Trump religious exemption to birth control coverage

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

US judge blocks Trump religious exemption to birth control coverage

Aug 13 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Wednesday struck down rules adopted during President Donald Trump's first term that exempt employers with religious or moral objections from having to provide workers with insurance coverage for birth control. U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone in Philadelphia said the 2018 rules were not justified, rejecting the Trump administration's claims that they were necessary to protect the rights of religious employers. The ruling came in a lawsuit by Pennsylvania and New Jersey that reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 2020 upheld the rules on technical grounds but did not address their merits. The U.S. Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Little Sisters of the Poor, a Roman Catholic order of nuns that intervened in the case to defend the rules, will appeal the ruling, according to the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a nonprofit that represents the order. The federal Affordable Care Act requires employers to provide insurance coverage for contraception but allows those with religious objections to seek exemptions. The 2018 rules created a blanket exemption for employers with religious or moral objections to contraception. The Trump administration said that even requiring employers to apply for an exemption could burden their religious practice, in violation of federal law. But Beetlestone on Wednesday said there was a mismatch between the vast scope of the exemption and the relatively small number of employers who may need it. That "casts doubt on whether ... there is a rational connection between the problem the Agencies identified and the solution they had chosen," wrote Beetlestone, an appointee of President Barack Obama, a Democrat. The administration of President Joe Biden, a Democrat, had proposed withdrawing the Trump administration rules in 2023 but that proposal was withdrawn weeks before Biden left office in January.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store