20 states sue FEMA for canceling grant program that guards against natural disasters
The lawsuit contends President Donald Trump's administration acted illegally when it announced in April that it was ending the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program. FEMA canceled some projects already in the works and refused to approve new ones despite funding from Congress.
'In the wake of devastating flooding in Texas and other states, it's clear just how critical federal resources are in helping states prepare for and respond to natural disasters,' said Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell of Massachusetts, where the federal lawsuit was filed. 'By abruptly and unlawfully shutting down the BRIC program, this administration is abandoning states and local communities that rely on federal funding to protect their residents and, in the event of disaster, save lives.'
FEMA did not immediately respond Wednesday to a request for comment. It said in April that the program was 'wasteful and ineffective' and 'more concerned with political agendas than helping Americans affected by natural disasters.'
The program, established by a 2000 law, provides grants for a variety of disaster mitigation efforts, including levees to protect against floods, safe rooms to provide shelter from tornadoes, vegetation management to reduce damage from fires and seismic retrofitting to fortify buildings for earthquakes.
During his first term, Trump signed a law shoring up funding for disaster risk reduction efforts. The program then got a $1 billion boost from an infrastructure law signed by former President Joe Biden. That law requires FEMA to make available at least $200 million annually for disaster mitigation grants for the 2022-2026 fiscal years, the lawsuit says.
The suit contends the Trump administration violated the constitutional separation of powers because Congress had not authorized the program's demise. It also alleges the program's termination was illegal because the decision was made while FEMA was under the leadership of an acting administrator who had not met the requirements to be in charge of the agency.
The lawsuit says communities in every state have benefited from federal disaster mitigation grants, which saved lives and spared homes, businesses, hospitals and schools from costly damage.
Some communities have already been affected by the decision to end the program.
Hillsborough, North Carolina, had been awarded nearly $7 million to relocate a wastewater pumping station out of a flood plain and make other water and sewer system improvements. But that hadn't happened yet when the remnants of Tropical Storm Chantal damaged the pumping station and forced it offline last week.
In rural Mount Pleasant, North Carolina, town officials had hoped to use more than $4 million from the BRIC program to improve stormwater drainage and safeguard a vulnerable electric system, thus protecting investments in a historic theater and other businesses. While the community largely supports Trump, assistant town manager Erin Burris said people were blindsided by the lost funding they had spent years pursuing.
'I've had downtown property owners saying, 'What do we do?'' Burris said. 'I've got engineering plans ready to go and I don't have the money to do it.'
___
Associated Press reporters Jack Brook, Michael Casey and Gary D. Robertson contributed to this report. ___
Brook is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs executive order making it easier to remove homeless people from streets
President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday making it easier for local jurisdictions to remove homeless people from the streets. The order directs Attorney General Pam Bondi to 'reverse judicial precedents and end consent decrees' that limit jurisdictions' abilities to relocate homeless people. It also redirects federal resources so that affected homeless people are transferred to rehabilitation and substance misuse facilities. It also directs Bondi to work with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy to fast-track federal funding to states and municipalities that crack down on 'open illicit drug use, urban camping and loitering, and urban squatting, and track the location of sex offenders.' 'President Trump is delivering on his commitment to Make America Safe Again and end homelessness across America,' Leavitt said in a statement Thursday. 'By removing vagrant criminals from our streets and redirecting resources toward substance abuse programs, the Trump Administration will ensure that Americans feel safe in their own communities and that individuals suffering from addiction or mental health struggles are able to get the help they need.' Advocates for the homeless condemned the executive orders with some saying that it will make homelessness worse for communities. 'These executive orders ignore decades of evidence-based housing and support services in practice. They represent a punitive approach that has consistently failed to resolve homelessness and instead exacerbates the challenges faced by vulnerable individuals,' said Donald Whitehead, executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless, in a press release. The National Homelessness Law Center said the order 'deprives people of their basic rights and makes it harder to solve homelessness' in a statement on Thursday. The group said the order will expand the use of police and institutionalization in response to homelessness, while increasing the number of people living in tents, cars and on the streets. Order follows high court decision The order comes a month after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of an Oregon city that ticketed homeless people for sleeping outside. Justices rejected arguments that such 'anti-camping' ordinances violate the Constitution's ban on 'cruel and unusual' punishment. The case had been watched closely by city and state officials who have struggled to respond to a surge in homelessness and encampments that have cropped up under bridges and in city parks across the nation. It was also followed by people who live in those encampments and are alarmed by efforts to criminalize the population rather than build shelters and affordable housing. Homelessness in the US soared to the highest level on record last year, driven by a lack of affordable housing, a rise in migrants seeking shelter and natural disasters, which caused some people to be displaced from their homes, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. More than 770,000 people experienced homelessness in 2024, an 18% increase from 2023. It was the largest annual increase since HUD began collecting the data in 2007 (excluding the jump from 2021 to 2022, when the agency didn't conduct a full count due to the Covid-19 pandemic). As a candidate, Trump railed against the nation's homeless crisis, telling supporters during a September campaign rally it was 'destroying our cities.' 'The homeless encampments will be gone,' Trump said in remarks from North Carolina. 'They're going to be gone. Oh, you have to see, you have to – some of these encampments, what they've done to our cities, and we've got to take care of the people.' CNN's Shania Shelton contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
3 minutes ago
- CNN
Protests expected as Trump arrives in Scotland for five-day visit
Donald Trump UKFacebookTweetLink Follow Protesters in Scotland say they will mount a wave of resistance as US President Donald Trump prepares to travel to the country on Friday for a five-day private visit. Trump is traveling to his golf resort in the small village of Turnberry, on the west coast, where he will meet UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday, before going to his other resort near Aberdeen, on the other side of Scotland, and open an 18-hole course dedicated to his Scottish-born mother Mary. Several protest groups, ranging from trade unions and climate justice campaigners to sections of the American diaspora and Palestinian and Ukrainian advocacy groups, are planning to demonstrate against the US president under the umbrella of the 'Stop Trump Coalition.' Protests are scheduled for Saturday in Edinburgh, Aberdeen and Dumfries. Police Scotland are expected to deploy thousands of officers during Trump's visit, according to PA Media. Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond told CNN in a statement that the visit 'will require a significant police operation using local, national and specialist resources from across Police Scotland, supported by colleagues from other UK police forces.' Trump himself is expected to stay at his golf resorts, away from the public. Scotland, ruled for decades by a left-of-center devolved government, has a long history of protesting against Trump. When he visited his Scottish golf courses during his first presidential term, police estimated that 5,000 people marched through Edinburgh in protest. On Tuesday, Scottish pro-independence newspaper The National printed a front page with the headline 'Convicted US felon to arrive in Scotland.' 'I don't think many Scottish people would feel he's welcome,' one Scottish resident Anna Acquroff told Reuters in Glasgow. 'I think it's an embarrassment that he is coming here at all. Personally.' Not everyone is so opposed to the Trump visit, however. Another Glaswegian, Keith Bean, told Reuters he thought Trump was 'welcome to come' because 'talking is always good. To divide and keep people separate from one another without discussing, it tends to create more problems than conversation.' While in Scotland, Trump will also meet its First Minister John Swinney, who said he will 'raise global and humanitarian issues of significant importance, including the unimaginable suffering we are witnessing in Gaza, and ensure Scotland's voice is heard at the highest levels of government across the world,' according to PA. This visit to Scotland marks a distraction from Trump's current domestic political troubles over his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein – an accused sex trafficker and disgraced financier who died by suicide in 2019. Already, however, that ongoing turmoil has seeped into Trump's visit. The White House removed the Wall Street Journal from the trip's press pool after the publication ran a story which described a collection of letters gifted to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003, including a note bearing Trump's name and an outline of a naked woman. Trump filed a lawsuit the next day claiming defamation 'because no authentic letter or drawing exists.' Trump will return to the UK in September for an 'unprecedented' second state visit at the invitation of King Charles, which is unlikely to have any public-facing events. Typically, second-term US presidents are not invited for a second state visit. In keeping with tradition, former presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush were offered lunch or tea with the monarch during their second administrations.
CNBC
3 minutes ago
- CNBC
What Europe's response to a no-deal with Trump could look like
Brussels is preparing for a no-deal scenario as uncertainty persists about if and when a trade agreement between the European Union and U.S. will materialize. Lawmakers on Thursday signed off on a major package of counter-tariffs which would target a wide range of goods and discussions are reportedly ongoing about deploying the EU's so-called "trade bazooka." Measures could kick in soon as there are just a few days left before Aug. 1, after which EU imports to the U.S. are set to be slapped with 30% tariffs and the EU is expected to respond promptly. Talks of a potential deal have however also been heating up this week, with sources telling CNBC that the current base-case scenario for a deal includes a 15% tariff on EU imports to the U.S. Any possible exemptions are still being worked out, they noted. But crucially, much depends on U.S. President Donald Trump, who is known for last minute changes of heart and quick decision making. There are therefore no guarantees about what a potential deal could look like. This week the European Commission combined two packages of proposed duties into one list, which totals tariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of a wide range of goods from food and drink items to clothing and machinery. A source told CNBC earlier this week that tariffs could be as high as 30%, mirroring those from the U.S. EU member states reportedly on Thursday voted to approve the combined list. The measures are set to come into effect just days after the U.S.' Aug. 1 deadline. Carsten Brzeski, global head of macro at ING, told CNBC on Friday that he expects tariff-level retaliation from the EU in the absence of a deal. "In a non-deal scenario without another delay of US tariffs, I see the EU going for a tit-for-tat approach, ie imposing 30% tariffs on selected US goods, not yet all goods, like the well-known motorcycles, cars, clothing and alcohol," he said in emailed comments. "Given that European countries are not fully aligned on how to react, I cannot see the EU going full in but rather trying to find a balance between showing that it reacts but without going beyond the US measures," Brzeski added. Another widely discussed option is the EU's so-called anti-coercion instrument, which has been referred to as a "trade bazooka." The measure is designed to be a deterrent, with the European Commission saying it would "be most successful if there is no need to use it." But if a third country does engage in coercion, "the instrument allows the Union to formally identify instances of economic coercion and to respond." The bloc views economic coercion as interference from non-EU countries in the region's policies by threatening or imposing measures that impact trade and investment. While the European Commission notes that dialogue and engagement would be part of their response to such coercion, the ACI for example, also allows for import and export curbs and restrictions on accessing the EU's market. The EU may be able to impose export restrictions regardless of whether it deploys its anti-coercion instrument, said ING's Brzeski. Alberto Rizzi, policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told CNBC on Friday that even though the ACI is considered the 'nuclear option,' "in reality there is room for flexibility in its application, as long as the retaliatory measures remain proportionate to the harm of the coercion." Rizzi suggested that despite the mood across the EU shifting to become more confrontational and supportive of "swift and substantial" retaliation in a no-deal scenario, it is uncertain when the ACI could be activated. "Retaliation is seen as a negotiating tool by the EU, so the ACI will probably be activated only in a second phase if there is no response by the US after the tariff packages enters into force — the EU would want to keep it as leverage rather than using it immediately," he said.
