Britain risks 'reintroducing a blasphemy law' by prosecuting man, 50, who allegedly shouted 'f*** Islam' as he burned Koran outside Turkish consulate, court hears
The prosecution of a man who allegedly burned a Koran outside the Turkish consulate in London risks 'reintroducing a blasphemy law' in the UK, a court heard today.
Hamit Coskun, 50, allegedly shouted 'f*** Islam', 'Islam is religion of terrorism' and Koran is burning' as he held the flaming Muslim holy book aloft in Rutland Gardens, Knightsbridge, on February 13.
He pleaded not guilty to a religiously aggravated public order offence of using disorderly behaviour motivated by 'hostility towards members of a religious group, namely followers of Islam' and also denied an alternative charge of using disorderly behaviour.
Turkey-born Coskun, who is half Kurdish and half Armenian, appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court today for his trial wearing a charcoal hoodie, dark trousers and white trainers.
He travelled from his home in the Midlands on February 13 and set fire to the Koran at around 2pm, the court heard.
He allegedly shouted 'f*** Islam', 'Islam is religion of terrorism' and Koran is burning' as he held the flaming Muslim holy book aloft in Rutland Gardens, Knightsbridge, on February 13.
Coskun had posted on social media that he was protesting against the 'Islamist government' of Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan who the defendant allegedly said 'has made Turkey a base for radical Islamists and is trying to establish a sharia regime'.
Katy Thorne KC, defending, said: 'The prosecution, in bringing this prosecution at all, is seeking to introduce a law unknown to this land, namely blasphemy in relation to Islam.'
Blasphemy laws were abolished in England and Wales in 2008 and in Scotland in 2021.
Ms Thorne said that burning the Koran 'cannot be a criminal offence' and accused the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) of an abuse of process in its decision to bring the case against Coskun.
She said in her written argument: 'To render such an act a criminal offence is tantamount to reintroducing a blasphemy law in relation to Islam, rendering the Koran a specially protected object in the UK, where a flag or another book would not be, and rendering trenchant or offensive criticism of Islam a criminal offence, is also akin to reinstating an offence of blasphemy.
'People must be free to exercise their religious or non-religious beliefs and to manifest those beliefs in whatever non-violent way they choose, and any curtailing by the state of that freedom must be absolutely necessary in a democratic society.'
Ms Thorne said that Coskun 'did not exhort hate' but voiced his dislike and frustration with a religion.
She added: 'He expressed nothing to suggest that he was hostile to those who followed Islam.
'He did so outside the Turkish Consulate, a political institution, which provides further evidence he was not seeking to persuade others to dislike Islam, but express his personal criticism of Turkey and its stance on Islam.
'His protest was specifically political and thus, it is submitted, requires the highest protection of freedom of speech.'
Prosecutor Philip McGhee said that Coskun was not being prosecuted simply for the burning of the Koran, but for 'disorderly conduct'.
Mr McGhee said of Ms Thorne's argument: 'There is simply no misconduct in this case.'
District Judge John McGarva ruled that there was no abuse of process and dismissed the application.
Mr McGhee added that the decision to prosecute does not affect the ability of others to criticise religion.
The prosecutor had earlier said that Coskun had deliberately chosen the time and location of his demonstration.
'His actions gave rise to a very clear threat to public order and went beyond a legitimate expression of protest, crossing the line to pose a threat to public order,' he told the court.
But Coskun, who is an atheist, believes that he protested peacefully and burning the amounted to freedom of expression.
Ahead of his trial, in a quote released through the Free Speech Union, he said: 'Encountering such treatment in a country like England, which I truly believed to be a place where freedom prevailed, was a real shock to me.'
His legal fees are being paid for by the Free Speech Union and the National Secular Society (NSS).
The Free Speech Union said it is defending him 'not because we're anti-Islam, but because we believe no one should be compelled to observe the blasphemy codes of any religion, whether Christian or Muslim'.
It said Coskun is an asylum seeker who fled Turkey, having been a political prisoner for almost a decade, who 'thought he was coming to a democratic country where he would be free to peacefully protest about a particular religion'.
Lord Young of Acton, general secretary of the organisation, added: 'The rights to peaceful protest and freedom of expression are sacrosanct and should not be disregarded because of fears about inflaming community tensions in a multicultural society.'
Stephen Evans, chief executive of the NSS said: 'A successful prosecution in this case could represent the effective criminalisation of damaging a Koran in public, edging us dangerously close to a prohibition on blasphemy.
'The case also highlights the alarming use of public order laws to curtail our collective right to protest and free speech based on the subjective reactions of others.
'Establishing a right not to be offended threatens the very foundation of free expression.'
A spokesperson for Humanists UK said that a successful prosecution would 'effectively resurrect the crime of blasphemy in England and Wales - 17 years after its abolition'.
They added: 'This reintroduction of blasphemy by the back door would have profound consequences, not only for free expression in the UK but for the safety and wellbeing of hundreds of thousands of so-called 'apostates' in the UK and their right to freedom of thought and conscience.'
The trial, which is due to last one-day, continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘What would a kid do in this situation?' Engineering Starlight Express's dazzling return
Howard Hudson (lighting designer): I saw the original production many times. The scale and feel of it were unlike anything else. Complete escapism. I used to skate around the living room singing the songs. Andrzej Goulding (video designer and animator): It's such a part of popular culture – Starlight Express is even referenced on Family Guy. But I didn't know a huge amount about the musical aside from the fact that it was on roller-skates and it was trains. Tim Hatley (set designer): I was studying at Central Saint Martins in the 80s and went to see Starlight because its designer, John Napier, was coming in to do a project with us. We'd been doing Shakespeare but this was almost like a fairground ride. I mean, they high-fived the audience – some of whom had seen the show 50 times. Gabriella Slade (costume designer): People who saw Starlight when they were kids are now bringing their own families. In our audience you can be up close with some of these characters and costumes. That's quite rare. Tim Hatley: For those who saw it the first time round, we wanted to give it a different spin. With a flexible space like this, the world is your oyster. Do it in the round? Have it like a tennis court? We had lots of thoughts and lots of models. Everybody's waiting on me to come up with the concept. Lighting, video, even skating and choreography – they can't get on with their work until they know where the slopes are and how steep they are and where the video wall is. Gabriella Slade: The original Starlight is probably one of the most iconic shows of all time. From a design point of view, it's just heaven. On a revival it's important, I think, to reference what has been before to a degree – we wanted to continue that spirit but also, 40 years on, shape it for a new generation. Tim Hatley: We didn't want to just copy what John had done before. And we didn't want to be stuck with real trains running through tunnels and over bridges. Gabriella Slade: The brief is really tricky! In our early conversations, we talked about the core components of a train and how to present those in a costume for performers who need to be able to move as easily as possible and to fall safely. There was a lot of aerodynamic chat! Andrzej Goulding: As soon as we landed on the idea of train tracks through space, where we're sat as an audience became the race planet. There are other planets out there, like Electra's and Greaseball's. There's no direction of that in the script. It's completely left up to the team. References can come from anywhere but there's that amazing 80s advert for Milky Way with the red car and the blue car where they're kind of floating through the air. It's that kind of world. Tim Hatley: With video gaming, what kids are used to now is very different to playing with the old Hornby train sets. Andrzej Goulding: I had a train set as a kid, one of those little wooden ones. You pretend they're anything. Starlight was like mixing Mario Kart with trains and setting it in space. The reason you can go over the top is it's the point of view of a child. Having the kid, Control, on stage is a bit of a masterstroke – you can do even more because they're directing what happens. We'd often ask: What would a kid do in this situation? Gabriella Slade: We're in a child's bedroom – Control's outfit had to look like it had been made at home or bought, or a hybrid of the two. The jumpsuit vibe felt right – a bit cosmic. Howard Hudson: We had to keep the childlike essence of the piece – this is a child's imagination – while using such ultra-modern technology. So there are moments that are incredibly simple, like a single star flying in. Tim Hatley: There were three separate designs: auditorium, front of house and the show. As a theatre designer, you're not usually governing where the audience are going to sit – or worried about where they are going to be coming in and out. With this, it was a priority. Gabriella Slade: First off, you read the script, listen to the music and collate research images. From there, you form sketches or initial shapes and start to think about fabrics. Then you go into much more fully rendered concept sketches integrating the fabrics. That, of course, is costed and there's a process of research and development. We had a skate school for a number of weeks so were able to access our company quite early on for fittings. Some of the shapes are not form-fitting, so we needed to make sure they would be all right going around corners in the auditorium. Tim Hatley: I'm very old fashioned. I work with model boxes. We had an enormous one for this because there were so many collaborators who weren't necessarily in the world of theatre, but also because it was a space that didn't really exist yet. So people needed to understand the auditorium. Howard Hudson: The skaters had to get used to having mega bright lights in their eyes as they try to navigate these routes around the space. There are more than 600 moving lights in the show, which has probably one of the biggest rigs for a musical. For the Starlight sequence in act two we have 250 of these star units that fly above the audience – each has got six LEDs on it. Then there's however many kilometres of LED tape. Tim Hatley: We've got LED set into the floor and the skaters go over that. It's not like using the old tungsten lights which got very hot, but it does warm up, which causes the plastic on top to expand. So there was a lot of development. I was able to give Howard places to put lights where you normally wouldn't have them, like coming up through the floor. It became clear to me that it needed a rock concert feel. The songs were rearranged to have a more contemporary, poppy sound too. Howard Hudson: Early on, we built a pre-visualisation studio with huge screens and had a 3D version of the set on a computer. Andrzej was able to feed his content into that and we had the whole rig there. So we would watch actors rehearse a number then go into our studio and work out how to light it. Andrzej Goulding: Lighting and video are closely intertwined because there's only so many photons you can throw on stage. Howard and I have worked together several times. The Starlight rehearsal room had a full set and the two of us sat there tracking the race, drawing a map of what goes where. The hardest thing in theatre, compared with film, is that an audience can look anywhere. Our job is to pull the attention of the observer. We used a live camera in the races to help follow the characters. And we used a leaderboard. It took us a long time just to sculpt the journey of those races. Tim Hatley: For the ramps, we talked to skaters who had been in the show before. How do we get that amount of speed up in that amount of space? Those were technical problems which were all new to me. We collaborated with a company that builds skate ramps and parks. It's a timber surface – we've used some metallic paints in there too, to pick up the video. We've got moving scenery but where those joins are the surfaces have to be perfect and seamless. You can't have any little gaps that might get worse during the run. Andrzej Goulding: Video design should only be there if it's serving the story. If you're just doing something for the sake of looking fun, it weirdly makes things slower. There's also only so much spectacle you can do. A show is all about peaks and troughs, following the storytelling. If you're peaking the entire time, it's boring. Howard Hudson: Luke [Sheppard, the show's director] has the most technical mind. I'm convinced he could be a lighting designer if he wanted to. We've collaborated for years and have developed a kind of shorthand – we started out at the Finborough and now work on these massive commercial musicals together. Set designers build models and costume designers do drawings whereas lighting is so visceral. You need to see the lights in the space, so we're always the last people to come in. And we're doing our job in front of 150 people in the theatre. So it's a bit nervy. Gabriella Slade: It was important to make sure that each group of characters had a visual identity: carriages, trucks, steam engines, electric trains. They needed to feel cohesive when put together but have differentiations as well. Campbell Young and Helen Keane were our wigs and hair designers and Jackie Saundercock was our makeup designer. We had a brilliant collaborative relationship. The integration of the hair and makeup feels like one unit, which is always the aim. Each character has their own iconography, too. The designs need to be bold enough for you to identify who's who and where they are in the races. Howard Hudson: For Electra's song AC/DC we wanted laser units to give a quality of light you don't get from normal fixtures. We went down to a laser company and spent a day experimenting with the looks we could get. It almost comes out of nowhere in the show and adds another layer of spectacle you don't get out of a traditional lighting unit. Gabriella Slade: The backpacks have handles, which are important for racing together. For me, the backpacks suggest a power bank or a battery – and they light up so actually have their own batteries! It's all an extension of the actual costume. Greaseball's spark gun creates another really lovely extension of the image. It's got the same yellow and black scheme and that moment really fits the energy of her song. Howard Hudson: We couldn't use traditional manual followspots because people are moving so quickly. So we use an automated system called Zactrack. Performers wear tags that send tracking data to the lighting desk, and we're able to tell the lights which person to follow around the space. Andrzej Goulding: Video is slow. Every time we want to do something, it's got to be rendered. We've got all these multiple layers. You've got to put in a lot of hours. I'll sit up until three in the morning if I'm not happy with one little thing. I just want to make sure it's right. The scale of it was enormous. I tend to work on my own but got the biggest team I've ever had on a show. If you surround yourself with the right people it's fun to do. And super satisfying when everything's working in synergy. Howard Hudson: Whenever I go in and see it again, I think: Crikey, how on earth did we achieve that? Tim Hatley: There's not a bad seat in the house, and they're all very different. I don't think I've designed a show where that has been the case so much. Sitting in what we call the side tracks, looking down, you're very close. If you're at the back, you get the whole overview and a real sense of the video. Gabriella Slade: Some fans come in costume. It's so lovely to have people recreate the designs. I'm never not amazed that they want to spend the time to do that. Andrzej Goulding: The craziest thing was going on to do a 'normal' show afterwards – one without people on roller skates! You're wondering why everyone's moving around the stage so slowly. Starlight Express is booking at Troubadour Wembley Park theatre, London, until March 2026
Daily Mail
35 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Katie Price's butt lift injector BANNED from all procedures...after he left women with killer sepsis
A celeb-backed liquid BBL injector has been banned from carrying out cosmetic procedures following a shocking BBC investigation and subsequent court ruling. 'Beauty consultant', Rick Sawyer, was found to be administering injections containing up to 1,000ml of dermal filler into clients' buttocks, despite not having a single healthcare qualification. The president of the Chartered Institute of Environmental Health, Mark Elliot, today slammed the shocking and dangerous practices Mr Sawyer was found to have committed. 'The regulatory framework has failed to keep pace with the increase in the prevalence of cosmetic procedures in recent years, fuelled by social media,' he said. Sawyer was exposed in a chilling documentary that saw him working out of a rented office block in London, performing dangerous procedures, that left women hospitalised with deadly sepsis. On Wednesday 28 May, a judge at the Manchester Civil Justice Centre granted an injunction against the self-proclaimed cosmetician, banning him from performing any procedures in England and Wales until 27 May 2028. The injunction will also prohibit Sawyer from possessing related surgical equipment or any antibiotics typically used in such treatments, unless prescribed for his own personal use. The court attached a power of arrest to the order, meaning Sawyer could be arrested without a warrant if he is found to be in breach of these terms. He has been given 21 days to challenge the injunction. 'We believe that the most high-risk cosmetic procedures, such as the BBL, should be designated as surgical and undertaken only by appropriately trained, regulated and experienced GMC-registered doctors,' Mr Elliot continued. The court, together with Trafford Council, heard evidence from the original BBC investigation, which featured testimonies from nearly 40 women, alongside graphic pictures submitted by one of Mr Sawyer's clients. James Parry, the lawyer who raised the case, said the injuries suffered were akin to that of a 'serious knife crime'. One woman, who suffered sepsis—a life-threatening reaction to an infection—after undergoing a procedure by Sawyer, shared her story. Ashely, 27, who attended one of Sawyer's pop-up clinics in London, said: 'He butchered me, there is no other word for it'. Ashely said that when she left the clinic, covered in blood, she was barely able to walk. Three days later she was rushed to hospital with sepsis, where she could have died without treatment. This happens when your immune system overreacts to an infection and starts to attack your body's own tissues and organs. Without treatment, this can quickly develop into septic shock, causing the organs to shut down completely. The liquid BBL procedure is notoriously risky, especially when performed by non-medics. This is because when injected into or near a blood vessel, filler can block blood flow leading to tissue death. Inadequately sterilising equipment can too, trigger dangerous infections. Reacting to Wednesday's court proceedings, Ashley said: 'I am relieved, it makes me feel that we're being taken seriously.' The environmental health watchdog is now urging the government to enforce a licensing scheme for non-surgical cosmetic procedures across England with the hope that it will prevent people without the proper certifications from preforming these dangerous procedures. Mr Elliot said: 'This scheme will help to ensure that people who undergo non-surgical cosmetic procedures receive treatment from practitioners who are properly trained and qualified, have the necessary insurance cover and operate from premises that are safe and hygienic.' Another of Mr Sawyer's clients required life-saving emergency surgery that saw medics cut dead tissue from almost the entire left buttock, the BBC probe found. Louise Moller, from Bolton, was hospitalised four days after receiving a liquid BBL at his Essex clinic in October 2023 and was told she had contracted sepsis. The now 28-year-old rang her mother, Janet, from Salford Royal's A&E department and said: 'Mum, I think I'm going to die.' The BBC documentary saw one woman known only as Joanne, travel seven hours from south Wales to Essex for the liquid BBL treatment. The mum-of-two said she had undergone other cosmetic treatments previously and had been persuaded to get a 'peachy bum' by Mr Sawyer's adverts and celebrity endorsements. However, when she arrived she claimed his clinic was in a block of flats in an industrial estate and she waited in a 'dingy little hallway' for roughly half an hour. 'I should have turned and ran but I had paid £600 deposit and travelled all this way,' she said. After parting with the additional £1,400 for the treatment, she then stood in front of him while he sat on a stool and injected her with a litre of filler. 'I felt dizzy, sick and like shaky. My legs didn't even move properly. And that was all within a minute of him starting,' she said. 'I remember looking round and he had white gloves on that were full of blood.' By the time she returned to South Wales hours later, the swelling had begun and she could hardly walk, she claimed. 'I messaged Ricky loads of times to say how bad I was feeling and how worried I was. He just told me to take my antibiotics,' she added. 'My temperature kept on going up and I felt terrible. I had to phone 999. I was dripping with sweat and screaming.' In hospital, she was diagnosed with sepsis and attached to intravenous antibiotics. Medics fortunately did not need to operate. Experts have long warned of 'non-surgical' aesthetic treatments carried out by practitioners will little experience and repeatedly called for tighter controls over the cosmetic industry. While the risks of a traditional Brazilian Butt Lift (BBL) are well known — surgery to transfer fat from other areas to the buttocks — a non-surgical methods that aim to create the same result are less understood. Unlike a traditional BBL which sees fat transferred from other areas of the body, a liquid BBL involves hyaluronic acid fillers. Dermal filler — the same material used to fill lips — is injected in large quantities into the buttock. Non-surgical BBLs are not illegal in the UK. However, several local authorities including Wolverhampton, Essex and Glasgow have banned certain companies from carrying out liquid BBLs in their area. And since the BBC documentary aired Trafford, Salford and Manchester councils have banned Sawyer from practicing in their areas. Trafford Council will continue to monitor compliance with the injunction and encourages anyone with information about unlawful cosmetic procedures to contact them.
BBC News
36 minutes ago
- BBC News
Football and other premium TV being pirated at 'industrial scale'
A lack of action by big tech firms is enabling the "industrial scale theft" of premium video services, especially live sport, a new report research by Enders Analysis accuses Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft of "ambivalence and inertia" over a problem it says costs broadcasters revenue and puts users at an increased risk of Sutcliffe and Ollie Meir, who authored the research, described the Amazon Fire Stick - which they argue is the device many people use to access illegal streams - as "a piracy enabler".BBC News has contacted Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft for comment. The piracy problem Sports broadcasting is big business, with the total value of media rights across the world passing the $60bn (£44bn) mark last increasing cost of rights deals results in higher prices for fans at home, especially if they choose to pay for multiple services to watch their team play. To get round this, some resort to illegal streams of big say there are often multiple streams of individual events - such as high profile football games - each of which can have tens of thousands of people watching of big rights holders, Sky and DAZN, have previously warned piracy is causing a financial crisis in the broadcast industry. There is a risk for users Enders report says fans watching football matches, for instance, via illegal streams are typically providing information such as credit card details and email addresses, leaving them vulnerable to malware and phishing scams. Fire Stick in the firing line The researchers focussed on Amazon, Google, Meta and Microsoft. While Meta, the owner of Facebook, was criticised for being the source of adverts for illegal streams, the technology of the other three was blamed for the increase in Amazon Fire Stick is a major cause of the problem, according to the device plugs into TVs and gives the viewer thousands of options to watch programmes from legitimate services including the BBC iPlayer and are also being used to access illegal streams, particularly of live November last year, a Liverpool man who sold Fire Stick devices he reconfigured to allow people to illegally stream Premier League football matches was jailed. After uploading the unauthorised services on the Amazon product, he advertised them on man from Liverpool was given a two-year suspended sentence last year after modifying fire sticks and selling them on Facebook and WhatsApp. According to data for the first quarter of this year, provided to Enders by Sky, 59% of people in UK who said they had watched pirated material in the last year while using a physical device said they had used a Amazon fire Enders report says the fire stick enables "billions of dollars in piracy" overall. Depreciation of tech allows piracy to flourish The researchers also pointed to the role played by the "continued depreciation" of Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems, particularly those from Google and technology enables high quality streaming of premium content to devices. Two of the big players are Microsoft's PlayReady and Google's WidevineThe authors argue the architecture of the DRM is largely unchanged, and due to a lack of maintenance by the big tech companies, PlayReady and Widevine "are now compromised across various security levels".Mr Sutcliffe and Mr Meir said this has had "a seismic impact across the industry, and ultimately given piracy the upper hand by enabling theft of the highest quality content".They added: "Over twenty years since launch, the DRM solutions provided by Google and Microsoft are in steep decline."A complete overhaul of the technology architecture, licensing, and support model is needed. Lack of engagement with content owners indicates this a low priority." Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the world's top tech stories and trends. Outside the UK? Sign up here.
