
Donald Trump's first 100 days in office: Polls show voters dissatisfied, labelling him as chaotic and scary
Donald Trump
may be celebrating his first 100 days in office, but the majority of Americans do not. Poll after poll shows that voters disapprove of his leadership, describing his presidency as chaotic, frightening, and off course.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
The groundwork before India mounts a strike at Pakistan
India considers closing airspace to Pakistani carriers amid rising tensions
Cold Start: India's answer to Pakistan's nuclear threats
Despite Donald Trump's self-praise, his approval rating has dropped dramatically, even among Republicans.
Why are voters unhappy with Donald Trump's early performance?
Voters are dissatisfied with issues such as immigration and trade, with many advocating for future limits on presidential power.
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Skip
Ads by
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
During his first 100 days in office, Donald Trump broke his own record of having the lowest presidential approval rating. He has self-acclaimed that the last three months have been among the "best" in the history of presidential administrations.
On his first day in office, Donald Trump pledged to put an end to the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, but he claimed that these pledges were made "figuratively" and "obviously…in jest," he stated in a recent interview with Time magazine about his tenure in the White House.
Live Events
He also claimed that the majority of immigrants in the United States are "criminals," a falsehood that he and his supporters regularly promote to defend their harsh immigration laws.
ALSO READ:
President in the dock: House Democrat Shri Thanedar drops political bombshell by unveiling articles of impeachment against Donald Trump
The president defended his recent economic policies, which the American public finds extremely unpopular.
Donald Trump has been undermining civil rights, weakening American democratic norms, and enacting legally questionable policies that negatively impact the lives of Americans in the working class since January, as per a report by Truthout.
President Trump has received low marks from political analysts who have evaluated his performance during the first 100 days in office.
What do the polls say about public opinion?
Numerous polls show that the American public does not share Donald Trump's optimistic view of his presidency thus far.
An Economist/YouGov poll released last Wednesday reveals that most voters now have a negative opinion of Trump, whereas a majority had a favourable opinion of him at the beginning of his second term, as quoted in a report by Truthout.
Donald Trump had a net approval rating of +6 after his first week in office earlier this year, with 49% of voters supporting him and 43% disapproving of his actions during his first 100 days in office.
However, according to its most recent survey, only 41% of voters said they had a favourable opinion of him, while 54% gave him a negative rating, or a net rating of -13 points.
Most people consider Donald Trump's performance to be far worse than that of other presidents YouGov has polled on during their first 100 days in office.
For instance, former President Joe Biden had a net average of +11.2 points around the 100-day mark, while Obama had a +6.0 average during that same period. He had an average approval rating of -8.3 in the polls in 2017, which is also lower than his current 100-day rating.
Similar, and occasionally worse, results have been obtained from other polls that ask voters about his performance this term. According to an Associated Press/NORC poll, only 39% of Americans are satisfied with Trump's job performance thus far, while 59% are not.
According to that same survey, only 31% of voters thought Donald Trump was "great" or "good", while 52% thought he was a "poor" or "terrible" president.
Donald Trump also received low marks from voters, according to an ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll, which found that 39% of respondents approve of his performance in the first 100 days and 55% disapprove.
This is the lowest net rating in polling on the issue for any president in the previous 80 years. The president's approval rating was a net -11 points, according to a Fox News poll conducted during his first 100 days back in the White House.
Meanwhile, a recent poll conducted by Siena College and The New York Times asked participants to rate Trump's second term thus far.
Just 42% of respondents described his presidency as "exciting," compared to 59% who described it as "scary" and 66% who described it as "chaotic."
The same poll also shed light on the reasons behind Trump's low approval rating. Every significant issue it polled respondents on had negative net polling numbers; for instance, Trump received a net -4-point approval rating on immigration, a -12-point rating on the economy, and a -11-point rating on foreign trade, as per a report by Truthout.
Voters also wanted more restrictions on presidents in general, according to the poll, which found that 61% of respondents wanted Congress to approve presidential tariffs before he imposed them, and 54% agreed that presidents shouldn't be able to unilaterally terminate well-liked federal programs that Congress has passed into law.
FAQs
How do voters see Donald Trump's first 100 days?
Most describe it as "chaotic" and "scary," with low marks for major issues.
Has Donald Trump's approval rating dropped, even among Republicans?
Yes, according to polls, nearly one-third of GOP voters disapprove of his performance.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump administration's visa delays drive surge in UAE university applications
The US government's recent visa restrictions and delays are prompting a sharp rise in international student applications to universities across the United Arab Emirates, according to officials at major higher education institutions in Dubai, Abu Dhabi , and Ajman. Following a proclamation by former President Donald Trump to restrict visas for international students at institutions like Harvard University-now temporarily blocked by a federal judge, students are increasingly turning to UAE universities for stability and access. The policy shift in the US has led to the suspension of student visa interviews, creating uncertainty and travel disruption for aspiring students worldwide. According to Gulf News, Heriot-Watt University Dubai reported a 53.5% increase in applications for its September 2025 intake compared to the same period last year. Professor Dame Heather McGregor, Provost and Vice Principal, said to Gulf News, the rise is driven by 'growing global restrictions on international student visas,' positioning Dubai as an 'attractive study destination.' 'Our campus recorded a 4.5 per cent year-on-year increase in enrolments for 2024/25,' she added. 'Cities like Dubai and Abu Dhabi rank among the world's safest, offering families peace of mind alongside academic excellence.' (Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates) Ajman-based Gulf Medical University is also seeing expanded demand. Acting Chancellor Professor Manda Venkatramana noted that applications have increased significantly year-on-year, with interest growing from Asia, Africa, and the MENA region. Live Events MORE STORIES FOR YOU ✕ UK job market slowdown raises concerns for international students Indian students made up one in four international students in US in 2024: ICE report Harvard university scores legal win against Trump's international student ban « Back to recommendation stories I don't want to see these stories because They are not relevant to me They disrupt the reading flow Others SUBMIT 'We've observed a significant spike in enquiries and interest from both students and parents across several countries – particularly those who had initially planned to pursue higher education in the US,' he said. 'Families are beginning to view the UAE as a primary choice.' Sorbonne University Abu Dhabi confirmed that international student interest has nearly doubled from the previous year. Camille Assouline, Head of Communications, Marketing and Public Affairs, told Gulf News, 'The recent visa disruptions in the US may be contributing to this shift, as more students look toward stable, globally connected alternatives.' The Gulf News Edufair events in Dubai and Abu Dhabi also reflected this trend, with universities showcasing opportunities in medical, technology, and global mobility pathways. UAE institutions cite their streamlined visa systems, strong infrastructure, and part-time work options as key attractions.


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC refuses to stay ongoing teachers recruitment exam in Andhra Pradesh
The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to hear a plea for halting the ongoing teacher recruitment examinations in Andhra Pradesh and said it couldn't be stopped "midway". "We don't devise a mechanism for holding examinations. It is not our expertise," a bench of Justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan told the petitioner's counsel. The bench questioned the petitioner's counsel for not moving the Andhra Pradesh High Court first. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like You Won't Believe What These Celebrities Studied in College Learn More Undo After the counsel said the high court was on summer break, the bench said, "The High Court of Andhra Pradesh is reopening after summer vacation on June 16. In view of the above, we are not inclined to entertain this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach the high court." The petitioner's counsel referred to the government notification and said even for a district-level recruitment, multi-shift examinations were to be conducted. Live Events "They are going for a computer-based testing and then they go for normalisation," the counsel said. The bench, however, said, "The exams have commenced. We can't stop them midway." Additional Solicitor General S V Raju informed the bench that over a lakh aspirants had already appeared in the examinations. The plea said the state government initiated the process for teachers' recruitment for filling over 16,000 posts and examinations would be conducted from June 6 to July 6.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
30 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Decoded: How Iran and Israel's decades-old conflict could explode into war
The Islamic Republic of Iran on Thursday (June 12) posted a chilling two-word message on social media platform X: 'We are ready,' amid reports that Israel is preparing to launch a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. The United States has responded by warning that Iran may retaliate against American targets in neighbouring Iraq and has advised some US citizens to leave the region as a precaution. Tensions have surged since the breakdown of nuclear talks between Washington and Tehran. US President Donald Trump has reaffirmed his hardline stance, declaring that Iran would not be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. 'Very simple. They can't have a nuclear weapon. We're not going to allow that,' he said, adding that US troops are being repositioned away from parts of the Middle East 'because it could be a dangerous place.' Iran's enriched uranium stockpile nears weapons-grade threshold The trigger behind this rising tension lies in Iran's growing nuclear stockpile. According to a recent estimate by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran now holds over 408 kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent purity, dangerously close to the 90 per cent threshold required for a nuclear weapon. That's a nearly 50 per cent increase from earlier this year. The time it would take Iran to 'break out' and build a bomb is shrinking rapidly. Tracing the historical roots of Iran-Israel hostility Iran and Israel weren't always enemies. In fact, prior to 1979, the two countries maintained close ties. Iran was one of the first Muslim-majority nations to recognise Israel after its founding in 1948. Under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, Iran and Israel enjoyed diplomatic, economic, and military ties. Both nations viewed Arab nationalism as a mutual threat, and Israel considered Iran a key strategic ally on the periphery of the Arab world. But this cooperation snapped after the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The new regime in Tehran cut all ties with Israel, transferred the Israeli embassy to the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), and declared Israel an enemy of Islam. Ayatollah Khomeini's regime began openly supporting anti-Israel militant groups, shifting the nature of the conflict from political rivalry to ideological confrontation. Iran's proxy network intensifies regional warfare against Israel Since then, Iran has supported and armed groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and the Islamic Jihad Movement in the Palestinian territories. This network of proxies has conducted many wars against Israel, including those in Lebanon and several Gaza conflicts from 2008 to 2024. Iran has also provided support to groups in Syria and Yemen over the years, designed to counter Israel and attack its interests. How close is Iran to developing a nuclear weapon? Iran's nuclear programme has always been at the heart of Israeli fears. Israel has long considered Iran's nuclear ambition an existential threat. Over the years, it has launched covert operations to sabotage Iran's programme, including the infamous Stuxnet cyberattack and the assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists. These efforts have slowed but not stopped Iran's progress. Once Iran crosses the 90 per cent enrichment mark, experts warn it could produce a nuclear weapon within weeks—a scenario Israel says it will not allow. Where are the modern flashpoints in the Iran-Israel conflict? The conflict has played out across multiple theatres in West Asia. Lebanon remains a critical front. Iran's most powerful proxy, Hezbollah, is based there and has fought major wars with Israel, including the 2006 conflict. Hezbollah is believed to possess over 100,000 rockets aimed at Israeli cities. In Gaza, Iran funds and supports both Hamas and the Islamic Jihad Movement. Despite the Shia-Sunni divide, their shared hostility towards Israel unites them. Syria is another major flashpoint. Iran maintains a strong military presence there and uses the territory to transfer weapons to Hezbollah. Israel frequently launches airstrikes on Iranian assets and supply routes in Syria. Recently, Iraq has emerged as a new front. Iranian-backed militias there have carried out drone attacks on Israeli targets. In 2024, after Israel bombed an Iranian consulate in Damascus, Iran and its proxies launched a large-scale drone and missile barrage. Though most were intercepted with US and European assistance, Israel responded with strikes inside Iran and Syria. Both sides then pulled back to avoid a wider regional war. Who supports Iran and Israel in this regional power struggle? Iran's 'Axis of Resistance' includes state and non-state actors such as the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), its elite Quds Force, Hezbollah, Hamas, the Islamic Jihad Movement, Houthi rebels in Yemen, and various Shiite militias in Iraq and Syria. Iran also supports smaller militant groups in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Israel, meanwhile, is firmly backed by the United States. Washington provides billions in military aid, advanced defence systems like Iron Dome, and intelligence support. US forces also target Iranian-backed militias in Syria and Iraq. Western allies, including the UK, Germany, and Italy, assist diplomatically and through missile defence cooperation. While not formal military allies, several Sunni Arab states share Israel's concerns. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, and Egypt have deepened ties with Israel since the 2020 Abraham Accords. The Palestinian Authority in the West Bank remains ideologically opposed to Israel but occasionally coordinates security efforts against Hamas. Why is Iraq becoming a critical theatre in this confrontation? Iraq now serves as a launchpad for Iranian-aligned militias and a proxy battleground. Groups like Kata'ib Hezbollah under the 'Islamic Resistance in Iraq' banner have claimed attacks on Israeli military assets. These militias allow Iran to strike Israel indirectly while avoiding direct confrontation. Geographically, Iraq's proximity to Israel makes it strategically significant for weapons transfers and strikes. However, the Iraqi government under Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' Al-Sudani is under pressure to control these groups, fearing that Israeli retaliation could further destabilise the country. The US military presence in Iraq—currently around 2,500 troops—acts as a deterrent. But Washington's plan to withdraw by 2026 could reduce Iraq's resistance to Iranian pressure and shift the balance of power further. Are the conditions now set for full-scale regional war? With nuclear breakout potential, active proxy networks, and direct military exchanges, the Iran-Israel conflict is dangerously close to escalation. Iraq's emergence as a proxy front, growing Hezbollah stockpiles, increased Western involvement, and failed diplomacy are all converging. Whether this leads to an all-out war or a prolonged cycle of strikes and retaliation depends on the decisions made in the coming weeks—both in Jerusalem and Tehran, and in capitals far beyond.