Jerry Falwell Jr. to get $15 million payout after Liberty University sex scandal
Liberty University has agreed to pay its former president, Jerry Falwell Jr. roughly $15 million as part of a settlement after his resignation in the wake of sex scandals that rocked the famously conservative university.
Falwell took over as president following the 2007 death of his father Jerry Falwell Sr., a massively influential figure within America's modern right-wing Christian movement who founded the university in 1971.
Falwell Jr. resigned in 2020, and a settlement was announced in 2024, but the terms were not disclosed.
But recently filed tax documents reveal the university is paying Falwell more than $15 million to 'settle certain claims and close certain transactions.' USA Today first reported the disclosures.
Falwell has also agreed to pay the university $440,000 to settle 'disputed expenses' with the university. The filings did not include details of the payments.
In total, Falwell is set to receive roughly $5.5 million to settle the lawsuits along with $9.7 million as part of his retirement package, according to tax filings.
The Independent has requested comment from Liberty.
Falwell told USA Today that he was 'very pleased with the outcome of the settlement negotiations and with the final settlement.'
In its 2024 statement, the university said it had reached a 'global resolution agreement' with its Board of Trustees 'settling all outstanding disputes on both legal and personal matters' with Falwell.
'This agreement is grounded in a firm commitment to protecting and preserving Liberty's original mission of developing Christ-centered men and women with the values, knowledge, and skills essential to impact the world,' according to the statement.
Falwell took over the university in 2007 after the death of his father, the Rev. Jerry Falwell Sr., who founded the college. Thirteen years later, Falwell – who shook the evangelical Christian and Republican establishments with his 2016 endorsement of then-candidate Donald Trump — was placed on indefinite leave in August 2020 after posting, then deleting, a provocative Instagram photo in which he wraps his arm around a woman while they both have their pants unbuttoned, revealing their bare midriffs.
The university announced his resignation a few weeks later, following the publication of allegations that Falwell and his wife had engaged in a years-long sexual relationship with another man.
In a lengthy statement at the time, Falwell claimed that the man had tried to blackmail the family and accused him of threatening to reveal the relationship "to deliberately embarrass my wife, family, and Liberty University unless we agreed to pay him substantial monies."
'Over the course of the last few months this person's behavior has reached a level that we have decided the only way to stop this predatory behavior is to go public,' he said at the time.
Giancarlo Granda, who shared messages with Reuters as part of the outlet's investigation into his relationship with the couple, denied the allegations against him.
Granda said he was in his early 20s when he first met Falwell and his wife Becki while working as a pool attendant at a Florida hotel. He reportedly began a sexual relationship with Becki Falwell in 2012, which continued through 2018, during which Falwell would watch, according to Reuters.
The Falwells had meanwhile financed a Miami beach hostel, in which Granda also had invested, according to Reuters. The Falwells filed a lawsuit over its ownership in 2015, which was dismissed, and they refiled in 2017.
Reuters and The New York Times also reported in 2019 that in 2015, Falwell sought Trump's attorney Michael Cohen — who at the time had arranged for hush-money payments on the president's behalf to pay for the silence of women who alleged affairs with the president — to get rid of photos that Cohen allegedly claimed should be kept 'between husband and wife.'
After leaving the university, Liberty launched an investigation into his alleged conduct and a wave of litigation followed. Falwell sued for defamation, but the complaint was dropped. Liberty then sued Falwell in 2021 alleging breach of contract, and in 2023, Falwell filed a lawsuit over his retirement package and another against the use of his father's image.
Those claims were dropped by July 2024, when the university announced a settlement was reached.
The settlement 'is based on a mutual understanding regarding the amount Liberty University will pay its former president in authorized retirement and severance under the various disputed agreements' as well as 'the conditions under which the university will make use of Dr. Jerry Falwell, Sr.'s name, image, and likeness,' Liberty said at the time.
Falwell, university and its board 'sincerely regret the lengthy and painful litigation process, and each take responsibility for their part in the disputes,' according to the statement.
'Falwell acknowledges and apologizes for the errors in judgement and mistakes made during his time of leadership,' the statement aThe Board of Trustees acknowledge and apologize for the errors and mistakes made on their part as well. The Trustees and Falwell are committed to move forward in a spirit of forgiveness and with the hope of reconciliation in a Christ honoring manner.'
The university and its board promised no further statements on the settlement.
That same year, President Joe Biden's administration sought $16 million from the university following allegations that students were afraid to report sexual abuse, which included a $14 million fine and $2 million pledge from the university 'for on-campus safety improvements and compliance enhancements.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
13 minutes ago
- NBC News
Australia confident U.S. will proceed with AUKUS submarine deal after review
SYDNEY — Australia 's defense minister said Thursday he was confident that the AUKUS submarine pact with the United States and Britain would proceed, and that his government would work closely with the U.S. while the Trump administration conducted a formal review. Australia in 2023 committed to spend 368 billion Australian dollars ($239 billion) over three decades on AUKUS, the country's biggest ever defense project with the U.S. and Britain, to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines. A Pentagon official said the administration was reviewing AUKUS to ensure it was 'aligned with the President's America First agenda' on the eve of expected talks between President Donald Trump and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. In an Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio interview, Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles said AUKUS was in the strategic interests of all three countries and that the new review of the deal signed in 2021 when Joe Biden was the U.S. president was not a surprise. 'I am very confident this is going to happen,' he said of AUKUS, which would give Australia nuclear-powered submarines. 'This is a multi-decade plan. There will be governments that come and go and I think whenever we see a new government, a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken,' Marles told the ABC. Albanese is expected to meet Trump for the first time next week on the sidelines of the Group of 7 meeting in Canada, where the security allies will discuss a request from Washington for Australia to increase defense spending from 2% to 3.5% of gross domestic product. Albanese has said defense spending would rise to 2.3% and has declined to commit to the U.S. target. The opposition Liberal party on Thursday pressed Albanese to increase defense spending. Under AUKUS, Australia was scheduled to make a $2 billion payment in 2025 to the U.S. to help boost its submarine shipyards and speed up lagging production rates of Virginia-class submarines to allow the sale of up to three U.S. submarines to Australia starting in 2032. The first $500 million payment was made when Marles met with his U.S. counterpart, Pete Hegseth, in February. The Pentagon's top policy adviser Elbridge Colby, who has previously expressed concern that the U.S. would lose submarines to Australia at a critical time for military deterrence against China, will be a key figure in the review, examining the production rate of Virginia-class submarines, Marles said. 'It is important that those production and sustainment rates are improved,' he added. AUKUS would grow the U.S. and Australian defense industries and generate thousands of manufacturing jobs, Marles said in a statement. John Lee, an Australian Indo-Pacific expert at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank, said the Pentagon review was 'primarily an audit of American capability' and whether it can afford to sell up to five nuclear-powered submarines when it is not meeting its own production targets. 'Relatedly, the low Australian defense spending and ambiguity as to how it might contribute to a Taiwan contingency is also a factor,' Lee said. John Hamre, president of the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a former senior Pentagon official, told a Lowy Institute seminar in Sydney on Thursday there is a perception in Washington that 'the Albanese government has been supportive of AUKUS but not really leaning in on AUKUS,' and that defense spending is part of this. Under the multi-stage pact, four U.S.-commanded Virginia submarines will be hosted at a Western Australian navy base on the Indian Ocean starting in 2027, which a senior U.S. Navy commander told Congress in April gives the U.S. a 'straight shot to the South China Sea.' Albanese wants to buy three Virginia submarines starting in 2032 to bring its submarine force under Australian command. Britain and Australia will jointly build a new AUKUS-class submarine that is expected to come into service starting in 2040. Following a recent defense review, Britain said it would boost spending on its attack submarine fleet under AUKUS. Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who struck the AUKUS deal with Biden, said Thursday that Australia should 'make the case again' for the treaty.
The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Sen. Rand Paul calls Trump admin ‘incredibly petty' as he's uninvited from White House picnic
Sen. Rand Paul blasted President Donald Trump and his administration as 'incredibly petty' after his family's invitation to a White House picnic for members of Congress was abruptly rescinded. 'I think I'm the first senator in the history of the United States to be uninvited to the White House picnic,' the Kentucky Republican told reporters on Wednesday. 'I just find this incredibly petty. I mean – I have been, I think, nothing but polite to the president.' Trump himself may not see it that way, however, having been angered by Paul's recent opposition to his 'Big, Beautiful Bill.' Paul, a fiscal hawk, briefly formed an alliance with Elon Musk earlier this month when he labelled the president's signature tax and spending legislation 'a huge mistake,' joining the tech billionaire in expressing anxiety about the bill adding as much as $5 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. That led the president to lash out at the senator in a brace of posts on Truth Social, in the first of which he complained: 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming. He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!' In the second, he griped: 'Rand votes NO on everything, but never has any practical or constructive ideas. His ideas are actually crazy (losers!). The people of Kentucky can't stand him. This is a BIG GROWTH BILL!' Paul also risked Trump's wrath by criticizing the upcoming military parade in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, marking the president's 79th birthday and the 250th anniversary of the founding of the U.S. Army. The senator told reporters he has 'never been a big fan of goose-stepping soldiers in big tanks and missiles rolling down the street,' and compared the event to the sort of triumphalist show of might more commonly associated with the Soviet Union and North Korea. Paul has further provoked the administration by accusing it of 'running sort of a paid influencer campaign against me for two weeks on Twitter.' 'We know they're being paid because... someone has told us that the White House called them from the White House, and offered them money to attack me online,' he said. As if that were not enough, Paul has also attacked Trump's senior adviser Stephen Miller for 'basically going around casually talking about getting rid of habeas corpus.' The picnic blacklisting is nevertheless embarrassing for the senator, who learned of his exclusion when he inquired about picking up his tickets, according to Politico. Paul said he did not know whether Trump himself or a White House staffer had made the decision to cross him off the guest list, but said the 'level of immaturity is beyond words.'
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Democratic governors embrace border security, reject Trump immigrant 'abuses'
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - Three prominent Democratic U.S. governors face a grilling on Thursday from a Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives panel over immigration policy, as President Donald Trump steps up a crackdown on people living in the country illegally. The governors of New York, Illinois and Minnesota are due to testify to the House Oversight Committee following days of protests in downtown Los Angeles over the Trump administration's aggressive ramping up of arrests of migrants. Tensions escalated as Trump ordered the National Guard and Marines into California to provide additional security. Trump's immigration crackdown has become a major political flashpoint between the White House and national Democrats. California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, seen as a contender for the party's presidential nomination in 2028, in a Tuesday night video speech accused Trump of choosing "theatrics over public safety." Minnesota's Tim Walz, who ran unsuccessfully for vice president last year; Illinois' JB Pritzker, also seen a 2028 hopeful, and New York's Kathy Hochul, walked a careful line in their prepared testimony for Thursday's hearing, voicing support for immigration enforcement, if not Trump's tactics. "If they are undocumented, we want them out of Illinois and out of our country," Pritzker said. At the same time, Pritzker lashed out against "any violations of the law or abuses of power" and said, "Law-abiding, hardworking, tax-paying people who have been in this country for years should have a path to citizenship." Reuters/Ipsos polls show Trump getting more support for his handling of immigration than any other policy area. "Minnesota is not a sanctuary state," Walz proclaimed, adding that state officials cooperate with federal immigration authorities, while noting that it offers "respect" to cities and counties that choose to give no more than the legal minimum support to the Department of Homeland Security.
