Vice chairman of Kansas Board of Regents to resign post with two years left on term
TOPEKA — The vice chairman of the Kansas Board of Regents intends to resign from the state higher education board rather than complete the final two years of his second term.
Jon Rolph, president and CEO of a Wichita restaurant company, was appointed to the Board of Regents in 2019 by Gov. Laura Kelly. He is expected to depart by June 30. The governor would appoint a replacement, subject to confirmation by the Kansas Senate, to finish a term ending in June 2027.
The nine-person Board of Regents has jurisdiction over public universities, community colleges and technical colleges in Kansas.
'Jon is an enthusiastic supporter of higher education who has prioritized the needs of Kansans and our state during his time on the board,' said Carl Ice, chairman of the Board of Regents.
Ice said Rolph 'helped our system implement and move forward many key strategic initiatives. He has been an outstanding colleague.'
In 2021, Rolph endorsed a board policy that made it easier for campus administrators of the six state universities to suspend, dismiss or terminate employees, including tenured faculty members, without formally declaring a financial emergency. The policy was implemented in 2022 by Emporia State University to justify dismissal of 30 faculty. It triggered a state and federal court battle that continued into 2025.
In 2023, Rolph revealed that he had surgery to remove a tumor in his abdomen and was undergoing treatment for cancer.
Rolph was serving as chairman of the Board of Regents when the board voted in 2024 to change its diversity and multiculturalism policy under pressure from members of the Kansas Legislature.
The revised policy declared state universities in Kansas couldn't require faculty to pledge 'allegiance to, support for or opposition to diversity, equity or inclusion' or DEI.
'This is, again, our good-faith effort in trying to listen to the Legislature,' Rolph said at the time.
Rolph's company, Thrive Restaurant Group, operates or owns more than 170 restaurants. It is the second-largest Applebee's franchisee with restaurants in 15 states. He was a student body president at Baylor University.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Trump order on homelessness will undo decades of progress, Kansas service providers warn
A man lies under shading on July 19, 2022, on North Topeka Avenue in Wichita. Service providers say an executive order by President Donald Trump could jeopardize their efforts to help those who are experiencing homelessness. (Lily O'Shea Becker/Kansas Reflector) TOPEKA — Christine English-Baird spends at least one day a week distributing basic supplies to homeless people in Wichita, home to one of Kansas' largest homeless populations. 'I do that because I can't even fathom anybody else going through what I did,' English-Baird said. 'Feeling invisible. Feeling alone.' But English-Baird, who was homeless in Colorado and housing insecure in Kansas, says the services that once helped her could be jeopardized by President Donald Trump's July 24 executive order, which encourages involuntary institutionalization for people in mental health crises and increased criminal pressure on people experiencing homelessness across the United States. The order makes hefty promises of 'fighting vagrancy,' 'ending support for 'housing first' policies' and 'encouraging civil commitment.' Trump followed the July order with another that deployed National Guard troops to police District of Columbia streets, targeting 'drugged-out maniacs and homeless people,' he said in an Aug. 11 news conference. The Trump administration's approach to homelessness has sparked concern among social service providers, experts and advocates, who say the July order is unspooling decades of progress. They are skeptical that the order's provisions will be within reach, especially as cuts to Medicaid and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development are imminent. Plus, institutionalization and criminalization are some of the most expensive and ineffective ways to address homelessness, said Steve Berg, chief policy officer with the National Alliance to End Homelessness. The threat of being taken into custody 'sets people against each other,' Berg said. 'I know one thing really is true about places that have made progress on homelessness is that people are working together,' he said. 'And if people are at each other's throats over things like this, then there's going to be more homelessness.' Kansas Senate President Ty Masterson, an Andover Republican who is seeking his party's nomination for governor, said Trump followed through 'on his promise to restore law and order in our Kansas communities.' 'State legislation should focus on mental health and addiction treatment, reducing encampments, and keeping Kansans safe,' he said in a statement. 'I'm committed to working with the White House in any way I can to deliver on the President's agenda.' English-Baird's life was a series of revolving doors, beginning with fleeing a violent partner in Denver. She slept in a domestic violence shelter, a transitional shelter, an apartment paid for by her ex, then a rental, a bus stop, sometimes a jail cell and then the streets for three-and-a-half years. At times, she nearly died, she said. She lost a lot along the way: apartments, her son, sometimes hope. But English-Baird connected with a friend in Kansas who put her up so she could recover from substance use, build savings and regain hope. With a lifetime restraining order against her ex and a new life with her husband and son, she now works to influence policies and practices for how homeless people are treated in Kansas through her role on a statewide board. 'Nobody wants to see anybody homeless, regardless of what that means,' English-Baird said. To her, it means providing people safe, affordable housing, support, a sense of belonging and purpose. To the Trump administration, it means something else entirely. During the first Trump administration, there wasn't much attention on homelessness, Berg said, until the end of Trump's term, when elected officials began promoting the idea of putting homeless people in camps. Since then, Berg said, 'there's been a desire to lock people up, I think. There's no polite way of saying it.' The executive order takes a four-pronged approach with the stated goal of 'protecting public safety.' It cites the most recent national data that estimates how many people were experiencing homelessness on a given night last year in the U.S. — nearly 771,500 people, 274,000 of whom were unsheltered. In Kansas, almost 2,800 people experienced homelessness, which is one of the lowest state totals in the country but is also considered by service providers to be an undercount. The order directs the U.S. Attorney General to broaden the criteria that governments use to involuntarily commit people, which currently is based on whether someone poses an imminent risk to themself or others. It also asks federal agencies to give funding preference to governments that 'enforce prohibitions on open illicit drug use, urban camping and loitering, and urban squatting, and track the location of sex offenders.' It directs funding to be allocated to 'ensure individuals camping on streets and causing public disorder and that are suffering from serious mental illness or addiction are moved into treatment centers, assisted outpatient treatment, or other facilities.' It also deprioritizes Housing First programs, which get people into safe, affordable housing, often in tandem with supportive services. Donald Whitehead Jr., executive director of the National Coalition for the Homeless, said in a July 24 statement that the executive orders take a punitive approach, which 'has consistently failed to resolve homelessness' while exacerbating the challenges faced by people experiencing homelessness, substance use disorders or mental health issues. 'Everyone deserves a safe place to live,' Whitehead said. 'These executive orders ignore decades of evidence-based housing and support services in practice.' The salient question, according to Randy Callstrom, the CEO of Wyandot Behavioral Health Network in Kansas City, Kansas, is where will people go? In Kansas, he said, there is no place for people to turn. 'Even if you move people from one part of a community, they will go somewhere else,' he said. He added: 'Unless those individuals are moving into housing, they're still going to be living in the community unhoused.' Much depends on how the executive order is actually carried out, he said. Regardless, he said, the order significantly modifies people's civil liberties. And he predicts homelessness will get worse. The order moves 'things back 35-40 years or longer,' Callstrom said, 'and that's concerning.' He worries that if the order is enforced, mental health will be stigmatized and local governments, service organizations, hospitals, jails and law enforcement will be strained. The order misses the mark when it comes to effectively serving people experiencing homelessness, Callstrom said. '(A) longtime misperception around people who are homeless is that it is a moral failure,' he said, 'that these are individuals who are less than, that we just want to push them out of line of sight and wish the problem will go away, when the reality is, you know, in many, many cases, the people who end up living unhoused have experienced many traumas in their life.' He leads a community mental health center, which he said doesn't have enough resources to fulfill the order's demands. At the only public psychiatric hospital in eastern Kansas, Osawatomie State Hospital, a waitlist of 30-50 people has remained constant for the past decade, he said. A publicly available report indicated the waitlist was at 37 people in early August. Kansas must build new facilities or convince current facilities to take on more people, Callstrom said. Kansas has budgeted for roughly 710 beds in public psychiatric facilities, said Cara Sloan-Ramos, a spokeswoman for the Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services. More than 660 of them are occupied, according to data from the department. More than 2,500 adults and more than 1,500 children use services at private psychiatric institutions. According to a publicly available database containing regular updates of bed availability at public and private psychiatric facilities across the region, no beds were available at state hospitals. In the order, the White House argues federal and state governments 'have spent tens of billions of dollars on failed programs that address homelessness but not its root causes, leaving other citizens vulnerable to public safety threats.' Agencies at all levels of government across the United States have implemented Housing First policies. Once housed, supportive services address people's mental health, substance use, employment, familial connections and other reintegration efforts. The order mimics the anti-Housing First efforts of the Cicero Institute, a Texas-based conservative think tank, which has pushed states for years to ban homelessness. Kansas Republicans in 2023 entertained the group's proposal at a legislative hearing, where a Cicero Institute fellow was the only proponent. English-Baird said she is 'a firm believer' in Housing First. She has seen it work on both sides — as someone in need of housing and as someone offering aid and crafting policy on a board for the Kansas Statewide Homeless Coalition. When implemented correctly, she said, the approach gains people's trust. 'Without a stable environment, you can't address mental health. You can't address addiction,' she said. Eliminating funding for organizations, especially rural ones, 'literally takes away all the progress we're making,' English-Baird said. Forcing people to be institutionalized, as the order encourages, 'doesn't do anything to get people housed,' she said. Institutional beds are scarce, anyway, she added. The order also bars grant funding from being used for harm reduction efforts, such as safe injection sites. Harm reduction focuses on reducing the adverse outcomes of drug use, which can include distributing naloxone, sterile syringes and fentanyl test kits, along with first aid, treatment resources and educational materials on overdose prevention. Harm reduction offers people supplies to stay alive and as disease-free as possible, said English-Baird, who experienced substance use and addiction. She now offers mutual aid to people experiencing homelessness in the Wichita area. Harm reduction is key, she said, to expanding treatment options and connecting people to needed mental health services. 'But we can't do that if they're dead,' she said. In Kansas, illicit drug possession and distribution carry criminal penalties, as does use or possession of drug paraphernalia. Cities across the state have passed ordinances to restrict unauthorized camping on public or private land, including Lawrence, Leavenworth, Topeka and Wichita. Some also regulate panhandling and loitering. Berg, with the National Alliance to End Homelessness, said he also thinks the order will result in more people experiencing homelessness. If 'the states that want to do the cost-effective solutions to homelessness can't get the money to do it because they're not punitive enough, then that's going to mean more homelessness,' he said. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
For Kansas GOP, Trump and his ‘beautiful' bill parallel Brownback's poisonous tax ‘experiment'
President Donald Trump holds up the "big, beautiful bill" that was signed into law as during a Fourth of July military family picnic on the South Lawn of the White House on July 4, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Alex Brandon - Pool/Getty Images) Within a year, Kansans will be voting to elect a new governor and fill a U.S. Senate seat, plus four congressional seats, among elections for other offices. Candidates are already announcing for office, and campaigns are getting underway. Most Republican candidates are fawning at the feet of President Donald Trump. The groveling of these sycophants may be misplaced as Kansas voters recall the toxic remains of Gov. Sam Brownback's infamous tax experiment, initiated in 2012 and abandoned in 2017 after five years of unfair taxes, deficit spending, and record debt. Trump's 'one big, beautiful bill' has followed a path that parallels Brownback's tax experiment and may experience the same result. After six months in office, available evidence suggests that Trump and the bill may become political liabilities for the grovelers. Take a look at the parallels. Both Brownback and Trump chose partisanship rather than seeking common ground, and as a result, political liability falls entirely on Republicans. Democrats were shut out of decisions. Both partisan plans had to be forced through with brazen arm-twisting. When Brownback's tax bill stalled over disagreements between the legislative chambers, the governor double-crossed state Senate leadership and signed a flawed bill intended for negotiation. Brownback later stood aside as the Kansas Chamber of Commerce PAC effectively purged state senators of the governor's party who opposed the policy. Trump issued multiple threats of primary challenges targeted at resistant Republicans to bring them into line on the 'big, beautiful bill.' One senator who balked fell victim to the pressure and announced he would not seek reelection. Both Brownback's tax experiment and Trump's bill were Koch inspired. Brownback sought the advice of Arthur Laffer, a Koch-sponsored tax-cut guru, and shortly thereafter embraced 'a real live experiment' to eliminate state income taxes. Koch and a handful of well-heeled donors underwrote a million-dollar campaign through the Chamber PAC to elect legislators willing to do their bidding. Their campaign succeeded. Americans for Prosperity, a Koch political network, called early for Trump to renew and deepen tax cuts and launched a multimillion-dollar campaign to 'turn up the heat' on Congress for quick passage. Both Brownback's tax experiment and Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' had common intent: Benefiting the wealthy while costing everyone else. Brownback's experiment tilted the tax burden from rich to poor; it further exempted 330,000 businesses from the income tax and promised the eventual elimination of the tax. Trump's law gives households with incomes in the top 10% a break of $12,000 per year while those in the bottom 10% pay an additional $1,600, according to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office. The top 1% are the prime beneficiaries. Additionally, both Brownback and Trump coupled tax cuts for the rich with measures undermining aid to the needy. Brownback restricted eligibility for income support and food assistance and blocked the expansion of Medicaid. The budget office estimates the 'big, beautiful bill' will slash more than $1 trillion in spending from Medicaid and food assistance for the next 10 years, primarily by restricting eligibility for aid. Ten to 12 million will be cut from Medicaid, and those qualified for food assistance will fall as well. Brownback's experiment created red ink as far as the eye could see, and Trump's plan will do the same. The Kansas Legislative Research Department projected soaring deficits from Brownback's tax experiment, amounting to $2.5 billion in the first five years. Even after a sales tax increase, the depletion of state balances and the diversion of highway funds, the state faced a mid-year deficit of $300 million in 2017. The Congressional Budget Office estimates Trump's law will increase the deficit to $3.4 trillion over the next 10 years and add $4 trillion to the national debt when interest payments are taken into account. Even so, the rhetoric of both Brownback and Trump soared: Brownback claimed his experiment would provide 'a glide path to zero' for state income taxes. And further: 'Look out Texas, here comes Kansas!' Trump declares the 'big, beautiful bill' would 'make this country into a rocket ship. It's going to be really great. … We'll have growth in record numbers.' After five years of unbalanced budgeting, one-sided taxing, and unprecedented borrowing, Kansas voters had seen enough of Brownback's experiment. The governor's approval ratings steadily sank to the lowest in the nation among governors. In 2016, voters ousted Brownback's legislative allies and elected a bipartisan legislative coalition that expeditiously abandoned the experiment and restored sanity to state finances. In Trump's first six months, his disapproval ratings have bumped up by 10 percentage points, well above comparable figures for Biden, Obama, and George W. Bush. Recent polling indicates 55% disapproval of the 'big, beautiful bill,' compared with 29% approval. In the upcoming election contests, Kansans will have the opportunity to query incumbents about their choices: shoddy partisan tactics over bipartisanship. Sponsorship by Koch. Support for taxes that benefit the rich and ditch the poor. Votes that swamped the state and nation in a sea of red ink. We now what they did back in 2016. We'll see what they decide in 2026. H. Edward Flentje is a professor emeritus at Wichita State University and formerly was director and professor in the Hugo Wall School of Public Affairs at the university. He has written and edited numerous publications, including most recently co-writing and co-editing 'Reform and Reaction: The Arc of Kansas Politics.' Through its opinion section, Kansas Reflector works to amplify the voices of people who are affected by public policies or excluded from public debate. Find information, including how to submit your own commentary, here.
Los Angeles Times
a day ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump expands crusade against ‘woke' from the Smithsonian to museums across the country
President Trump on Tuesday said he intends to expand his crusade against what he calls 'woke' ideology from the Smithsonian Institution to museums across the country. 'The Museums throughout Washington, but all over the Country are, essentially, the last remaining segment of 'WOKE,'' Trump wrote on Truth Social, adding that the Smithsonian is 'out of control,' and that everything featured in its exhibits discuss, 'how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future.' To prevent more of the same in other institutions, Trump said he has instructed his attorneys, 'to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made.' Contacted for comment, a White House rep said, 'President Trump will explore all options and avenues to get the Woke out of the Smithsonian and hold them accountable. He will start with the Smithsonian and then go from there.' They did not respond to a request for clarification on how the administration intends to vet the content of exhibits at other museums, or whether or not the president intends to issue an executive order with details on a plan. Trump's concern about the Smithsonian first became public in late March when he issued an executive order titled 'Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,' which directed Vice President JD Vance to remove 'improper ideology' from the Smithsonian's 21 museums and the National Zoo in Washington, D.C. Two months later, Trump exerted even greater control when he said he'd fired Kim Sajet, the longtime director of the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery, for being 'a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI.' It soon became apparent that it wasn't in Trump's power to do so and Sajet continued to work. In early June the Smithsonian rejected Trump's attempt to fire Sajet after a lengthy Board of Regents meeting. The Regents issued a statement stating that the organization's secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch, 'has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian.' It was implied that Bunch would be the one making personnel decisions, not Trump. Still, the statement opened the door to the idea that the Smithsonian might make changes that would appease Trump's criticism. 'To reinforce our nonpartisan stature, the Board of Regents has directed the Secretary to articulate specific expectations to museum directors and staff regarding content in Smithsonian museums, give directors reasonable time to make any needed changes to ensure unbiased content, and to report back to the Board on progress and any needed personnel changes based on success or lack thereof in making the needed changes,' the statement read. Sajet resigned a few days later, writing in a note to staff, 'From the very beginning, my guiding principle has been to put the museum first. Today, I believe that stepping aside is the best way to serve the institution I hold so deeply in my heart.' Other museums are ringing alarm bells about what it could mean for art and history at large. The Japanese American National Museum in L.A.'s Little Tokyo recently issued a statement condemning what it called the, 'Reshaping of Smithsonian Museums' to fit 'the administration's historical interpretation.' 'These latest attempts to sanitize and reshape history to fit a narrow ideological narrative amount to nothing less than the erasure of history,' said JANM's President and Chief Executive Ann Burroughs. 'We cannot reverse America's journey toward a more just and equitable future. Museums must be places of truth, not propaganda — spaces where the next generation can confront the complexity of our nation's injustices, mistakes, and darkest chapters; where empathy, social responsibility, and the courage to defend democracy are nurtured.' The American Alliance of Museums also recently issued a statement warning of 'growing threats of censorship against U.S. museums.' 'In recent months, museums have faced increasing external pressures to modify, remove, or limit exhibitions and programs,' the statement read. 'People trust museums because they rely on independent scholarship and research, uphold high professional standards, and embrace open inquiry. When any directive dictates what should or should not be displayed, it risks narrowing the public's window into evidence, ideas, and a full range of perspectives. 'This is not just a concern for select institutions,' the statement continued. 'These pressures can create a chilling effect across the entire museum sector.'
