
15% of households couldn't cope with a financial emergency
How would your household deal with an unexpected financial emergency costing €1000?
That was a question posed as part of this month's Credit Union Consumer Sentiment survey.
Just over a third of consumers say that they would use savings, while 18% say they would use their income, and 15% say they would be unable to cope with an unexpected expense or bill.
Asking about people's capacity to weather a financial emergency has been part of the survey for the past five years, and is based on a similar question asked in the regular "Report on the Economic Well-Being of US households" conducted each year by the US Federal Reserve.
The findings show the share of Irish consumers resorting to savings has been trending down in the past two years from the 2023 peak of 44%.
Economist Austin Hughes says the slightly reduced reliance on savings in the 2025 survey could reflect the fact that some consumers have drawn down Covid-era savings or required them for other purposes such as a deposit for a house purchase.
"It may also be that, in a more uncertain environment, that some consumers are trying to build a higher level of precautionary or long-term savings," he said.
"As the overall level of household deposits has continued to increase, these results might also be consistent with a greater concentration of savings in wealthier households of late."
As might be expected, there was a strong positive correlation between income and capacity to use savings in a financial emergency in the 2025 survey.
Over 65's were the age group most likely to draw on savings, followed by those aged 25 to 34, perhaps reflecting less family-related financial commitments in these demographics. Those aged under 25 tended not to say they would use savings.
The results also show a small increase in those who say they would use their income to handle a financial emergency to just under one in five consumers or 18%.
"There has been a modest trend increase in reliance on incomes through the past six years that may reflect benefits from a resilient economy and an easing in cost-of-living strains for some consumers. Some element of this uptick could also reflect a switch necessitated by depleted or spoken-for savings," Mr Hughes said.
The age group most likely to draw on their incomes in a financial emergency were the under 25's, followed by the over 65's - "a result that may speak of widely differing income circumstances within these age groups".
A significant 15% of Irish consumers say they would be unable to cope with a financial emergency costing €1000 in 2025.
The economist said while this is lower than the peak 17% share reported in 2023, it still represents a higher share than the 7% of consumers who said they would be unable to handle a financial emergency costing €1000 in the 2021 survey.
"In that respect, it suggests continuing strains on household finances in Ireland from the recent cost-of-living crisis," he said.
"It may be worth trying to reconcile the incidence of this response in the 2025 survey with a clear improvement in overall 'macro' conditions in the Irish economy through the past year," he said.
"While aggregate household income increased in 'real' or inflation-adjusted terms, the number of households is likely to have increased faster, meaning that, on average, household spending power has declined," the economist stated.
Mr Hughes said, while inflation has eased over the past year, it has started to pick up again in recent months, and far more importantly, consumer prices have not retraced any of the sharp increases of recent years.
"In these circumstances, it is not entirely surprising that significant numbers of Irish consumers say they would struggle to cope with a financial emergency at present," he said.
Those on higher incomes are less likely to say they could not handle a financial emergency in the 2025 survey as are those who say they are currently making ends meet with ease. This response was altogether more common among females than males.
It was also most common among those aged between 45 and 64, while those aged 65 and over were the demographic least likely to give this response, which Mr Hughes said it perhaps suggests a heavy burden of 'fixed' household costs among the middle-aged leaving many with little capacity to cope with the unexpected.
While there are relatively small numbers of consumers in most other categories of responses, the survey suggests a somewhat greater incidence of reliance on financial lenders other than on banks and credit unions, or on credit cards.
"This response was more prevalent among those on low incomes and those facing difficulties making ends meet. This might hint at the worrisome sight of a small but not insignificant group of consumers who are both cash and credit-constrained. The very small number who would resort to selling something would also fall under this heading."
Overall, the 2025 'financial emergency' survey would seem to emphasise an important if often overlooked consideration in relation to the circumstances of the Irish consumer at present, Mr Hughes said.
"Financial circumstances continue to vary markedly across Irish households. While that may not appear surprising, it counters the widely adopted economic assumption of the 'representative agent' which implies that a rising 'macro' tide must inevitably lift all boats. In that regard, it sheds light on why, in a 'Great' Irish economy, consumer sentiment suggests so many consumers may be 'grumpy'," he stated.
"From a policy perspective, these survey findings run counter to the widely heard argument that lower inflation and rising aggregate incomes mean that further fiscal supports are no longer required," he said.
"Beyond the immediate strains highlighted in the survey, the evidence at home, and, in many instances, more dangerously abroad, is that economic and social fracture is damaging and destabilising. Those framing Budget '26 need to be conscious that trade threats are not the only challenge the Irish economy faces at present," he concluded.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Extra.ie
3 hours ago
- Extra.ie
Twix joins list of ads banned from Irish and UK TV
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) caused quite a stir this week for their move to pull a 70s-themed advertisement for chocolate bar, Twix, due to the alleged promotion of 'unsafe driving.' The advertisement was released in March of this year but has since been banned by the ASA following five complaints that the footage 'condoned unsafe driving.' The commercial sees two cars involved in a car chase with the man in the first car putting the foot down in order to get away from the car chasing him. The advertisement was released in March of this year but has since been banned by the ASA following five complaints that the footage 'condoned unsafe driving.' Pic: Twix The man then takes a sharp turn which leads the vehicle to come off the side of the road and overturn a number of times before ending up overturned on top of an identical car, similar to the two bars in a Twix. The ASA acknowledged that there were 'fantastical elements' in the ad but upheld the complaints and ruled the advertisement could not appear in its current form again. Agencies such as the ASA and the ASAI (Avertising Standards Authority of Ireland) work to regulate TV commercials within their countries. View this post on Instagram A post shared by (@extradotie) Following the latest banned advertisement, take a look at five more advertisements that have been pulled across Irish and/or British TV. In 2023, the ASAI banned a piggybank commercial which had been created for Bank of Ireland due to the idea that the ad 'normalised the illegal and environmentally corrupt practice of backyard burning.' The television ad promoted Bank of Ireland's Big Move initiative to help consumers switch banks with ease, following the withdrawal of two banks from the market. The objected scene showed a man and a woman standing over a burning barrel, with the narrator saying: 'Break-ups are always a bit messy.' The woman, holding a money jar in the shape of a hippo then says: 'They gave me this when we first met' – before throwing the jar into the burning barrel. Despite the bank highlighting that no materials were 'actually fully burnt,' the ASAI complaints committee found that apart from limited circumstances, the backyard burning of waste was illegal and subject to prosecution, therefore the ad was banned. Going back to 2017, the commercials watchdog pulled a cinema advertisement for car brand Nissan due to the depiction of bullying and gender sterotypes. The two and a half minute video sees a young boy, who does errands for an elderly neighbour, beaten up by a group of older boys every time he does the errands for the elderly lady. The bullying continues throughout the years, with the youngster becoming more and more withdrawn as a result. Meanwhile, his little sister decides to join a martial arts class and is eventually able to step into defend her brother. No violence is shown throughout the ad, however, the young boy is seen with cuts and bruises on a number of occassions. Following the finale where the sister defends her brother, the siblings transform into cars. The ad was banned when the ASAI ruled that the message was 'that violence could be used to revolve issues and that it was an appropriate response to bullying.' Pic: Youtube Period product Tampax' Tampax and Tea advertisement was banned in Ireland in 2020 with the ASAI committee ruling that it 'should not run in the same format again,' due to being offensive. With almost 100 complaints made to the watchdog, complainants found the advertisement offensive, crude and vulgar. The advertisement came in the from of a fake talk show with the host asking her guest and audience members if they can feel their tampon before telling them that they shouldn't and explaining it might not be inserted properly. 'Ya gotta get it up there girls!' the host then exclaims. Despite the ASAI noting that the ad had provided 'factual information in a manner that was neither explicit nor graphic,' it was banned from Irish TV. Beer brand Heineken have had Formula 1 star Max Verstappen on board as an ambassador in recent months, with the promotion of their 0.0 beer and campaign: 'The best driver is the one who is not drinking.' While many will be familiar with the TV advertisement, the Dutch company were left with no choice but to remove the advertisement on social media due to failure in meeting advertising standards. The paid social media advert saw the Verstappen holding a bottle of the non-alcoholic alternative and the slogan: 'The best driver is the one who is not drinking.' Unfortunately, the standard alcohol Heineken logo was on the bottom of the photograph, instead of the alcohol free logo with the UK watchdog ruling that there wasn't 'sufficiently prominent statement of the product's abv.' They said: 'The only reference in the ad to abv was the label on the bottle of Heineken 0.0 beer held by Max Verstappen. However, the bottle was relatively small, especially comparing the text on the label to the image of Max Verstappen, who was the focus of the ad. 'We therefore did not consider that was a sufficiently prominent statement of the product's abv.' Ahead of the Six Nations in 2012, the BBC pulled their promotional trailer due to fears of it would be perceived as being anti-English. The minute-long ad sees a number of groups from Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Italy of people beaming as they shout, 'England' in what one might think was the groups cheering the team on. A caption then reads: 'The Six Nations. It's not about who you want to win… It's about who you want to lose.' The video then cuts to a group of English supporters who are divided in who they want to see losing the tournament.


Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
GAA welcomes British government's offer of €59m in funding for Casement Park rebuild but project is still €100m short
The Irish Government and the GAA have welcomed the UK's belated decision to commit €59m in funding to the redevelopment of Casement Park.


RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Median household net wealth up 29% between 2020 and 2023
New figures from the Central Statistics Office show that the median net wealth value of Irish households was €256,900 in 2023. This marked an increase of €58,500 or 29% on the 2020 value of €198,400. Net wealth is the value of any assets owned minus the value of any debt and the median value is obtained by arranging all households in ascending order from the smallest to the largest value and then selecting the middle value. The CSO said that property is the main source of wealth with 46% of gross wealth coming from the value of the main residence. Today's figures show that 68% of households owned their main residence in 2023 with a median value of €340,000, up €80,000 or 30.8% from the €260,000 median value in 2020. The median net wealth for households that own their main residence was €391,600 in 2023 compared with €10,200 for those who rent or those living rent free. To be in the top 10% of households, a net household wealth of about €1,024,000 is needed. The CSO said this threshold was up from €838,000 in 2020 and is the highest ever recorded in this survey which began in 2015. The bottom 10% of households had less than €2,400 in household net wealth in 2023, the CSO said. This threshold was up from €1,300 in 2020. Today's figures show that the Eastern & Midland region (Dublin, Wicklow, Kildare, Meath, Louth, Longford, Offaly, Westmeath and Laois) had the highest median net wealth at €264,400. This was followed by the Southern region (Clare, Tipperary, Limerick, Waterford, Kilkenny, Carlow, Wexford, Cork and Kerry) at €251,700 and the Northern & Western region (Donegal, Sligo, Leitrim, Cavan, Monaghan, Galway, Mayo and Roscommon) at €239,000. The CSO said this was mainly driven by higher house prices in the Eastern & Midland region which includes Dublin and its commuter counties. Meanwhile, 66% of households had some form of debt in 2023 such as a mortgage, personal loan, or credit card balance. This was down from 69% in 2020. The median value of debt, for those that had it, was €34,600, up from €25,000 in 2020.