
Stray dogs case: 71% support Supreme Court order, 24% oppose it, says survey
Only 24 percent of respondents said they "don't support' the order and 5 percent of respondents did not give a clear answer.
The survey said the result clearly showed that a large majority of residents of Delhi NCR "are in favour of their municipality executing the two judge bench order."
The Local Circle's survey received 12,816 responses from residents of Delhi, Gurugram, Noida, Faridabad and Ghaziabad. As many as 62 percent respondents were men, while 38 percent respondents were women.
The Supreme Court on Thursday, 14 August, reserved an order on a prayer seeking an interim stay on the 11 August order, in which the two-judge bench ordered shifting Delhi-NCR stray dogs to shelter homes.
During the hearing, the Supreme Court asked local authorities about their position on implementing the Animal Birth Control rules.
The three-judge bench headed by Justice Vikram Nath said, "The whole problem is because of inaction of local authorities". The bench, also comprising Justices Sandeep Mehta and N V Anjaria, said everyone who has moved the apex court and filed intervention will have to own responsibility.
The hearing on Thursday followed widespread protests against the Supreme Court's earlier order directing the blanket removal of stray dogs from all Delhi—NCR areas.
The Supreme Court had passed a slew of directions on August 11 while hearing a suo motu case initiated on July 28 over stray dog bites leading to rabies, particularly among children, in the national capital
On August 11, the two-judge bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan observed instances of dog bites had given rise to an 'extremely grim' situation and ordered the permanent relocation of all strays in Delhi-NCR 'at the earliest."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
14 minutes ago
- Business Standard
EC makes public names of 6.5 mn people deleted from Bihar voter list
The Election Commission (EC) on Monday came out with the names of 65 lakh people who were removed from the draft electoral rolls published as part of the special intensive revision (SIR) exercise, officials said. The development came in the backdrop of the Supreme Court's direction that details of the deleted names be made public by August 19 and a compliance report be filed by August 22. The EC is publishing the names of 'ASD' (Absentee, Shifted, and Dead) voters across polling booths, and is likely to do so online as has been directed by the apex court, they said. According to the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), Bihar, ASD lists have been displayed at polling booths in Rohtas, Begusarai, Arwal and other places.


New Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Election Commission makes public names of 65 lakh people deleted from Bihar voter list during SIR
PATNA: The Election Commission (EC) on Monday came out with the names of 65 lakh people who were removed from the draft electoral rolls published as part of the special intensive revision (SIR) exercise, officials said. The development came in the backdrop of the Supreme Court's direction that details of the deleted names be made public by August 19 and a compliance report be filed by August 22. The EC is publishing the names of 'ASD' (Absentee, Shifted, and Dead) voters across polling booths, and is likely to do so online as has been directed by the apex court, they said. According to the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), Bihar, ASD lists have been displayed at polling booths in Rohtas, Begusarai, Arwal and other places.


Scroll.in
14 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
SC dismisses AAP MP's plea against UP government shutting 105 primary schools
The Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear a petition filed by Aam Aadmi Party MP Sanjay Singh challenging the Uttar Pradesh government's decision to shut down 105 primary schools, Live Law reported. A bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and AG Masih noted that the matter is pending before the Allahabad High Court. It agreed to Singh's request to direct the High Court to hear the matter expeditiously. In June, the Uttar Pradesh government had ordered the closure of the schools after finding that they had either zero or very few students enrolled. The state government had said that they would be 'paired' with other institutions. In his petition, Singh had argued that the state government's decision was 'arbitrary, unconstitutional and legally impermissible'. He added that it would negatively affect the access to education of many children in the state. Singh also said that the order violated children's right to education under Article 21A of the Constitution and the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. The MP told the court that the Right to Education Rules require the establishment of a primary school within one kilometre of every habitation with at least 300 residents. The Uttar Pradesh government has defended the move as part of a policy restructuring and alignment with the National Education Policy 2020, arguing that sustaining schools with negligible student strength was inefficient, the Hindustan Times reported.