Anger over axing of scholarships
Staff and students were informed of the cuts to doctoral scholarships in an email from vice-chancellor Grant Robertson this week.
"We are now in a situation where, if we continue to award scholarships using our current approach, what is set to be a tight 2026 scholarship budget ... will likely be required entirely to fund students already studying with us now or who will have started based on 2025 offers," the email says.
"A consequence of that situation would be that, to stay within budget, there would be no funding for new scholarship offers in 2026. This is a position I want to avoid. "
Mr Robertson's email also referred to the difficult financial environment the university was facing: "Both at Otago and nationally we face tightening research funding and significant strategic shifts in the external landscape".
Otago University Students' Association president Liam White said the announcement was "a huge shock, and frankly, disappointing".
"It seems like all of this has happened rather quickly, without a ton of notice, and I am concerned for the students that potentially have planned the next three years of their life and now, for whatever reason, aren't able to get a scholarship."
An Otago University spokeswoman said the decision was expected to mean a reduction of about 50 doctoral scholarships in the coming months.
It still expected to award 140 of the scholarships this year.
OUSA postgraduate representative Josh Stewart said he was absolutely livid at the university's "short-sighted decision making" and the lack of communication.
"I really feel for all the students who consistently have to deal with the university system, where the ballpark keeps changing, and they don't get any say in the matter."
Many students he had spoken to about the changes were now considering studying elsewhere, he said.
"Otago is always having to compete with doctoral scholarships overseas ... If they, however, stay at Otago, one would think that a degree of loyalty will be rewarded, but now the rules have changed again."
Green MP Francisco Hernandez had also seen the email.
He said the announcement was the natural result of the government's Budget decision to cut overall tertiary funding by $162 million.
"We are already experiencing a mass exodus of some of our best and brightest young people. These short-sighted cuts risk leaving communities like Dunedin as hollowed-out husks."
MPols student Lindsay Roberts was among many students concerned about their academic future at Otago University.
"I think for me and anyone considering doing a PhD in the future it kind of changes the incentive, to progress your career and progress your academic journey, you do want some kind of financial support as there is a big financial risk.
"It pushes the incentive elsewhere — I've discussed going to Waikato University," Mr Roberts said.
Former Otago University academic Prof Robin Gauld, now executive dean of Bond Business School at Bond University in Queensland, said he was aware of the concerns among the professoriate at his former university.
"Good PhD students are incredible. They go on to be stellar academics, and they're incredibly productive.
"So they build reputation and they build a research pipeline. They are a pretty important piece of the university's lifeblood, really."
Mr Robertson's email said the September and November Graduate Research Committee doctoral scholarship panels and award rounds would be cancelled.
Students who met the academic criteria for an automatic scholarship award would still be accepted and it would follow through with offers to those approved at the most recent (June) meeting of the Graduate Research Committee and the agreed Maori and Pacific Strategic awards.
"Our budget for 2026 must continue the path to reducing our deficit and returning us to a financial surplus, as required by the Tertiary Education Commission."
A university spokeswoman said it forecast spending about $19.77m on doctoral scholarships this year, slightly above last year's spend of $18.26m. It declined to give a projected spend for next year, other than to say it was "certainly no more " than this year.
It did not expect the change to affect its reputation.
"This is a temporary pause on new doctoral scholarship offers. We have hundreds of doctoral scholarship students studying at Otago, and we will be awarding more scholarships this year and next year."
matthew.littlewood@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
NZ Government allocates $25m for referendum on four-year parliamentary terms
Willis' spokesman directed the Herald's questions to Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith. In a statement, Goldsmith said he is satisfied the 'allocated funding of $25m would enable the Electoral Commission and the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) to appropriately implement any referendum and information programme'. He said no decision has been made on whether the legislation required for a referendum on four-year terms – The Term of Parliament (Enabling four-year Term) Legislation Amendment Bill – will proceed beyond select committee stage. Several parties close to the matter suggested to the Herald that both the limited budget and the limited capacity of the Electoral Commission, in light of significant electoral change the Government is also pursuing, mean a referendum is very unlikely to go ahead in 2026. In addition, the amendment bill in its current form is complicated and too messy to underpin a clean referendum question. The Act Party and the New Zealand First Party coalition agreements with the National Party agree that the legislation for four-year parliamentary terms should reach first reading and select committee stage respectively. Neither specify that a referendum must be held in 2026, though the Act Party is particularly keen on this option. The work and expense of any referendum would be divided across the Electoral Commission, the independent Crown entity responsible for running parliamentary elections and referendums, and the MoJ. A spokeswoman for the commission told the Herald the agency is already building the possibility of a referendum into its general election planning and has started to incur costs. She said that so far, these costs are low and can be absorbed through the business as usual budget; the funding 'pre-commitment' in the Budget has not yet been drawn down. Act Party leader and Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour has championed four-year parliamentary terms, and argued they would provide New Zealand with greater stability. Photo / Michael Craig The main costs The $25m cost breaks down to $6.227m to develop and deliver a public information campaign (the job of the MoJ) and $18.773m for the Electoral Commission to conduct a binding referendum. The budget was based, at least in part, on the $25.4m cost of delivering two referendums at the 2020 election – on euthanasia and cannabis legalisation. MoJ civil and constitutional general manager Kathy Brightwell said that for the 2020 referendums, the Electoral Commission received $18.4m and the MoJ ran the public information campaign for $7m. She said some additional funding was also provided because of disruption related to the pandemic and the change of the election date. The Herald requested the cost for each of the 2020 referendums, but Brightwell declined; she said the funding was combined because implementation was concurrent. The budget documents recently released under the OIA also provide some detail about the 2020 costs. A January 2025 letter to Willis from Goldsmith noted the Electoral Commission was able to use Covid-19 funds and existing paper stocks to keep the referendum costs low in 2020; Goldsmith also cited a 'different delivery model' and 'significant inflationary cost increase since 2020″. 'Revised service levels for the 2026 general election mean that there is no ability to absorb these additional costs again,' Goldsmith wrote, then plumping for a budget bid reduced from the original $33.057m figure to $26.217m, but which appears to have left Willis unmoved. Public information The public would need to be sufficiently well informed about any plan for four-year parliamentary terms and its implications for a referendum result to be credible. To undertake a public information campaign, the MoJ would likely deploy some existing staff and also hire in specialist expertise. For the 2020 referendums, MoJ's annual review documents show the agency signed a one-year, $3m contract with advertising giant Saatchi & Saatchi to deliver 'public information across the referendums'. That work ranged from producing a mass-media advertising and information campaign to surveying the population to gauge baseline awareness of the related issues and convening focus groups. In addition, an official website provided explanatory material. Information, including through a mailout campaign, was also disseminated in a range of translations and formats aimed at accessibility. The MoJ used the web addresses and both under the purview of the Department of Internal Affairs. (In 2019, the MoJ also took out dozens of additional domain names, including: it continues to pay $817 annually to retain 21 of these.) The MoJ documents released to the Herald redact important figures, but they suggest that over half of the $8.057m sliced from the original referendum budget came from reduced spending on advertising and public information for both the Electoral Commission and the MoJ (much of the balance appears to have been reduced contingency provisions). 'This may result in lower reach for the information programme. The target aim for the programme is to reach 85% of eligible voters. Any significant reduction in reach may mean lower awareness, lower participation and lower confidence in the referendum,' officials warned. They also cited concern for 'reduced knowledge of the referendum topic, and how to vote in the referendum', which could increase polling wait times, they said. Two referendums held in conjunction with the 2020 general election cost $25.4 million. Photo / Bevan Conley Funding for the Electoral Commission The Electoral Commission's job is tied to the nuts and bolts of holding an election, and it would also be responsible for letting voters know a referendum was being held for communicating and how to enrol and vote. The Government is also pursuing a series of Electoral Act changes, including scrapping same-day enrolment to vote on election day, and the commission will already have a big job in 2026 accommodating and communicating this. The spokeswoman said that in preparing for a referendum the commission must consider and plan for: 'printing referendum voting papers, employing more people to issue votes, training for staff, bigger voting places to accommodate more issuing points, and headquarters large enough to securely hold referendum as well as voting papers'. A $25m dollar question As it's currently anticipated, the wording of the referendum question that arises from the amendment bill is unwieldy: 'Yes, I support the Term of Parliament (Enabling four-year Term) Legislation Amendment Bill coming into force' and 'No, I do not support the [Term of Parliament (Enabling four-year Term) Legislation Amendment Bill] coming into force'. However, many observers think the bill, if it survives, is likely to change; this could allow for a cleaner question. Professor Andrew Geddis is a specialist in election law and constitutional matters at the University of Otago's Faculty of Law. He estimated general cross-party support for four-year parliamentary terms, notwithstanding differences of opinion on the details, mean the matter is likely to go to a referendum. However, he also thought the select committee will likely recommend that the bill is simplified considerably, such that it provides for four-year parliamentary terms, possibly in much the same way current legislation provides for three-year terms. The bill currently contains provisions aimed at offsetting the additional power a four-year term would hand to governments. Chiefly, it provides for greater power to accrue to Opposition parties through select committees. Geddis said the committee may recommend that these power-balancing provisions be removed from the legislation altogether and provided for through convention rather than statute in Parliament's Standing Orders. If the Government agreed, this could pave the way for a much cleaner referendum question, along the lines of: I do/I do not support four-year parliamentary terms. Kate MacNamara is a South Island-based journalist with a focus on policy, public spending and investigations. She spent a decade at the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation before moving to New Zealand. She joined theHeraldin 2020.
Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Competitive election ‘good for local democracy'
Janine Hayward. Photo: supplied Dunedin voters should not be daunted by the large number of names on council ballot papers this election, a politics professor says. Prof Janine Hayward, of the University of Otago, said they should simply determine whom they like and rank them in order. "Remember that you do not need to rank everyone," she said. Sixteen people are standing for the Dunedin mayoralty, which is thought to be a record for the city. Fifty-four candidates have put their names forward for 14 councillor positions on the Dunedin City Council — the largest field this century, at least. Prof Hayward thought this reflected the council's high profile since the last election. The council's campaign to prevent government cuts to the new hospital was an example, she said. A high number of candidates might show they thought councils could make a difference to people's lives — "which of course they can", Prof Hayward said. "It is certainly very good for local democracy to have a competitive election and it may help boost voter turnout to have so many campaigns going on across the city." The number of candidates for Dunedin councillor positions was just 21 in 2001, which was the last time the city council used the first-past-the-post (FPP) electoral system. The Dunedin City Council then switched to using the single-transferable vote (STV) system, which the Otago Regional Council will this year use for the first time. Prof Hayward said Dunedin voters had done well in the past two decades to navigate both systems. Having just one system for the city council and regional council would be helpful for Dunedin voters, she said. However, the Queenstown Lakes, Central Otago, Clutha and Waitaki District Councils have stuck with FPP. Prof Hayward said the regional council would need to be clear with these areas about ranking candidates under the STV system — instead of giving them a tick. She expected the FPP district councils would carefully consider changing to STV in the future. "This will produce election results that better reflect the way their community voted and make the process of voting much more straightforward for voters." The Otago Daily Times asked Prof Hayward to share a few tips about how voters considering the list of potential councillors might best arrive at their rankings. Information from media or candidate summaries could be supplemented by seeing candidates in person at local events and this could help people decide who might be good on council, she said. "Once you have a list of who you like — whether that list is long or short — rank them starting at '1' for who you like best. "You don't need to be strategic or worry about whether that candidate is likely to get more support than they need, or not enough support, to get elected." Prof Hayward said STV was designed to ensure votes were not "wasted" in either case — they were transferred to reflect voters' next preference. "Once you have ranked all the candidates you like in order, your job is done."
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Treasury raised concerns about reform
The government's financial watchdog raised serious concerns about Penny Simmonds' reform of polytechnics, the Otago Daily Times can reveal. Papers released under the Official Information Act showed that in March, Treasury had many criticisms about the handling of the breakup of mega-polytechnic Te Pukenga. Among the risks were the potential financial and educational cost of the reforms, the lack of monetary support for the reconstituted polytechnics, the untested "federation model" and the lack of communication between Vocational Education Minister Simmonds and various stakeholders. In the break up of Te Pukenga last month, Otago Polytechnic was named as one of the 10 regional polytechs (ITPs) to be returned to regional control, but it will be part of a "federation model" alongside the Open Polytechnic and Universal College of Learning (Ucol). Treasury cast doubt over the model's financial stability. "Particularly given the narrow focus on ITP viability, we think [Ms Simmonds] could more clearly articulate the package of changes being made to support ITPs' financial viability, and their cumulative impacts. "This is because the proposed future state for ITPs appears to be similar, if not worse, than the situation faced by ITPs pre-Te Pūkenga." It described the federation model as "untested". The scale of changes, the short timelines for implementation and the complexity of changes "with limited implementation resource" all increased the risk for successfully completing the reform, Treasury said. Green MP Francisco Hernandez said the report reinforced what he had been saying about the whole process. "This is a risky reform which has been jeopardised by the minister's haphazard decision-making processes, short timeframes for implementation, and the lack of support for polytechs to undergo the transition. "It is damning that, despite such a difficult and disruptive transition, Treasury advises the future for polytechnics 'appears to be similar, if not worse' than what they were before Te Pūkenga." Otago Polytechnic executive director Dr Megan Potiki was unsurprised. "We note the concerns raised about the scale and short timelines for implementing the changes — establishing 10 ITPs on January 1, 2026 — and the complexity of the changes. "This underscores some of the reasons Otago Polytechnic has requested a meeting [with Ms Simmonds], to explain her recent decisions in more detail and to discuss how we might come to a constructive resolution for the benefit of the Otago community." Ms Simmonds said the government was taking a responsible approach to re-establishing regionally governed polytechnics. The federation model had been clearly communicated, she said. "The federation does not dilute academic achievement or autonomy — it preserves local governance while enabling collaboration, anchored by the Open Polytechnic, on shared services such as online learning resources and academic board.' She said a $157 million contingency was put in place in Budget 2024 to support the transition, if needed. "We expect to use some or all of the contingency, depending on the level of debt and transition costs involved in re-establishing the polytechnics."
