logo
As Trump targets clean energy, will utilities embrace DERs and VPPs?

As Trump targets clean energy, will utilities embrace DERs and VPPs?

Yahoo21-04-2025

This story was originally published on Utility Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Utility Dive newsletter.
Amid stiff headwinds for utility-scale renewables and gas, electricity system experts say utilities, industrial companies and other heavy power consumers may find some relief in a cheaper, faster and increasingly scalable solution: distributed generation and flexible loads, known as distributed energy resources, or DERs, that can be batched into virtual power plants or multi-megawatt demand response programs and deployed faster than utility-scale assets.
'There is an awareness that, oftentimes, distributed solar and distributed storage can come online much more quickly than larger resources … and a recognition of the role [they] can play in providing energy and in some cases capacity resources,' said Sean Gallagher, senior vice president of policy for the Solar Energy Industries Association.
Then again, nothing in the energy world is easy these days.
Earlier this month, President Donald Trump announced sweeping tariffs on imports from most U.S. trading partners. The targeted countries included major suppliers of solar panels, batteries and high-voltage electrical components, such as Vietnam (46%) and China (145% or more). Trump later announced a 90-day reduction to 10% for most countries other than China.
Distributed generation and storage assets may stand to benefit as developers look to sidestep bulk grid constraints, but they are not immune to supply chain challenges, particularly for larger projects, said Ravi Manghani, senior director of strategic sourcing at Anza Renewables, an energy data provider.
Trump's 'Liberation Day' announcement was just the latest setback for the clean energy industry, which has been under siege since Jan. 20 despite providing 93% of new generating capacity in 2024. In a series of executive orders on his first day in office, Trump halted federal onshore and offshore wind permitting, withdrew all federal waters from offshore wind leasing, and declared an 'energy emergency' that appeared to favor thermal and other high capacity-factor generating resources over wind, solar and batteries. A subsequent federal funding freeze, later partially rescinded, threw previously-authorized support for clean energy projects into limbo. Meanwhile, anti-renewables bills are proliferating in Texas, Oklahoma and other Republican-controlled states.
With the fate of Inflation Reduction Act tax credits up in the air as the U.S. Congress looks to offset an estimated $4.2 trillion in tax cuts this year, the clean energy sector could be in for more pain. Fully repealing the IRA's technology-neutral Section 45Y investment and Section 48E production tax credits this year would reduce wind and solar deployments by about 50% over the next decade, The Brattle Group and ConservAmerica said in February.
That sort of pullback could jeopardize U.S. industrial growth, which is a driving factor in an expected 50% increase in electricity demand by 2035, ConservAmerica said. With new gas turbine costs rising fast and production capacity tied up until 2030, according to NextEra CEO John Ketchum, it may not be feasible to make up the shortfall with new fossil generation.
Because the U.S. already has tens of gigawatts of DERs that could be aggregated into VPPs within months, rather than years, some electricity system experts see smaller-scale resources as a potential stopgap should utility-scale renewables and storage development falter.
'DER' is a catch-all term for a broad range of generation resources, from residential solar arrays of a few kilowatts to grid-connected or behind-the-meter installations of 10 MW or more, and potentially flexible loads such as thermostats, water heaters and electric vehicles.
The U.S. has well over 100 GW of DERs that technically could be aggregated into VPPs and traditional demand response programs, but over 80% of that capacity is not, Wood Mackenzie said last year. Still, the firm identified 1,459 VPP deployments operating across 321 monetized market, utility and energy retailer programs.
Earlier this year, the Department of Energy pegged current U.S. VPP capacity at about 30 GW and said that figure could scale to 80 GW to 160 GW by 2030.
Utilities and state policymakers increasingly see the value in VPPs and DER aggregations, according to a February report from the NC Clean Energy Technology Center and the Smart Electric Power Alliance that catalogued more than 100 policy actions last year in 38 states and the District of Columbia. Many of those actions aim to harness the United States' rapidly-growing distributed battery capacity or deploy sophisticated VPPs that use multiple categories of DERs, NCCETC Managing Director of Policy and Markets Autumn Proudlove said earlier this year.
In a flipbook released last year, RMI called out particularly innovative, multi-resource VPPs like those run by Puget Sound Energy in Washington (smart thermostats, behavioral load shaping, electric vehicles, water heaters and interruptible loads), Portland General Electric in Oregon (batteries, water heaters, behavioral load shaping and interruptible loads) and National Grid in New England (smart thermostats, batteries and technology-agnostic demand response).
Clean-energy groups are actively pushing supportive state policy and developing standardized templates for simpler, more efficient VPP programs, both key recommendations from last year's Wood Mackenzie report.
'There's a lot of enthusiasm around VPPs,' SEIA's Gallagher said. 'We are trying to templatize them so that they're not as bespoke [and] are more straightforward to explain to utilities and customers.'
Though utility interest is 'uneven' across the country, with some embracing DERs and others more resistant, eye-catching recent load growth forecasts help make the case, Gallagher said.
In January, SEIA released a roadmap for 10 million distributed energy storage installations and 700 GWh of total deployed storage capacity by 2030. Utilities, too, are showing more ambition on DERs with plans for bigger, more sophisticated distributed resource aggregations.
In a February deal touted by Utah Gov. Spencer Cox, R, Rocky Mountain Power and distributed energy solutions provider Torus said they would collaborate on a commercial-and-industrial VPP that could provide up to 70 MW of flexible, behind-the-meter capacity by the middle of 2026.
'It's no longer in question whether [this] is a path forward,' Torus CEO Nate Walkingshaw said in February. '[VPPs] can be seen at the same size, scale, quality and reliability as monolithic grid-tied architecture and are 100% viable today.'
In a regulatory filing in August, Xcel Energy's Minnesota subsidiary proposed deploying and aggregating 440 MW of distributed solar and 400 MW of distributed storage to create what would likely be one of the United States' largest VPPs.
'Xcel Energy believes distributed capacity can complement our existing plans for additional utility-scale renewable and firm dispatchable generation … [with] benefits including continued reliability, economic growth and providing our customers more options to adopt clean energy technologies,' Xcel spokesperson Josiah Mayo said in an email.
Meanwhile, utilities across the U.S. are working with developers to install larger-scale distributed energy resources with an eye to improving local and regional resilience.
In California, San Diego Gas & Electric partnered with EES and Mitsubishi Power Americas joint venture Prevalon to deploy multiple community microgrids totaling 180 MWh, and the company is now pursuing 'half a dozen' similar opportunities right now, Prevalon President and CEO Tom Cornell said.
'We've seen a lot more utility inquiries in the past six to 12 months,' he said.
The value proposition for distributed batteries and firm generation is especially strong in regions where the grid is less reliable due to infrastructure challenges or weather-related risk, such as western North Carolina — hit hard by two hurricanes in 2024 — and other swaths of vertically-integrated utility territories across the Southeast, where developable land is abundant, Cornell said.
In those territories, a typical 10-MW, 40- to 60-MWh system might take 12 months to site and permit, with equipment procurement happening in parallel and construction and commissioning taking a matter of months afterward, according to Cornell.
The Southeastern utilities 'move especially fast … they understand that they can move quicker on these than any other resource,' he said.
Despite clear advantages over larger, less flexible, slower-to-deploy resources, DERs aren't immune from the economic and policy uncertainty roiling the electricity sector, experts say.
California's NEM 3.0 net metering tariff, effective for residential solar and storage systems that entered the state's interconnection queue after April 14, 2023, dramatically reduced solar-only installations while boosting battery attachment rates. Until more independent system operators implement rules consistent with FERC Order 2222 and additional states enact policies that capture the full value of distributed generation and storage, the residential segment could see muted growth on a national level, Anza Renewables' Manghani said.
State-level policy could also temper growth in the fast-growing community solar segment following a record-breaking 1.7-GW year in 2024, according to Wood Mackenzie data. Cumulative U.S. deployments reached 8.6 GW at the end of 2024, Wood Mackenzie said.
But a closer look at the numbers shows disproportionate contributions from a handful of pro-solar states — with Illinois, New York and Maine accounting for 83% of total capacity deployments last year — and policy uncertainty in emerging state markets as more mature markets saturate.
'Emerging markets have been slow to ramp up and program size caps limit the potential for growth in these states to make up for declines in larger markets,' Wood Mackenzie research analyst and lead report author Caitlin Connelly said in February. The upshot is an uncertainty band — as much as 40% to the downside and 37% to the upside — around Wood Mackenzie's base case of 15 GW in cumulative deployments by 2029.
Cost is another concern for smaller-scale energy resources, Manghani said. For example, while the cost gap between distributed and utility-scale storage continues to close amid fierce supplier competition, 'utility-scale projects still benefit from superior economies of scale, revenue generation market structures and financing advantages,' he said.
And Manghani emphasized that, like their bulk counterparts, distributed generation and storage systems and components are at least somewhat exposed to supply chain challenges.
'Ultimately, price trends will depend on policy shifts, manufacturing capacity expansion and how quickly suppliers adjust to demand,' he said.
Recommended Reading
Trump administration orders a stop to Empire Wind construction

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk
NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk

Washington Post

time8 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

NASA, Pentagon push for SpaceX alternatives amid Trump's feud with Musk

Federal officials at NASA and the Pentagon moved swiftly this week to urge competitors to Elon Musk's SpaceX to more quickly develop alternative rockets and spacecraft after President Donald Trump threatened to cancel Space X's contracts and Musk's defiant response. Government officials were especially stunned after Musk responded to Trump with a salvo of his own: SpaceX would stop flying its Dragon spacecraft, a move that would leave the space agency with no way to transport its astronauts to the International Space Station.

Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings
Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings

Lululemon analysts reboot stock price target after earnings originally appeared on TheStreet. Now that was a real lulu. The dictionary tells us that the slang term "lulu", which dates to the 1850s, can be used to describe a person or thing "outstanding for some quality." 💵💰Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter 💰 That quality can be positive or negative, and for Lululemon () it translated into about 5 pounds of oy vey in a two-pound bag. Shares of the Vancouver athleisure giant nosedived on June 6 after it beat Wall Street's first-quarter-earnings expectations but slashed its full-year guidance, citing a 'dynamic macroenvironment' that included increased competition and the impact of the Trump administration's tariffs. "The current tariff paradigm has brought uncertainty into the retail environment," Chief Executive Calvin McDonald told analysts during the earnings call. "As consumers try to assess the impact they will have on daily life, as businesses evaluate these impacts as well, I believe we are better positioned than most to navigate the near term while also maintaining our focus on investing in our growth potential over the long term," he added. Chief Financial Officer Meghan Frank said Lululemon estimated a thinner operating margin, which measures profitability by dividing a company's operating income by its net sales for the full year. It now expects a narrowing of 1.6 percentage points, compared with the previous estimate of 1 point, "all driven by the net impact of tariffs." More Retail Stocks: Halloween retailer sounds warning consumers need to hear Target expands same-day delivery to 100s of retailers Walmart makes surprise cuts as it looks at tariff price hikes "We are planning to take strategic price increases, looking item by item across our assortment as we typically do, and it will be price increases on a small portion of our assortment, and they will be modest in nature," she said. Comparable sales in the quarter rose 1% from a year earlier, missing analysts' forecasts calling for a 3% increase. The result reflects a 2% decrease in the Americas and a 6% increase internationally. "We're definitely not happy where the growth is in the U.S., but relative to the market and our performance versus others, pleased that we're putting on share, pleased with the reaction to the newness and with the mix of newness that's coming," McDonald said. Lululemon is known for advanced athletic apparel, particularly its workout leggings, and it is said to use "holistic guerrilla marketing" to make customers feel that they are part of a community. In April, President Donald Trump unleashed a broad range of tariffs that he has since paused and rebooted several times, causing widespread confusion among companies and consumers and in the markets. Several retailers have reduced or withdrawn their guidance and indicated that they would raise prices due to the uncertainty surrounding the tariff regime. Meanwhile, Trump said that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick would travel to London along with U.S. Trade Representative Jameson Greer on June 9 for renewed trade talks with China, adding that "the meeting should go very well."Lululemon's stock sank nearly 20% on June 6. The shares are off 31% in 2025 and down roughly 18% from a year earlier. Several investment firms issued research reports on Lululemon following the earnings report, including Needham, which lowered its price target to $317 from $366 and affirmed a buy rating on the shares, according to The Fly. The company posted fairly lackluster Q1 results, though the selloff in the stock seems "aggressive" relative to the size of management's guidance cut, the investment firm said. That's particularly since the guidance reduction is mostly tariff-driven, and also considers that management struck an encouraging tone about how new products are performing, Needham said. Lululemon's domestic business remains sluggish, however, while international comparable-sales growth slowed in Q1, likely raising questions about the growth algorithm going forward, Needham added. Telsey Advisory analyst Dana Telsey pared the firm's price target on Lululemon to $360 from $385 and maintained an outperform rating. The Q1 results "nicely topped" the Wall Street consensus and the company's guidance, Telsey said. Consumers continue to respond well to newness and new-product launches, Tesley added. BMO Capital lowered its price target on Lululemon to $250 from $302 and maintained a market-perform rating. The company reported what the investment firm called a slight top- and bottom-line beat to estimates, with better gross margins partly offset by a miss of estimates for selling, general and administrative expense. But looking ahead, BMO Capital said, management guided in Q2 "materially below" estimates and pared the fiscal 2025 outlook for gross margin and earnings due to tariffs and markdowns. This marks the first time the company has lowered its fiscal-year earnings forecast at Q1 since fiscal 2014, BMO Capital analysts reboot stock price target after earnings first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 7, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared.

Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says
Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says

The White House is challenging the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office's assessment that President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending package will raise the federal deficit by trillions of dollars throughout the next decade. The national debt, currently $36.2 trillion, tracks what the U.S. owes its creditors, while the national deficit measures how much the federal government's spending exceeds its revenues. So far, the federal government has spent more than $1 trillion more than it has collected this fiscal year, according to the Department of the Treasury. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued an analysis Wednesday predicting that the so-called "big, beautiful, bill" the House passed in May would increase the federal deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years. But according to the White House, the CBO's analysis is based on a faulty premise because it assumes that Republicans in Congress will fail to extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts. Rather, the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) forecasts that the tax and spending measures would independently reduce deficits by $1.4 trillion. Senate Weighs Trump's 'Big, Beautiful, Bill' As Policy Group Backs Cbo, Projects $3 Trillion Debt Increase Read On The Fox News App Additionally, the White House argues that the measure, coupled with other initiatives like tariffs and other spending cuts, will lead to reducing the deficit by at least $6.6 trillion over 10 years. The "big, beautiful, bill" has faced criticism from figures including SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who labeled the measure an "abomination" and argued that the bill would increase the federal deficit. The measure now heads to the Senate, where lawmakers, including Sen. Rand Paul, R-K.Y., have voiced opposition to the legislation. Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Faces Resistance From Republican Senators Over Debt Fears Meanwhile, OMB Director Russell Vought told lawmakers on the House Appropriations Committee Wednesday that he believed the CBO's analysis was "fundamentally wrong." "It will lead to reduced deficits and debt of $1.4 trillion," Vought said. "It will reduce mandatory savings of $1.7 trillion. I don't think the way they construct their baseline, not only does it not give a fair shake to economic growth, but it fundamentally misreads the economic consequences of not extending the current tax relief." Failure to pass Trump's tax package would trigger a recession, according to Vought. "We'll have a recession," Vought told lawmakers. "The economic storm clouds will be very dark. I think we'll have a 60% tax increase on the American people." Meanwhile, the White House has accused the CBO of employing those who've contributed to Democratic campaigns, even though CBO Director Phillip Swagel served in former President George W. Bush's administration. Price Tag Estimate For House Gop Tax Package Rises To $3.94T "I don't think many people know this: There hasn't been a single staffer in the entire Congressional Budget Office that has contributed to a Republican since the year 2000," Leavitt told reporters Tuesday. "But guess what, there have been many staffers within the Congressional Budget Office who have contributed to Democratic candidates and politicians every single cycle since. So unfortunately, this is an institution in our country that has become partisan and political." The CBO director is appointed according to the recommendations of the House and Senate Budget Committees. Then-Sen. Mike Enzi, R-Wyoming, first recommended Swagel in 2019, and then Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, recommended Swagel again in 2023. The CBO did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital on OMB's analysis or claims from the White House about the office being full of staffers who've backed Democrats. Fox News' Deirdre Heavey contributed to this report. Original article source: Democrat-controlled budget office wrongly analyzed Trump's big bill, missed record savings, White House says

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store