Malacañang questions Bato's remark on hiding from ICC arrest
Malacañang has questioned the statement of Senator Bato de la Rosa, who said he is considering hiding if the International Criminal Court (ICC) issues a warrant of arrest against him.
Presidential Communications Office Undersecretary and Palace Press Officer Claire Castro enoted that Bato was once the chief of the Philippine National Police. 'Nakakapagtaka lamang po na siya ay dati pang PNP chief. Yan po ba ang gusto niya ring ipahihwatig sa taong bayan na kapag may warrant of arrest ay dapat magtago,' Castro said.
She added that it is no wonder Pastor Apollo Quiboloy took time before surrendering or being arrested.
Castro stressed that Malacañang does not agree with this kind of thinking and action. 'Hindi natin sinasangayunan ang ganung klase pong paniniwala at kanyang nais gawin. Hindi po ito makakabuti sa mga kababayan natin na mismo leader natin ay hindi haharapin ang kaso o complaint na naisampa o maisasampa laban sa kanya,' she explained.
She also pointed out that Senator Bato seemed to distance himself from former President Duterte, recalling that he did not join Duterte's trip to Hong Kong. 'At hindi po ba sabi natin, parang siya nga yata ang medyo umiwan sa dating Pangulong Duterte, considering na hindi siya pumunta sa Hong Kong kasama sa kanila,' Castro said.
'Hindi po ba dapat ang kaibigan ay walang iwanan?' she added.
If a warrant of arrest is issued, Castro confirmed that the Philippine National Police (PNP) would be required to assist the International Criminal Police Organization (Interpol) in finding Bato. She said that the government would still coordinate with Interpol, following Republic Act (RA) 9851.
RA 9851 states that the Philippines can surrender or extradite individuals to international courts or other countries, even without an existing treaty. Castro cited retired Supreme Court Justice Antonio Carpio's explanation that the law allows surrender to the ICC when necessary.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
2 days ago
- Middle East Eye
UK lobbying US against sanctioning ICC over Israel war crimes probe
The British government is lobbying the US against sanctioning the International Criminal Court - having so far successfully lobbied the Trump administration not to sanction UK nationals involved in the court's issuing of arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, Middle East Eye can reveal. The US has already imposed sanctions on the court's British chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, and four of its judges, but sanctioning the court itself could deal a fatal blow to its ability to function. This comes after MEE reported earlier this month that the Labour government believed the US could sanction prominent human rights lawyer Amal Clooney and other UK nationals over their roles advising Khan on arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. Numerous sources in the British government told MEE on Monday that the Labour government successfully lobbied the Trump administration not to sanction the UK nationals. However, British officials fear more US sanctions are likely to come. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Clooney and other British lawyers, including former ICC judge Lord Justice Adrian Fulford and Baroness Helena Kennedy KC, had served early last year on an independent panel of legal advisers convened by the ICC prosecutor. Exclusive: UK believes Trump may sanction Amal Clooney over ICC Palestine role Read More » The panel expressed their support for Khan's decision to seek arrest warrants for senior Israeli and Hamas leaders for war crimes and crimes against humanity, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant. ICC judges granted Khan's application in November, and in February this year the Trump administration imposed financial and visa sanctions on Khan. In early June the US imposed further sanctions on four ICC judges - from Benin, Peru, Slovenia and Uganda - whom it accused of being involved in 'illegitimate actions targeting the United States and Israel'. Neither the US nor Israel are parties to the Rome Statute and have long rejected the authority of the court. A list of demands British government sources told MEE the UK is now aiming to persuade the US not to place sanctions on the institution of the ICC itself. MEE understands that earlier this month the US informed its allies that to avoid facing further sanctions, the court has to permanently close all actions against the US and Israel. The court has previously investigated alleged war crimes committed by American forces based in Afghanistan, which is a signatory to the Rome Statute. The US also said the ICC must commit to not targeting US nationals and US allies who have not consented to the court's jurisdiction. The British Foreign Office declined to comment. Khan, the ICC prosecutor, has had his American visa revoked and his wife and children have been banned from travelling to the US. His bank accounts have been frozen in the UK. If the US sanctions the court as an institution, this would prevent banks and software companies from dealing with it, which could destroy the ICC's ability to function. Cameron threatening ICC The Labour government's current approach represents a dramatic shift from that of the previous Conservative government. Exclusive: David Cameron threatened to withdraw UK from ICC over Israel war crimes probe Read More » Last week MEE revealed that in April 2024 David Cameron, then the Conservative foreign secretary, threatened in a phone call with Khan that the UK would defund and withdraw from the ICC if it issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. The British Foreign Office and Khan both declined to comment in response to the report, while Cameron did not respond to multiple requests by MEE for comment. On 10 June 2024 the Conservative government filed an objection to Khan's application to the ICC, arguing that the court did not have jurisdiction over Israeli nationals - a position the Israeli government has held for years. The next month, however, Keir Starmer's newly elected Labour government announced it would drop the objection. 'We're very clear about the importance of the rule of law and the independence of the court both domestically and internationally,' a spokesperson for Starmer said at the time. Palestine was accepted into the ICC in 2015, and in 2021 the court said it had the power to investigate war crimes in the occupied territories. Prosecutor on leave Khan is currently on leave after attempts to suspend him failed, and pending a UN investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct towards a colleague. He denies the allegations, which have not been referred to Dutch police. 'These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution' - International Criminal Court The warrants for Israeli leaders are currently in the hands of two deputy prosecutors. In a statement, the ICC said it deplored the sanctions against Khan and the four judges. It said it stood fully behind its personnel and would continue its work undeterred. 'These measures are a clear attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution which operates under the mandate from 125 States Parties from all corners of the globe,' it said. The court recently ordered that any further warrants issued in relation to its Palestine investigation cannot be publicised.
Filipino Times
4 days ago
- Filipino Times
ICC prosecution to respond to Duterte's request for interim release
The International Criminal Court (ICC) prosecution is set to file its response to former President Rodrigo Duterte's request for interim release, which seeks to allow him to stay in a country that has reportedly agreed to receive him. In a statement, the Office of the Prosecutor confirmed that it will submit its position to Pre-Trial Chamber I, addressing the defense's application for Duterte's temporary release while facing crimes against humanity charges. 'The Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court will file before the Pre-Trial Chamber I a response to the defense's request for the interim release of Mr. Rodrigo Roa Duterte,' the prosecution said via email. Duterte, through his lawyer Nicholas Kaufman, is seeking interim release to an unnamed country—its identity redacted in the public version of the 16-page filing—which he says has agreed to accept him and enforce court-imposed conditions. The defense also claims that the prosecution has not objected to the proposed interim release, provided specific conditions laid out in a confidential annex are met. Kaufman argued that Duterte does not meet the threshold for continued detention under Article 58(1)(b) of the Rome Statute, citing no flight risk, no threat to the investigation, and no risk of committing further crimes. '[Redacted] has affirmed its principled willingness to cooperate with the court, and to accept Mr. Duterte onto its territory for the duration of his interim release and enforce conditions of release,' the defense stated. The ICC is currently conducting pre-trial proceedings against Duterte in connection with killings linked to his anti-drug campaign, both during his presidency and his term as mayor of Davao City. A ruling from the Pre-Trial Chamber on Duterte's interim release request is expected following the prosecution's response.
Filipino Times
5 days ago
- Filipino Times
Duterte asks ICC for release as mystery country offers refuge under strict terms
Former President Rodrigo Duterte is seeking temporary freedom from the International Criminal Court (ICC) as an unnamed country signals its willingness to provide him shelter—under tightly controlled conditions. In a public but heavily redacted court filing dated June 12, Duterte's lead counsel Nicholas Kaufman submitted an 'Urgent Request for Interim Release' to ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I, invoking Article 60(2) of the Rome Statute. Kaufman disclosed that a confidential state party to the treaty has offered to host Duterte and implement whatever restrictions the Court may require. The defense insists Duterte does not pose a flight risk, nor does he threaten ongoing investigations, witnesses, or victims connected to the ICC probe into alleged crimes against humanity tied to his drug war. 'There is more than good reason to believe that Mr. Duterte would not embarrass his hosts… by violating the terms of his release,' the defense argued. Duterte's legal team also said he would be relocated outside the geographic areas where the alleged crimes occurred and assured the Court that he would not commit further offenses. Significantly, the defense claimed that ICC prosecutors are unlikely to oppose Duterte's release, as long as strict conditions—detailed in confidential annexes—are enforced. These conditions may include curbs on his travel, public statements, and communication. Now 80 years old, Duterte has been detained at the ICC facility in The Hague since March 13, 2025, following his arrest upon arrival in Manila two days earlier. His lawyers highlighted his age and health concerns as humanitarian grounds for the release request, noting that the unnamed host country offers a 'stable and suitable environment' that aligns with international legal norms. The ICC Pre-Trial Chamber is expected to review responses from prosecutors, victim representatives, and potentially the offering state before making a decision. If granted, Duterte would become the most high-profile individual to be released by the ICC under interim conditions.
