LA Fitness sued over ‘exceedingly difficult' gym membership cancellations
Fitness International and Fitness & Sports Clubs, which operate gym chains, including LA Fitness, Esporta Fitness, City Sports Club and Club Studio, have illegally charged hundreds of millions of dollars in recurring fees through difficult cancellation procedures, according to the complaint.
Advertisement
'Gym cancellations have been hard for Americans for a very long time,' Andrew N. Ferguson, chairman of the FTC, told FOX Business on 'The Bottom Line' Wednesday.
'This has been going on so long that the show 'Friends' did an entire episode about how hard it is to cancel gym memberships.'
Tens of thousands of LA Fitness members have alleged difficulties with canceling their memberships.
Cancellation frequently required members to speak to specific managers who were often unavailable, and those who tried to cancel their memberships by mail also ran into challenges, according to the FTC.
Advertisement
'What we have alleged in our complaint is that the method of cancellation LA Fitness is making available to consumers wasn't simple,' Ferguson told Fox Business.
3 The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sued the operators of LA Fitness for allegedly making the process of customers canceling their gym memberships 'exceedingly difficult.'
Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
'You had to mail in a form, or you had to go to a brick-and-mortar gym. … You had to then provide cancellation to a specific person, and that person often wasn't there.'
'That's what this suit is about,' Ferguson said.
Advertisement
'It's about improving Americans' lives in specific ways and saving them the money that they have to spend on memberships they don't want anymore.'
3 The complaint states that the operator of LA Fitness, Fitness International and Fitness & Sports Clubs, have illegally charged hundreds of millions of dollars in recurring fees through difficult cancellation procedures.
XinhuaThe FTC is seeking money to be returned to affected consumers and a court order to bar the allegedly unfair practices.
'We remain confident that we will prevail in court,' Jill Hill, president of club operations for Fitness International, said in a statement.
Advertisement
'Our company works diligently to comply with all health club state laws regarding membership cancellations and to offer, at a minimum, every cancellation method specifically required by each state. … We will continue to defend our practices vigorously while ensuring our members receive clear, simple and fair membership experiences.'
3 FTC chairman, Andrew N. Ferguson said 'the method of cancellation LA Fitness is making available to consumers wasn't simple,' as allegedly tens of thousands of LA Fitness members have had difficulties ending their memberships.
Getty Images
Fitness International and Fitness & Sports Clubs offer memberships that can cost as much as $299 a month, with optional add-on services available, according to the FTC.
The FTC, which works to prevent unfair business practices, has previously targeted difficult-to-cancel subscriptions and recurring fees, according to Reuters.
The FTC and Fitness International did not immediately respond to FOX Business' request for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
27 minutes ago
- Atlantic
A MAHA Progress Report
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has spent the past six months working fast to embed his Make America Healthy Again creed into American life. Over the summer alone, he has struck deals with some food companies to phase out some petroleum-based food dyes, waged a war against pediatricians over COVID-19 vaccines for young children, seemingly toyed with the idea of shipping fresh food to Americans in ' MAHA boxes,' and pledged to reboot the nation's dietary guidelines from scratch. I spoke with the Atlantic staff writer Nicholas Florko, who reports on health policy, about how the MAHA-fication of the country is coming along. Nicholas Florko: We've seen Robert F. Kennedy Jr. take actions that will weaken our vaccination system in the United States, confirming some of public health's worst fears. But there have also been some surprising successes in his term. RFK Jr. has embraced the role of a dealmaker, and we've seen him leaning on food companies in particular to change their offerings and get rid of synthetic dyes. He's been able to do that simply by asking and by making handshake agreements, as opposed to what we would normally expect from a health secretary—for him to use his regulatory power to force these changes. Stephanie: Why are these handshake agreements proving successful? Nicholas: Food companies likely realize that it's in their best interest to get on the good side of the Trump administration. We see this throughout all sectors of business, but for the food sector, these changes are small enough that companies can make them without dramatically hurting their bottom line, while also earning a lot of brownie points with the administration. Stephanie: That reminds me of President Donald Trump's announcement in July that Coca-Cola, famously his favorite drink, had agreed to make their soda with cane sugar rather than high-fructose corn syrup. To what extent is Trump influencing health policy? Does RFK Jr. have a lot of latitude? Nicholas: The Coca-Cola issue is an interesting one because while it's true that RFK Jr. is very anti–high-fructose corn syrup, he's also publicly called sugar a 'poison.' So this is one of those instances where you wonder what is behind RFK Jr. supporting this change. He must know that this isn't actually going to significantly improve public health, but also probably realizes that this is important to his boss. That being said, I think that RFK Jr. does have some latitude. If you left Trump to his own devices, you probably wouldn't see the same level of aggression toward food companies overall, unless he had a personal stake in the situation. Stephanie: With back-to-school season under way, many students are getting up-to-date on their shots. How does this year's vaccination season compare to years past? Nicholas: We haven't seen huge changes, but we are seeing some hints of what might come. Much of the action thus far is around COVID vaccines. In February the president issued a largely symbolic executive order barring schools from enforcing COVID-19 vaccine mandates, but by the time that was issued, virtually no schools actually had such a policy. RFK Jr. also softened the CDC's recommendation for kids to get the COVID-19 vaccine. That's probably been one of his most controversial decisions, prompting a high-profile clash with pediatricians; a leading pediatrics group put out its own suggestions saying that children should be getting vaccinated. But we haven't seen major changes to the other vaccines typically required for returning to school. Stephanie: That disagreement must make it confusing for parents to know who to listen to. Nicholas: It's reasonable to assume that a good portion of people will listen to RFK Jr., but those people may be already skeptical of vaccines and see him as a trustworthy messenger, versus folks who are on the fence. I think that's really the question: Where do those people who are on the fence go? Do they take RFK Jr.'s suggestion, or do they trust their doctor? Stephanie: In May, you wrote a story that was alarming for salad lovers, specifically about how bagged lettuce should be avoided. What's happening with America's food-safety system? Nicholas: One of the earliest, most concerning changes for food safety happened when DOGE came into the federal agencies. Advisory committees focused on food-safety questions were shut down. People were being laid off—such as the administrative staff in charge of making sure that inspectors can go out to farms. Some layoffs seem to have been rescinded, but there's a broad worry about what will happen to the day-to-day operations that we all depend on to keep us safe. Stephanie: A recent story about the recall of frozen shrimp with potential radioactive contamination has caused a bit of a panic about where America's food safety is headed. How did you take that news? Nicholas: One thing that gives me some hope is the fact that this is the sort of thing that we caught, and there have been recalls by Walmart. That's really the big fear when it comes to food safety: that if we attack these federal programs, they're not going to be able to actually find the food that might get us sick before a lot of people get sick. So I think this is actually a good sign that things are working relatively well. Stephanie: Out of all the stories you've written this past summer about the MAHA movement, is there one that keeps you up at night? And is there one that makes you feel hopeful for where American health and safety is going? Nicholas: Honestly, the stories that keep me up at night are by our colleague Katie Wu. Her recent one on RFK Jr.'s COVID revenge campaign has really stuck with me. My own story that both keeps me up at night and that makes me hopeful is related to states, which are taking up the MAHA charge in a very quick fashion. It's felt like Republican governors and legislatures are all trying to out-MAHA one another to ingratiate themselves to Trump and to RFK Jr. Some of these ideas are good from a public-health perspective, but these states are doing a lot of things really fast, which is what worries me. For example, some states are blocking people from using food stamps to buy soda and other junk food. There's a question of how that policy will be implemented, how the attempts to enact these restrictions could affect the entire food-stamp system. Other states have passed laws banning artificial dyes in their school meals. Again, it's one of those ideas that's a good step, but the devil is in the details of how it's executed. How does this flurry of activity in the states actually affect people in the coming months? Does this ultimately make America healthier, or does it send our food system into chaos? Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Today's News A New York appeals court voided the roughly $500 million civil-fraud penalty against President Donald Trump, calling it 'excessive,' but upheld the finding that Trump and his company committed long-running business fraud. Business restrictions on Trump in New York remain, and the state plans to appeal. More immigrants are leaving the U.S. than arriving, according to the Pew Research Center. The shift, affected by Trump's strict immigration policies, is the first of its kind since the 1960s. California lawmakers passed the first of three bills on a redistricting plan backed by Governor Gavin Newsom that would shift as many as five Republican-held U.S. House seats toward Democrats ahead of the 2026 midterms. The move comes a day after Texas state House Republicans passed a new congressional map that could add five U.S. House seats for the GOP. Evening Read What We Gain When We Stop Caring By Anna Holmes Sometime in the early aughts, the comedian Amy Poehler made a vulgar joke while sitting in the Saturday Night Live writers' room waiting for a midweek read-through to begin. As detailed in Tina Fey's 2011 memoir, Bossypants, Jimmy Fallon, who was also in the show's cast at the time, jokingly recoiled and told Poehler to stop it. 'It's not cute!' Fallon exclaimed. 'I don't like it.' 'Amy dropped what she was doing, went black in the eyes for a second, and wheeled around on him,' Fey writes. ''I don't fucking care if you like it.'' Read the full article. More From The Atlantic Read. In 2022, The Atlantic 's Culture writers recommended the books that they read too late —but that you should read now. Take a look. This is how the 17th-century painter Rachel Ruysch became one of the greatest still-life painters in the history of art, Zachary Fine writes. When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic.
Business Insider
27 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Americans want their stuff delivered fast — and they're willing to pay
American shoppers appear to be singing the iconic words of the rock group Queen: "I want it all, I want it all, and I want it now." Walmart shoppers in particular seem to have an insatiable appetite for getting lots of stuff delivered — and fast. "Speed of delivery is important to customers, and we're continuing to get faster," Walmart CFO John David Rainey said Thursday on the retail giant's second-quarter earnings call. Rainey said that roughly a third of the company's ship-from-store orders were fulfilled in three hours or less — many of which required either an additional rush fee or a $98-a-year membership with Walmart Plus. A fifth of those orders reached customers in 30 minutes or less, Rainey said. That works out to one in fifteen orders fulfilled from the store arriving in less than half an hour. That kind of speed is key to competing with rivals. Walmart's push to speed up delivery comes as competitors Amazon and Tractor Supply Co. have laid out ambitious expansion plans this year for the size and speed of their fulfillment networks, especially in more rural markets. Morgan Stanley analysts estimate that rural households account for about one out of every five dollars spent on personal consumption in the US. But regardless of whether they live in cities, suburbs, or rural areas, American shoppers seem to be getting increasingly impatient — especially when it comes to everyday essentials. To that end, Amazon also said last week that it now offers fresh grocery delivery in more than 1,000 cities and plans to double that by the end of the year. Its same-day delivery service is free for Prime members on orders over $25 and available to non-members for $12.99. Both of Amazon's initiatives (rural expansion and faster grocery delivery) target Walmart's bread and butter business. Walmart CEO Doug McMillon said he isn't surprised — and the competition is pushing the company to get stronger. "Convenience has been driving our business for a while now, and I think that'll continue," McMillon said on Thursday's earnings call. "We stay focused on what's happening with the customer." Jefferies retail analyst Corey Tarlowe told Business Insider that Amazon still has a long road ahead to close the gap with Walmart. "We all know that Amazon can get you stuff fast, but Walmart can deliver to 95% of the US in under three hours," he said. Speeding delivery, from milk to chicken feed Americans don't just want their milk and eggs to arrive fast. They want their livestock and chicken feed delivered to their doorsteps, too. Rural lifestyle retailer Tractor Supply Co. reported strong growth of its in-house fulfillment service, which can handle everything from chicken feed to fencing to gun safes with more speed and finesse than some of its existing delivery partners. "In markets where Final Mile is active, we're seeing an average order size of nearly $400, which is a multiple of our average basket. Our largest order has been valued at more than $40,000," the company's supply chain chief, Colin Yankee, told investors on an earnings call last month. Yankee said the service earns higher customer satisfaction scores, a significantly lower return rate, and stronger engagement than the company's other delivery options. Consumers also continue to hire private taxis for their burritos. Uber's delivery revenue was up 20% last quarter. And Instacart reported that one in four orders that paid an expedited Priority fee last quarter were completed in 30 minutes or less. The company also said it rolled out new Priority options for Costco and Kroger. Behind the scenes, the companies in this delivery race are tapping into huge budgets for AI, robotics, and other supply chain wizardry in the effort to eke out a bit more speed and efficiency. Some are even expanding their fleet of drones. So far, US shoppers have shown themselves willing to pay for the option of having their groceries, merchandise, and more delivered right to their door in minutes.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Home prices falling in half of U.S., new real estate data shows
Home prices are now falling in about half the country, according to new data from the National Association of Realtors. Why it matters: The housing market has been a significant driver in wealth creation for Americans in recent years. U.S. home prices rose by 49% in the six years from July 2019 to July 2025, according to NAR. The big picture: The market is tipping in favor of buyers. "Homebuyers are in the best position in more than five years to find the right home and negotiate for a better price," NAR chief economist Lawrence Yun said in a statement. "Current inventory is at its highest since May 2020, during the COVID lockdown." Zillow on Monday reported that sellers cut prices on 27.4% of listings in July, the highest share since it began tracking the metric in 2018. Between the lines: Prices are holding up the worst in the West, where the median price fell 1.4% to $620,700 in July, NAR reported. Prices also fell 0.6% in the South to $367,400. Nationally, the median price of existing-homes was $421,400 in July, up 0.2% from a year ago. That was the 25th straight month of increases but also marked the lowest rate of price hikes in two years, Bloomberg noted. The Midwest recorded a 3.9% increase in prices to $333,800, while the Northeast posted a 0.8% rise to $509,300. Threat level: After the huge runup during the pandemic, national home prices were 10.5% overvalued in the first quarter, according to Fitch Ratings estimates released last week. U.S. homebuilders started construction on new homes at the quickest pace in five months in July, though permits for future projects were the weakest since 2020, Axios' Courtenay Brown reported. Yes, but: Don't expect prices to fall significantly as inventory remains low and mortgage rates remain elevated. "We have a hard time seeing how affordability is going to improve any time soon," Jefferies analyst Thomas Simons said Thursday in a research note. "New entrants are finding increasing difficulty in breaking into the market due to high prices, high mortgage rates, and high competition for limited supply."
