'Doomsday mom' Lori Vallow Daybell now faces two more life sentences
Lori Vallow Daybell, the Idaho woman serving life in prison for the murders of her two youngest children and a romantic rival, was sentenced to two consecutive life sentences in Arizona for conspiring to kill her estranged husband and attempting to murder her niece's ex-husband.
Vallow Daybell, often referred to as "Doomsday mom" because of the apocalyptic beliefs that fueled her string of grisly murders, was convicted earlier this year for the murder of her former husband, Charles Vallow, and the attempted murder of Brandon Boudreaux in 2019.
"The amount of contemplation, calculation, planning and manipulation that went into these crimes is unparalleled in my career," Judge Justin Beresky said before sentencing Vallow Daybell on July 25. "It will take an act of god for you to go free."
Vallow Daybell is already serving multiple life sentences in Idaho for the 2019 murders of her children, Joshua 'J.J.' Vallow and Tylee Ryan, along with the killing of her current husband's former wife, Tammy Daybell. Her two life sentences in Arizona will run consecutively.
Family members of Vallow Daybell's victims testified for more than an hour at the July 25 sentencing hearing about harm she caused. Her only surviving child, Colby Ryan, described the moments when he found out his father had been shot and killed and then later, when he learned his 7-year-old and 16-year-old siblings had been murdered.
"I had to do something I've never done, and that was fight to stay alive after the pain," Ryan said.
Boudreaux, the victim of attempted murder, told the judge he "choose to forgive" Vallow Daybell, but would "never feel safe if she has freedom."
Prosecutors alleged Vallow Daybell and her husband, Chad Daybell, believed an apocalypse was imminent and people around them were evil zombies. They accused Vallow Daybell of manipulating her brother, Alex Cox, and husband, Chad Daybell, into carrying out the crimes to cash in on her husband's life insurance policy and Social Security survivor benefits from her children.
Victims Charles Vallow and Brandon Boudreaux
Vallow Daybell met her current husband, Chad Daybell, in 2018 at a religious conference in Utah. The pair bonded over their shared religious beliefs, including that an apocalyptic doomsday would soon arrive.
Shortly after, in 2019, Charles Vallow filed for divorce, claiming that his wife had threatened to kill him and believed she was a godlike figure preparing for the second coming of Christ.
Vallow was shot at Vallow Daybell's rental home in Chandler, Arizona, in July 2019. Months later, her niece's ex-husband, Brandon Boudreaux, was shot at while driving in Gilbert, Arizona. The shooting was later tied to Vallow Daybell's brother who had begun to share her apocalyptic beliefs.
Boudreaux survived the shooting.
The murders of Joshua Vallow, Tylee Ryan and Tammy Daybell
Vallow Daybell moved in September 2019 with her children to the small Idaho town where Chad Daybell lived with his then-wife, Tammy Daybell. Weeks after the move, Tammy Daybell was found dead.
Relatives of Vallow Daybell soon after told police they had not seen her children in awhile.
Vallow Daybell was arrested on child abandonment counts in Hawaii in February 2020. She was extradited to Idaho, and in early June of that year, authorities found the bodies of her children buried on Chad Daybell's property.
(This story has been updated to add new information and because an earlier version included an inaccuracy.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
2 days ago
- NBC News
Social Security number leaked? Chances are, a criminal is already trying to use it
Data breaches that expose the personal information of millions of people can have very real consequences for individuals, most notably: identity theft. A new study found that the more of a person's personal information is easily accessible to criminals on the dark web, the likelier it is that that person will be a target for criminals. The odds skyrocket if the information includes the person's Social Security number, which is usually necessary for financial applications like opening a bank account, applying for a credit card or filing tax returns, all of which are common targets for fraudsters. The findings, published Monday by SentiLink, a company that monitors customer data for fraud on behalf of finance companies, are intuitive. But they are believed to be the first of their kind showing a clear correlation between the robust cybercriminal trade of people's identities and real-world attempts where criminals try to commit fraud against those victims. David Maimon, SentiLink's head of fraud insight, told NBC News he conducted the study by comparing three sets of data from people whose information is available online. For a baseline list of people whose names and addresses were available online, he used publicly available voter registration records. For a set of people whose names and addresses — but not Social Security numbers — were widely traded among criminals, he took names off stolen checks from a ring of check fraud thieves that operated on Telegram. For a list of people whose names, addresses and Social Security numbers were all widely traded among cybercriminals, he downloaded a database of around 100,000 victims, cobbled together from various hacks and repeatedly traded on the dark web since 2021. Maimon then compared more than 2,000 people from those datasets with SentiLink's internal records of attempted identity theft to see how often each of those people had been targeted. The results were dramatic. Only 2.1% of the people from voter registration forms had been targeted by identity thieves. Of those whose names were found in the stolen check ring, 12.1% had been targeted. But nearly all people in the 2021 database with Social Security numbers — 97% — had been victims of attempted identity theft, Maimon found. Data breaches have become increasingly common, to the point where most Americans' information has been repeatedly stolen. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission received 1.1 million claims of identity theft in 2024, though that is believed to be a severe undercount of the complete number of victims. Even children often have their Social Security number stolen, and credit monitoring services rarely help victims much. According to statistics provided to NBC News by the nonprofit Identity Theft Resource Center, there were 1,857 new data breaches in 2024 that included Americans' Social Security numbers. While Social Security numbers are routinely hacked, it's often impossible for a victim to know how widely their information has been shared — a key component of SentiLink's findings. Not all breaches are equal, and cybercriminals often sell hacked data only to the highest bidder to keep it more exclusive. When a person's information does become widely repackaged and repeatedly traded between criminals, they are targeted by thieves repeatedly for a longer period of time, Maimon found. The best course of action, Maimon said, is for people to freeze their credit ratings with the three major credit agencies and to monitor their ChexSystems Consumer Score to see if anyone has opened bank accounts in their name.
7 days ago
Trump's comments on Epstein raise new questions about when and why they fell out
President Donald Trump this week spoke at length about his relationship with accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, but his accounts raise new questions about when exactly the two fell out and why. Trump said on Monday that his relationship with Epstein, who died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on charges of trafficking young girls and women, soured because Epstein poached some employees after he explicitly warned him not to do so. Trump on Tuesday went on to say that Epstein "stole" young women who worked at the spa at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida. "People were taken out of the spa, hired by him. In other words, gone," Trump told reporters on Air Force One. One of those workers, Trump said, was Virginia Giuffre, an Epstein accuser who said she was recruited by his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, when Giuffre was an underage teenager working as a locker-room attendant at Mar-a-Lago in 2000. Maxwell, convicted of sex trafficking minors and now serving a 20-year prison sentence, has denied the allegations. Giuffre died by suicide this past April at age 41. "I don't know. I think she worked at the spa, I think so, I think that was one of the people," Trump first said when asked about Giuffre before going on to say more definitively, "Yeah, he stole her. And by the way, she had no complaints about us, none whatsoever." According to Social Security records submitted to the court during Giuffre's defamation case against Ghislaine Maxwell, Giuffre was employed at Mar-a-Lago Club LLC in 2000 and earned $1,866.50 during that calendar year. The duration and precise dates of her employment at Trump's club remained in dispute when the lawsuit settled in 2017. Giuffre -- then known as Virginia Roberts -- subsequently went on to travel extensively around the world with Epstein and Maxwell over the next two years, according to flight logs kept by one of Epstein's pilots that have been entered into court records in civil and criminal cases. Trump's comments came after the White House last week said Epstein was kicked out of Mar-a-Lago for being a "creep." Asked about the discrepancy between the White House's reasoning for his split with Epstein and his own that it was over Epstein stealing his employees, Trump said on Tuesday "it's sort of a little bit of the same thing." As he told reporters that Epstein poached young female staff, Trump said "people would come and complain, 'this guy is taking people from the spa.' I didn't know that." "And then when I heard about it, I told him, I said, 'Listen, we don't want you taking our people, whether it was spa or not spa.' I don't want him taking people. And he was fine. And then not too long after that, he did it again and I said, 'Out of here,'" Trump said. But previous comments from Trump suggested his falling out with Epstein occurred several years later than that. In 2002, Trump praised Epstein in a New York magazine profile of the now-deceased financier and convicted sex offender. "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy," Trump told the magazine. "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life." Then in 2004, the two men were rivals over a property in Florida as reported by the Washington Post. Trump ultimately won the property at auction. In 2019, when Epstein was arrested on federal charges, Trump said he hadn't spoken with Epstein in 15 years. "I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him. I mean, people in Palm Beach knew him. He was a fixture in Palm Beach," Trump said in the Oval Office. "I had a falling out with him a long time ago. I don't think I've spoken to him for 15 years. I wasn't a fan. I was not, yeah, a long time ago, I'd say maybe 15 years. I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you. I was not a fan of his." Asked at the time for the reason behind their falling out and why Epstein was banned from Mar-a-Lago, Trump responded: "The reason doesn't make any difference, frankly."
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
California leads coalition suing Trump administration over SNAP data
This story was originally published on Grocery Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Grocery Dive newsletter. Dive Brief: The office of California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced Monday that it is suing the USDA, arguing that the agency is illegally demanding that states provide personal and sensitive information about millions of SNAP participants. California is leading a coalition of attorneys general from 20 states and Washington, D.C., in filing the lawsuit. The lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claims that President Donald Trump's administration is trying to collect unrelated, protected data to fuel mass deportation efforts and says that the USDA has threatened to pull funding from states that do not comply with the data request. Dive Insight: The lawsuit comes after Bonta led a coalition of 14 attorneys general earlier this month criticizing the USDA's demand in May that states turn over information about SNAP participants. In the May letter, the USDA said it was trying to eliminate 'information silos' within the SNAP program, citing a recent executive order focused on stopping waste, fraud and abuse, according to the lawsuit. 'USDA claimed the agency would use this data to 'ensure program integrity,' including by verifying the eligibility of recipients, even though Congress has delegated that task to the States,' the lawsuit says. The USDA directed states to provide personally identifiable information, including names, dates of birth, personal addresses, Social Security numbers and the total amount of benefits received for all SNAP applicants and recipients since January 2020, according to the lawsuit. While the USDA says it wants this information to improve the SNAP program, the lawsuit claims that this request is part of 'a number of similar moves by federal agencies to obtain and disclose highly sensitive [personally identifiable information], not for program purposes, but for the creation of a surveillance system to advance the President's agenda, including by facilitating the President's mass deportation efforts.' The agency threatened to take action against states that didn't comply, such as potentially pulling SNAP funding, in the May letter and again in July, the lawsuit claims. 'Any delay in that funding could be catastrophic for the State and the residents who rely on SNAP to meet their basic nutritional needs,' the lawsuit says. The USDA said in early July that it wants states to provide the data no later than July 30 — just days after the July 23 deadline for public comments on the proposed action. The lawsuit said this quick turnaround made clear that the 'USDA had no intention of modifying the proposed data collection based on any public comments it received.' A USDA spokesperson told Grocery Dive the agency does not comment on pending litigation. The state attorneys general argue that the USDA's actions violate state and federal privacy and security laws, including the Privacy Act. Bonta and the coalition also argue that the USDA has failed to meet the public comment requirements for this type of action and exceeded the agency's statutory authority. The coalition is asking the court to declare the Trump administration's demands unlawful and seeking an injunction to block the USDA from initiating noncompliance procedures. Editor's note: This story has been updated with input from the USDA. Recommended Reading SNAP to drive growth in consumables throughout 2025: report
