
What's behind the death of the Duolingo mascot
Death all part of a stunt to get brand attention, says expert
⭐️HERE'S WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW⭐️
Duolingo said that its iconic mascot, Duo, died.
That being said, the company says it's not the last we'll see of the owl.
An expert in public relations says this is a classic marketing stunt.
Read on to find out why she thinks it could be good for the brand. ⬇️⬇️⬇️
If you went onto language-learning app Duolingo today to brush up on your Spanish, you may have shed a tear in the process.
You would have noticed the iconic owl mascot isn't looking so good.
He has Xs where his eyes should be.
On Feb. 11, Duolingo announced in a tweet that Duo the owl had died unexpectedly.
The social media announcement has been viewed more than 50 million times on X (formerly Twitter) already, and one expert says that's exactly the point.
Brands pull stunts to pull focus
Toronto-based Courtney Khimji, founder of the public relations agency Chimera Collective, said that brands are always looking for new ways to get more eyes on their products.
Sometimes, like in the case of Duolingo, they take big swings.
'It's a classic PR stunt. They've made a really bold move. Not everyone is going to like it, but it's obviously caught the media's attention globally,' she told CBC Kids News.
The Mr. Peanut brand pulled a similar marketing stunt to Duolingo back in 2020 when it announced that Mr. Peanut had died. (Image credit:)
Khimji said she thinks it could be part of a rebrand by Duolingo, which can be a good way for companies to 'freshen things up,' with the ultimate goal of making more money.
#RIPeanut: Mr. Peanut has died at age 104
'The Duolingo owl has been the cornerstone of their brand identity and personality, and to do away with that clearly signals a big new move,' she said.
She said the fact that we don't yet know what happened to the owl creates a sense of anticipation among the audience and sets up a possible rebrand.
On Thursday, Duolingo used social media to reveal that their characters Falstaff, Lily and Zari had also died and said that app users could bring Duo the mascot back to life by doing their daily language lesson.
In Duolingo, users are encouraged to take daily lessons to build a streak, earn points and progress on leaderboards.
So whether or not a rebrand happens, Duolingo is already using the marketing campaign to get users to spend more time in the app.
In an email to CBC Kids News, a spokesperson from Duolingo said: 'Duo's story isn't over yet.'
'What exactly happened to him? Well, that's a mystery we'll be unraveling over the next couple of weeks.'
What can kids learn from this?
If you bought into Duolingo's announcement without considering that it could be a marketing stunt, you're probably not alone.
That's why Khimji said it's important for kids to develop critical thinking — to make a habit of questioning what they see before they make a decision about it.
'It's important for kids now more than ever to learn what's real and what's not, since it's becoming increasingly harder in the world of AI and deepfakes.'
She said doing that is all about asking the right questions.
Namely, what is the motivation behind this brand's advertisement, announcement or other action?
'Brands aren't just trying to tell a story to benefit consumers. They're doing it for themselves, and that's OK, but you need to question why,' Khimji said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
‘Orgasmic meditation' wellness company leaders convicted in forced labour trial
Published Jun 09, 2025 • 3 minute read Nicole Daedone, centre, founder and former CEO of OneTaste, departs Brooklyn federal court on Tuesday, June 13, 2023, in New York City. Photo by Jeenah Moon / AP Photo NEW YORK — The leaders of a sex-focused women's wellness company that promoted 'orgasmic meditation' have been convicted of federal forced labour charges. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account A Brooklyn, N.Y., jury on Monday found Nicole Daedone, founder of OneTaste Inc., and Rachel Cherwitz, the California-based company's former sales director, guilty after deliberating for less than two days following a five-week trial. The two each face up to 20 years in prison when sentenced later. Prosecutors had argued the two women ran a years-long scheme that groomed adherents — many of them victims of sexual trauma — to do their bidding. They said Daedone, 57, of New York, and Cherwitz, 44, of California, used economic, sexual and psychological abuse, intimidation and indoctrination to force OneTaste members into sexual acts they found uncomfortable or repulsive, such as having sex with prospective investors or clients. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The two told followers the questionable acts were necessary to obtain 'freedom' and 'enlightenment' and demonstrate their commitment to the organization's principles. Prosecutors said OneTaste leaders also didn't pay promised earnings to the members-turned-workers and even forced some of them to take out new credit cards to continue taking the company's courses. Read More Assistant U.S. Attorney Nina Gupta, in her closing statement last week, said the defendants 'built a business on the backs' of victims who 'gave everything' to them, including 'their money, their time, their bodies, their dignity, and ultimately their sanity. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'The jury's verdict has unmasked Daedone and Cherwitz for who they truly are: Grifters who preyed on vulnerable victims by making empty promises of sexual empowerment and wellness only to manipulate them into performing labour and services for the defendants' benefit,' said Joseph Nocella, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. Daedone's defence team cast her as a 'ceiling-shattering feminist entrepreneur' who created a unique business around women's sexuality and empowerment. Cherwitz's lawyer, Celia Cohen, argued that the witnesses who testified weren't forced to do anything. When they didn't like the organization anymore or wanted to try other things, she said, they simply left. 'No matter what you think about OneTaste and what they were doing, they chose it. They knew what it was about,' she said in her closing statement last week. 'The fact they are regretting the actions that they took when they were younger is not evidence of a crime.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Lawyers for the defendants said their clients maintain their innocence and intend to appeal. 'We are deeply disappointed in today's verdict,' the lawyers said in a statement Monday. 'This case raised numerous novel and complex legal issues that will require review by the Second Circuit.' Daedone co-founded OneTaste in San Francisco in 2004 as a sort of self-help commune that viewed female orgasms as key to sexual and psychological wellness and interpersonal connection. A centrepiece was 'orgasmic meditation,' or 'OM,' which was carried out by men manually stimulating women in a group setting. The company enjoyed glowing media coverage in the 2010s and quickly opened outposts from Los Angeles to London. Portrayed as a cutting-edge enterprise that prioritized women's sexual pleasure, it generated revenue by providing courses, coaching, OM events, and other sexual practices for a fee. Daedone sold her stake in the company in 2017 for $12 million — a year before OneTaste's marketing and labour practices came under scrutiny. The company's current owners, who have rebranded it the Institute of OM Foundation, have said its work has been misconstrued and the charges against its former executives were unjustified. They maintain sexual consent has always been a cornerstone of the organization. The company didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Toronto Blue Jays Olympics Columnists Canada Ontario


CBC
an hour ago
- CBC
Hundreds of striking WSIB workers rally in downtown Toronto after talks break down
Hundreds of striking workers at Ontario's Workplace Safety and Insurance Board rallied in downtown Toronto on Monday, calling on their employer to find a "fair compromise" on outstanding issues. About 3,600 members of the Ontario Compensation Employees Union (OCEU), also known as CUPE Local 1750, which represents workers at the WSIB, have been on strike for better wages and working conditions since May 22. The union and employer met on Saturday and Sunday in mediated bargaining talks, but talks broke down on Sunday evening. Thomas Chang, OCEU's vice-president for Toronto, said the WSIB rejected the latest offer. "OCEU remains available to negotiate, but needs to see a meaningful move by the employer to meet our member core needs," Chang told the rally. Chang said the mediator has decided to hold off on mediation until both sides come closer together. Picket lines will continue until a deal is reached, he said. The union's bargaining team will provide an update to members this week at a town hall. In an interview later, Chang said: "We've made significant moves to find common ground on wages, workload and seniority, and they have not come back to the table." The WSIB said in a news release on Monday that its latest position includes above-inflation wage increases, improved benefits and a commitment to continue to improve workload. It called on the union to return to negotiations with "fair and realistic expectations" to reach a deal. "When people are hurt at work, we help them recover and return to what matters, and we're getting the best results in a decade," Jeff Lang, president and CEO of the WSIB, said in the release. "I hope our team sees our position as a genuine effort to put this strike behind us and get back to what we do best: helping people." Meanwhile, the WSIB said appeals of its decisions continue to be on hold while the strike continues. Christine Arnott, spokesperson for the WSIB, said in an email on Monday that new claims are still being processed. "Anyone with an existing claim is continuing to receive any income support and health care they need. Any new claims are being registered the same day and will receive the health care they need and income support if they are off work," Arnott said. "Unfortunately, appeals of previous claims are on hold until the strike is resolved." Injured worker says wait has become longer for appeal At least one injured worker says he feels as though he is in limbo. Freddy Ilabaca, a former construction worker from Ajax, said he is waiting to learn the outcome of an appeal filed with the WSIB. His back was injured in March 2023 and the WSIB stopped payments in August 2023. He is currently on long-term disability. IIabaca is fighting with the help of his union to have the matter resolved. Now with the strike continuing, his lawyer has told him he needs to wait longer than expected. He said he has children, owns a home and now there is only one income in his family. "Everything is on hold right now," Ilbaca said. "To me, it's just like now it's more delayed than it was before. It was hard enough in the beginning just to get an appeal. Now that we have an appeal, now that's stopped. It's frustrating," he added.

Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Can Canada still get things built? Yes, we can
Last week, I wrote about how quickly Canada used to build megaprojects. The National Dream went from first spike to Last Spike in three-and-a-half years. Toronto and Montreal built the first lines of their subway systems in four-and-a-half years. And Expo 67 also went from conception to completion in four-and-a-half years, and a mere 44 months from first shovel to opening day. I contrasted that record with those of recent projects, notably in public transit, that today take far longer to build and cost many times more, even accounting for inflation. For example, the Ontario Line in Toronto has an estimated price tag of more than $1-billion a kilometre – roughly 10 times the cost of building a Toronto subway line from the 1950s to the 1990s. And I wrote about the mayor of Longueuil, Que., who took to TikTok to express her exasperation at how mega-problems beset even micro-projects: New traffic lights are $1-million, and a speed bump – a lump of asphalt – clocks in at $10,000. Is negative productivity – paying more, getting less, doing it more slowly – the best we can hope for? Does anyone know how to build any more? Yes, we do. There's an entire world of examples of infrastructure that are as good as or better than Canada's, built quickly, and at a fraction of the cost. These cases are almost all outside the English-speaking world. But there are also Canadian examples of infrastructure as good as or better than the rest of the country's, built relatively quickly and cheaply. The School of Cities at the University of Toronto recently put out a brief comparing transit construction costs in Ontario and the rest of the developed world. Its findings echo those of a report published five years ago by the Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario. They are sobering reads. From Spain to Finland, Turkey to Italy and South Korea to France, subways and other high-level transit are being built for the low prices that used to be the norm in Canada more than a generation ago. Other countries are paying far less, which means that they can afford to build far more. We are paying more, leaving us only able to afford to build much, much less. Take Toronto's Finch West LRT, which is being financed and overseen by Ontario and built by the private sector, and compare it with new subway lines in Finland, Turkey, South Korea and Italy. The latter are underground, high-capacity, heavy rail; Finch is light, surface rail. The foreign projects should cost several times more per kilometre than Finch. In fact, they cost about half as much. Examples such as this abound across Europe and Asia. But they also exist in Canada. Here are three: In 2007, Montreal completed an extension of the Metro's Orange Line. It's 5.2 kilometres long and entirely underground. There were cost overruns, but in hindsight the project was a relative bargain: The price was $143.3-million a kilometre. Factor in inflation and that's $210-million a kilometre today. That's on par with costs in Europe and Asia, or 20th-century Canada. It's also less than the Finch LRT, even though Montreal's project is underground, higher capacity and passes under a river. Or consider Vancouver's Canada Line, part of the SkyTrain network. Opened in 2009, it's 19.2 kilometres long and almost half is below ground. It was built in four years for $2.05-billion. Taking inflation into account, that's just $154-million a kilometre – roughly half the cost of the Finch LRT, and a fraction of the price for the Ontario Line, which Canada Line is similar to. It's also a third of the cost of Vancouver's own under-construction Broadway Subway. Then there's Montreal's Réseau express métropolitain, or REM. It involves building an entire mass-transit system – 67 kilometres of track and 26 stations – in a short period of time. The first phase, between downtown and Brossard on Montreal's South Shore, opened in 2023. Most of the rest of the network is supposed to open in the fall. It runs on elevated tracks, similar to SkyTrain, except for a portion through the centre of the city that is tunnelled. The project has been dogged by criticism, and it is behind schedule and over budget. It was originally supposed to cost $7-billion, though last fall Quebec's Auditor-General estimated that the final tally would be $9.4-billion. But everything is relative: At $9.4-billion, the REM would cost just $140-million a kilometre. Even if we assume more cost overruns on the nearly complete project – let's be hyper-pessimistic and inflate the price by another third – that's still less than $200-million a kilometre. That's comparable to the cost of similar transit projects in Europe and Asia, and a fraction of the cost of recent Canadian projects. Or to look at it this way: If Toronto's Scarborough Subway and Yonge North Subway Extension were being built at REM pricing, Ontario could afford to build four of each of them. And if the Ontario Line were delivered at the REM's price, Queen's Park's existing budget would be sufficient to finance five – yeah, five – Ontario Lines.