Archaeologists baffled to find strange 800-year-old mummy with face tattoos
Humans have adopted body modification methods throughout history to conform to prevalent beauty standards, social status and group affiliation, and even for ritual reasons. Among such body modifications, tattooing still exists as a widely practised cultural practice.
However, there are very few surviving examples of tattooed skin in archaeological records due to the soft nature of skin.
An analysis of existing records of preserved skin with evidence of tattoos suggests that South American coastal deserts have the most preserved tattooed human remains in the world.
So, scientists closely assessed a well-preserved female mummy held at the Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography of the University of Turin that had been excavated from a site in the Andes mountains.
Radiocarbon analysis revealed that the mummy was over 800 years old. She lived sometime between 1215 and 1382CE.
Researchers used two new infrared analysis techniques to look for any tattoos not visible to the naked eye. They were surprised to find tattoos on both cheeks of the mummy's face, including three straight running lines from the ear to the mouth.
They also found a wrist tattoo in the shape of an S.
Using chemical analysis techniques like x-ray fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy, they determined the tattoos were made using pigments developed from the iron mineral magnetite and another called pyroxenes. The analysis revealed a surprising absence of charcoal, the most commonly used tattoo material reported in literature.
'The results show both rare shapes and anatomical location – lines on cheeks and S-like mark on wrist – and unusual ink composition,' they wrote in the study.
The simple tattoos have proved difficult to interpret and identify with any specific culture, however.
South American tattoos are typically more complex drawings on hands, wrists, forearms, and feet. Cheek tattoos are rarer. In fact, no other ancient tattoo found in the region so far is comparable to the 'S' motif on the mummy's arm.
Given the location of the tattoos on body parts not usually covered by clothing, researchers suspect they may have had a 'decorative or communicative purpose'.
However, they add that 'at the moment, it is not possible to attribute either a sort of medical or therapeutic purpose or a cultural provenance' to them.
'To conclude, the research actively contributes in the study of ancient tattoo practice, in particular in South America about eight centuries ago, and highlights the role of museum collections in the analysis of ancient cultures,' researchers noted.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
'Divine blood' found on Jesus' burial cloth 'proves' Shroud of Turin is authentic
The Shroud of Turin is one of the most well-studied artifacts in history. Believed to be the burial cloth of Jesus following the crucifixion, scientists have long debated its authenticity. While radiocarbon dating in the 1980s suggested a medieval origin, some scholars have argued that the blood on the linen tells a different story. Dr Jeremiah Johnston, a biblical scholar, told the Tucker Carlson Network that testing from the 1990s identified blood type AB on the Shroud. 'The Shroud has type AB blood, identified as Semitic, present in only six percent of the population, confirmed as human and male, ruling out animal blood or a hoax,' Dr Johnston said. He also noted that testing showed it was human, male blood that was both premortem and postmortem. 'You would have to actually kill someone if you were trying to reproduce the shroud because we have premortem and post-mortem blood all over the shroud,' said Dr Johnston. The presence of both pre- and post-mortem blood on the Shroud is unusual, suggesting processes inconsistent with natural decomposition, interpreted by some as aligning with resurrection accounts. The AB blood type was first documented in 1982 by Italian biographer Dr Pierluigi Baima Bollone and colleagues, who analyzed a sample from the Shroud's pierced side. Subsequent testing also detected M, N, and S antigens in blood from the foot area, confirming the blood was unquestionably human. The researchers tested the samples in two ways to figure out the blood type. First, they checked for antibodies by putting the fibers on slides, keeping them cold at about 39°F for a long time, adding A1 or B red blood cells and letting them sit for 30 minutes. They looked at the slides under a regular microscope and later used a powerful electron microscope after preserving the fibers in alcohol and coating them with gold. Then the team tested for antigens, particles that stimulate the immune system to produce antibodies, using a mixed agglutination method. They kept the slides cold for 24 hours with anti-A and anti-B serums, washed them several times with saltwater and a cow protein solution, added A1 or B red blood cells, and checked them under a regular microscope, followed by electron microscope checks. The results showed the Shroud's bloodstained fibers had both A and B antigens but no antibodies, pointing to type AB blood. The clean Shroud fibers had no antigens, proving they were free of blood. Dr Johnston also told Carlson that the Sudarium of Oviedo in Spain, which is the facecloth that John's Gospel talks about that covered his face, was also found to have type AB blood. There is no image on this cloth. Only stains are visible to the naked eye, although more is visible under the microscope. However, Dr Kelly Kearse, an immunologist who has extensively studied the Shroud of Turin, has expressed skepticism about the claim that the blood on the Shroud is type AB. Dr Kearse argued that the methods lacked proper controls and could produce false positives due to contamination, such as bacteria, or degradation of the blood over centuries. 'Regarding tests to determine blood type, it could be AB, but I really don't think there's any solid scientific evidence to back that up,' he wrote in a 2020 study. Dr Johnston estimated there are roughly 700 wounds visible on the Shroud. 'This was a very badly wounded man, pints of type AB blood, all over it,' he said, noting that the injuries align with what is known about Roman crucifixions. Dr Johnston also highlighted the image itself, a faint, full-body imprint of a bearded man. 'The image on the Shroud is only two microns thick and does not penetrate through the cloth,' he explained. 'If this were a hoax, painted or dyed, the material would have soaked through completely. 'Instead, the image is so thin we could shave it off with a razor. Even the world's best scientists are baffled.' He suggested the imprint could have formed through a sudden chemical reaction triggered by an immense burst of energy, possibly corresponding to the moment of the Resurrection. Paolo Di Lazzaro, a physicist and laser specialist at ENEA Laboratories near Rome, spent five years studying the Shroud. His team managed to recreate the chemical change in the linen fibers using a massive burst of 34 trillion watts of energy. This 'cold' energy, lasting just a quarter of a billionth of a second, altered the linen's structure to form the image on the Shroud, Dr Johnston explained. Measuring 14 feet long, the linen was first publicly displayed in the 1350s and presented as the actual burial cloth of Christ. While 1988 radiocarbon dating placed its origin between 1260 and 1390 AD, Dr Johnston contends that only a contaminated corner patch, not the original linen, was tested. 'The actual linen has never been radiocarbon dated, just the upper-left corner patch, which was contaminated,' he said. Dr Johnston described the Shroud as 'the most lied about and misunderstood artifact in the world' and thanked Carlson for the opportunity to share his findings.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Tucker Carlson's jaw drops at staggering 1-in-200-billion Shroud of Turin odds
Tucker Carlson was left astounded by evidence presented by a biblical scholar regarding the Shroud of Turin, a linen cloth believed to be the burial cloth of Jesus. Dr Johnston revealed that mathematician Bruno Barbaris of the University of Turin analyzed the shroud's unique characteristics, concluding there is a mere one-in-200-billion chance 'it's anyone other than Jesus of Nazareth.' This staggering statistic left Carlson reeling, challenging decades of skepticism about the shroud's legitimacy, sparked by a 1988 radiocarbon dating study that suggested a medieval origin Barberis's calculation likely factored in multiple elements, including the shroud's dimensions, rare type AB blood and the presence of both pre-mortem and post-mortem blood, aligning with patterns described in the Bible. Beyond statistics, forensic evidence has further supported the shroud's authenticity as scientists have identified more than fifty species of pollen trapped in the fabric, including flowers that bloom only in Israel, and only in April. Traces of limestone and clay unique to Jerusalem are smeared on the nose, knees, and feet, precisely where they would appear if a man stumbled while carrying a rough wooden crossbeam through the streets. 'The image on the shroud is only two microns thick and does not penetrate all the way through the cloth,' Dr Johnston explained. 'I f this were a hoax, painted or dyed, the material would have soaked through completely. Instead, if we took a razor to the shroud, we could shave off the image because it's so thin. This quality has baffled even the world's best scientists.' Dr Johnston suggested the image may have formed through a sudden chemical change triggered by an incredible burst of 34,000 billion watts of energy in just a fraction of a billionth of a second, possibly at the moment of the Resurrection. The 14-foot-long linen bears a faint, full-body image of a bearded man, which many Christians believe to be a miraculous imprint of Jesus. When first exhibited in the 1350s, the shroud was presented as the actual burial cloth used to wrap the mutilated body of Christ after his crucifixion. Radiocarbon dating performed in 1988 placed the shroud's origin between 1260 and 1390 AD, suggesting a medieval origin. However, Dr Johnston argued that only a contaminated patch, not the original linen, was tested. 'The actual linen cloth has never been radiocarbon dated, just the upper left corner patch, which was contaminated,' he told Carlson. 'So, it was the patched sample, not a fine linen sample.' Carlson asked, 'So, not the real thing?' to which Dr. Johnston replied, 'Correct.' Dr Johnston described the shroud as 'the most lied about and misunderstood artifact in the world,' and thanked Carlson for the opportunity to share his findings. Dr Johnston also criticized the British Museum's handling of the 1988 radiocarbon dating data, claiming critical information was suppressed for 29 years. Stunned, Carlson admitted, 'I'm being baffled right now.' Further forensic evidence includes wounds consistent with Roman crucifixion practices, including puncture marks in the wrists and heels, hundreds of scourge marks from lead-tipped whips, and more than 50 punctures from a brutal crown of thorns. A spear wound between ribs five and six matches John 19:34: 'But one of the soldiers pierced his side with a spear, and at once there came out blood and water.' Studies show the blood in that region bears signs of pre-mortem injury, aligning with the Gospel account. In total, there are more than 700 wounds displayed on the shroud. Those include marks left behind from the crucifixion nails. 'You can actually see in the four arms of the crucified man. We see by the way wrist, hands, the entire hand, it's all the same,' Dr Johnston said. 'We know that the nail penetrates through the wrist and the palm. And that's how the Romans would crucify their victims.' For Johnston, the shroud is not simply an archaeological puzzle but a testament, what he calls 'the receipt of God's gift.' Every bloodstain, every fiber, every unexplained detail is, to him, a silent witness to the greatest moment in history: the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Recent scientific studies, including wide-angle X-ray scattering from the Institute of Crystallography in Rome, support the shroud's 2,000-year age, citing the absence of vanillin, a compound that would be present in younger linen. Dr Johnston also criticized the British Museum's handling of the 1988 radiocarbon dating data, claiming critical information was suppressed for 29 years. Stunned, Carlson admitted, 'I'm being baffled right now.'
BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
Skeletons with Sub-saharan grandparents found in Dorset and Kent
A boy and girl who lived in medieval England likely had grandparents from Africa, according to new findings by DNA from the skeletons - which are over a thousand years old - was tested by scientists to reveal their boy was found in a medieval cemetery in Dorset, and the girl was found at cemetery in archaeologists said they were surprised to find early medieval skeletons with grandparents from so far away. What did the scientists find? The scientists originally tested the DNA of 23 bodies that were found in a medieval they studied their DNA most of the skeletons buried there had either northern European or western British and Irish scientists were amazed to find that one person at each cemetery had a recent ancestor from west fact, the team found that between 20 to 40 percent of the ancestry in the skeletons was from sub-Saharan Africa. They even revealed that the individuals had similar DNA to groups living in west Africa right now, such as the Yoruba, Mende, Mandenka and Esan groups. 'A diverse population' According to researchers, the findings suggest that medieval Britain may have been more diverse than once of the researchers, Dr Edwards, said the results suggested "a diverse population with far-flung connections who were, nonetheless, fully integrated into the fabric of daily life." Another of the team, Dr Sayer, said the finding was "fascinating" because the children were buried in very different places, but had such similar DNA.
