After-hours boost details awaited
The government on Sunday announced more than $164 million over four years would be spent to expand urgent and after-hours healthcare services across the country.
Health Minister Simeon Brown said the initiative would mean 98% of New Zealanders would be able to receive in-person urgent care within one hour's drive of their homes.
It would result in a new urgent and after-hours service in Dunedin and other services would be offered in other parts of the South.
A document outlining changes said the Invercargill after-hours service would next year expand to also provide daytime services.
Improved services would also be rolled out across rural and remote communities in places such as Balclutha and Stewart Island.
Clutha Health First chief executive Gary Reed said the Balclutha facility welcomed the announcement, although details remained scant at this early stage.
"Any new monies are warmly received in these financially constrained times. We are waiting for further information from the ministry with respect to how and when the monies will be allocated, as well as what the ministry's expectations are with regards to it," Mr Reed said.
The Invercargill after-hours clinic closed in March last year as it struggled to get doctors but reopened within a few days.
WellSouth Primary Health Network chief executive Andrew Swanson-Dobbs said he was looking forward to receiving more details about the after-hours healthcare package and what it would mean for Invercargill.
"This news paves a way for a more sustainable service in Dunedin as well as the Invercargill after-hours service," he said.
"We all know the pressure on health practitioners and other staff to support after hours, with clinicians often working day jobs as well as after hours to sustain the service.
"It's a good result and now we need to get on and plan the work."
Up to 30 rural and remote South Island services will be improved, alongside a further seven provincial and urban services in 2027.
This includes places such as Haast and Gore.
Gore Health chief executive Karl Meltzer said he was glad to hear of the increase in funding but, like everything in health, "the devil is in the details."
He said potentially it was exciting, and it could help alleviate urgent-care issues.
"But we do not know what it is going to be. I have been making a few calls to Wellington but have not had any calls back," he said.
Gore Health had a round-the-clock emergency department which allowed Gore GPs to be able to go to bed by 9pm, he said.
That sort of coverage was great for a population of 20,000. He said the interesting thing would be whether the money was tagged to the Gore Health emergency department.
HealthCentral Alexandra general manager Jenaya Smith said HealthCentral began lobbying for adequate and equitable after-hours and urgent-care funding prior to opening its urgent-care centre in July last year.
"We are currently providing an extremely well-utilised walk-in service for both residents of Central Otago and visitors to the area and are open from 8am to 6pm, seven days a week," he said.
She was hopeful any funding boost would benefit patients accessing urgent-care/after-hours service but had not yet seen any information.
Central Otago Health Services Ltd was contracted to provide urgent GP services between 6pm-8am for HealthCentral-enrolled patients. Comparatively small numbers of its patients accessed this service, she said.
Central Otago Health Services Ltd could not be contacted.
Waitaki District Mayor Gary Kircher welcomed the news Oamaru would have its after-hours services improved.
"The after-hours emergency department has always been a critical service provided by Oamaru Hospital, so it is great to see that Health NZ is making further improvements to support our wider Waitaki community. A significant proportion of our population will benefit and, in a time when government funding is under huge pressure, it's awesome to hear that this service will be improved."
— APL
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
Heart Health Care System 'Verge Of Collapse' A Barometer Of Wider Public Hospital Verging
It has been said more than once that overcrowding in emergency departments is a barometer of how public hospitals as a whole are performing in Aotearoa New Zealand's health system. It has now emerged that another barometer is the rate of heart attack patients being treated within clinically accepted timeframes. According to a new Otago University report, Heart disease in Aotearoa: morbidity, mortality and service delivery, commissioned by cardiac advocacy charity Kia Manawanui Trust (the Trust), the rate of these patients not being treated within clinically appropriate timeframes is a massive one-half. While dramatic, this is not as surprising as one might think. New Zealand has just one-third the number of cardiologists it needs. It has led to the regrettably correct conclusion that the heart healthcare system is verging on collapse. Health journalists doing their job This scandal was well reported on 11 August by Radio New Zealand's health reporter Ruth Hill: Half of heart attack patients not treated within accepted timeframes. She quotes the Trust's Chief Executive Letitia Harding in a dramatic, but not overstating, manner observing that the findings exposed a system that was failing at every level. In her words: Heart care in New Zealand isn't just stretched – it's on the verge of collapse. We are failing in all aspects and it's costing New Zealanders their lives. TVNZ gave the report prominent coverage on 1News (11 August): Verge of collapse. Stuff journalist Nicholas Jones, like Ruth Hill, on the same day also gave a good outline of the report's findings: People are dying. Key Findings The reports key findings include: Life-threatening delays: Half of all heart-attack patients are not seen within internationally accepted timeframes. New Zealand has only a third of the cardiologists it should have. Māori and Pacific people hospitalised or die from heart disease more than a decade earlier, on average, than other New Zealanders. Heart disease costs the country's health system and economy $13.8 billion per year ($13 million in 2020). The biggest contributor is hospitalisations but also contributing are lost workdays, GP visits, prescriptions and mortality. [These are minimum costs as some other factors such as emergency department admission costs were not included in this analysis.] Regions with the highest death rates are Tairāwhitii, Lakes (Rotorua-Taupo), Whanganui, and Taranaki. They have the fewest cardiac specialists. Dr Sarah Fairley is a Wellington-based cardiologist. She is also the Trust's medical director. Her conclusion was that the findings by the Otago University study matched the experience of health professionals on the cardiac frontline. Cardiac workforce reality check Sometimes non-government organisations can be overly gentle and deferential in describing bad news such as this. However, the Trust does not pull its punches over the report's findings. It calls a spade a spade. This in the context of heart disease being the greatest cause of mortalities in New Zealand. It was responsible for one in five deaths and 5% of hospital admissions. The Trust is calling for immediate investment in public hospital cardiac care infrastructure – beds and equipment – and a national strategy to recruit and retain cardiology staff. This goes to the root of the 'verging collapse'. Drilling down further, in 2024 New Zealand had 173.2 full-time cardiologists (32.8 per million people). This is three times lower than the average (95 specialists per million) of all countries measured by the European Society of Cardiology. Contrasting the figures 32.8 and 95.0 speaks volumes. However, the cardiac workforce is not just medical specialists. The number of sonographers had dropped from 70.4 in 2013 to just 43.5 in 2024, despite the 17% population increase. Their ratio had nearly halved from 16 per million to 8.2 over the same period of time. Political reaction Health Minister Simeon Brown in response gave some acknowledgement to the report but passed the buck to Health New Zealand (Te Whatu Ora) as if its political leadership were not responsible in some way. He referred to it establishing a National Clinical Cardiac Network which is developing national standards and models of care. In fact, this network was established well over a decade ago when Tony Ryall was health minister (2008-14). The network did good innovative and collaborative work. But the vertical centralisation of the health system under Labour's Andrew Little meant that the network was brought under direct bureaucratic control thereby giving it less oxygen for its independent advice. A further dimension: clinical follow-ups Understandably the impression can be formed that the critical threshold for treatment is to have a first specialist assessment (FSA). In this context this is the assessment by a cardiologist of a patient's heart condition following a general practitioner referral for further investigation. Where, for whatever reason, treatment such as surgery was not consequentially scheduled after the FSA (including because further monitoring was considered more appropriate) a clinical follow-up would normally be scheduled within a clinically appropriate timeframe. In the mid to late 2010s, towards the end of my employment as Executive Director of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, I became aware of increasingly serious concerns of a range of medical specialists (not just cardiac) that these clinical follow-ups were being severely delayed As a result, their patients (including children) were facing increased health risks. This includes denial through excessive delay of access to treatment that might have improved these conditions. This was regardless of location – rural, regional or urban. Consequently, the powerful message given by Northland cardiologist and Trust Board member Dr Marcus Lee on Radio New Zealand's Midday Report (11 August) in an interview with Charlotte Cook, resonated strongly with me: Delayed clinical follow-ups. After pushing back on Minister Brown's use of statistics, Dr Lee referred to the downside negative effects on clinical follow-ups after patients' FSAs. The cause of these clinically unsafe delays is the sheer volume of FSAs which had to take priority. Coupled with severe workforce shortages, these patients were trapped in a vice. Consequently, for many, their health conditions worsened to the extent that those who might otherwise have been able to be treated could not be. In other words, they were denied access to necessary diagnosis and treatment. Moral injury Dr Lee also raised the issue of moral injury. In the context of healthcare it refers to the psychological, social and spiritual impact of events on health professionals who overwhelming hold strong ethical values over, for example, denial of timely access of patients to diagnosis and treatment. This includes when events are determined by factors beyond their control, particularly political (especially) and bureaucratic decision-making. In the context of Dr Lee's reference to moral injury it is the cardiologist that has to explain this situation to patients and families of the harm done by delayed diagnostic or treatment access even though it was not caused by him or his colleagues. Although responsibility rests with political and bureaucratic decision-makers they are not the ones who have to explain it to harmed patients and their families. Dr Lee made the point well that one consequence is the undermining of patient trust in him and his colleagues. The heart healthcare barometer and a 'wake up' call A standout observation by the above-mentioned cardiologist Dr Sarah Fairley really struck home with me. In her words: From inside the system, I can tell you that this report reflects what we see every day – a workforce stretched beyond safe limits, patients slipping through the cracks and no end in sight. While this comment was made in the context of the heart healthcare system, it also reads as a standalone comment for the whole public health system, regardless of branch of medicine or type of diagnosis and treatment. The verging collapse of the cardiac care system is a barometer of the public hospital system as a whole. Public hospitals across the health system are in all in this dire situation with differences being in degree, not kind. One only needs to read the latest travesty involving adult inpatient and related mental health services in Canterbury due to ineffective governance, understaffing and cumulative strain for a decade. This disaster was covered by Nadine Roberts in Stuff (12 August): Damming mental health report. Christopher Luxon's government can't be blamed for Aotearoa's deteriorating health system. While it has worsened under his watch, it is an inherited state of affairs. It goes back to the relative underfunding ('light austerity') of the National led government for much of the 2010s and the poor compounding health system stewardship of under the previous Labour led government whose solution was destructive restructuring through vertical centralisation. What characterised all three of these governments is their shared neglect of the severe medical specialist shortages that first became evident in the late 2000s. The last word should be left to the Trust's Chief Executive Letitia Harding. She said that the report should be 'a wake-up call for the government'. She nailed it in one. But it is equally a wake-up call for the government for the whole health system.
Scoop
11 hours ago
- Scoop
Bowel Cancer NZ Meets With Health Minister To Push For Screening From Age 45 & Post-Treatment Exercise Programme
Press Release – Bowel Cancer New Zealand Bowel Cancer New Zealand met with Hon Simeon Brown last week to push for two life saving measures: lowering the national bowel screening age and introducing a supported exercise programme after chemotherapy The meeting was constructive, with the Minister outlining work taken in response to the charity's screening proposals put to him in February. Work is now underway on both measures – but screening timelines remain unclear. A further meeting later this year was agreed. Work on screening age progressing – but no plan yet Bowel Cancer NZ reiterated its costed proposals, first presented to the Minister in February, showing how the Government can deliver on Prime Minister Christopher Luxon's 2023 pledge to match Australia's screening age of 45. The plans are achievable, affordable, and reinstate earlier screening for Māori and Pacific peoples – groups with worse survival rates under the current one-size-fits-all approach. The Minister confirmed that improvements in investigations for people with symptoms are rolling out from this month – a key enabler for lowering the screening age. He acknowledged that moving to 58 is only a step on the journey, describing it as 'a step, but it's not enough' – signalling the Government recognises the need to go further. Bowel Cancer NZ Chief Executive Peter Huskinson said: 'It's encouraging that our proposals are being taken seriously – but we need solid timelines. Every month that goes by, more than 50 Kiwis in the age group that can access screening in Australia are diagnosed with bowel cancer.' The minister stated that modelling to inform next steps is not expected until late 2025 or early 2026, leaving little time to implement changes before the next election. Under BCNZ's proposals, screening from 45 could be implemented swiftly, with earlier eligibility for Māori and Pacific peoples reinstated. Without this, stark inequities remain, with many people developing bowel cancer before reaching the current starting age of 60. Ball rolling on major survival gains through exercise after chemotherapy Bowel Cancer NZ also presented evidence from the landmark CHALLENGE trial, which shows that a structured behaviour change and exercise programme after chemotherapy increases eight-year survival rates by 7% for Stage 2 and Stage 3 patients – saving more than 50 lives each year in New Zealand. 'This is one of the biggest survival gains we've seen in years,' said Huskinson. 'It's highly effective, highly affordable, and could be rolled out nationwide within 12 months. We want to see the Government champion this and make it standard care.' The Minister responded positively, asking officials to provide further advice and inviting BCNZ to meet with the Ministry of Health and Health New Zealand to discuss modelling and next steps. Next steps The meeting ended with a commitment to meet again. 'Many New Zealanders are frustrated and rightly want faster action. We share those concerns and will keep pressing the case for change,' said Huskinson. 'Kiwis facing the impact of bowel cancer don't have time to wait. Every month matters, and we'll keep advocating until these life-saving measures are delivered.' Bowel Cancer NZ will continue working to ensure all New Zealanders benefit from timely equitable screening, high quality treatment, and innovative post-treatment care – to work towards a future where no life is lost to this disease. More information on bowel cancer and the Bowel Cancer New Zealand charity can be found at
RNZ News
14 hours ago
- RNZ News
Mayoral hopeful's website condemned as 'horrendous'
Photo: RNZ / Nate McKinnon An Invercargill mayoral hopeful has been slammed by fellow candidates after his party website looks to have posted "dangerous" and sexually disturbing content online. Gordon McCrone is standing for the top job under an unofficial party for which he is listed as the only staff member. His nomination is listed as pending approval on the Invercargill City Council website. The website, whose domain is registered to Gordon McCrone, refers to the party leader as an unregistered, self-appointed child sex psychologist. It includes sexually disturbing content. Local Democracy Reporting has chosen not to publish the website's name. It makes claims that McCrone is a leading cancer researcher who expects to find a cure for the disease. It also says he advises "President" Joe Biden on internal and external affairs, and proposes beneficiaries are given free Lotto tickets. McCrone was approached for comment to validate these claims but chose not to address the questions in his emailed reply. The website content has been condemned by a number of sitting councillors running for mayor in the southern city. McCrone's beliefs have been condemned by Invercargill councillors (from left) Ria Bond, Tom Campbell and Alex Crackett. Photo: Supplied via LDR Ria Bond was concerned about a lack of candidate safety checks prior to entering local politics and would like to see a robust system to ensure people meet the standard. "I'd recommend that that candidate pull himself from the election, because he clearly has behaviours and beliefs that don't fit with our community whatsoever," she said. Deputy mayor Tom Campbell disagreed with filtering candidates but condemned the party website messaging. "It's terrible. It's horrendous. It's awful. Any right-minded person would be nauseated by it," he said. Alex Crackett described the content as "appalling" and "dangerous", adding there would need to be protocols at candidate events for the health and safety of those attending. McCrone has already been barred from a Southland Business Chamber debate on 19 August, with president Chris Hughes saying they were "deeply concerned" by the commentary. "Given his very public views, we feel it's appropriate to take this stance in the best interests of the chamber and the wider Southland community," Hughes said. He said the website content "makes clear why this decision is reasonable". The chamber received strong support for its decision after it was made public, he said. Councillor Ian Pottinger is also running for mayor but did not wish to comment on McCrone. He too supported the chamber's decision. Police would not say if any complaints had been received about the website or whether they were investigating. "In general, police cannot respond to queries which seek to establish whether specific individuals or organisations are, or have been, under investigation," a spokesperson told Local Democracy Reporting. Invercargill City Council deputy electoral officer Michael Morris said the rules for candidacy were set out in legislation with very few restrictions for running. The two key rules were that candidates needed to hold citizenship and be enrolled to vote. "The electoral officers or council cannot have any role in determining who stands or not, as long as the requirements are met," Morris said. Election day is set for 11 October. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
