Seeing farther, striking deeper, this brigade is pushing its drones
Soldiers with the Hawaii-based 25th Infantry Division are in the midst of a training exercise with Philippine allies that has them pushing farther and striking deeper with the help of new drones.
The 2nd Mobile Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division, is forward deployed in the Philippines, training with the 7th Infantry Division of the Philippine Armed Forces as part of a Joint Pacific Multinational Readiness Center, or JPMRC, exercise.
Maj. Gen. Marcus Evans, 25th Infantry Division commanding general, told Army Times on Monday that the most challenging part of the exercise so far has been the environmental factors. High temperatures and monsoon conditions have slammed troops as they've operated across islands and jungles in the Luzon area of the Philippines.
The exercise marks the brigade's second evolution of the Army's Transformation in Contact, or TIC, initiative following its first evolution in 2024. As part of the initiative, which seeks to modernize and evolve formations as they prepare for real-world deployments, soldiers received new drones, counter-drone equipment and electronic warfare tools.
First armor brigade conducts combat training center rotation with new tools
Since then, the unit has been issued farther-reaching drones with both medium- and long-range capabilities, giving soldiers nearly 10 times the range of previous drones.
Last year, units were limited to about a 3-kilometer distance for drones to scout enemy locations. Now they can see, sense and strike targets as far as 30 kilometers out, Evans said.
'It creates increased survivability,' Evans said of the striking range. 'It enhances their ability to protect themselves with greater standoff and strike with loitering munitions or weaponized drones.'
Meanwhile, the brigade also brought 3D printing capabilities, which it has used to make replacement parts for equipment and build nearly 50 first-person-view drones so far during the exercise, he said.
The brigade brought an estimated 2,000 soldiers from Hawaii and Guam for the exercise, with Philippine partners bringing about the same amount of manpower.
They're facing off against a simulated battalion-size enemy force equipped with its own drone, counter-drone and electronic warfare capabilities.
During its Philippine rotation last year, which was also an exportable combat training center evolution, the brigade didn't have infantry squad vehicles. This time, however, it does, and the vehicles have made a major difference for troops in both mobility and sustainability, Evans said.
The Army's TIC initiative first focused on the brigade level with dismounted units. The second iteration is looking to make similar changes in mechanized or armor formations. That also ties in division-level assets.
On this run for the 2nd Mobile Brigade Combat Team, the 25th Infantry Division is using its headquarters to simulate a larger force and bringing division assets, such as long-range fires, to the brigade.
Troops are also using the 25th Infantry Division headquarters to synchronize and integrate with the Philippine's 7th Infantry Division headquarters, Evans said.
'[Their] main objective is procedural interoperability,' Evans said. 'U.S. and Philippine forces train sustainment, movement and maneuver together. See further, sense better and be able to strike.'
Following the initial field training, the units will gather at Fort Magsaysay, Philippines, and then conduct a combined maritime, land and air movement of more than 400 kilometers into 'enemy' territory north of the outpost to Camp Melchor F. dela Cruz in mid-June, he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
7 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Infomaniak breaks rank and comes out in support of controversial Swiss encryption law
In Switzerland, some of the best VPNs are in the firing line as a result of the country's proposed changes to encryption laws. The law's revision would extend surveillance obligations and require companies to collect information and identification on their users – a move that would significantly impact online privacy. Swiss-based VPNs Proton VPN and NymVPN would be affected, and Proton CEO Andy Yen said the privacy-focused company would rather leave its Swiss base than risk the privacy of its users. The most private VPNs uphold strict no-logs policies and collect very little information about users. This law would see these policies undermined. Despite widespread opposition from across the country, Swiss cloud security company Infomaniak is supporting the law. Infomaniak describes itself as an "ethical cloud" company and one that doesn't compromise on "ecology, privacy, or people." It's surprising, then, that they are seemingly the only privacy-focused company in Switzerland supporting the law change. In a debate on Radio Télévision Suisse (RTS), and reported in Clubic, Infomaniak spokesperson Thomas Jacobsen addressed Andy Yen's comments on the law. Jacobsen believed Yen showed a "lack of knowledge of Swiss political institutions" and called for finding the right balance, not looking for extremes. Infomaniak argued that anonymity prevents justice, saying there must be a "happy medium" to prevent the digital landscape becoming a "Wild West." Proton was cited as a company that advocates for anonymity, but this isn't technically the case. Proton, and Proton VPN, advocates for privacy – and there is a subtle but important difference between the two. Confusing privacy and anonymity is common – a Tom's Guide VPN survey found that 29% of readers think VPNs make you anonymous – but they don't mean the same thing. Anonymity is when your identity isn't known and no trace of your activity is left behind, with the Tor Network being an example. VPNs protect your data and your privacy. Many can still see some identifiable information and most don't claim to offer anonymity. Although your data is encrypted and reputable VPN providers can't see your internet activity, they can still see your connecting IP address and your payment information. The key point is that they never log or share it. Hackers, third-parties, or your ISP can't see what you're doing, and that is the privacy VPNs offer. Infomaniak is incorrect in saying Proton advocates for anonymity. Infomaniak also took issue with free services, such as free VPNs. In the debate, Jacobsen said how these free services allow anyone to hide from the law by enabling anonymity. While VPNs can be misused by bad actors for criminal endeavours, something all reputable VPNs and Tom's Guide opposes, this doesn't mean they should be taken away or targeted. Almost every kind of technology and device can be used for illicit purposes. We have to accept that not everything can, or should, be controlled in order to target a small minority. This trade-off would take away the right to privacy of millions of genuine users. VPNs, and especially the best free VPNs, are a lifeline for people living under censorship and internet restrictions. Without them, they would be unable to access a free and open internet and would suffer at the hands of authoritarian regimes. Proton VPN has a host of dedicated anti-censorship features, aimed at protecting the privacy of those who need it most – including the free service Proton VPN Free. Many VPNs also offer free emergency VPNs for journalists or activists. VPNs cannot just be for those who can afford them, so Infomaniak's targeting of free privacy services fails to consider the appropriate repercussions. The article quotes Infomaniak's founder, Boris Siegenthaler, as saying "the answer is clear: the day activists for important climate, humanitarian, or democratic causes are in the crosshairs, we will oppose this request." However, many argue that the Swiss government's request would put those people in the crosshairs, and they wouldn't be protected. Infomaniak doesn't advocate for widespread surveillance, but that would not be needed under these plans. Metadata collection could form a large part of the new surveillance law, and it's seemingly something Infomaniak supports. In a separate interview with RTS, Jacobsen argues that metadata collection is acceptable in order to help prosecute individuals who "carry out illicit activities" anonymously. He says how in other aspects of life, we don't accept that, saying you need ID for taking out a phone number and SIM card. "The outside of the package is enough to bring justice," he said – referring to metadata. The contents of messages or communications will remain encrypted, but the metadata will be seen and collected. Metadata can include geolocation, date and time, IP addresses, file size, device identifiers, plus who sent and received the message. So, even though the actual content of the message remains encrypted and hidden, you can identify and subsequently prosecute individuals based on analysis of metadata. The opposition claims this is a fundamental privacy risk if handled in the wrong way, and something that should be opposed, not lauded. Infomaniak's approach to metadata has also received backlash from others in the industry. A LinkedIn post by founder Boris Siegenthaler saw disagreement with Infomaniak's position in the comments. A journalist said he was concerned about metadata, should it be collected, falling into the wrong hands. He claimed certain people and sources would be at risk and communication methods must preserve their safety. One comment argued that "metadata protection is important to avoid profiling," and another said a middle ground between Proton and Infomaniak's position was needed. Infomanaik has said it's moving to an encrypted email service. Jacobsen said the content of emails will be protected, "but without anonymity." Infomaniak's own service would therefore appear to be affected by the law change and they'd be required to collect and store the metadata of its users and their emails. The Swiss government's consultation on the proposed law change ended on May 6 2025. Its findings are still not known, but we will monitor its progress closely. We test and review VPN services in the context of legal recreational uses. For example: 1. Accessing a service from another country (subject to the terms and conditions of that service). 2. Protecting your online security and strengthening your online privacy when abroad. We do not support or condone the illegal or malicious use of VPN services. Consuming pirated content that is paid-for is neither endorsed nor approved by Future Publishing.
Fast Company
15 minutes ago
- Fast Company
TikTok bans the #SkinnyTok hashtag for unhealthy weight-loss content. Will it actually solve the problem?
TikTok, a platform where misinformation and dangerous rhetoric often spreads far and wide, has officially removed the #SkinnyTok hashtag from its search results. The hashtag had become a space for creators to promote restrictive eating and other forms of unhealthy weight-loss content. TikTok spokesperson Paolo Ganino told Politico that the move was part of a 'regular review' of the platform's risks, but it followed considerable pressure from the European Union. Fast Company has reached out to TikTok for comment and will update this post if we hear back. 'Revolting and absolutely unacceptable' In April, France's minister for digital media, Clara Chappaz, requested that the nation's media regulator, Arcom, look into the hashtag. The agency teamed up with the European Commission to review the 'revolting and absolutely unacceptable' videos, as Chappaz described them. The European Commission has also been investigating TikTok's 'risk management of addictive design and harmful content' since February 2024. Users searching #SkinnyTok will now see a landing page that reads, 'If you or someone you know has questions about body image, food, or exercise—it is important to know that help is out there and you are not alone. If you feel comfortable, you can confide in someone you trust or check out the resources below. Please remember to take care of yourselves and each other.' It also has a resources link with an explainer on eating disorders, steps to take if you or your friend needs support, and emergency information. TikTok's community guidelines prohibit videos that promote eating disorders and dangerous weight loss behaviors, and selling or promoting products to lose weight. Last year, TikTok even banned Liv Schmidt, a popular user known for posting controversial eating habits, for violating community guidelines. However, she freely posted to her 670,000 followers until The Wall Street Journal sent questions to TikTok for a profile on Schmidt. She created a new account following her ban. Could other platforms see a #SkinnyTok spillover? Now, #SkinnyTok might be gone from TikTok's search results, but who's to say that users won't migrate to another hashtag or platform to keep sharing these harmful videos? Despite the community guidelines, this content continued out in the open through a well-known hashtag. Before regulatory agencies stepped in, users who searched for #SkinnyTok would see a message from TikTok stating, 'You are more than your weight,' accompanied by a resources button. But the harmful content followed right behind it, violating the rules and risking the health of the users who absorbed it. TikTok, owned by China-based ByteDance, has 1.58 billion monthly users, according to data from SproutSocial. Its largest audience is in the United States.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S.-backed Gaza aid group pauses work amid reported killings
The controversial U.S.-backed humanitarian aid operation in Gaza, which has been mired by reports of dozens of Palestinians being killed trying to reach its distribution hubs in the war-torn enclave since it started work just over a week ago, said it was pausing its operations for Wednesday. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said in a statement posted on social media that the pause was "for update, organization, and efficiency improvement work," but a spokesperson for the group said it was working to address security concerns. GHF said in its brief statement that operations would resume on Thursday. The United Nations and other aid agencies have refused to work with the group, calling it a distraction and accusing it of weaponizing access to desperately needed food. More than 50 people have been killed by Israeli forces near the sites, according to Gaza's Hamas-run Ministry of Health, which has called the GHF effort a trap for hungry Palestinians. The Israeli military has denied the accusations and accused Hamas of shooting at people seeking aid. The funding, operational details and origins of the GHF have remained murky since its inception, and it has been plagued not only by grave questions about security for civilians accessing its hubs, but by potentially existential issues regarding its internal operations. The move comes just days after GHF said it would shutter its Switzerland-based office after officials there told CBS News the foundation was violating Swiss rules for non-governmental organizations. It also comes just a day after The Washington Post reported that U.S.-based consulting firm Boston Global had severed its ties with the group and launched an internal review over its involvement with GHF. GHF said it began work in Gaza on May 27, but it remains unclear where it is based and who is funding its operations. Its official website consists only of a homepage bearing its name and the message: "More information coming soon." A GHF spokesperson told CBS News in a statement sent Wednesday that the group was "actively engaged in discussions with" Israel's military aimed at enhancing security "beyond the immediate perimeter of GHF sites." The organization said it had asked the Israel Defense Forces to "guide foot traffic in a way that minimizes confusion or escalation risks" around its ongoing military operations in Gaza, to offer clearer guidance for civilians seeking to reach its distribution hubs, and to "enhance IDF force training and refine internal IDF procedures to support safety." "Our top priority remains ensuring the safety and dignity of civilians receiving aid," the spokesperson said in the statement, which was also shared with other news outlets. Health officials in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip said 27 Palestinians were killed trying to reach a GHF hub in southern Gaza on Tuesday alone. The Israeli military denied the claim of mass shooting at civilians, saying troops about a third of a mile away from the site had fired at several people who were deemed to present a threat after they strayed beyond the defined boundaries of the access route. The IDF said it was looking into the reports of civilian casualties. In a message posted Wednesday on social media in Arabic, IDF spokesperson Lt. Col. Avichay Adraee warned Gazans against using the roads leading to GHF distribution centers, saying they would be considered "combat zones" for the day and stressing that access to them was "prohibited and dangerous." The IDF has repeatedly accused Hamas of sabotaging the GHF effort, accusing it of sending gunmen specifically to shoot at civilians at the aid hubs. "We are not preventing Gaza residents from accessing aid distribution sites," IDF spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said in a video statement posted online Tuesday, before the one-day pause was reported. "Food packages are being distributed daily by a U.S.-based civilian company. This initiative is proving effective. Gazan residents are coming to the distribution centers to receive the aid. The civilian population of Gaza understands that Hamas is not taking care of them — on the contrary, Hamas is actively trying to prevent them from receiving the aid." Defrin said IDF forces "operate nearby and do whatever is necessary to ensure that the aid does not fall into the hands of Hamas." He also accused the United Nations' aid agencies of failing to collect and distribute more than 450 trucks carrying humanitarian aid that Israel says were allowed into Gaza in recent days but left waiting on the other side of the Kerem Shalom border crossing with Israel. The U.N. has rejected similar previous Israeli claims, noting that Israeli forces maintain control over virtually all of Gaza and that there are huge logistics challenges to operating in a densely populated active warzone. And the IDF's assault, which Israel has vowed to continue until Hamas is destroyed and the remaining 58 Israeli hostages are brought back home from Gaza, has continued to ramp up despite the U.S.-backed aid effort. CBS News' team in Gaza was there as Palestinians rushed to rescue survivors of an Israeli strike that destroyed a bank in Gaza City where families had taken shelter. At least seven people were killed and dozens injured, according to first responders who spoke with CBS News at the scene. They were among 97 Palestinians killed over the preceding 24 hours alone, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Ministry of Health, which put the overall death toll from the war at 54,607 as of Wednesday. The war was sparked by the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on southern Israel orchestrated by Hamas, which has long been designated a terrorist group by the U.S., Israel and the European Union. That attack killed some 1,200 people in Israel and saw 251 others taken hostage into Gaza. Israeli authorities believe about 20 of the remaining hostages are still alive. January 6 defendant refuses Trump's pardon Sneak peek: Where is Jermain Charlo? Baldwin grills McMahon on unallocated funds for students, schools, approved by Congress
