Bulldozers arrive in Assam village as drive to evict over 600 families from wetlands begins
The eviction and demolition of homes began with heavy security deployment on Monday morning in Goalpara district's Hasila Beel village, where most of the residents are Bengali-origin Muslims.
Goalpara DC Khanindra Chaudhury, who oversaw the eviction drive, said the residents had been illegally encroaching on government land.
'This is actually a wetland, and we had issued notices both in 2023 and 2024 to the illegal encroachers to vacate the area themselves. Some people still had not left, and on Friday, we issued notices again. Almost 20-25% of the people have left by themselves,' he told reporters.
The administration has estimated that 667 houses would be evicted. However, the drive was not completed on Monday as it was hampered by rain in the afternoon.
'It has been peaceful and there has been no resistance,' said Chaudhury.
Suleman Ali (50), whose house was demolished on Monday, expressed distress at the lack of rehabilitation arrangements. He said his family had been living on this land for over 70 years and that he had been born there.
'The demolitions started two days after the notice was given, which is not enough time to gather all our belongings and make arrangements. We had a pucca house here. The children have exams in a few days. They are in terror now, and I am very worried about their future. We stood in the rain for two hours after they demolished our house, and now the police have told us not to set up any kind of tent or shelter here. I don't know where we will spend the night. There should have been some kind of rehabilitation arrangement for us, we are completely landless people,' he said.
Leaders of the All Assam Minority Students' Union (AAMSU) arrived at the site on Monday afternoon. AAMSU president Rejaul Karim Sarkar also said there should have been a proper rehabilitation plan.
'The Supreme Court has already given guidelines that people cannot be evicted in this way without rehabilitation. If they are given notices one day and the bulldozers are operated the next day, the people will not be able to gather all their belongings and leave. These people are all from Goalpara, who have been living here for 50-60 years after being affected by river erosion in riverine areas. The government's first responsibility was to come up with a rehabilitation plan for them or to give them some time,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC stays operation of UP govt's Banke Bihari temple ordinance, forms panel led by ex-HC judge
The Supreme Court has stayed the operation of Uttar Pradesh government's Banke Bihari temple trust ordinance, which rests administrative control of the shrine with the state, till the high court decides its validity. The bench, however, clarified that its interim direction will not preclude the state from ratification of the Ordinance in the state assembly.(HT Photo) A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi refused to entertain the challenges made to the Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025, and said the affected parties can approach the high court. "At this stage, we are reminded of the fact that the petitioners' challenge to the Ordinance will doubtlessly take some time in proper adjudication. We, therefore, deem it fit to stay operation of the Ordinance's provisions in the interregnum, only to the extent they grant the state powers to constitute a Trust for managing the temple's affairs," the bench directed. The top court said consequently, the constitution of the Shree Bankey Bihar Ji Temple Trust, as defined in Section 3 of the Ordinance and its composition, as contained in Section 5, shall be kept in abeyance till the question of validity of the Ordinance (or any Act in relation thereto subsequently passed by the state legislature), is finally resolved by the high court. The bench, however, clarified that its interim direction will not preclude the state from ratification of the Ordinance in the state assembly, but such an exercise will be subject to the outcome of the proceedings for which the affected persons and the petitioners have been relegated to the high court. The top court in its detailed order uploaded on Saturday also constituted a 12-member high-powered committee headed by retired Allahabad High Court judge Ashok Kumar to look after the day-to-day affairs of the iconic temple. It said, "We are equally mindful that the sum of our directions shall effectively leave the management of the subject temple in limbo yet again, since the ad-hoc arrangement of temple management has been wholly ineffective and inefficient in discharging its duties over the years. "We are pained to observe that the previous administerial deadlock(s) and in-fighting have only worsened the problems plaguing the temple, causing much distress to the pilgrims – who are left without any amenities or redress." The bench said the material on record indicates that despite the substantial donations received by the temple running into hundreds of crores, no tangible steps appear to have been taken by the successive managements for providing essential facilities to the scores of devotees visiting the temple, and the Goswami Shebaits remain divided into factions and continue to litigate before the civil courts, further contributing to administrative inaction. "We are, therefore, satisfied that a high-powered managing committee headed by an impartial person with considerable experience and ability is required to be constituted to run the day-to-day affairs of the temple, apart from undertaking some of the initiatives, which we are illustratively mentioning in the latter part of this order. "There is no gainsaying that the sanctity of safe religious pilgrimage shall never be unjustly denied to all the citizens of this country," the top court said. It also lauded the state government for taking a "fair stand" over the constitution of the committee for the management of the affairs of the temple, and said the panel may deal with a variety of issues for the proper functioning of the temple, including the provision of essential amenities for the devotees. The top court also modified its May 15 order, which gave the go-ahead to the state's scheme to develop the Shri Banke Bihari Temple Corridor at Vrindavan in Mathura, and allowed the government to use temple fund to acquire five acres of land for developing it as a holding area for the devotees. "It seems to us that the order passed by a coordinate bench requires certain modifications/clarifications. That order purportedly directs for the redevelopment of the temple's vicinity through the employment of temple funds. "However, we find that such directions suffer from a foundational procedural infirmity -- the principal affected parties, including the Shebait Goswamis, who have been administering the temple, were not heard prior to the passing of the said order," it said. The bench further said to allow substantive directions on a matter of such significance to be issued in collateral proceedings, especially in absentia of the necessary stakeholders, may not be in conformity with procedural fairness and judicial best-practices. "That apart, we note that the high court, vide its judgment dated November 8, 2023, had expressly declined the state's prayer to utilise temple funds for land acquisition as part of the proposed redevelopment plan. "That judgment has attained finality, having never been assailed by the state in any appropriate appellate proceedings. In these circumstances, this court could not have, in exercise of its civil appellate jurisdiction, effectively set aside the high court's judgment without any formal appeal or challenge being placed before it," the top court said. While directing for modification of the May 15 order, the bench ordered for restoring the legal position to status quo ante.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Why BJP's backing of term 'Bangladeshi language' must be making even SP Mookerjee turn in his grave
A slip of the pen by an inspector of Lodhi Colony, New Delhi, has turned into a nightmare for the BJP in West Bengal, blunting its chances of seriously challenging Mamata Banerjee in the 2026 elections. Perhaps the inspector should have sent that letter to the Bangladesh high commission. But no. The inspector sent it to Banga Bhavan, West Bengal's state guest house in Delhi, which doubles as the office of the state resident commissioner, and requested the services of a translator for the 'Bangladeshi language'. The police, he explained, had detained some suspected Bangladeshis who had produced documents in a language that could not be understood. And, so, the services of a translator, please. Mamata Banerjee saw red at 'Bangladeshi language' -- unquestionably a faux pas as no such thing exists. They speak Bengali across the border as do the people of West Bengal. But the BJP, instead of putting a lid on the debate over the error, tried to justify it – an abomination that would have made even SP Mookerjee cringe. The BJP's founding father was a Bengali bhadralok whose mother tongue was Bengali. Not Bangladeshi. For Mamata Banerjee, already fuming at the BJP for allegedly harassing migrant labour from West Bengal in BJP-ruled states, labelling them Bangladeshis and deporting them, it was a heaven-sent cause celebre to ratchet up her rhetoric against the BJP and kickstart her 2026 campaign with a bang.'Scandalous, insulting, anti-national, unconstitutional,' she thundered on X where she shared the controversial letter. 'See now how Delhi police under the direct control of Ministry of Home, Government of India (read Amit Shah aka BJP), is describing Bengali as 'Bangladeshi' language!' Now,the BJP could have nipped the sticky issue in the bud, passing off the 'Bangladeshi language' offence as an inadvertent error by the inspector. But instead, in an inexplicable act of self-harm, it tried to explain the error and shot itself in the foot. BJP Bengal leaders struggled to contain the damage. But Amit Malviya hit the ball out of the park. In a lengthy tweet, he said, 'Delhi Police is absolutely right in referring to the language as Bangladeshi in the context of identifying infiltrators. The term is being used to describe a set of dialects, syntax and speech patterns that are distinctly different from the Bangla spoken in India. The official language of Bangladesh is not only phonologically different but also includes dialects like Sylheti that are nearly incomprehensible to Indian Bengalis. 'There is, in fact, no language call 'Bengali' that nearly covers all these all these variants. 'Bengali' denotes ethnicity, not linguistic uniformity. So when the Delhi Police uses 'Bangladeshi language,' it is a shorthand for the linguistic markers used to profile illegal immigrants from Bangladesh – not a commentary on Bengali as spoken in West Bengal,' Malviya concluded. This attempt to justify the term 'Bangladeshi language' has not gone down well with many in West Bengal who view it as a slur on the mother tongue Bengali. It is a language for which an entire population fought and won nationhood in 1971: Bangladesh. In the early 1950s, Islamabad declared Urdu the sole national language of Pakistan, triggering protests in the east over Bengali being marginalised. The language movement that swept East Pakistan culminated on 21 February 1952 when around 30 people died in police firing at Dhaka University. Since then, 21 February is observed as 'Bhasha Dibash' or language day on a mammoth scale in Dhaka and, on a much smaller scale, in Kolkata. In 1999, the UN declared 21 February International Mother Tongue Day. Bengalis in India have their own language day, 19 May, when, in 1961, 11 Bengali speaking persons died in police firing at Silchar in Assam's Barak Valley while protesting the government's decision that Assamese would be the state's sole official language. The Barak Valley, comprising three districts, is Bengali-dominated and protests there against the marginalisation of Bengali forced the Assam government to roll back its decision on its only-Assamese policy. Just as the speakers of every other language take pride in their mother tongue, so do the Bengalis. It is also the second most spoken language in India after Hindi, the seventh most spoken language in the world and an entire nation was born because of this language. And Rabindranath Tagore, who wrote in Bengali, is the first Nobel laureate from Asia. For literature. He also gave us our national anthem. In Bengali. And Bangladesh's, too. Now, Bangladeshis speak the same language as people from West Bengal. Yes, there are distinct dialects like Sylheti, perhaps a little tough to understand for the untrained ear but Sylheti is Bengali. Like Cockney is English, though often hard for a standard English speaker to understand. Dialects are defined as "sub-forms of languages which are, in general, mutually comprehensible'. So, what's the big deal about Sylheti? For the BJP, the defence of the reference to 'Bangladeshi language' spells trouble as it reinforces the Trinamool Congress's charge that the BJP is a party of outsiders – bahiragata – alien to Bengali thought and culture. That strategy worked for the TMC in the 2021 elections and again in 2024. In the forthcoming elections, too, the BJP may have to pay through its nose for failing to feel the pulse of Bengali Asmita and doggedly defend an error by a poorly-lettered inspector who should have known better.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Call for true religious freedom in India
Hyderabad Speakers at a national seminar on Saturday expressed grave concern over 'increasing cases of violence against Christians', even as they alleged misuse of law to foist cases on members of this community. 'Religious Freedom in India: Reality or Dream?', organised at the Centenary Baptist Church, by the Civil Rights Initiative Internationale (CRII), saw prominent speakers, including former civil servants, sharing their views. The seminar brought together intellectuals, legal experts, and policy makers, who laid emphasis on justice, equality, and true religious freedom. K. Babu Rao, former IPS officer, and national president of CRII, recalled the case of an Adivasi pastor, Subhash Bhagel, whose son was unable to bury him in the village graveyard. His son had to move the apex court in an effort to get justice. 'Is living as a Christian a crime? Enjoying the religious freedom guaranteed by the Constitution is our right,' he said. Speakers also highlighted the 'lack of religious freedom faced by Dalit Christians and Muslims' due to the 1950 Presidential Order, and urged that efforts should be made towards its repeal. They expressed concern over misuse of anti-conversion laws. 'We are Indians, and we will uphold the Constitution,' was the collective message. Recent incidents from Chhattisgarh and Uttar Pradesh were pointed out. In one incident, over 500 people were booked during a prayer service though they were not 'converted'. In another, birthday cake cutting was labelled a Christian ritual. Keynote speeches were delivered by advocates Tehmina Arora and Franklin Thomas Caesar, both of whom joined the seminar from Delhi. They shared their opinions on how legal systems have been affecting religious freedom in India. Former Chief Secretary of Andhra Pradesh Minnie Mathew was the Chief Guest. Mr. Rao released a book titled 'Swechha Nunchi Cherasala Loki' (From Freedom to Prison), written by journalist Suresh Pulugujju.
