Europe's rights body says Hungary's transparency bill threatens human rights
BUDAPEST, June 4 (Reuters) - The Council of Europe's Commissioner for Human Rights has called on Hungarian lawmakers to reject or amend a bill that targets foreign-funded NGOs and media, citing concerns over human rights violations.
In a letter published on Wednesday and addressed to parliament Speaker Laszlo Kover, Commissioner Michael O'Flaherty said the legislation "allows for severe interferences in the functioning of civil society organisations, to the point that the continuation of their activities may become impossible."
The Council of Europe, the continent's leading human rights watchdog, was formed after World War Two to uphold rights and the rule of law.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban's ruling Fidesz party submitted a bill to parliament on May 14 that would draw up a list of organisations that get foreign funding and restrict or even shut them down if deemed to threaten Hungary's sovereignty and its culture.
Orban - who has repeatedly clashed with the EU over policies that critics say erode democracy in Hungary - has described such groups as a "shadowy army" funded by foreign powers to undermine the state. He pledged to crack down on foreign funding of independent media, opposition politicians and NGOs in March, stepping up his campaign ahead of elections due in 2026 where he faces a serious challenge from a new opposition party.
O'Flaherty, whose office has an independent mandate to promote respect for human rights among the Council's 46 member states, urged lawmakers to refrain from adopting the legislation unless it is modified to comply with international human rights laws.
The bill is expected to be approved in mid-June as Orban's party holds a parliamentary majority. The proposed law triggered protests and over 80 editors from leading European news outlets signed a petition last month calling for the scrapping of the legislation.
Hungarian government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs said last month that the bill was introduced "in response to escalating concerns about foreign-funded organisations".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump tells German leader WWII defeat ‘was not a pleasant day for you' as chancellor is forced to school him on Nazis
A meeting between President Donald Trump and German Chancellor Frederich Merz took an awkward turn on Thursday when Trump suggested that Germans would not view the anniversary of D-Day favorably because the U.S.-led invasion of Europe was carried out against the Third Reich. Sitting in the Oval Office, Merz and Trump were discussing the death toll from Russia's three-year-old war against Ukraine, the bloodiest conflict in Europe since the end of the Second World War, when Merz noted that tomorrow marks the 81st anniversary of Operation Overlord, the allied amphibious assault on Nazi Germany that began with American, British, Canadian and Free French troops storming the beaches of Normandy in France. Merz told Trump he wanted to discuss how to bring the current Russo-Ukrainian conflict to an end. 'I'm here, Mr. President, to talk with you later on on how we could contribute to that goal. And we all are looking for measures and for instruments to bring this terror war to an end. And may I remind you that we are having June 6 tomorrow. This is D-Day anniversary when the Americans once ended a war in Europe,' he said. At that point, the American leader interjected, asking Merz: 'That was not a pleasant day for you?' The chancellor began to reply that it was 'not a pleasant day' before stopping himself and delivering a bit of a history lesson for his U.S. counterpart. 'In the long run, Mr. President, this was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship,' he said. Merz continued by stating that Germans know what they owe to America for liberating their country from Nazis, telling Trump that the U.S. is 'again in a very strong position' to help end Russia's war by throwing steadfast support to Ukraine's defensive efforts. 'We know what we owe you, but this is the reason why I'm saying that America is again, in a very strong position to do something on this war and ending this war. So let's talk about what we can do jointly, and we are ready to do what we can,' he said. The bizarre moment was not even the first example of questionable historical references from Trump, who also attempted to crack a joke about Merz's efforts to push past decades of German pacifism to help bolster Ukraine's defense and jump-start his country's own arms industry. Asked whether Germany is doing enough to meet their commitments to NATO by spending a set percentage of GDP on defense needs, Trump replied that he knows Germany is now 'pending more money on defense now and quite a bit more money' and called the development 'a positive thing' before waxing on about the late American general Douglas MacArthur's views of Germany in the wake of two world wars. 'I'm not sure that General MacArthur would have said it's positive, you know, he wouldn't like it, but I sort of think it's good,' Trump said. 'He made a statement, never let Germany rearm. And I said, I always think about that. When he says, Sir, we're spending more money on defense, I say, Oh, is that a good thing or a bad thing? I think it's a good thing. But you know, at least to a certain point, there'll be a point where say, Please don't arm anymore. If you don't mind.' The president then, perhaps jokingly, suggested that the U.S. would be 'watching' Germany's re-armament efforts with skepticism. In what appeared to be a reversal from his first-term position, the American leader told reporters that the U.S. would be keeping the tens of thousands of troops based in Germany in that country, the site of some of America's largest European bases. Asked whether the U.S. would continue to base troops in Merz's country, he replied: 'The answer is yes.' 'We'll talk about that. But if they'd like to have them there, yeah,' he said. 'We have a lot of them, about 45,000 it's a lot of troops. It's a city,' Trump continued, adding that their presence is good for Germany's economy because they're 'highly paid' and 'spend a lot of money' there.
Sky News
33 minutes ago
- Sky News
Zia Yusuf: Chairman of Reform UK resigns
The chairman of Reform UK, Zia Yusuf, has resigned. In a statement, Mr Yusuf said in a post on X that working to get the party elected is no longer "a good use of my time". He said: "11 months ago I became chairman of Reform. I've worked full time as a volunteer to take the party from 14 to 30%, quadrupled its membership and delivered historic electoral results. "I no longer believe working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time, and hereby resign the office." It comes after a row in which he described a question to Sir Keir Starmer about a ban on burkas from his party's newest MP Sarah Pochin as "dumb". Rupert Lowe, a former Reform MP, was strongly critical of Mr Yusuf in the wake of the politician's suspension following allegations that he had threatened violence towards the party chair. Many credited businessman Mr Yusuf with professionalising the party's operations as they secured millions of votes at last year's general election. Please refresh the page for the latest version.
BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
York parking fees still too dear after price cut, traders warn
A cut in some parking charges in York following a backlash against their increase earlier this year does not go far enough, traders have April, car parking spots including Bishopthorpe Road saw prices rise from 80p per hour to £4.85, but after complaints from businesses and the public, the council decided this week to reduce fees outside the inner ring road to £3 an hour from some traders have said the £3 rate was still too expensive, and they were "very worried" shoppers would instead visit supermarkets and shopping centres with free of York councillor Kate Ravilious said the charges would be reviewed every three months to "monitor their impact". Simon Baines, who runs Millie's fruit and vegetable shop on Bishopthorpe Road, said while he welcomed the fact on-street parking fees had been reduced, he believed they were still "too expensive"."It's a little bit better, but it's still a big increase from 80p," he said."I don't see why we've had to go through all this rigmarole. It's another 21 days before this reduction goes through, so we'll have had two months of all this palaver." Joe Neeson, who runs The Bishy Weigh eco-refill shop on Bishopthorpe Road, said people running businesses in the area had "mixed feelings" about the council's decision to cut parking charges."We acknowledge the council have done a large u-turn on the back of our petition and are listening to us," he said."But the next review needs to be informed by the correct car parking data and information about various shops' takings - and I don't feel it is. "Their data isn't reflective. We traders can provide the council with all this takings information." 'Drives people away' Husband and wife team Hugo Hildyard and Florencia Clifford, who run the Partisan Cafe on Micklegate, both agreed the £3 parking fee was still too much. Ms Clifford said the fact the council had removed the option to pay for just 30 minutes parking was "really affecting businesses" in the was also "no open consultation" over the original changes, Ms Clifford said, adding: "It feels like it was an overnight thing."Meanwhile, she said the new parking payment machines were not user-friendly and excluded many potential shoppers."Now people have to use an app to pay for parking and a lot of people can't do that. I know because I've spent a lot of time doing it for them."Ms Clifford said she and her husband were worried that instead of using independent businesses on Micklegate and Bishopthorpe Road, people felt pushed towards out-of-town shopping centres with free parking."Life is quite tough already for small independent businesses," she said."Everything's gone up, and this just drives people away." Ravilious, Labour's transport spokesperson on the council, said: "While we remain committed to tackling congestion and making it easier for everyone to get around, we recognise some of the uplift in charges in areas where they were previously very low has felt too much in one go. "We promised when setting the budget we would monitor the impact of any changes. "We have listened to concerns and acted, approving several changes this week following detailed discussions with traders and local communities across the city."These charges will be reviewed at three, six and nine months in order to monitor their impact and ensure we have set them at the right level." Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North
