
Scam Summer: Experts Warn Price Caps May Fuel £100 Million in Ticket Fraud
LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--With the UK heading into its biggest summer of live events in years, experts are warning that the Government's plans to cap the resale price of tickets could backfire - dramatically increasing fraud, pushing fans into the hands of scammers and triggering a financial backlash for both banks and consumers.
Experts warn that price caps may fuel £100 million in ticket fraud.
Share
While the move to strengthen regulation is welcome, the proposal to restrict the price of resold tickets is raising serious concerns. In response to the Government's recent consultation on ticket resale regulation, which includes proposals to restrict the price of resold tickets, We Fight Fraud (WFF) - supported by one of the UK's leading fintechs, Revolut - is sounding the alarm: price caps won't protect fans - they'll expose them.
Data from the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau, Action Fraud and the National Crime Agency shows that the cost of reported ticket fraud for England and Wales was £70 million last year.
Yet this pales into insignificance with how much consumers would lose in the event of a mooted price cap being introduced. New figures from Bradshaw Advisory, backed by independent research from We Fight Fraud, suggest that number would quadruple as ticket resales migrate from the regulated secondary market to social media.
This would mean consumers being hit in the pocket to the tune of £280 million a year – with £100 million of that falling in the peak summer months alone.
Dr Nicola Harding, CEO of We Fight Fraud, a specialist unit made up of ex-police, intelligence officers, cyber experts, and financial crime investigators, said: 'Capping resale prices may sound fan-friendly - but in practice, it pushes buyers into unregulated, risky spaces where criminals operate freely. We've tested this market. We've seen what happens. Price caps don't stop fraud - they multiply it and we could see live event fans defrauded to the tune of £100 million this summer.'
As part of its investigation, We Fight Fraud conducted a covert ticket-buying operation at a Premier League match in March between Liverpool and Southampton. The results were stark:
Three out of four tickets purchased via social media in test cases were either fake or never arrived.
Two out of five tickets were outright scams.
Two others were obtained illegally via hijacked memberships.
Buyers were asked to pay bogus 'name change' fees and transfer money to money mule accounts.
All scams were orchestrated via social media platforms and encrypted messaging apps.
'These aren't opportunistic chancers,' said Harding. 'They're organised criminal networks exploiting fans who've been shut out of safe, legitimate resale routes. 'The more you limit legitimate access, the more you push desperate fans into the shadows - and that's exactly where scammers lie in wait.'
While We Fight Fraud's research* focused on the UK, international data tells a worrying story. In Ireland and Victoria, Australia - where ticket resale caps are in place - fraud has surged. Bradshaw Advisory's research found that in Ireland, 13.6% of fans reported being scammed, over three times the UK's 3.8% rate. Independent research shows fraud has risen in step with these restrictions.
Since October 2024, UK banks have been required to reimburse victims of Authorised Push Payment (APP) fraud, which includes most ticket scams. With resale restrictions forcing more buyers onto risky channels, the financial burden is now spreading from fans to banks - and eventually to the wider economy.
Revolut saw ticket scams increase by 40% in the run-up to Taylor Swift concerts in London in August 2024.
"We know that highly anticipated events, like concerts and sports matches, can become a target for unscrupulous criminals preying on enthusiastic fans,' said Dave Eborne, Head of Fraud Operations at Revolut.
'Especially with sought-after tickets, fraudsters leverage both the fear of missing out on a unique opportunity and a sense of urgency due to scarcity and high demand. The idea that a potential ticket could disappear quickly encourages people to act fast without thinking – but it's vital that consumers look for tell-tale warning signs before handing over their hard-earned cash. As Dr. Harding's research shows, banning or capping resale doesn't stop these scams; it simply provides another platform for them to thrive, costing fans and the wider economy through increased fraud. Smart, transparent regulation of the resale market, and robust consumer education on the warning signs of ticket scams, are the only real solutions to protect fans."
For further information please contact contact@wefightfraud.org or call us on +44(0)20 3633 0996
NOTES TO EDITORS
About Revolut:
Revolut is one of the UK's leading fintechs, helping people get more from their money. In 2015, Revolut launched in the UK offering money transfer and exchange. Today, more than 50 million customers around the world use dozens of Revolut's innovative products to make more than half a billion transactions a month.
Across our personal and business accounts, we give customers more control over their finances and connect people seamlessly across the world.
We Fight Fraud (https://www.wefightfraud.org/) is a testing and research consultancy that specialises in identifying vulnerabilities related to financial crime.
The independent research by WFF was commissioned by viagogo.
Reinforcing We Fight Fraud's findings, Lloyds Bank recently issued a warning following a surge in scams linked to Oasis reunion tickets. Their analysis revealed that over two-thirds of all ticket scams now originate on social media, with Facebook responsible for 90% of those cases. Victims lost an average of £436, contributing to an estimated £2 million in total ticket scam losses over the past year. The scams typically involved convincing but fake listings, pressure to act quickly, and bogus charges like 'admin' or 'name change' fees - tactics that mirror those uncovered in We Fight Fraud's own investigations.
REPORTING FRAUD: If you suspect fraud, report it to your bank and to Action Fraud at actionfraud.police.uk/reporting-fraud or if you prefer, on 0300 123 2040. If you're in Scotland, call Police Scotland on 101.
About the data:
Action fraud data from the NFIB dashboard shows the cost of ticket fraud for England and Wales is around £9.8m across the last 12 months.
When you factor in that 86% of fraud goes unreported (Action Fraud and National Crime Agency), the more realistic figure is likely to be £70m across the last 12 months.
If we regulate that with price caps, that figure will balloon to £280m (based on Bradshaw advisory research that shows level of fraud in markets with price caps is four times that of the UK).
WFF's research at a Premier League football match investigation shows three in four tickets purchased were scams.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
So now it's official. The ‘graduate premium' is a myth
Have you ever thought about the main reason why school leavers keep choosing to go to university and higher education (HE) participation rates continue rising? Of course there are many reasons; a chance for young adults to get away from their parents, ease of application and acceptance, it looks more fun than going to work, an interest in the subject… But what is the main driver that underpins society's messaging and ends up channelling 18-year-olds into university rather than the workforce? Well, it's the perception that there is a 'graduate premium'; and put simply, the narrative goes like this – 'Don't worry about the debt, you're going to get paid more to make up for it'. And the HE sector well knows the importance of maintaining the societal belief in the graduate premium to drive up their customer numbers. They are relentless in their efforts, issuing constant public comments, articles and self-commissioned reports, often via sympathetic think-tanks, claiming the limitless powers of HE to deliver a graduate premium to all who enrol. But this positive advertising is starting to contrast starkly with increasing evidence, now in plain sight, of graduates' difficulties getting jobs as well as the low pay on offer of not much above minimum wage. There is a growing realisation that we are burdening too many of our young adults with morale-sapping student debt for their whole working life, with little or no corresponding improvement in their career prospects. There are also concerns that we are building up a dangerous stockpile of student loans that won't be repaid, only for the taxpayer to pick up the tab. Meanwhile, money is flowing freely into the bloated HE sector via unwitting students being used as pawns. The Government has announced a White Paper due out this summer regarding Post-16 Education. So given the importance of the notion of a graduate premium, you would assume that the Government has ensured there is robust informative data to inform policy-making. Well, sadly not. There is only one Government report, the annual Graduate Labour Market Statistics, which attempts to quantify the graduate premium; and my research shows that it is fundamentally flawed. Some will say that the IFS Graduate Lifetime Earnings report from 2020 also 'proves' a graduate premium, but my research argues that it is just as flawed. My findings are already supported by the Royal Statistical Society, and the Office for Statistics Regulation (OSR) has also found a case in my favour and agreed that there is a problem with graduate premium data. The OSR has intervened and forced the hand of the Department for Education (DfE), who admitted in their release today that their figures are misleading – and to such an extent that even though this has been a mainstay of graduate outcome reporting since 2007, they have decided to cease publication. The DfE have agreed that a report demonstrating the difference between the career pay outcomes of those with equivalent A-level results is necessary, and they intend to produce it as part of their LEO data e.g. comparing school leavers with three Cs who attended university and those that did not. But the inadequacy of the data doesn't stop there. Using mathematical modelling, I've found that since we surpassed 30 per cent HE participation as long as 20 years ago, the marginal graduates added – increasingly being drawn from school leavers with relatively lower prior academic attainment – haven't earnt any graduate premium at all on average. Yet this phenomenon isn't explored in official Government statistics. When graduates do earn a premium, there is still the age-old statistical issue that correlation does not prove causation. For the majority of graduates, the job they end up doing will have no meaningful connection to the degree subject itself. So you must question why the official Government statistics keep churning out data that implies that studying for a degree was the main causation reason for the higher earnings, whereas in fact it is more likely their pre-existing attributes such as academic ability and ambition. Furthermore, when there is a link between the degree subject and the graduate's career, did they genuinely need to study academically for three whole years at great cost to themselves beforehand? Couldn't the course have been far shorter? And to what extent could it have been cheaper and more effective for them to start work at 18 and learn from colleagues, undergoing job-based formal and informal training in order to progress? You can often learn far more in three weeks of doing the job than you can in three years of theoretical study. The existing statistics don't explore this at all and by implication see their main role as demonstrating what degree is better than another. They act on the assumption that for non-manual work, everybody should get a 3-year degree before entering the workplace, rather than whether a degree is necessary at all. Until now, these inadequate statistics have allowed the sector to hijack the official figures and mislead the public and Government regarding the benefits of higher education, claiming that 'everybody' will be able to benefit from the supposed average premium. What is needed is root and branch reform of graduate statistics. I believe it would provide compelling evidence that surpassing around 25-30 per cent HE participation was a monumental mistake, and we certainly should never have let it reach the existing 50 per cent. The vicious spiral of never-ending increasing participation is condemning ever more of our young adults to pay huge amounts for unnecessary degrees. The Government's ideologically driven policies are led by a misguided false notion of 'opportunity for all'; but in the hands of a commercially-driven sector it has become a gross exercise in mass exploitation. The only way for this to end is for the Government to introduce a sensible, pragmatic cap on student numbers, calculated based on useful data – not the misleading data currently being produced. Paul Wiltshire is a parent campaigner against Mass HE and is the author of 'Why is the average Graduate Premium falling' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Austin Litigation Firm Cleveland Krist Earns Repeat Recognition from Chambers USA
Partners Tim Cleveland and Austin Krist earn individual recognition AUSTIN, Texas, June 05, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cleveland Krist PLLC is pleased to announce it has earned repeat recognition as a leading commercial litigation firm from Chambers USA, the prestigious ranking guide known for its comprehensive analysis of the legal industry. Firm co-founder Tim Cleveland was again recognized by Chambers in its 2025 guide as a leading lawyer in commercial litigation, and partner Austin Krist was selected for the guide's list of Up-and-Coming attorneys. The firm was also recognized as a leading litigation firm in Texas. "This recognition by Chambers of our firm is a testament to the continued commitment, talent, and hard work of the entire team," Mr. Cleveland said. "We're a boutique firm by choice, so it's gratifying to see that we're recognized alongside much larger and older firms in the legal industry." Based in London, Chambers and Partners publishes its annual rankings using what is considered one of the legal industry's most rigorous and in-depth reviews. This includes comprehensive research, peer and client interviews, and review by Chambers analysts. In the 2025 guide, Chambers reported that Cleveland Krist "has fantastic strategists who zoom out on the matter and understand client objectives." One source told Chambers that the firm "ensures thorough preparation, diligent research and sharp analytical abilities, alongside strategic thinking and exceptional advocacy." Chambers' sources have also described Mr. Cleveland, whose recently earned an invitation to join the American Board of Trial Advocates, as "one of the most highly skilled trial lawyers I've had the opportunity to work with. His in-court skill set can't be touched by other lawyers." Cleveland Krist PLLC is an Austin-based litigation firm handling complex commercial cases in state and federal courts and arbitration tribunals across the country. To learn more, visit View source version on Contacts Media Contact: James Bingham800-559-4534james@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Business Wire
29 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Austin Litigation Firm Cleveland Krist Earns Repeat Recognition from Chambers USA
AUSTIN, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Cleveland Krist PLLC is pleased to announce it has earned repeat recognition as a leading commercial litigation firm from Chambers USA, the prestigious ranking guide known for its comprehensive analysis of the legal industry. Firm co-founder Tim Cleveland was again recognized by Chambers in its 2025 guide as a leading lawyer in commercial litigation, and partner Austin Krist was selected for the guide's list of Up-and-Coming attorneys. The firm was also recognized as a leading litigation firm in Texas. 'This recognition by Chambers of our firm is a testament to the continued commitment, talent, and hard work of the entire team,' Mr. Cleveland said. 'We're a boutique firm by choice, so it's gratifying to see that we're recognized alongside much larger and older firms in the legal industry.' Based in London, Chambers and Partners publishes its annual rankings using what is considered one of the legal industry's most rigorous and in-depth reviews. This includes comprehensive research, peer and client interviews, and review by Chambers analysts. In the 2025 guide, Chambers reported that Cleveland Krist 'has fantastic strategists who zoom out on the matter and understand client objectives.' One source told Chambers that the firm 'ensures thorough preparation, diligent research and sharp analytical abilities, alongside strategic thinking and exceptional advocacy.' Chambers' sources have also described Mr. Cleveland, whose recently earned an invitation to join the American Board of Trial Advocates, as 'one of the most highly skilled trial lawyers I've had the opportunity to work with. His in-court skill set can't be touched by other lawyers.' Cleveland Krist PLLC is an Austin-based litigation firm handling complex commercial cases in state and federal courts and arbitration tribunals across the country. To learn more, visit