
Few candidates for governor want to get on Norcross' bad side
Presented by
Good Friday morning!
It's been two days since a judge dismissed the state's corruption case against George Norcross, and this much is clear: Only a few gubernatorial candidates have anything substantive to say about it.
First, the Democrats. Steve Sweeney, Norcross' childhood friend, had what I consider one of the most clear positions. He called Norcross and his co-defendants 'innocent' and the prosecution 'political.' On the opposite side of the Democrats was Steve Fulop, who complained that Norcross got off on 'technical legal reasons vs what is actually right/wrong.' Sean Spiller was also a bit more critical of Norcross, saying the dismissal 'leaves many unanswered questions that will only build distrust.'
Josh Gottheimer did some political jujitsu, turning the judge's decision into criticism of Trump rather than express how he felt about the case itself: 'Today's decision speaks to how the justice system is built to work — a judge, making decisions by the book without fear or favor. It's the opposite of what President Trump is now doing with the Department of Justice — actively undermining the rule of law,' he said. Mikie Sherrill said less: 'As a former prosecutor, I have been monitoring this case and will continue to do so should the AG appeal.'
Ras Baraka said nothing at all, which is puzzling considering his usual outspokenness and appeal to progressives, though he is endorsed by Camden Mayor Vic Carstarphen.
On the Republican side, the two top candidates, Jack Ciatarelli and Bill Spadea, also chose not to comment, perhaps showing Norcross' influence isn't limited to the Democratic Party. Jon Bramnick told the Inquirer that 'rough and tumble politics is not a crime.' Only Ed Durr said something critical of Norcross, telling me that while he was not intimately familiar with the case itself, that 'just like [with] Bob Menendez, there's always been a lot of smoke. So is there fire with George? I can't say, because I don't have all the evidence sitting in front of me.'
Gottheimer's avoidance of Norcross criticism strikes me. Sweeney has most South Jersey Democratic machine support in the race, but Gottheimer — who had Hudson County Democrats lined up for his campaign but lost them, and who unsuccessfully courted Middlesex County early on — looks like he's positioning himself as the Norcross machine's backup choice should Sweeney drop out. Note his attendance with Sweeney, Gov. Murphy and four former governors at the January Cooper groundbreaking/Norcross fealty fest.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY: Alexandra Acosta, Brenda Kelly. Saturday for Jay Webber, Virginia Long, David Bailey Jr. Sunday for Christian Hetrick.
WHERE'S MURPHY? Out of state. Acting Gov. Way has no public schedule.
QUOTE OF THE DAY: 'Did we subsidize the 8-track cassette industry when it was going out of style? No, we didn't. Did we subsidize the pager industry? No, we didn't. Did we subsidize the mimeograph industry when copiers (came)? We did not.' — Assemblymember Jay Webber, on legislation that gained final passage yesterday to further delay a resolution on newspaper legal notice publication requirements.
TIPS? FEEDBACK? Email me at mfriedman@politico.com
WHAT TRENTON MADE
THAT'S WHY THEY CALL IT CRAPS — 'Platkin rolled dice on Norcross and came up empty. Can NJ politics ever change?' by The Record's Charles Stile: 'On paper, Platkin's bombshell indictment named [George] Norcross, and five other codefendants, including his brother, Philip. In reality, the 39-year-old Platkin was putting on trial the New Jersey political system that allowed Norcross and other party bosses to convert hardball power into profit for decades. But on Wednesday, state Superior Court Judge Peter E. Warshaw Jr. tossed out the entire indictment. It was a slam-dunk rejection to Platkin's sweeping case, which Democratic Party activists and progressives had hoped would serve as the long-sought breakthrough, a building block for lasting reform … Now the unsettling question for the progressive activists who challenged the Democratic machine in Camden, Norcross's base of political and community operations, and for the neighborhood residents who fought for redress and recognition in the shadow of office buildings rising along the Delaware River, is this: Will New Jersey's corroded system ever change?'
— Assembly Republicans move to impeach Platkin, by POLITICO's Matt Friedman: Assembly Republicans moved to impeach Attorney General Matt Platkin on Thursday, just one day after the biggest case of his three years in office collapsed. The five-page impeachment resolution, introduced after a Superior Court judge tossed the state's case against Democratic power broker George Norcross, alleges Platkin has used his office for political ends. It cites numerous botched cases overseen by the Office of Public Integrity and Accountability, some of which began before his tenure, and Platkin's oversight of the State Police. 'Platkin has undermined people's trust in our police and the office of the Attorney General. We're starting the impeachment process to balance the scales of justice,' Assembly Republican Leader John DiMaio said in a statement. 'He is not above the law.' In a statement, Platkin said: 'I am not going to respond to partisan political attacks. I am focused on the same priorities I have had since day one: driving gun violence down to historically low levels, holding social media corporations accountable for the harms they're inflicting on our children, and protecting our residents — including by standing up to threats from Washington and fighting corruption, no matter who it offends.'
— 'Kim stands with Platkin amid Norcross indictment backlash'
THE WHEELS OF GOVERNMENT GO ROUND AND ROUND VERY SLOWLY — 'NJ school bus system problems mount. New safety chief hired but state mum on details,' by The Record's Colleen Wilson and Mike Davis: 'In January 2022 … Gov. Phil Murphy signed a law to create an Office of School Bus Safety that would employ a team of people to increase oversight and accountability of private school bus contractors seeking lucrative contracts to transport children. But it took the state Department of Education about two years to hire anyone to staff the new office and begin that accountability work. The office became 'operational' in December 2023, said Michael Yaple, a DOE spokesman … While that process stalled, private bus companies continued to operate without the extra oversight. And the consequences can sometimes be harrowing.'
— Ballot redesign bill clears state Legislature
— 'Portal bridge on track for mid-2026 opening'
— 'The $1 billion in tax hikes that Murphy wants'
— 'Is Murphy's proposal to increase NJ's 'mansion tax' a good thing? Experts have concerns'
— 'Bid to make NJ police more accountable in use-of-force incidents'
— 'Officers union objects to governor's proposal to close East Jersey State Prison'
— 'NJ Transit launches plan to improve commuter experience'
— 'Governor's new budget plan proposes school funding tweaks'
TRUMP ERA
IMMIGRATION — Trump administration reopening immigrant detention facility in Newark, by POLITICO's Daniel Han: The Trump administration will reopen a Newark immigrant detention facility, creating a new hub in the Northeast as federal officials continue their mass deportation efforts. The Delaney Hall facility, which is owned by private prison contractor the GEO Group and has 1,000 beds, won a 15-year contract to detain immigrants, the company announced Thursday. The contract is estimated to bring in $60 million during its first full year and will be worth approximately $1 billion over its entire duration, according to company officials. The decision is already causing pushback among Democrats in the state, with Gov. Phil Murphy saying he was 'disappointed' in the move and a local Congress member calling it a 'step in the wrong direction.' … Murphy signed a bill into law in 2021 that prohibited state and local governments and private detention facilities from holding immigrant detention agreements with ICE. A federal judge, however, allowed the Elizabeth immigrant detention center to operate — paving the way for other private facilities to open in the Garden State.
BRIDGE AND TROUBLE — Trump wants congestion pricing dead by March 21. New York won't budge,' by The New York Times' Stefanos Chen and Winnie Hu: 'In the furor and confusion over the Trump administration's move to kill congestion pricing in New York City, a major question remained unanswered: If the president had his way, when would the tolling program end? Federal officials, it turned out, had a date in mind: March 21. The battle over congestion pricing, which the state-run Metropolitan Transportation Authority is counting on to fund billions of dollars in mass transit repairs, is expected to play out in federal court in Manhattan. While many legal experts say that the March deadline is not binding, some question whether President Trump might resort to other tactics, including withholding federal funding for other state projects, to apply pressure. In a letter last week to New York transportation leaders, Gloria M. Shepherd, the executive director of the Federal Highway Administration, said they 'must cease the collection of tolls' by that date.'
JEFF VAN DOGE'S DISTRICT — 'Musk's SpaceX antennas installed at South Jersey FAA building where DOGE spurred federal worker firings,' by The Philadelphia Inquirer's Alfred Lubrano: 'Following recommendations from Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the Trump administration has fired 15 or more workers at the Federal Aviation Administration facility in Egg Harbor Township. At the same time, Musk, the world's richest man who helped lead a Trump Cabinet meeting this week, is poised to take over $2 billion contract currently held by Verizon to run the FAA's communications system for all of U.S. air traffic, according to reports from the Associated Press and other outlets. Workers at the William J. Hughes Technical Center, 10 miles west of Atlantic City, said they saw two Starlink antennas from Musk's SpaceX company being erected on one of the center's buildings last Saturday. On Monday, the FAA confirmed on Musk's X social media platform that it's testing a Starlink terminal at Hughes.'
— ''Pray for us, pray for us,' pleads South Jersey restaurant owner who was arrested by ICE with his wife'
LOCAL
I THANK GOD EVERY DAY THAT SOCIAL MEDIA DIDN'T EXIST WHEN I WAS A TEEN — 'Paterson's newest councilman called out by colleague over racist joke from 2010,' by The Paterson Press' Joe Malinconico: 'Councilman Michael Jackson is calling for the removal of his newest colleague on Paterson's governing body, Ibrahim Omar, over a racist joke that Omar posted on his Facebook page in 2010 ... Jackson said it shouldn't matter that Omar was a 15-year-old in high school when he posted the off-color joke about Black people committing robberies … 'It's hard to even properly express how very sorry and embarrassed I am for these cringeworthy posts and I would like to sincerely apologize to anyone I may have offended,' Omar said … Mayor Andre Sayegh, who pushed hard for Omar's council appointment, said the 'inappropriate joke' should be denounced. But the mayor also defended his political mentee … Sayegh recalled Jackson's public comments during a televised City Council meeting in 2019, when he said a property owner was trying to 'Jew us down' on the price of a proposed deal … Paterson Press on Wednesday asked Jackson about the 2019 comment, seen by many as an antisemitic slur, in the context of his call for Omar's removal. 'Some Jews may feel complimented by that and their ability to negotiate,' Jackson said.'
JERSEY CITY — 'State's star witness tied Fulop to pay-to-play scheme, AG's office declined to pursue case,' by HudPost's Michael Shurin: 'Back in December 2019, under the leadership of then-Attorney General Gurbir Grewal, the AG's Office announced criminal charges against five public officials and political candidates … Court documents obtained by HudPost reveal that the state's cooperating witness, attorney Matt O'Donnell, confessed to multiple schemes and identified numerous co-conspirators that were never prosecuted …. On February 16, 2018, in a proffer session with the NJOAG, O'Donnell told investigators that straw contributions … to Fulop's first mayoral campaign were part of a pay-to-play scheme that resulted in him becoming Jersey City's tax appeal attorney after Fulop took office in 2013, according to Det. Kristin Maier's report. The Jersey Journal reported that the 'lucrative gig' made $260,720 for O'Donnell's law firm in 2015 alone. O'Donnell said he was initially approached by 'campaign manager' Ray Ferraioli of H&P Consulting in 2011 about giving money towards Fulop's first mayoral campaign, per Maier's report … In response to questions from HudPost, the mayor's press secretary stated Fulop was unaware of O'Donnell's admission to investigators, claimed 'at no point did [Fulop] ever have a conversation with Matt O'Donnell or Ray Farioli [sic],' and said contracts in Jersey City are awarded via a fair and open process, which 'undermines' O'Donnell's claim.'
WARREN COUNTY — ''Startlingly high' levels of PFAS pollution found in Warren County hot spot,' by NJ Spotlight News' Michael Sol Warren: 'A private well at the heart of a pollution hot spot in Warren County has levels of toxic 'forever chemicals' that appear to be the highest recorded in New Jersey and among the highest ever seen in the nation. Records from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection show that a drinking water sample from a private well at a self-storage facility in the area of South Lincoln Avenue in Washington Township had a total concentration of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances — PFAS — of 18,997 parts per trillion. The sample was pulled from the well on June 13, 2023.'
ANTS MARCHING IN PROTEST — 'Toms River fires 20-year veteran animal control officer in cost-saving move,' by The Asbury Park Press' Jean Mikle: 'The township's last animal control officer has been let go in what Mayor Daniel Rodrick described as a cost-saving move. Dave Matthews, who had worked for the township for nearly 20 years, was laid off last week. He was the only animal control officer left working directly for Toms River after Rodrick's administration privatized most animal control services last year.'
— 'Teaneck's 'protest' ordinance failed to pass, heads for constitutional attorney review'
— 'Former teacher sues Burlington Township schools on asbestos exposure claim'
— 'O'Dea calls for separating Jersey City police & fire depts., de-escalation center'
— 'Newark school board members disputing ethics complaint will not get attorneys fees paid, state says'
EVERYTHING ELSE
PASTA TRANSGRESSIONS — 'Neighboring Middletown eateries in saucy food fight over rights to serve Italian cuisine,' by The Asbury Park Press' Kathleen Hopkins and Sarah Griesemer: 'When breakfast and lunch restaurant Tatum's Table was preparing to open in the Lincroft Plaza strip mall last September, the veteran restaurateurs who operate neighboring Luigi's Famous Pizza welcomed the new business with open arms. 'We would send over pizzas while they were trying to get ready to open,' said Kelly Emerson, who owns Luigi's with husband Jason … But a social media post in recent weeks announcing [Tatum] Menake's intentions to open Tatum's Table for dinner shattered the relationship. The problem, according to the Emersons, is that Tatum's Table's proposed dinner menu contained some Italian dishes that Luigi's claims to have exclusive rights to sell, under the terms of its lease.'
— 'South Jersey in an 'extreme' drought, monitor says'
— 'Significant new 'void' opens up under I-80 eastbound lanes in N.J.'
— 'New measles cases linked to NJ patient who may have spread virus at 3 health facilities'
— 'Man hid submerged in freezing brook after shoplifting from N.J. Target, police say'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump's top general just undercut his ‘invasion' claims
One of the problems with making a series of brazen and hyperbolic claims is that it can be hard to keep everyone on your team on the same page. And few Trump administration claims have been as brazen as the idea that the Venezuelan government has engineered an invasion of gang members into the United States. This claim forms the basis of the administration's controversial efforts to rapidly deport a bunch of people it claimed were members of the gang Tren de Aragua – without due process. But one of the central figures responsible for warding off such invasions apparently didn't get the memo. At a Senate hearing Wednesday, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman retired Lt. Gen. Dan Caine acknowledged that the United States isn't currently facing such a threat. 'I think at this point in time, I don't see any foreign state-sponsored folks invading,' Caine said in response to Democratic questioning. This might sound like common sense; of course the United States isn't currently under invasion by a foreign government. You'd probably have heard something about that on the news. But the administration has said – repeatedly and in court – that it has been. When Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act to rapidly deport migrants without due process, that law required such a foreign 'invasion' or 'predatory incursion' to make his move legal. And Trump said that's what was happening. 'The result is a hybrid criminal state that is perpetrating an invasion of and predatory incursion into the United States, and which poses a substantial danger to the United States,' reads the proclamation from Trump. It added that Tren de Aragua's actions came 'both directly and at the direction, clandestine or otherwise, of the Maduro regime in Venezuela.' So the White House said Tren de Aragua was acting in concert with the Maduro regime to invade; Caine now says 'state-sponsored folks' aren't invading. Some flagged Caine's comment as undermining Trump's claims of a foreign 'invasion' in Los Angeles. Trump has regularly applied that word to undocumented migrants. But the inconsistency is arguably more significant when it comes to Trump's claims about the Venezuelan migrants. Perhaps the administration would argue that Trump has halted the invasion and it is no longer happening; Caine was speaking in the present tense. Caine did go on to cite others who might have different views. 'But I'll be mindful of the fact that there has been some border issues throughout time, and defer to DHS who handles the border along the nation's contiguous outline,' he said. But if an invasion had been happening recently, it seems weird not to mention that. And if the invasion is over, that would seem to undercut the need to keep trying to use the Alien Enemies Act. The Department of Homeland Security is certainly not in the camp of no invasion. On Wednesday, DHS posted on Facebook an image with Uncle Sam that reads: 'Report all foreign invaders' with a phone number for ICE. When asked about the image and whether the use of the term 'foreign invaders' had been used previously, DHS pointed CNN to a number of posts from White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller using terms like 'invade' or 'invaders' when referring to undocumented immigrants. Plenty of Trump administration figures have gone to bat for this claim. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said soon after Trump's proclamation that Tren de Aragua gang members 'have been sent here by the hostile Maduro regime in Venezuela.' Then-national security adviser Michael Waltz claimed Maduro was emptying his prisons 'in a proxy manner to influence and attack the United States.' We soon learned that the intelligence community had concluded Venezuela had not directed the gang. But Secretary of State Marco Rubio stood by Trump's claim. 'Yes, that's their assessment,' Rubio said last month about the intelligence community. 'They're wrong.' Trump administration border czar Tom Homan has said the gang was an 'arm of the Maduro regime,' and that Maduro's regime was 'involved with sending thousands of Venezuelans to this country to unsettle it.' The question of Venezuela's purported involvement actually hasn't been dealt with much by the courts. A series of judges have moved to block the administration's Alien Enemies Act gambit, but they've generally ruled that way because of the lack of an 'invasion' or 'predatory incursion' – without delving much into the more complex issue of whether such a thing might somehow have ties to Maduro's government. One of the judges to rule in that fashion was a Trump appointee, US District Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr. So the intelligence community and a bunch of judges – including a Trump-appointed one – have rebutted the claim the underlies this historic effort to set aside due process. And now, the man Trump installed as his top general seems to have undercut it too.

Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘We've lost the culture war on climate'
President Donald Trump's latest climate rollback makes it all but official: The United States is giving up on trying to stop the planet's warming. In some ways, the effort has barely started. More than 15 years after federal regulators officially recognized that greenhouse gas pollution threatens 'current and future generations,' their most ambitious efforts to defuse that threat have been blocked in the courts and by Trump's rule-slicing buzzsaw. Wednesday's action by the Environmental Protection Agency would extend that streak by wiping out a Biden-era regulation on power plants — leaving the nation's second-largest source of climate pollution unshackled until at least the early 2030s. Rules aimed at lessening climate pollution from transportation, the nation's No. 1 source, are also on the Trump hit list. Meanwhile, the GOP megabill lumbering through the Senate would dismember former President Joe Biden's other huge climate initiative, the 2022 law that sought to use hundreds of billions of dollars in tax breaks and other incentives to encourage consumers and businesses to switch to carbon-free energy. At the same time, Trump's appointees have spent months shutting down climate programs, firing their workers and gutting research into the problem, while making it harder for states such as California to tackle the issue on their own. The years of whipsawing moves have left Washington with no consistent approach on how — or whether — to confront climate change, even as scientists warn that years are growing short to avoid catastrophic damage to human society. While the Trump-era GOP's hardening opposition to climate action has been a major reason for the lack of consensus, one former Democratic adviser said her own party needs to find a message that resonates with broad swaths of the electorate. 'There's no way around it: The left strategy on climate needs to be rethought,' said Jody Freeman, who served as counselor for energy and climate change in President Barack Obama's White House. 'We've lost the culture war on climate, and we have to figure out a way for it to not be a niche leftist movement." It's a strategy Freeman admitted she was 'struggling' to articulate, but one that included using natural gas as a 'bridge fuel' to more renewable power — an approach Democrats embraced during the Obama administration — finding 'a new approach' for easing permits for energy infrastructure and building broad-based political support. As the Democratic nominee in 2008, Obama expressed the hope that his campaign would be seen as 'the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal.' But two years later, the Democrats' cap-and-trade climate bill failed to get through a Senate where they held a supermajority. Obama didn't return to the issue in earnest until his second term, taking actions including the enactment of a sweeping power plant rule that wasn't yet in effect when Trump rescinded it and the Supreme Court declared it dead. Republicans, meanwhile, have moved far from their seemingly moderating stance in 2008, when nominee John McCain offered his own climate proposals and even then-President George W. Bush announced a modest target for slowing carbon pollution by 2025. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin contended Wednesday that the Obama- and Biden-era rules were overbearing and too costly. 'The American public spoke loudly and clearly last November: They wanted to make sure that all agencies were cognizant of their economic concerns,' he said when announcing the rule rollback at agency headquarters. 'At the EPA under President Trump, we have chosen to both protect the environment and grow the economy.' Trump's new strategy of ditching greenhouse gas limits altogether is legally questionable, experts involved in crafting the Obama and Biden power plant rules told POLITICO. But they acknowledged that the Trump administration at the very least will significantly weaken rules on power plants' climate pollution, at a moment when the trends are going in the wrong direction. Gina McCarthy, who led EPA during the Obama administration, said in a statement that Zeldin's rationale is "absolutely illogical and indefensible. It's a purely political play that goes against decades of science and policy review." U.S. greenhouse gas emissions were virtually flat last year, falling just 0.2 percent, after declining 20 percent since 2005, according to the research firm Rhodium Group. That output would need to fall 7.6 percent annually through 2030 to meet the climate goals Biden floated, which were aimed at limiting the rise in global temperatures to 1.5 degrees Celsius since the start of the Industrial Revolution. That level is a critical threshold for avoiding the most severe impacts of climate change. Those targets now look out of reach. The World Meteorological Organization last month gave 70 percent odds that the five-year global temperature average through 2029 would register above 1.5 degrees. The Obama-era rule came out during a decade when governments around the world threw their weight behind blunting climate pollution through executive actions. Ricky Revesz, who was Biden's regulatory czar, recalled the 'great excitement' at the White House Blue Room reception just before Obama announced his power plant rule, known as the Clean Power Plan. It seemed a watershed moment. But it didn't last. 'I thought that it was going to be a more linear path forward,' he said. 'That linear path forward has not materialized. And that is disappointing.' Opponents who have long argued that such regulations would wreck the economy while doing little to curb global temperature increases have traveled the same road in reverse. Republican West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey said he felt dread when Obama announced the Clean Power Plan in 2015. Then the state's attorney general, he feared the rule's focus on curbing carbon dioxide from power plants would have a 'catastrophic' impact on West Virginia's coal-reliant economy. 'It was really an audacious and outrageous attempt to regulate the economy when they had no power to do so,' said Morrisey, who led a coalition of states that sued the EPA over Obama's proposal. 'You can't take the actions that they were trying to take without going to the legislature.' Meanwhile, Congress has become harsher terrain for climate action. In May, House Republicans voted to undo the incentives for electric cars and other clean energy technologies in Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, the nation's most significant effort to spur clean energy and curb climate change. That same week, 35 House Democrats and Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) crossed the aisle and voted to kill an EPA waiver that had allowed California to set more stringent tailpipe pollution standards for vehicles to deal with its historically smoggy skies. California was planning to use that waiver to end sales of internal combustion engine vehicles in 2035, a rule 10 other states and the District of Columbia had planned to follow. The Supreme Court has added to the obstacles for climate policy — introducing more existential challenges for efforts to use executive powers to corral greenhouse gas emissions. In its 2022 decision striking down the Obama administration's power plant rule, the court said agencies such as EPA need Congress' explicit approval before enacting regulations that would have a 'major' impact on the economy. (It didn't precisely define what counts as 'major.') In 2024, the court eviscerated a decades-old precedent known as the Chevron doctrine, which had afforded agencies broad leeway in how they interpret vague statutes. Many climate advocates and former Democratic officials contend that all those obstacles are bumps, not barriers, on the tortuous path to reducing greenhouse gases. They say that even the regulatory fits and starts have provided signals to markets and businesses about where federal policy is heading in the long term — prodding the private sector to make investments to green the nation's energy system. One symptom is a sharp decline in U.S. reliance on coal — by far the most climate-polluting power source, and the one that would face the stiffest restrictions in any successful federal regulation to lessen the electricity industry's emissions. Coal supplied 48.5 percent of the nation's power generation in 2007, but that fell to 15 percent in 2024. Last year, solar and wind power combined to overtake coal for the first time. 'Regulation has served the purpose of moving things along faster,' said Janet McCabe, who was deputy EPA administrator under Biden and ran EPA's Office of Air and Radiation during Obama's second term. 'The trajectory is always in the right direction.' Freeman, who is now at Harvard Law School, said federal regulations plus state laws requiring renewable power to comprise portions of the electricity mix helped justify utility investments in clean energy. That, in turn, accelerated price drops for wind and solar power, she said. Clean energy advocates point to those broader market shifts, calling a cleaner power grid inevitable. 'There are people in each of these industries who wouldn't have taken the climate problem seriously and cleaner technology seriously, and invested in it, if it weren't for the pressure of the Clean Air Act and the incentives that more recently had been built into the IRA,' said David Doniger, senior attorney and strategist at the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'So policy does matter, even when it's not in a straight line and the implementation is inadequate.' But even if those economic trends continue — an open question given the enormous new power demand from data centers — it will not bring the U.S. closer to cuts needed to keep the world from overheating, multiple climate studies have concluded. And the greatest chunk of the emissions decline since 2005 comes from shifting coal to natural gas, another fossil fuel, which fracking made cheap and abundant. Biden's power plant rule, now being shelved by Trump's EPA, would have imposed limits on both coal-burning power plants and future gas-fired ones, requiring them to either capture their greenhouse gases or shut down. Staving off regulations may well keep coal-fired power plants running longer than anticipated to meet forecast demand growth, belching more carbon dioxide into the air. The Trump administration has even sought to temporarily exempt power plants from air pollution rules altogether and is trying to use emergency powers to prevent coal generators from shuttering. Without federal rules that say otherwise, power providers would also be likely to add more natural gas generation to the grid. Failing to curb power plants' pollution, scientists say, means temperatures will continue to rise and bring more of the floods, heat waves, wildfires, supply chain disruptions, food shortages and other shocks that cost the U.S. hundreds of billions of dollars each year in property damage, illness, death and lost productivity. 'I don't think the economics are going to take care of it by any means,' said Joe Goffman, who led the Biden EPA air office. 'The effects of climate change are going to continue to be felt and they're going to continue to be costly in terms of dollars and cents and in terms of human experience.' Some state governors, such as Democrats Kathy Hochul of New York and Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, have vowed to go it alone on climate policy if need be. But analyses have shown state actions alone are unlikely to achieve the greenhouse gas reductions at the scale and speed needed to avoid baking in catastrophic effects from climate change. The Sierra Club, for example, has helped shutter nearly 400 coal-fired units across the U.S. since 2010 through its Beyond Coal campaign, which has argued the economic case against fossil fuel generation in front of state utility commissions. While Joanne Spalding, the group's legal director, said it can continue to strike blows against coal with that strategy, she acknowledged that 'gas is a huge problem' — and left no doubt that the Trump administration's moves would do damage. 'Given what the science says about the need to act urgently, this will be a lost four years in the United States,' she said.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stephen Miller Explicitly Ordered ICE Raid Home Depots
Stephen Miller explicitly ordered ICE to target Home Depot parking lots to arrest undocumented day laborers, a report alleges. The White House deputy chief of staff gave the order in late May, gloating in a meeting that he could leave ICE's D.C. headquarters and arrest 30 people outside the nearest Home Depot, sources told the Wall Street Journal. Miller, 39, is also said to have reminded top immigration officials they are not just targeting the 'worst of the worst' criminals, but anybody who is in the country illegally—even if that is their only alleged wrongdoing. 'Just go out there and arrest illegal aliens,' he said, according to the Journal. ICE officials appear to have heeded the White House's call. The Journal reported that ICE conducted an immigration sweep at a Home Depot on Friday in a predominantly Latino neighborhood of Los Angeles. The raid was among those that spurred widespread anti-ICE demonstrations and occasional riots in the city, which escalated after President Donald Trump activated the National Guard and deployed Marines against the wishes of Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Day laborers are known to use Home Depot parking lots to find work at locations across the country, often waving down contractors or homeowners as they exit the home improvement store. Home Depot has acknowledged the practice, but does not explicitly allow it. Some stores feature signage to make clear that soliciting work is illegal in their parking lots. MAGA influencers have seized on this practice by migrants and are now encouraging ICE to continue targeting Home Depot parking lots. 'I'd like to report the front entrance of @HomeDepot at 5 am,' said Laura Loomer on Wednesday, responding to a promotion for the Department of Homeland Security's tip line to report undocumented immigrants. 'Location: Every Home Depot in the U.S.' Recent Home Depot raids have occurred at a minimum of seven locations in California, according to the Journal, The Guardian, and NBC Los Angeles. This appears to have workers skiddish about finding work in their go-to spot. Martha Arévalo, the executive director of the Central American Resource Center of Los Angeles, told the Journal that Home Depot parking lots in Southern California, once filled with hundreds of willing workers, have dwindled down to a 'handful.' Home Depot spokeswoman Beth Marlowe told the Daily Beast that the Atlanta-based corporation is not working in conjunction with ICE and that it does not receive any advance notice of raids at or near its locations. 'We tell associates to report [raids] immediately and not to engage with the activity for their safety,' she said. 'If associates feel uncomfortable after witnessing ICE activity, we offer them the option to go home for the rest of the day, with pay.' ICE did not respond to emails from the Daily Beast. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told the Beast in a statement, 'If you are present in the United States illegally, you will be deported. This is the promise President Trump made to the American people, and the administration is committed to keeping it.' Miller has reportedly orchestrated the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. In the same meeting he reportedly ordered ICE to target Home Depot locations, he also allegedly threatened to terminate officials if their arrest numbers did not rise significantly. Miller told ICE it needed an arrest total at or near 3,000 migrants per day. A plan, dubbed 'Operation At Large,' was implemented shortly after. It saw thousands of federal law enforcement officers and special forces, who don't typically assist with immigration, being activated to help ICE round up migrants accused of being in the country illegally. This supercharging of arrests resulted in several notable mishaps. That included ICE briefly detaining a U.S. Marshal in Arizona by mistake last week.