Russia releases oil tanker from Baltic Sea detention, Estonian broadcaster says
FILE PHOTO: Liberia-flagged crude oil tanker Green Admire transits the Bosphorus in Istanbul, Turkey, September 2, 2023. REUTERS/Yoruk Isik/File Photo
COPENHAGEN (Reuters) -Russia has released a Greek-owned oil tanker which was detained in Russian waters on Sunday after leaving an Estonian port, and the vessel has resumed its journey towards the Dutch port of Rotterdam, Estonian public broadcaster ERR reported on Tuesday.
The Liberia-flagged Green Admire appeared to be underway in the Baltic Sea on Tuesday with its destination listed as Rotterdam and was estimated to arrive there on May 24, according to ship tracking data on the MarineTraffic platform.
The vessel's Athens-based manager Aegean Shipping did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Norway's Skuld, one of the tanker's insurers, declined to comment on Tuesday.
The detention of the vessel has raised growing concerns over potential escalation in busy Baltic sea lanes after separate action by Estonia in recent days to stop tankers as part of enforcing Western sanctions on Russia.
Green Admire had left the Sillamae port in Estonia using a designated navigation channel that crosses Russian territorial waters after which it was detained, the Estonian Foreign Ministry said on Sunday.
"Expect heightened maritime security risks, particularly around vessels transporting oil from or to Baltic ports, including the increased likelihood of arbitrary detentions, military posturing, and freedom of navigation impediments," UK maritime security company Ambrey said in a note on Tuesday.
Estonia's foreign minister has said Russia's action against the Green Admire was likely a response to a campaign by the Estonian navy to inspect tankers used to transport millions of barrels of Russian oil through the Baltic Sea.
'SHADOW FLEET' TANKERS
The spokeswoman of Russia's foreign ministry on Tuesday accused NATO of trying to control Baltic shipping lanes and she said that Moscow would react to any unlawful actions by vessels of the Atlantic alliance's member states.
"NATO is trying to present the Baltic Sea as its own internal sea," Maria Zakharova told a weekly briefing in Moscow.
Russia, rejecting Western efforts to pressure its oil exports over its war in Ukraine, has turned to hundreds of so-called 'shadow fleet' tankers to transport cargoes to buyers in Asia.
The vessels typically have opaque ownership structures and sail without top-tier Western insurance or safety certification cover. They often have unknown insurers or assessors of vessel seaworthiness - both required for ocean-going commercial ships, shipping and insurance industry sources familiar with the matter have said.
"It is a realistic possibility that if Baltic Sea nations continue to strengthen their adversarial posture toward the sanctioned vessels in their waters, Russia will likely conduct reciprocal actions in the maritime domain, including detentions, seizures and plausible deniability attacks," Ambrey said.
"The vessels operating in Estonian and Finnish waters are assessed as most likely targets for detentions."
Estonia said on May 19 that all commercial traffic to and from Sillamae would be routed through Estonian territorial waters, which Ambrey said was likely "to limit exposure to Russian jurisdiction and military pressure".
The EU and Britain announced new sanctions against Russia on Tuesday without waiting for the United States to join them, a day after President Donald Trump spoke to Vladimir Putin without winning a promise for a ceasefire in Ukraine.
Apart from specific sanctions, the Group of Seven countries is also set to review a price ceiling on Russian oil sales locked at $60 a barrel.
The EU will propose to G7 finance ministers this week to lower the current price cap to $50 a barrel. If approved, this would add to the heat faced by Moscow.
(Reporting by Stine Jacobsen, Jonathan Saul and Renee MaltezouEditing by Gareth Jones )
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Exclusive-Ukraine hits out at Europe's payout from frozen Russian cash
KYIV/BRUSSELS (Reuters) -Ukraine's government has criticised a decision to take billions of euros of Russian wealth frozen in Europe and hand it to Western investors, warning that it weakened Europe's stand against Moscow. The criticism follows a move last month by Belgium's Euroclear to take 3 billion euros ($3.4 billion) of Russian investor cash held at the clearing firm to pay Westerners who lost out when Moscow seized their money held in Russia. Now Ukraine has warned that it sends a wrong signal and threatens to weaken Europe's hand when dealing with Russia, while it debates using the entire $300 billion of Russian wealth stranded in Europe to rebuild and defend the battered country. "If private investors are compensated before the victims of war, it won't be justice," said Iryna Mudra, a senior official in Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's office, in Kyiv's first public comments on the move. "It creates a perception of inconsistency, of Europe wavering in its resolve," Mudra, a deputy head of Ukraine's presidential administration, told Reuters. "International law requires that the aggressor is to make full reparation to the victim and not to investors who ... entered a high-risk jurisdiction," said Mudra, who is in charge of legal affairs in Zelenskiy's administration. The criticism comes at a critical time for the Western alliance backing Kyiv, with U.S. President Donald Trump's administration distancing itself from Europe and casting doubt over its commitment to Ukraine's defence and Russian sanctions. Mudra, one of a small circle of officials that set policy, also stressed the importance of maintaining control of the frozen Russian assets, which chiefly belong to its central bank with the majority held at Euroclear. The central bank assets were frozen at the outset of war in the single most powerful sanction directed at Russia over its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, a penalty that is deeply resented in Moscow. Euroclear in March gained clearance from Belgium, its principal legal authority, to make the payout, people familiar with the matter have told Reuters, after the European Union changed its sanctions regime last year to make this possible. A spokesperson for the Belgian government said: "This is not a Belgian decision but the application of a European regulation decided unanimously by the member states." Euroclear has emphasised that it only implements sanctions and does not take decisions about lifting them. 'MIND BOGGLING' Three Russian sources recently told Reuters that Russian President Vladimir Putin's conditions for ending the war include the resolution of the frozen assets issue. Ukraine, meanwhile, is campaigning fiercely against any return of the money to Moscow. Euroclear alone held 195 billion euros of cash in March - mainly Russian central bank funds, with some belonging to Russian investors. "If it is returned to Russia, it will be converted into tanks, missiles, drones, training of new troops," said Ukraine's Mudra. "The world ... must demonstrate that unlawful war brings irreversible financial consequences." Some see the frozen Russian wealth as a lifeline for Kyiv. In the past, the West has engineered loans and payments to Ukraine from the interest on the stranded Russian stockpile, which Putin denounced as theft. Ukrainian officials fear the Euroclear payout, even though it does not affect the central bank money, could undermine their efforts to secure an agreement on using the wider pool of Russian assets to help their country. Mykola Yurlov, an official at Ukraine's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said the payout set a bad precedent, while Kira Rudik, a Ukrainian parliamentarian, was also critical. "Western companies were operating in Russia at their own risk. Why are these companies basically asking their societies to compensate for this risk?" Rudik told Reuters. "We need this money to rebuild and defend Ukraine." Last month's move also drew criticism abroad. "It is mind boggling that the priority is to reimburse corporate interests rather than spend the money defending Ukraine," said Jacob Kirkegaard, a sanctions expert with the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a Washington-based think tank. While the payout to investors left frozen Russian central bank reserves untouched, it made a dent in the stockpile of Russian wealth that gives the EU leverage over Moscow. More importantly for critics, it sets a worrying precedent. European Union leaders are expected to renew sanctions, including a freeze of Russian assets, at a summit meeting in June, although they could yet face an attempt by Hungary to derail those efforts. (Reporting by John O'Donnell and Tom BalmforthEditing by Tomasz Janowski)
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
US pressures NATO to seal deal on ramping up defence spending
BRUSSELS: US defence chief Pete Hegseth on Thursday pushed NATO to agree a deal on increasing military spending that could satisfy President Donald Trump at a summit this month. The volatile US leader has demanded that alliance members boost defence budgets to five percent of their GDP at the June 24-25 meeting in the Netherlands. NATO chief Mark Rutte has put forward a compromise agreement for 3.5 percent of GDP on core military spending by 2032, and 1.5 percent on broader security-related areas such as infrastructure. Several diplomats say Rutte looks on track to secure the deal for the summit in The Hague as NATO grapples with the threat from Russia after more than three years of war in Ukraine. But a few allies are still hesitant about committing to such levels of spending. 'The reason I'm here is to make sure every country in NATO understands every shoulder has to be to the plough, every country has to contribute at that level of five percent,' Hegseth said at a meeting with his NATO counterparts in Brussels. 'Our message is going to continue to be clear. It's deterrence and peace through strength, but it can't be reliance. It cannot and will not be reliance on America in a world of a lot of threats,' he said. Most vocal in its reluctance is Spain, which is only set to reach NATO's current target of two percent of GDP by the end of this year. Diplomats say other countries are also haggling over making the timeline longer and dropping a demand for core defence spending to increase by 0.2 percentage points each year. But the deal appears an acceptable compromise to most, which will allow Trump to claim that he has achieved his headline demand, while in reality setting the bar lower for struggling European allies. The United States has backed Rutte's plan, but Washington insists it wants to each country to lay out a 'credible path' to meet the target. Germany needs more troops In a connected move, NATO ministers were due to sign off at their meeting on new capability targets for the weaponry needed to deter Russia. German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius estimated the new requirements meant Berlin would need to add 'around 50,000 to 60,000' more soldiers to its army. His Dutch counterpart Ruben Brekelmans said reaching the level requested would cost the Netherlands at least 3.5 percent of GDP. It is not just the fear of Moscow that is pushing Europe to ramp up its ambitions -- there is also uncertainty over the United States' commitment to the continent. 'What we will decide in The Hague, what we will spend on defence going forward, the new defence investment plan, of course, is rooted in what we need in terms of the hard capabilities,' Rutte said. Hegseth, a former TV presenter, rocked NATO on his last visit in February with a fiery warning that Washington could look to scale back its forces in Europe to focus on China. Since then, there has been no concrete announcement from the United States on troop withdrawals, but NATO allies remain on tenterhooks. Ukraine question With NATO looking set for the defence spending deal, another thorny issue threatening to overshadow the summit in three weeks' time is what to do about Ukraine. Trump's return to the White House ripped up Washington's support for Ukraine and upended the West's approach to Russia's three-year-long war. Hegseth underscored the US disengagement with Kyiv by skipping a meeting of Ukraine's backers in Brussels on Wednesday. Kyiv's European allies are pressing to overcome US reluctance and invite Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky to The Hague as a sign of support. So far, NATO has said only that Ukraine will be represented at the gathering, and has not confirmed that Zelensky will be in attendance.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Thailand urges talks after Cambodia threatens to take border dispute to world court
Buddhist monks visit the Preah Vihear temple, which sparked deadly clashes between Cambodia and Thailand in 2011. - Photo: Reuters BANGKOK: Thailand called on Cambodia to engage positively in efforts to settle a longstanding border dispute, stressing on Thursday (June 5) it did not recognise the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) after its neighbour said it would refer the issue to the world court. The two countries have for days made statements committing to dialogue while vowing to protect their sovereignty following a May 28 border skirmish between troops in which a Cambodian soldier was killed. Deadly clashes between Cambodia and Thailand last erupted in 2011 over Preah Vihear, an ancient temple at the heart of a decades-long dispute that has stirred nationalist sentiment on both sides. 'Thailand has not recognised compulsory jurisdiction of the ICJ since 1960. Thailand and Cambodia already have existing bilateral mechanisms to address these issues,' Thailand's government said in a statement. Cambodia last week accused Thai troops of opening fire on a trench that served as a Cambodian army base. Thailand's military described the incident as a misunderstanding at an undemarcated border area and said its soldiers were forced to engage after coming under fire. Although the two countries have a historic rivalry, their governments enjoy warm ties, partly due to the close relationship between their influential former leaders, Thailand's Thaksin Shinawatra and Cambodia's Hun Sen, whose daughter and son respectively are now prime ministers. Cambodia's government, in a statement late on June 4, said the recent clash underscored the limitations of their dispute-resolution mechanisms in addressing 'longstanding points of contention'. It said ICJ referral to settle disputes over four border areas was, therefore, necessary. It did not say when it would initiate proceedings. 'These four areas have long remained unresolved and sensitive, with the potential to escalate tensions if unaddressed,' it said, stressing it is committed to dialogue and diplomacy. 'Cambodia expresses its hope that Thailand will cooperate in jointly referring this case to the ICJ.' The two countries are due to meet for talks on June 14. A small protest took place on June 5 outside Thailand's Defence Ministry, and an activist group has planned a demonstration outside the Cambodian embassy on June 6 'to protect the land of Thailand'. Cambodia, in its statement, urged its people to show calm and restraint, underlining the importance of protecting relations with Thailand. - Reuters
