
I can't go everywhere my daughter goes – a wheelchair only works in accessible spaces
I had been disabled for six years. While on a hike, I developed dysautonomia, which is secondary to a genetic connective tissue disorder called hEDS [hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome]. I experience a great deal of daily pain and can't stand for more than a minute or sit upright unsupported for more than five.
As a result, I spend most of my day reclined. Her high need for physical contact in infancy fit my need to rest all day. She didn't need a mom who could pace. She needed a mom who didn't get bored lying on the sofa. We were a perfect match.
After a few months with K, we started to make plans. The first was a trip to a small island called Lummi off the coast of Washington state. We flew out of Oakland; a friend drove us to the airport and helped us check the bags. David pushed me in my wheelchair, and I carried K on my lap. Once in the air, we learned the hard way that air pressure changes can contribute to diaper blowouts, but the flight was, generally, fine.
When we arrived in Seattle, David pushed K and me to the corner of the baggage claim area and returned to watch for our bags while I bottle-fed her. Once David had our suitcases, he dropped them off with us in the corner and left to get our rental car. Returning an hour later with the car, he parked out front, came in and retrieved the bags, and then, finally, two hours after landing, brought K and me to the car. A few extra steps, but manageable.
Our week on Lummi was heaven. I read so many books that I joined the local library so that I could check out more. At night, I drank IPAs and ate Oreos under the stars. During the afternoons, K and I lounged on a picnic blanket, listening to the waves.
But the return trip was the first time I felt what would become a familiar sinking shame about my disability complicating our life as parents. Due to a few car complications, we were cutting it close to make our flight. There was no bag check. I had been using a wheelchair in airports for years and knew that an airport attendant would push me to the gate if I requested it. I suggested to David that we ask someone at the airport to push me while I carried K so that David could manage our bags.
When the person arrived, they told me I couldn't carry K on my lap. They said it was airport policy that a baby couldn't ride on a wheelchair (never mind that it was my wheelchair, my lap, and my baby). So now David needed to find a way to push our suitcases and carry K simultaneously – which was impossible, and our flight was about to leave. The attendant left, and we scrambled for solutions.
We called the attendant back and asked him to push me. I would drag our suitcases, and David would carry K. We inched our way through the airport. I am not strong enough to hold my arms out to the side and push suitcases; before long, I had moved the bags in front of me, pushing them with my feet. It was difficult – they zigged and zagged, unwieldy and slow.
We made our flight. We made it home. But the humiliation of not being allowed to carry my baby continued to burn.
As K grew older, the list of places she needed or wanted to go expanded.
She started ballet, and I couldn't last an hour propped on the hard wooden floor. She started daycare, and dropping her off required a long walk up a steep driveway. She wanted to visit the zoo and the playground and the children's discovery museum.
Part of how I adapted to her expanding world was to get a power wheelchair. I needed to be able to recline; the 450-lb chair does that and more. In many ways, the solution was effective. I attended ballet classes. We went to the playground. We fed the cows at the little farm in the Berkeley Hills. But a 450lb wheelchair only works in spaces that are wheelchair accessible. When we go somewhere with stairs, I can't bring my chair. I can walk up a few stairs, but if the seating at the top isn't accessible, I must leave after only a few minutes.
For some disabled or chronically ill people, leaving the house isn't possible at all. But for others, the barriers are structural.
K is now six. Below is a non-exhaustive list of places she has gone but where, because of inaccessibility, I haven't been able to join:
Her kindergarten classroom. In fact, the entirety of the school she attended for two years.
Countless hikes.
Multiple preschool tours – so many schools in California, North Carolina and Ontario are up or down stairs.
Field trips.
Nearly every shop and restaurant in Montreal while on a family vacation.
Birthday and holiday parties.
Most playgrounds with sand or gravel.
In an ambulance, twice.
In particular, being separated on the ambulance rides devastated me. The first time we called 911, K wasn't yet two and had been sick with pneumonia; the EMTs arrived quickly, assessed K's status, and said she needed to get to Oakland's Children's hospital urgently.
'Who's coming?' they asked, looking between David and me, as they attached sensors to my tiny baby. Saying I couldn't go with her to the hospital as she struggled to breathe felt like tearing an organ from my body. But my wheelchair wouldn't fit inside the ambulance.
David is a kind and attentive dad. K did not suffer for having David in the ambulance. But I did. I walked outside as they loaded my baby and turned on the sirens, which faded as they sped down the hill. Our house, which had minutes before been loud and busy with equipment and people and uniforms and alarms, was silent. Shaking, I went back inside to figure out how to get myself to the hospital with my wheelchair. I called my neighbor and could barely speak through my tears. He answered, and within minutes, we were en route to the hospital.
About a year later, K again became sick with a minor cold that turned to be pneumonia and worsened quickly. We were different parents by that point; after a year of monitoring her respiratory rate, oxygen percentages, and trachea tugs, we knew exactly what to watch for.
Even with all our vigilance, K experienced a rapid decline only hours after visiting her pediatrician. Like the first time, my gut knew before my brain, and when I called the after-hours nurse's line, I knew what they would say: 'Call 911 immediately.'
Sign up to Well Actually
Practical advice, expert insights and answers to your questions about how to live a good life
after newsletter promotion
Just like the time before, our apartment went from quiet and tense to brimming with noise and commotion. David, K and I were on our king-sized bed, thermometers and oxygen monitors surrounding us, when the EMTs entered. The paramedics checked K's vital signs, and their demeanors changed. 'Signs of sepsis,' one reported. 'Hurry.'
And just like that, they were running, K on a stretcher, David hurrying behind. The silence they left behind was eerie. I knew what sepsis could mean for a baby and all I wanted was to be with my child to ensure that no one made a life-threatening mistake. To demand that every person pay undivided attention to K.
Alone in my apartment, I remembered that, in my 20s, I had helped the chief of emergency medicine at the closest major hospital buy a home. He and I had connected in the process, and I had joined him and his wife, an infectious disease doctor, on their boat to celebrate after. It had been years since we had talked, and a lot had changed, including my disability and becoming a parent. I picked up my phone, found his contact, and called.
'It's Jessica, your old realtor. I have a child now, and she is in an ambulance on the way to the emergency room, and the paramedics said it might be sepsis. K is in respiratory distress.' I was weeping, and my hands shook, but I got the words out. He was calm and kind and said he would call the attending on duty to make sure everyone acted quickly and would keep me in the loop. I was doing all I could to save my baby. I would have done anything.
Hanging up the phone, the adrenaline took over, and I barely made it to the bathroom before vomiting.
K was OK. It wasn't sepsis, thank goodness. She recovered from the respiratory distress at home while I watched her chest rise and fall. But seeing her disappear into the ambulance had felt like someone pulling my heart up and out of my throat.
Disabled parents' caregiving abilities are optimized in our homes. But when we leave the house, the obstacles multiply. For one, the built environment is often inaccessible and inhospitable for individual bodies and minds. Secondly, when not in our homes we see other people – and people, through words and actions, create a different kind of hostile environment.
Many parents my age remember our childhoods in the 80s and 90s and compare the risks of our childhoods to the safety expectations of parents today. It's hard to imagine a child today being tossed around in the trunk of a station wagon or roaming the neighborhood for hours before the age of 10. Risk calculation is complex, and I am certainly not one to elevate the experience of the 'good old days' – good? For who? – but parents are expected to insulate their children from many harms (at least those that we can purchase solutions for).
Personally, I am always wrestling with safety. I live in a body that is proof that bodies are fragile. For disabled parents in wheelchairs or on crutches, leaving the house brings risk. We cannot, despite our deepest desires, run after our kids. We cannot lift a car in a feat of superhuman strength. We cannot dive into the ocean to snatch our grade-schooler from a riptide. But we want to have big lives.
Accessibility is, simply, adjusting the environment to allow disabled people to participate. The belief that it's worse to be disabled – which dictates a great deal of public and private life – thrives in part because disability is a reminder that bodies and minds fail, always. We build entire structures and belief systems around avoiding the reality of our collective fragility. Our governing ethos is that of independence and strength, not of need. When we request an accommodation – a lighter car seat, a ramp, a Braille edition of a book – we are admitting that we are needy. And when we have needs, we confess to something we wish weren't true, that we are mortal.
What makes this manic rejection of our mortality even more fraught is that, once we become parents, we must also find a way to delude ourselves that our kids are indestructible. It is intolerable to think about the reality that our kids will be hurt, physically and emotionally. We buy into the myth of safety, as we attempt to create a force field of invincibility around our family so that we can stay safe and happy forever.
Instead of worrying about safety when we see a baby riding on their parent's wheelchair, we should consider how we can create more spaces where wheelchair users are welcome. The picture disabled parents paint while in public with our kids is beautiful and offers permission. We are showing that there are countless ways to have bodies and minds and that it's OK to cross the border of what's expected. We are not reminders of death – we are reminders of how full life can be.
Extracted from Unfit Parent: A Disabled Mother Challenges an Inaccessible World by Jessica Slice, published by Beacon Press on 15 April.
Unfit Parent by Jessica Slice (Beacon Press, £27). To support the Guardian and Observer, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
5 days ago
- Daily Record
Generous Perthshire lottery winner helps family, friends and county golf club
Sixty-three-year-old People's Postcode Lottery winner David shares how his life has changed - and how he even helped Dunkeld Golf Club buy a new tractor. Kindhearted Postcode Lottery millionaire Davie Crowder has told of his incredible 12-month spending spree since winning £1.02m —including helping his beloved golf club buy a new tractor. Bridge of Earn Grandad Davie (63) has commissioned a luxury bungalow, bought a top-of-the-range Merc, new golf clubs and splashed out on family and friends ‚ as well as chipping in for his club's new wheels. He revealed details of his new lifestyle on a visit to one of his favourite charities — Scotland's Charity Air Ambulance — and which is also supported by players of People's Postcode Lottery. Davie said: 'It's been life changing. It's made my life so much easier. I've been able to help my family and friends, which I would do anyway, but not to that extent. 'We always say it never happens to guys like me, but it does. It's insane, it really is — but a nice insane. It's a mad, mad thing — but it's great. 'The big thing is the security, not just for me but for the family as well. Their futures are pretty much secured now, too.' Retired Davie, who was a sergeant in the Black Watch and a Detective Constable with the former Grampian Police, landed his windfall with 10 neighbours in their close-knit village estate after PH2 9FG won Postcode Lottery's Millions prize on Saturday, April 27, last year. The £10.2million pot was Postcode Lottery's biggest ever in Scotland to date. The big winners were joined at a special event in Perth's South Inch Park by 522 other players living in six villages - Aberargie, Abernethy, Bridge of Earn, Forgandenny, Forteviot and Glenfarg — across the wider PH2 9 postcode area. They won cheques ranging from £8,629 to £43,145, depending on the number of tickets they played with. In the year since, the dad-of-two has ensured that he, his family and friends have all benefitted from his good fortune. Davie's also shelled out to help his golf club in Dunkeld purchase a new tractor to use on the course. He added: 'I made a good donation to the Dunkeld Golf Club. They were after a new tractor and were struggling a bit for money, so I helped them out.' Davie admitted he found it hard to accept he's pocketed more than £1m — until the whopping amount landed in his bank account. Davie pointed to SCAA's life-saving helicopter stationed at their base at Perth Airport and said that's why he plays Postcode Lottery — and SCAA's own lottery. He said: 'I never join these lotteries to win; I like contributing to them. You just have to look at the helicopter out there, to see what the benefit is. 'It's a great feeling when you can help charities like Scotland's Charity Air Ambulance. I've been in helicopters since I was 19 in the Army and my son's obviously in and out them every other day while working on the rigs. When I was in the police there were quite a few serious incidents where the air ambulance came along to help out. There's a connection there all the way through. 'And I have a few ex-colleagues from the police now working for the air ambulance up in Aberdeen. It takes a lot of money to run these things. If you're not in it, join it. I might change my postcode when I move, actually.' He added: 'I still contribute to the air ambulance charity and Postcode Lottery.' And he laughed: 'I've never won the air ambulance lottery though!' SCAA was also celebrating on the same day that Davie bagged his million after it was announced the charity would receive £300,000 of Postcode Lottery funding every year in addition to the £1,150,000, players have already raised. Criona Knight, director of development and engagement, said: 'As a charity we are really conscious that without the players there wouldn't be this pot of funding each year. 'It's wonderful to have the opportunity to sit face to face in front of someone to say thank you for supporting the charity for so long and for playing People's Postcode Lottery.' In the year to March, SCAA had nearly 1,000 callouts for their Perth and Aberdeen based helicopters, as well as their rapid response vehicles. They airlifted 326 patients to hospital and dealt with 347 trauma cases. More than 130 of the flights involved taking a specialist doctor-led team — basically taking an A&E department to the incident scene to treat injury or illness. The crews also covered almost 83,000 nautical miles — almost four times the distance round the world.


Scotsman
6 days ago
- Scotsman
The Scottish lighthouse built by Robert Louis Stevenson's family on sale for £350,000
A historic lighthouse in Shetland built by the father and brother of Scottish writer Robert Louis Stevenson is up for sale, with an asking price of over £350,000. The iconic lighthouse, on the island of Bressay on the east side of Shetland, has stood for over 160 years. Now, the Shetland Amenity Trust, the local heritage charity which has owned the complex since 1995, is looking for a new custodian for the B-listed landmark. It said was no longer able to look after the building due to rising costs, and made the decision to part with the lighthouse following a 'careful and lengthy' period of consultation with the local community. The lighthouse was built in 1858 by engineers David and Thomas Stevenson, who were the father and brother of writer Robert Louis Stevenson, best known for his classic novel Treasure Island. It served to guide vessels safely through Bressay Sound, the sheltered channel separating Bressay from Lerwick. Although the light was automated in 1987 and is no longer essential to modern navigation, the site remains an important symbol of Shetland's maritime history. In April 2022, the Shetland Amenity Trust invited expressions of interest from community groups and private individuals, exploring a range of potential uses for the lighthouse complex. However, no final agreement was made. The trust said its priority throughout has been to secure a sustainable future for the site - whether through community-led initiatives or private ownership. Shetland Amenity Trust chair Alison Moncrieff said the lighthouse holds a 'special place in Shetland's story'. 'While it's been a difficult decision to part with the building, we believe this is the right moment to invite new energy and investment to help it thrive again,' she said. 'Rising costs and financial pressures mean the Trust is no longer able to care for the lighthouse in the way it deserves, but we are excited by the possibilities that lie ahead. 'We're hopeful that a new owner will bring fresh vision and commitment to restore and reimagine the site, ensuring it can be enjoyed for years to come. 'We are grateful to the Directors of Bressay Development Ltd for their thoughtful work exploring a community-led solution. Although this was not feasible in the end, their dedication shows the deep value placed on the site.' Any restoration or development will require permission from Historic Environment Scotland, and works must use traditional materials and techniques appropriate to the lighthouse's listed status. The property listing on Savills says the lighthouse complex comprises several buildings, including the original lighthouse tower, two former keepers' cottages, a former engine room, and an artist's residence and studio. It said the former keepers' cottages and outbuildings have been adapted to support the Bressay Lighthouse artists' residency, offering accommodation and studio space to visiting artists. It said the east and west cottages were previously in use as holiday lets. Bressay is an island located to the east of Shetland capital town Lerwick, with the ferry crossing taking less than ten minutes. The lighthouse is located at Kirkabister Ness, on the southwestern tip of the island. 1 . View of the lighthouse The lighthouse is located at Kirkabister Ness, on the southwestern tip of the island of Bressay, in Shetland | Savills Photo Sales 2 . Bird's Eye View The complex comprises the original lighthouse tower, two former keepers' cottages, a former engine room, and an artist's residence and studio | Savills Photo Sales 3 . View from the lighthouse The lighthouse looks out across the water to mainland Shetland, which is only a ten minute ferry ride away | Savills Photo Sales 4 . Inside the lighthouse A spiral staircase leads up to the top of the lighthouse | Savills Photo Sales


Daily Record
6 days ago
- Daily Record
Japan Airlines plane crash pilot's 'harrowing' last words before 520 people died
"The pilots were talking to each other in a state of deep distress because they didn't know what was going on and what they could do." The single deadliest air crash happened 40 years ago in Japan. The most shocking of recent times is the London bound Air India plane crash shortly after take-off in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad on June 12 of this year, killing 241 of the 242 people on board and 19 others on the ground. The largest number of deaths in an aviation incident was on March 27, 1977, when two 747s collided on a foggy runway on Tenerife North, formerly Los Rodeos Airport. 583 people were killed. In Scotland, Pan Am Flight 103 exploded over Lockerbie, killing all 259 people on board on December 21, 1988. However, the crash in mountainous terrain north west of Tokyo - in Ueno, Gunma, Japan, exactly 40 years ago today remains the deadliest involving a single aircraft, reports the Mirror. Amid the remains of the Japan Airlines plane and the souls that perished on board, investigators recovered the black box containing the cockpit voice recording which captured the terror of the pilots. Aviation journalist David Learmount, who has investigated and reported on air incidents for almost five decades, recalls how reading the CVR transcript was so harrowing that he was reduced to tears. Speaking on the 40th anniversary of the crash, David, a consulting editor on Flightglobal magazine said: "I've lost count of the number of CVRS I've listened to and transcripts I've read from accidents - and the Japan Airlines 123 remains the only one that ever made me cry. "The transcript was so harrowing I could not listen to the CVR. "The pilots were talking to each other in a state of deep distress because they didn't know what was going on and what they could do. "It wasn't just fear. They wanted to save their airplane, to save their own lives and the lives of everybody on board, and they didn't know what to do. You've never heard that kind of distress." On the anniversary, we remember the lives lost on the doomed flight. What happened? On Monday August 12 1985 Tokyo's Haneda Airport was crowded with thousands of people trying to get home. It was the eve of Obon - a Japanese Buddhist custom when most of the country traditionally honour their ancestors, often returning to their place of birth for family reunions. At 6.12pm, Japan Airlines 123 took off heading to Osaka, 400 kilometres to the west. The flight was filled almost to capacity. 509 passengers and a crew of 15. The flight time was 52 minutes. The most senior pilot on board was Captain Masami Takahama, 49. Takahama was was one of the airlines' senior training captains, and was supporting the First Officer Yutaka Saski, 39, who was captaining the flight. Also on board was Hiroshi Fukuda, a veteran flight engineer. For the first few minutes after take off, all seemed to be fine. As the plane climbed, the air pressure difference between the air inside the cabin and the air outside the cabin grew greater and greater. Approximately 12 minutes after takeoff, the aircraft experienced a loud explosion. Oxygen masks dropped down in front of hysterical passengers. The cabin altitude alarm was blaring, alerting the pilots that the air inside the plane was now too thin to breathe. The piloting crew radioed an emergency to air traffic control. Captain Masami Takahama requested a turn back to Haneda- now 70 miles behind them. He was unaware that the bang that was heard in the cockpit was due to a hole at the rear of the plane and this wave of pressure had blasted off a huge section of the aircraft's tail, including the rudder, the auxiliary power unit, and several other critical control systems. The captain instructed his first officer to turn to the right to head back to Haneda but he started banking too steeply. But no matter what the first officer did, he couldn't turn the plane back to wings level. Horrified Hiroshi Fukuda, the flight engineer could now see that hydraulic pressure has dropped. The plane had a complete hydraulics failure and there was no checklist to deal with this nightmare scenario. Flight 123 began to swing from side to side like a falling leaf - a nauseating movement for passengers. Without hydraulic power, the pilots could no longer control the pitch of the aircraft. It began plunging up and down hundreds of metres at a time in a terrifying rollercoaster cycle. Passengers began scribbling farewell notes to loved ones, which were later found in the wreckage. Using the engine power, they were able to slow down the erratic moments and even turn the plane momentarily. "By increasing engine power on the left side, the plane would turn to the right. Increasing power on the right side, the airplane would turn to the left. So that helped. However, they still thought they could attempt to control the plane manually, which they couldn't,' said David. And their altitude pilots were now dulled by hypoxia - having been too distracted to put on their oxygen mask. In the cabin, passengers were running out of oxygen. Their best hope was a controlled crash landing at Haneda, but the plane needed to lose altitude. The flight engineer suggested they could lower the landing gear without hydraulic power. For the first time since leaving Tokyo, the plane had now dipped below 20,000 feet. A lower altitude now brought a new danger. Straight ahead of the plane loomed a towering mountain range. The aircraft began diving at more than 18,000 feet per minute, 10 times the normal rate of descent. "Raise nose, raise nose.... power' were the captain's last words as the ground proximity alarm buzzed around him before the CVR cut out on impact. The pilots fought a losing battle for almost 30 minutes before the plane hit the Mount Takamagahara area, close to Mount Fuji. The right wing tip and its outermost engine hit the mountain ridge and was ripped off. The plane spun onto its back and careened into the mountainside at hundreds of kilometres per hour, igniting into an enormous fireball. Four miracle survivors - including a 12-year-old girl whose parents and sister were killed in the crash - were all seated at the back of the plane, where impact forces were not as great as at the front, and sheer luck protected them from flying debris. The investigation into the crash concluded that a faulty repair on the aircraft seven years earlier had ultimately caused the fatal malfunction. During a landing in Osaka in 1978, the pilot had pitched the plane's nose too high and slammed the tail into the runway. The rear pressure bulkhead, a critical structural component in aircraft, specifically designed to maintain cabin pressure, was severely damaged. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Boeing engineers performed the botched repair - which led to a ever weakening structure. It wasn't a question of if it would fail, it was when. David said: "It was a patch-up job, not a repair. They took a shortcut trying to fix it and put the plane back in action.' Over time, repeated pressurisation while in the air put stress on the incorrectly repaired section. The cracks led to metal fatigue and ultimately, the separation of the aircraft's tail. By August 12, 1985, the plane had flown more than 12,000 times since the shoddy repair. But on that final fateful flight, the damaged bulkhead reached breaking point. The rapid decompression also ruptured hydraulic systems, rendering the aircraft uncontrollable, although the pilots tried desperately to prevent the inevitable. Boeing redesigned the tail of the 747, so that rapid pressure spikes in the tail plane would no longer cause the kind of structural failure which occurred on flight 123, and also redesigned the plane's hydraulic systems, so that the loss of the aircraft's tail would not result in the total depletion of all hydraulic systems. Japan Airlines also modified its maintenance procedures, putting in place stricter supervision of important repair work and making regular inspections more thorough. Although the crash was Boeing's fault, the airline bore the brunt of national fury. After the crash, Japan Airlines paid 780million yen ($7.6million) to the victims' families - not as compensation, but as 'condolence money'. The company decided against taking criminal action against Boeing. Japan Airlines president Yasumoto Takagi resigned from his post. The company's maintenance manager, Hiroo Tominaga, died by suicide. Susuma Tajima, the engineer who checked and cleared the 747SR for takeoff before its final flight, also took his own life after the crash. "Careless Boeing engineers were to blame, ' said David. 'But this was the company culture. The culture is set by the people at the top. It always does. It happens in every organisation. And they made such shortcuts and shoddiness permissible." In recent years, Boeing has been at the centre of several controversies regarding the safety of of its planes after two fatal crashes. And history appeared to eerily repeat itself after had a mid-flight blowout of a door plug, due to poor safety checks. It was a miracle no one was killed. The incident, which occurred shortly after takeoff from Portland, Oregon, resulted in a gaping hole in the fuselage. The NTSB, investigating the incident and has pointed to systemic failures within Boeing. The company said they are working on strengthening safety and quality across their operations.