logo
LGBT MP fears being ‘challenged' in toilets after Supreme Court ruling on gender

LGBT MP fears being ‘challenged' in toilets after Supreme Court ruling on gender

Yahoo24-04-2025
An LGBT MP has said she fears being confronted more often in women's spaces after the Supreme Court ruling on gender.
During a Lesbian Visibility Week debate in Westminster Hall, Kate Osborne told MPs that she is 'misgendered frequently', including in the House of Commons and when she was buying jeans last week.
'I suspect I will get challenged even more now when accessing facilities,' she warned on Thursday, after the justices' ruling on April 16 that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 'refer to a biological woman and biological sex'.
Baroness Falkner of Margravine, the Equality and Human Rights Commission's chairwoman, said following the ruling that 'single-sex services like changing rooms must be based on biological sex'.
Ms Osborne, the Labour MP for Jarrow and Gateshead East, said: 'Just last month as I got off the train at King's Cross, I was verbally abused by a man shouting at me that I'm obviously a lesbian, a sexual deviant, and I'm going to hell.
'I'm frequently misgendered and I do not mean occasionally – it's a weekly occurrence.
'In January, I was misgendered three times in one two-hour train journey. I've been misgendered by staff of this House, misgendered whilst buying some jeans last week.
'It's genuinely a frequent issue for me and a number of my lesbian friends.'
Turning to plans for 'guidance regarding the Supreme Court verdict', Ms Osborne continued: 'Actually, that decision will have a huge impact on my life and many other cis lesbians and indeed heterosexual women.
'I suspect I will get challenged even more now when accessing facilities, and whilst the impact on my life will be problematic, the impact on my trans siblings' lives is going to be significantly worse.'
Rachel Taylor, the Labour MP for North Warwickshire and Bedworth, had earlier intervened and said her 'first political activism' was campaigning against section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988, which banned town halls from 'promoting homosexuality' or teaching 'the acceptability of homosexuality' in schools.
She asked: 'It was that rhetoric and those comments that our relationships and our families were somehow pretend family relationships that were so hurtful, and does she agree with me that we need to safeguard now against the risks of the rhetoric about trans people, making the same sort of harm to them as it did to us in the 1980s?'
Ms Osborne said in response: 'We will always have 'T' as part of the LGBT community.'
On wider policies, Ms Osborne said she started the IVF process around 16 years ago but since then, the 'hurdles LGBT+ couples have to jump through have increased, with a fragmented NHS, meaning a postcode lottery in provision and the financial cost is significantly higher'.
She also warned that crimes against victims based on their sexual orientation or gender identity cannot be considered 'aggravated offences', in the same way as discrimination based on race or religion.
Labour MP Nadia Whittome described the Supreme Court's ruling as 'discriminatory' and said trans women face being 'at greater risk of violence' if they use facilities reserved for men.
The MP for Nottingham East continued: 'The last Labour government is often remembered as as time for progress for LGBTQ+ people, rightly, but just as rights can be won, they can also be lost.
'And this Labour Government risks being remembered as a period when things went backwards for our community.
'We've only been in Government for less than a year. It's possible to turn this ship around, but we must recognise that actions like the blanket ban on puberty blockers and barring trans women from women's spaces are dangerous steps in the wrong direction and take action to remedy them.'
Conservative shadow equalities minister Mims Davies said: 'For many women, a lesbian – of course, a same-sex attracted biological woman – should not feel the need for that identity to be subsumed amongst other identities.
'And I think all of us in this chamber today can be very clear that we support others and how they identify, and that is perfectly valid and it's important to not allow this to continue to be toxic or hateful, and for any lesbian to feel that they need to identify in any other way.'
Ms Davies said that 'women's rights and freedoms cannot and must not be eroded, but celebrated and protected, particularly as we approach the 100th anniversary of universal suffrage' in 2028.
Equalities minister Dame Nia Griffith said: 'To be seen, known and accepted for who we are truly is not just a privilege, it's a fundamental human need.'
She described prejudice against trans women as 'absolutely horrific, uncalled for, unjustified' and added: 'This Government is clear – trans people deserve safety, they deserve opportunity, they deserve respect.
'There remain protections in place for trans people to live free from discrimination and harassment, and have their acquired gender recognised. Trans people will still be protected on the basis of gender reassignment, a protected characteristic.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan
California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

San Francisco Chronicle​

time5 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

California Supreme Court clears way for Newsom's redistricting plan

The state Supreme Court opened the door Wednesday to plans by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other Democrats to redraw California's congressional districts in a gerrymander designed to pick up five seats, rejecting a Republican legal challenge. A lawsuit Monday by legislative Republicans contended the hastily drafted ballot measure, scheduled for votes in both houses on Thursday, has not been published long enough to meet the public-notice requirements in the state Constitution. But the court dismissed the suit Wednesday in a brief order with little explanation. The Republican lawmakers 'have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief at this time under (the) California Constitution,' the court said. Six justices, all appointed by Democratic governors, endorsed the order, while Justice Carol Corrigan, the only Republican appointee, was absent and did not participate, the court said. Newsom proposed the ballot measure, titled the Election Rigging Response Act, after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott introduced legislation to redraw the state's House districts and enable Republicans to pick up five seats in next year's elections. Democrats currently hold 43 of California's 52 House seats. The governor's measure, if approved by two-thirds majorities in both the Assembly and state Senate — where Democrats hold more than two-thirds of the seats — would redesign California's House seats for the rest of this decade in response to changes in Texas or any other state. Ballot measures approved by the voters in 2008 and 2010 established a bipartisan, independent commission to draft congressional and legislative districts in California, a task previously left up to state legislators, who design districts in most states. Newsom's proposed state constitutional amendment, ACA8, would temporarily suspend that commission if approved by a majority of the voters in November. While California law does not allow legislative action on a proposed measure until 30 days after it has been introduced, Democrats apparently sidestepped that deadline with a longstanding practice known as 'gut and amend' — using other legislation that had been pending for more than 30 days, erasing the contents and replacing them with the redistricting language. That was apparently enough to defeat the Republicans' lawsuit. Other Republican lawmakers, and the National Republican Congressional Committee, have promised additional challenges under the California Constitution and federal election laws.

Brazilian police say ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum
Brazilian police say ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum

NBC News

time6 hours ago

  • NBC News

Brazilian police say ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum

BRASILIA, Brazil — Brazil's federal police said that messages found on the telephone of embattled former president Jair Bolsonaro showed that at one point he wanted to flee to Argentina and request political asylum, according to documents seen Wednesday by the Associated Press. Bolsonaro is currently awaiting a Supreme Court ruling about an alleged coup attempt and on Wednesday found out he might face another case as police formally accused him and one of his sons, Eduardo Bolsonaro, of obstruction of justice in connection with his pending trial. The AP had access to the police investigation, messaging app exchanges, voice messages and reviewed the documents, which were sent to Brazil's Supreme Court. The 170-page police report said that Bolsonaro had drafted a request for political asylum from Argentine President Javier Milei's government dated Feb. 10, 2024. Bolsonaro saved the document two days after authorities searched his home and office as part of an investigation into an alleged coup plot. In a 33-page letter addressed to Milei, Bolsonaro claimed he was being politically persecuted in Brazil. 'I, Jair Messias Bolsonaro, request political asylum from Your Excellency in the Republic of Argentina, under an urgent regime, as I find myself in a situation of political persecution in Brazil and fear for my life,' the former Brazilian leader wrote. Argentina's presidential spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Bolsonaro did not make comments about the investigation either. On Feb. 12, Bolsonaro reportedly spent two nights at the Hungarian Embassy in Brasília, fueling speculation among critics that he may have been attempting to avoid arrest. Brazilian federal police investigators also said in their report that Bolsonaro's decision to ignore precautionary measures established for his house arrest and spread content to his allies 'sought to directly hit Brazilian democratic institutions, notably the Supreme Court and even Brazil's Congress.' With regards to Wednesday's obstruction of justice accusations, Eduardo Bolsonaro, a lawmaker who has lived in the United States, said in a statement that he 'never aimed at interfering in any ongoing proceedings in Brazil.' He added the conversations with his father that are part of the investigation are 'absolutely normal' and its publication has a political bias. Silas Malafaia, an evangelical pastor who is a staunch ally of Bolsonaro's, was also targeted by police. He had his passport seized by investigators but was not formally accused of obstruction of justice. Several messages exchanged between Bolsonaro and his son show their interest in praising U.S. President Donald Trump to affect legal proceedings in Brazil. Last month, Trump imposed 50% tariffs on some Brazilian exports and claimed the trial of the former president was the main reason for his sanctions. 'You won't have time to reverse the situation if the guy here turns his back on you. Everything here is very touchy, every little thing affects you,' Eduardo Bolsonaro told his father in one of the exchanges. 'In today's situation, you don't even need to worry about jail; you won't be arrested. But I'm afraid things will change here (in the United States). Even inside the White House, there are people telling (Trump): 'OK, Brazil is gone. Let's move on',' Eduardo Bolsonaro said. Some exchanges also show frictions sauced with expletives between father and son. Eduardo, who moved to the U.S. earlier this year despite holding a seat in Brazil's congress, calls Bolsonaro 'ungrateful' for his efforts to influence the Trump administration in their favor.

Brazilian police day ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum
Brazilian police day ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum

San Francisco Chronicle​

time7 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Brazilian police day ex-President Bolsonaro had planned to flee to Argentina seeking asylum

BRASILIA, Brazil (AP) — Brazil's federal police said that messages found on the telephone of embattled former President Jair Bolsonaro show that at one point he wanted to flee to Argentina and request political asylum, according to documents seen Wednesday by the Associated Press. Bolsonaro is standing trial for an alleged coup attempt and on Wednesday police formally accused the former president and one of his sons of obstruction of justice in connection with his pending trial. The AP had access to the police investigation, which was sent to Brazil's Supreme Court. The Argentine government did not respond a request for comment from the AP. Silas Malafaia, an evangelical pastor who is a staunch ally of Bolsonaro's, was also targeted by police. He had his passport seized by investigators but was not formally accused of obstruction of justice. Brazilian federal police investigators said in a 170-page report that Bolsonaro had a draft of a request for political asylum from Argentine President Javier Milei's government dated Feb. 10, 2024. The former president saved the document two days after authorities searched his home and office as part of an investigation into an alleged coup plot. In a 33-page letter addressed to Milei, Bolsonaro claimed he was being politically persecuted in Brazil. 'I, Jair Messias Bolsonaro, request political asylum from Your Excellency in the Republic of Argentina, under an urgent regime, as I find myself in a situation of political persecution in Brazil and fear for my life,' the Brazilian leader wrote. On Feb. 12, Bolsonaro reportedly spent two nights at the Hungarian Embassy in Brasília, fueling speculation among critics that he may have been attempting to avoid arrest. Brazilian federal police investigators also said in their report that Bolsonaro's decision to ignore precautionary measures established for his house arrest and spread content to his allies 'sought to directly hit Brazilian democratic institutions, notably the Supreme Court and even Brazil's Congress.' ____ Sá Pessoa reported from Sao Paulo.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store