‘We still want to be friends': Hundreds unite in cross-border handshake
Hundreds of people — some clutching umbrellas, others simply braving the drizzle — stood face-to-face across the invisible border between Canada and the United States. At a signal, they reached forward, clasping hands in a symbolic act that has meant peace and co-operation for generations: the Handshake Across the Border.
It was the first time in decades the International Peace Garden had hosted the event, and for many participants, it felt deeply personal.
Between 300 to 400 people participated in the Handshake Across the Border event on Saturday at the International Peace Garden along Manitoba's border with North Dakota. (Tim Smith/The Brandon Sun)
'We're thankful for the Peace Garden,' said Danny Luecke of North Dakota, attending for the first time with his wife and children. 'Even though maybe on a national level there are frustrations, we still want to be friends. That handshake is about showing that friendship.'
Luecke and his family moved to the Turtle Mountains three years ago and have visited the Peace Garden frequently. 'We go to Boissevain all the time — best bakery ever,' he said with a laugh. But Saturday's event was different.
'We heard about it last year but missed it, so we made sure to be here this year.'
As for Donald Trump's suggestion Canada should become the United States' 51st state, Luecke was blunt: 'No, I think that's stupid. We're just grateful for what the Peace Garden does to foster peace.'
The event drew people from near and far.
Kevin Friedt, also from North Dakota, drove about two hours for his first international handshake.
'It's just cool to see the peace between the two different nations and everyone being friendly,' he said. Though unsure about Trump's proposal — 'I don't know how that would work' — he was sure of one thing: 'It'll be fun to see everyone come together.'
It was the first time in decades the International Peace Garden hosted the event. (Tim Smith/The Brandon Sun)
Some came for more than the ceremony.
Kathy Chatz, who moved to North Dakota about a year and a half ago, used the event as an opportunity to meet a Canadian friend from Saskatchewan.
'If it exists here, it can exist anywhere,' she said. 'We can reach across borders to build relationships, share stories, find our common ground, and create the world we wish to see — one handshake at a time.'
For Camille Armstrong, a visitor from California, the handshake was about setting an example. She and her travel companions had been exploring Canada for weeks, visiting family in Winnipeg, when they decided to make the trip south to the Peace Garden.
'We as people are connected, and we need to be leaders for our leadership in the U.S.,' she said. 'They need to see that the people can lead in working together to solve problems and be peacemakers.'
As for the idea of Canada joining the U.S., Armstrong didn't mince words: 'Absolutely not. That's ridiculous. No way.'
Daniel Richter, another North Dakota resident, appreciated the event's deeper meaning.
Canadians and Americans greet each other at the Manitoba / North Dakota border as a symbol of peace and friendship Saturday. (Tim Smith/The Brandon Sun)
'I don't get too political, but in the U.S. right now, so much politics is focused on isolation,' he said. 'This is about inclusion, about culture, about appreciating other people.'
Laughing, he added, 'We were joking we might be lucky if the Canadian we shake hands with pulls us across into Canada and doesn't let us come back.'
Not everyone was there for political statements. Hugo Cota-Sanchez, a University of Saskatchewan professor originally from Mexico, used the handshake to mark a reunion with an American friend he hadn't seen in nearly a decade.
'I think it's a fantastic opportunity to show the friendship between our countries and to make sure it continues,' he said, adding that he hoped to return and possibly volunteer at the Peace Garden in the future.
For Maiia Laloma of Winnipeg, the handshake was a celebration of new beginnings.
'We just became Canadian citizens this March,' she said. 'We want to feel, as Canadians, being friends with Americans, too — this is our first time experiencing that.'
The turnout was a success despite the weather, with about 300 to 400 people participating in the handshake and many more visiting throughout the day, International Peace Garden chief executive officer Tim Chapman said.
This year's cross-border handshake comes in the wake of U.S. President Donald Trump announcing 35-per cent tariffs on Canadian exports. (Tim Smith/The Brandon Sun)
'It's a good example of us fulfilling our mission to celebrate longstanding co-operation and friendship between our two countries. Despite politics or trade differences, most Canadians and Americans truly value that connection.'
Although no government officials from the United States were present at the event, two of their Canadian counterparts, Brandon Mayor Jeff Fawcett and Manitoba Municipal and Northern Relations Minister Glen Simard, were in attendance.
The Peace Garden has always been symbolic of our relationship, Fawcett said.
'The reality is, we're all just people with lots of similarities. It's good to get down here and say hello to our friends and neighbours.'
Brandon East MLA Glen Simard stressed the handshake is a lasting symbol.
'Canada will never become the 51st state — we're a sovereign country with our unique history,' he said. 'But we're the best of allies, and the Peace Garden reminds us that it's peace first.'
Wednesdays
A weekly dispatch from the head of the Free Press newsroom.
By the time the last hands were shaken, the drizzle had lightened and the sun peeked through the clouds. Conversations lingered, photos were taken, and promises were made to meet again next year.
Americans and Canadians line up along the border of Manitoba and North Dakota at the Peace Garden in a display of neighbourly co-operation. (Tim Smith/The Brandon Sun)
For some, such as Luecke, it was about showing up for the first time. For others, like Cota-Sanchez, it was about reconnecting after years apart. For all, it was a reminder that peace between nations is built not just by treaties, but by the everyday gestures of ordinary people.
As Armstrong put it while leaving, 'It's just one handshake, but maybe it's the kind of thing the world needs more of.'
aodutola@brandonsun.com
X: @AbiolaOdutola
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
38 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Partisan podcasts are failing at comedy
Opinion Comedy has long been one of our most effective tools for speaking truth to power. The weapon of satire is capable of humbling even the revered and the royal, when wielded effectively. Wit and insight combined have the unique capacity for cutting through dogma, laying bare the truth that humans are preening primates who take the social mores we have contrived for ourselves far too seriously. So it has been a grating experience to witness the rise of the podcast bro edgelord as a strain of popular comedy — exemplified by the extended Joe Rogan cinematic universe, including figures like Andrew Schulz, Tim Dillon and the rest of their clones. Not only have they lost the plot when it comes to comedy, there is also much to be said about their shortcomings as interviewers when they stray into the territory of journalists. The way they are always 'just asking questions' while conveniently evading information which might lead them to real answers. Perhaps the most egregious example of this was when the Canadian podcasters known as the Nelk Boys recently interviewed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The hosts of this supposed comedy podcast acknowledged that they had little understanding of the conflict in the Middle East and were ill-equipped to conduct such an interview. Yet they proceeded on the weak premise that somehow speaking with Netanyahu personally would provide some sort of clarity, as if conversing directly with a propagandist is an avenue to truth. Unsurprisingly, the result was an unchallenged Netanyahu selling his war in Gaza to an audience of millions. The only pushback he received from his interviewers was when he contended that Burger King is better than McDonald's. This, the Nelk Boys contended, was Netanyahu's 'worst take' of the interview. Never mind being effective journalists, I'm not sure the Nelk Boys can be trusted near stairs unless there's a baby gate in place. But what all these podcasters will tell you is that they aren't trying to be journalists or pundits. They are, first and foremost, comedians. It's an excuse that was weak when Jon Stewart first contended it decades ago, but has grown fully laughable when these podcast bros push it. Because while Stewart undeniably strays into the territory of punditry, he remembers a rule of comedy that these podcasters have seemingly never learned. George Carlin was master of this lesson. Carlin understood that comedy suffers when you allow yourself to become a partisan. During this past American election cycle, many of these podcasters conducted interviewers with members of Donald Trump's political team, including Trump himself. These were uncritical interviews, entirely credulous of everything the Trump team said, and in many cases ended with outright endorsements from the podcasters for Trump's presidency. Carlin was the greatest satirist of his age because he understood all the things wrong with this. Firstly, he understood that as soon as you throw your lot in with a politician or a political party, you can never be taken seriously again as a pure comedian. Many of these podcasters are understanding this now, far too late, and speaking out against Trump's brutal policies. Somehow they had failed to foresee what a Trump term would bring, astute social analysts that they are. But even if Trump had been having an unlikely milquetoast term, think of the corner these comedians had painted themselves into through their sycophancy. For years they had established themselves as edgy truth-sayers as they mocked the Democrats in power, cultivating an audience of aggrieved Republicans. But now their guy is in power. What were they going to do on their edgy truth-saying podcast, talk about what a good job the president is doing for an hour? But even beyond the simple tenuous nature of their partisan branding, Carlin understood that most of the problems our society faces are systemic. His greatest bits were all about breaking down institutional power and traditional hierarchies. Subverting cultural norms and poking fun at our sacred cows. Did he have jokes about specific politicians and culture figures? Sure, tons of them. But he never fell into the trap of letting the news cycle du jour run his entire analysis. He satirized everyone who held power in a fashion that always let you know that the power itself was the target, leaving himself credible to go on the attack again when a new hand took the reins. And he would certainly never let himself become what these podcasters have become: at best duped mouthpieces for partisan propaganda, and at worst propagandists themselves. Distinctly choosing a side and selling yourself out to become a champion for one brand of institutional power effectively reduces you to a proponent of the system that satire is meant to undermine. A disastrous position for a would-be comedian. I think we have come to an impasse though. In our current political climate, the lines of morality and power have grown stark enough that even the typically wilfully blind are being forced to see light. And so I have hope the blueprint for effective satire will become the norm again as well, and that we will remember there is more to good comedy than making a room full of fools fawn over how politically incorrect one can be. Maybe we can even turf all these partisan mouthpieces for the hacks that they are. Alex Passey is a Winnipeg writer.
Calgary Herald
7 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Canada could be trade winner as U.S. tariffs undershoot global competitors by wide margin, says report
The tariff rate imposed on Canadian exports by the United States is estimated to be the lowest amongst the world's trading countries, meaning that Canada could end up coming out ahead in Donald Trump 's trade war, a new report says. Article content Oxford Economics Group Ltd. estimates the U.S.'s current effective tariff rate on Canada is 2.5 per cent, placing it below Mexico at four per cent and well below other major U.S. trading partners. Article content Article content For example, the U.S. tariff rate is 35 per cent on China, 15 per cent on Japan, 13 per cent on South Korea and eight per cent on the United Kingdom and the European Union, based on data from calculated duties as a share of imports, Oxford said. Article content Article content 'If the relatively low tariffs apparently being paid on imports from Mexico and Canada persist, these two economies could pick up some benefits from shifts in supply chains, although uncertainties over the endgame for tariffs and the future of the (Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement) will be near-term drags,' Adam Slater, lead economist at Oxford Economics, said in the report. Article content CUSMA-compliant goods escape U.S. tariffs, though the trade agreement is scheduled to be reviewed in July 2026, but some people, including Ontario Premier Doug Ford, think that deadline could be accelerated. Article content Still, Slater described the current estimates for the tariff rates 'as something of a puzzle.' Article content Article content One set of trade data from the U.S. Census Bureau indicates that 56 per cent of goods entering the U.S. from Canada and 47 per cent from Mexico are compliant with CUSMA, while other Census Bureau data suggests the rates are 91 per cent and 84 per cent, respectively. Article content Article content 'It may be the case that tariff exemptions for these economies are broader than assumed,' Slater said. Article content Slater said Oxford based its overall 2.5 per cent tariff rate for Canada on a higher level of CUSMA compliance, 'while not directly' adhering to the 91 per cent level. Article content But trade between the U.S. and Canada hasn't escaped unscathed. Article content 'The biggest negative impacts have been in Canada, where imports are down 25 per cent from January levels, and in China, where imports are down 50 per cent from January,' Slater said, adding that 'Chinese data on exports to the U.S. shows a much less dramatic decline of around 25 per cent since January,' possibly due to rerouting of goods through other countries.
Vancouver Sun
7 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Canada's first-past-the-post voting system is constitutional, Ontario appeal court rules
OTTAWA — A panel of three Ontario Court of Appeal judges unanimously affirmed the constitutionality of Canada's first-past-the-post electoral system in a ruling released on Monday. The system, laid out in the Canada Elections Act, sees the candidate who receives the most votes in a given riding or electoral district become the member of Parliament. Fair Voting BC and the Springtide Collective for Democratic Society argued in court that the first-past-the-post system violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms' guarantee of effective representation. The groups also said the system leads to the under-representation of women and other groups in Parliament, breaching the Charter's equality rights provision. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. In a proportional representation system, the number of representatives a political party elects reflects the percentage of the total vote the party receives. In November 2023, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed the challenge from Fair Voting BC and Springtide. It said that while a proportional representation system would be a fair alternative to the current system, it's not required by the Constitution. In its decision, the province's Court of Appeal also rejected the groups' key arguments. 'The electoral system is not in conflict with either the right to vote or the right to equality. It does not violate the Charter,' Justice Grant Huscroft said in written reasons delivered on behalf of another judge on the panel. 'The appellants' arguments that the electoral system violates the Charter are, in essence, a repackaging of failed political arguments as constitutional rights violations.' The expert evidence 'put forward in support' of those arguments, Huscroft wrote, is 'replete with highly contestable policy arguments about which reasonable disagreement abounds, not only in the academic community but amongst the public at large.' 'This evidence demonstrates the shortcomings of constitutional litigation in addressing public policy disagreements,' he added. The short answer to the argument that the electoral system violates the Charter is that Canadian citizens are free to vote for anyone they choose, and for any reason they choose, Huscroft added. 'There is no constitutional requirement that their individual choices aggregate in a way that achieves some ideal of representational diversity,' he wrote. 'Neither the political party affiliation nor the personal characteristics of the candidates who win election are relevant to the constitutionality of the electoral system.' During the 2015 election campaign, then-Liberal leader Justin Trudeau promised it would be the last federal election held under the first-past-the-post system. Once in office, however, Trudeau's government abandoned his pledge to replace the system. Fair Voting BC and Springtide argued that under the current system, small political parties do not enjoy the success they deserve, creating a disadvantage for people who vote for them. 'I do not doubt that small political parties fare poorly in Canada,' Huscroft wrote. 'They receive relatively few votes and invariably win few or no seats.' The failure of a political party cannot open the door to a claim for constitutional redress, he said. 'In short, the right to vote is a right to vote pursuant to the electoral system in operation — whatever that system is, and regardless of the electoral outcomes that may obtain,' he wrote. The appellants also argued the first-past-the-post system contributes to the under-representation of women and minorities in Parliament. Huscroft said no matter what sort of electoral system is in place, over- or underrepresentation of particular demographic groups might occur to a greater or lesser extent from time to time. He added that arguments based on degree of representation lose sight of the fundamental fact of the matter: that people are entitled to vote the way they want. 'This is the very essence of the freedom that lies at the heart of the right to vote,' he wrote. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
