logo
Daughter of holocaust survivors may leave job at Columbia due to university's new antisemitism definition

Daughter of holocaust survivors may leave job at Columbia due to university's new antisemitism definition

New York Post25-07-2025
For years, Marianne Hirsch, a prominent genocide scholar at Columbia University, has used Hannah Arendt's book about the trial of a Nazi war criminal, 'Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil,' to spark discussion among her students about the Holocaust and its lingering traumas.
But after Columbia's recent adoption of a new definition of antisemitism, which casts certain criticism of Israel as hate speech, Hirsch fears she may face official sanction for even mentioning the landmark text by Arendt, a philosopher who criticized Israel's founding.
8 Marianne Hirsch is a prominent genocide scholar at Columbia University.
AP
For the first time since she started teaching five decades ago, Hirsch, the daughter of two Holocaust survivors, is now thinking of leaving the classroom altogether.
'A university that treats criticism of Israel as antisemitic and threatens sanctions for those who disobey is no longer a place of open inquiry,' she told The Associated Press. 'I just don't see how I can teach about genocide in that environment.'
Hirsch is not alone. At universities across the country, academics have raised alarm about growing efforts to define antisemitism on terms pushed by the Trump administration, often under the threat of federal funding cuts.
8 After Columbia's recent adoption of a new definition of antisemitism, Hirsch is thinking of leaving the classroom.
AFP via Getty Images
Promoted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, the definition lists 11 examples of antisemitic conduct, such as applying 'double standards' to Israel, comparing the country's policies to Nazism or describing its existence as 'a racist endeavor.'
Ahead of a $220 million settlement with the Trump administration announced Wednesday, Columbia agreed to incorporate the IHRA definition and its examples into its disciplinary process. It has been endorsed in some form by Harvard, Yale and dozens of other universities.
While supporters say the semantic shift is necessary to combat evolving forms of Jewish hate, civil liberties groups warn it will further suppress pro-Palestinian speech already under attack by President Donald Trump.
8 'A university that treats criticism of Israel as antisemitic and threatens sanctions for those who disobey is no longer a place of open inquiry,' she said.
AP
For Hirsch, the restrictions on drawing comparisons to the Holocaust and questioning Israel's founding amount to 'clear censorship,' which she fears will chill discussions in the classroom and open her and other faculty up to spurious lawsuits.
'We learn by making analogies,' Hirsch said. 'Now the university is saying that's off-limits. How can you have a university course where ideas are not up for discussion or interpretation?'
A spokesperson for Columbia didn't respond to an emailed request for comment.
The 'weaponization' of an educational framework
8 In addition to Columbia, academics in other universities around the country have raised alarm about growing efforts to define antisemitism on terms pushed by the Trump administration, often under the threat of federal funding cuts.
AFP via Getty Images
When he first drafted the IHRA definition of antisemitism two decades ago, Kenneth Stern said he 'never imagined it would one day serve as a hate speech code.'
At the time, Stern was working as the lead antisemitism expert at the American Jewish Committee. The definition and its examples were meant to serve as a broad framework to help European countries track bias against Jews, he said.
In recent years, Stern has spoken forcefully against what he sees as its 'weaponization' against pro-Palestinian activists, including anti-Zionist Jews.
'People who believe they're combating hate are seduced by simple solutions to complicated issues,' he said. 'But when used in this context, it's really actually harming our ability to think about antisemitism.'
8 For Hirsch, the restrictions on drawing comparisons to the Holocaust and questioning Israel's founding amount to 'clear censorship.'
GHI/Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images
Stern said he delivered that warning to Columbia's leaders last fall after being invited to address them by Claire Shipman, then a co-chair of the board of trustees and the university's current interim president.
The conversation seemed productive, Stern said. But in March, shortly after the Trump administration said it would withhold $400 million in federal funding to Columbia over concerns about antisemitism, the university announced it would adopt the IHRA definition for 'training and educational' purposes.
Then last week, days before announcing a deal with the Trump administration to restore that funding, Shipman said the university would extend the IHRA definition for disciplinary purposes, deploying its examples when assessing 'discriminatory intent.'
'The formal incorporation of this definition will strengthen our response to and our community's understanding of modern antisemitism,' Shipman wrote.
8 Stern has spoken forcefully against what he sees as its 'weaponization' against pro-Palestinian activists.
AP
Stern, who now serves as director of the Bard Center for the Study of Hate, called the move 'appalling,' predicting it would spur a new wave of litigation against the university while further curtailing pro-Palestinian speech.
Already, the university's disciplinary body has faced backlash for investigating students who criticized Israel in op-eds and other venues, often at the behest of pro-Israel groups.
'With this new edict on IHRA, you're going to have more outside groups looking at what professors are teaching, what's in the syllabus, filing complaints and applying public pressure to get people fired,' he said. 'That will undoubtedly harm the university.'
Calls to 'self-terminate'
8 The university's disciplinary body has faced backlash for investigating students who criticized Israel in op-eds and other venues.
Derek French/SOPA Images/Shutterstock
Beyond adopting the IHRA definition, Columbia has also agreed to place its Middle East studies department under new supervision, overhaul its rules for protests and coordinate antisemitism trainings with groups like the Anti-Defamation League.
Earlier this week, the university suspended or expelled nearly 80 students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations.
Kenneth Marcus, chair of the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law, said Columbia's actions were an overdue step to protect Jewish students from harassment.
8 Earlier this week, the university suspended or expelled nearly 80 students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations.
AP
He dismissed faculty concerns about the IHRA definition, which he said would 'provide clarity, transparency and standardization' to the university's effort to root out antisemitism.
'There are undoubtedly some Columbia professors who will feel they cannot continue teaching under the new regime,' Marcus said. 'To the extent that they self-terminate, it may be sad for them personally, but it may not be so bad for the students at Columbia University.'
But Hirsch, the Columbia professor, said she was committed to continuing her long-standing study of genocides and their aftermath.
Part of that work, she said, will involve talking to students about Israel's 'ongoing ethnic cleansing and genocide' in Gaza, where more than 58,000 Palestinians have died, over half of them women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry.
'With this capitulation to Trump, it may now be impossible to do that inside Columbia,' Hirsch said. 'If that's the case, I'll continue my work outside the university's gates.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil argues Oct. 7 terror attack was ‘desperate attempt' by Palestinians to ‘break the cycle'
Anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil argues Oct. 7 terror attack was ‘desperate attempt' by Palestinians to ‘break the cycle'

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil argues Oct. 7 terror attack was ‘desperate attempt' by Palestinians to ‘break the cycle'

Anti-Israel activist Mahmoud Khalil argued Tuesday that the heinous Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas terror attack on Israel was a 'desperate' moment Palestinians 'had to reach' in order to be heard. The former Columbia University student, who was detained for over three months by the Trump administration for his prominent role in antisemitic campus protests, offered his thin rationale for the deadliest terror attack on the Jewish State in an interview with New York Times journalist Ezra Klein, who repeatedly asked Khalil to clarify his remarks. 3 Khalil blamed Israel for the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas terror attack, arguing the Israeli government was 'absolutely ignoring Palestinians' during Abraham Accord negotiations ahead of the massacre. Getty Images Advertisement 'To me, it felt frightening that we had to reach this moment in the Palestinian struggle,' Khalil said, when asked about what he was thinking on the day of the attack that killed more than 1,000 people in Israel, mostly civilians. 'I remember I didn't sleep for a number of days, and Noor [Khalil's wife] was very worried about my health. It was heavy. I still remember. I was like: 'This couldn't happen,'' he added. 'The Ezra Klein Show' host followed up by asking: 'What do you mean we had to reach this moment? What moment is this?' Advertisement 'You can see that the situation is not sustainable,' Khalil responded, referring to tensions between Israel and Gaza and the West Bank in the run-up to Oct. 7. 'You have an Israeli government that's absolutely ignoring Palestinians,' he argued. 'They are trying to make that deal with Saudi and just happy about their Abraham Accord without looking at Palestinians — as if Palestinians are not part of the equation. They circumvented the Palestinian question.' 'It was clear that it was becoming more and more violent. By Oct. 6, over 200 Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces and settlers. Over 40 of them were children. So that's what I mean by: Unfortunately, we couldn't avoid such a moment.' Klein later asked Khalil if he felt the attack was something 'Hamas must have wanted' to drag Israel into an all-out war or rather an event 'that needed to happen to break the equilibrium.' Advertisement 'It's more the latter — just to break the cycle, to break that Palestinians are not being heard,' Khalil argued. 'And to me, it's a desperate attempt to tell the world that Palestinians are here, that Palestinians are part of the equation.' 'That was my interpretation of why Hamas did the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel.' 3 The Trump administration claims Khalil was engaged in activities 'aligned with Hamas' at Columbia University. James Keivom 3 Khalil has previously refused to condemn Hamas. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement Khalil declined to characterize the attack as a 'mistake,' when asked by Klein, but acknowledged that 'targeting civilians is wrong.' 'Unfortunately, these horrible things happened, but we cannot ask Palestinians to be perfect victims,' the activist continued. Khalil was arrested by federal immigration authorities on March 8 and spent 104 days at a Louisiana detention center as the Trump administration fought to deport the Syrian-born permanent resident. The administration said Khalil, who is now suing the federal government for $20 million over his detainment, engaged in activities 'aligned to Hamas.' Last month, in a heated CNN interview, Khalil flatly refused to condemn Hamas over the Oct. 7 attack – calling the question from host Pamela Brown 'disingenuous.'

Ontario premier says he doesn't trust Trump and warns the US president could reopen trade pact
Ontario premier says he doesn't trust Trump and warns the US president could reopen trade pact

The Hill

time21 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Ontario premier says he doesn't trust Trump and warns the US president could reopen trade pact

TORONTO (AP) — The leader of Canada's most populous province said Wednesday he doesn't trust U.S. President Donald Trump and expects the president to soon reopen the free trade agreement he agreed to in his first term. Ontario Premier Doug Ford said the federal government needs to prepare for that to happen this fall. Ford made the comments after the country's provincial premiers and Prime Minister Mark Carney met in private for the first time since Trump escalated his trade war by hitting Canada with a baseline 35% tariff last week. The new tariff, which took effect on Friday after the two countries failed to hit an Aug. 1 deadline to secure a new trade agreement, applies only to goods not covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement that Trump negotiated during his first term. Trump previously hailed the agreement as 'the fairest, most balanced and beneficial trade agreement we have ever signed. ' Carney has said about 85% of trade with the U.S. remains tariff-free because of USMCA. Ford said Trump likely won't wait for the scheduled review of the agreement next year. 'He's not waiting until 2026. At any given time, President Trump — not that he even follows the rules — he can pull the carpet out from underneath us,' Ford told reporters in Toronto Wednesday. 'I'm going to ask the people, do you trust President Trump? I don't.' Carney told a press conference on Tuesday that he has not talked to Trump in recent days but would speak with him 'when it makes sense.' Sector-specific tariffs on Canada, like the 50% duty on steel, aluminum and copper, remain in place. Carney also suggested he may lift counter-tariffs if that helps Canada in the ongoing trade dispute.

Man accused of killing Israeli Embassy staffers indicted on federal hate crimes charges

timean hour ago

Man accused of killing Israeli Embassy staffers indicted on federal hate crimes charges

WASHINGTON -- The man accused of fatally shooting two staff members of the Israeli Embassy in Washington outside a Jewish museum has been indicted on federal hate crimes charges, according to court documents unsealed Wednesday. The indictment, filed in federal court in Washington, charges Elias Rodriguez with nine counts, including a hate crime resulting in death. The indictment also includes notice of special findings, which would allow the Justice Department to potentially pursue the death penalty. Elias Rodriguez is accused of gunning down Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim as they left an event at the museum in May. He was heard shouting 'Free Palestine' as he was led away after his arrest. He told police, 'I did it for Palestine, I did it for Gaza,' federal authorities have said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store