Missouri bill cracks down on 'organized retail theft'
A proposed Missouri law recently heard in the state senate suggests cracking down on organized retail theft from businesses, a growing concern in St. Joseph and nationwide.
HB 277, sponsored by Missouri House of Representatives Rep. Lane Roberts (R-Joplin) creates a new defense within state legislature to deter retail theft.
Language in the proposed legislation states if the amount stolen in 120 days is between $1,500 and $10,000, the crime becomes a class C felony and if the value is over $10,000, it becomes a class B felony.
"In this case, you have an agreement among several people to engage in this,' Roberts said. 'The head of a group will send four or five different people to various locations to commit a theft, but this bill will make everyone a part of the agreement and everyone responsible for the conduct to be charged with the aggregated amount.'
Roberts added that organized crime is a growing issue statewide which is landing business owners in a tough financial situation.
'They'll steal property then sell it online or will bring it back for an exchange for the money,' Roberts explained. 'That's the sort of conduct that ultimately costs the retailer, which drives and pushes the price up for the rest of us. This is an effort to try and better the livelihoods of everyone.'
The bill additionally applies to anyone who commits the offense of organized retail theft if they attempt to return the merchandise to the merchant for value or resells, trades, or if they barter the merchandise for value in any manner, including, but not limited to, through the use of an internet or network site.
For smaller law enforcement agencies such as the St. Joseph Police Department, prosecuting these cases can be complex and time-consuming. With a full plate of responsibilities, SJPD struggles to keep up with the increasing number of retail thefts.
'We do as much as we can to try and catch these incidents as they're in progress,' said SJPD Sergeant Jeremy Peters. 'So having this bill is a good thing. Any time we get a little bit more help on the law enforcement side, where we have some repeat offenders or people that are doing this on an organized level, that's a step in the right direction. There needs to be tougher penalties for people that are victimizing others.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-Los Angeles, progressive beacon at center of anti-Trump backlash
By Costas Pitas LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -Protests in Los Angeles against raids on suspected undocumented immigrants have turned into the strongest domestic backlash against President Donald Trump since he took office in January. Here is how the Democratic-leaning city and state of California vary from Trump's Republicans and his support in the U.S. heartland. PARTY POLITICS Nationwide, Trump won around 2.5 million more votes than his Democratic rival Kamala Harris in the November presidential election but in Los Angeles, Harris won by a margin of roughly two to one. Of the 50 U.S. states, California backed Harris by the fifth largest margin. California is also home to several top-level Democrats, including Harris herself, and long-time former Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi. Governor Gavin Newsom is a Democrat, as is the mayor of Los Angeles, Karen Bass. Both have complained about Trump's tactics this week. The party raises millions in the state from wealthy donors and grassroots supporters, sometimes in a single day. DEMOGRAPHICS At 27.3%, California has the highest foreign-born population of any U.S. state, compared to 13.9% of the total U.S. population, according to a 2024 Census report. Nearly half of Angelenos are Hispanic or Latino and some 35% of the city's total population is foreign-born, according to the American Community Survey, with many cultural and business ties to Mexico, which is only about a two-hour drive south. ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS Faced with persistently bad air quality, especially in cities with strong driving cultures such as Los Angeles, California has developed some of the strictest environmental regulations in the country, opposed by many Republicans. A landmark plan to end the sale of gasoline-only vehicles by 2035 in California is in the crosshairs of a battle between its Democratic leadership and the Republican-run federal government, also because many other states replicate California's first-in-the-nation action. In May, the Republican-run Senate in Washington voted to ban the plan and it is now awaiting Trump's signature. He is expected to sign it this week, according to industry officials. HOLLYWOOD American movies and television are one of the most visible U.S. exports, emanating from an LA-based industry that had been hailed by liberals for boosting diversity but criticized by some conservatives for creating films that include LGBT stories. In May, Trump suggested a tariff on movies produced in foreign countries to protect a domestic industry that he said was "dying a very fast death." But when China retaliated by saying it would curb American film imports, he prompted laughter at a cabinet meeting by a response that signaled his derision for Hollywood: "I think I've heard of worse things."
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reporter's Notebook: How the House is technically done with the 'big, beautiful bill'
Expect the House of Representatives to make "technical corrections" to President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" Wednesday. But if you blink, you might miss it. Senate Republicans are now in the middle of the "Byrd Bath" with Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough. This is a process, named after late Senate Majority Leader Robert Byrd, to exclude provisions from budget reconciliation packages that don't comport with special Senate budget rules. The Senate must use this special process to avoid a filibuster. Trump's Spending Bill Heads To Senate Where Republicans Plan Strategic Adjustments To Key Provisions Some items in the House bill don't fit into the bill under those special budget rules. So, they are tossing them out. But the House must essentially alter the bill and send it back to the Senate. Read On The Fox News App The House will embed those changes into a "rule" Wednesday to tee up the spending cancellations bill to trim money for USAID and public broadcasting for debate and a vote on Friday. Power Players Or Baseball Players? The History Behind The Congressional Baseball Game So, the "altered" bill, with the technical corrections, goes back to the Senate. "I think it's going to be nothing that was unexpected. I don't think it's going to be a problem," House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said. "I'm trying to defend my product that was sent over there. As you all know, it took a long time to get that balance."Original article source: Reporter's Notebook: How the House is technically done with the 'big, beautiful bill'
Indianapolis Star
11 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Here's what the woman forcibly removed from Indianapolis meeting wanted to say
Standing outside the City-County Building on June 9 after sheriff's deputies forcibly removed her, Lauren Roberts — a former deputy campaign manager for Mayor Joe Hogsett and the first woman to accuse the mayor's top aide of sexual harassment — read the statement she had planned to share with the Indianapolis City-County Council before she was kicked out. "If I could tell my younger self what Joe Hogsett and his then-campaign manager, Thomas Cook, were about to put me through," Roberts said of her time working for Hogsett from November 2014 to June 2015, during his first mayoral run, "I would tell her to run away and don't look back." Law enforcement's aggressive removal of Roberts is the latest eruption in a conflict made public in July 2024, when IndyStar reported Roberts and two other women's allegations that Cook pressured them toward intimacy and unwanted sexual encounters while he served as their boss under Hogsett. To investigate the claims, the city hired the Chicago-based law firm Fisher Phillips to conduct an investigation. The 54-page final report released May 29 found that the Hogsett administration followed the law in handling the women's claims. But investigators highlighted ethical concerns around Hogsett's decision to allow Cook to resign in 2020, more than two months after an internal recommendation to fire him. What further outraged Roberts and another Cook accuser, however, is what did not appear in the report: that the mayor, who was married and more than 30 years older than each woman at the time, sent them late-night and personal texts alluding to poetry. Fisher Phillips investigators have declined to comment on the omissions. Cook in the past apologized for his conduct. Hogsett, meanwhile, has defended his handling of his past investigations into Cook and did not address IndyStar's questions about the text exchanges. In her statement, Roberts called the Fisher Phillips report a "political performance" because the text messages were left out and Cook wasn't subpoenaed to testify — an authority granted to the council's Investigative Committee. "Fisher Phillips' report made glaring omissions in favor of the mayor's version of events, made sloppy errors about basic facts that we backed with overwhelming documentation, and frequently, in the most misogynistic way, characterized survivors' statements as claims while the mayor's were treated as facts," Roberts said in her statement outside the council meeting. At the June 9 meeting, the council voted to postpone the final $300,000 payment to Fisher Phillips until councilors learn more about why the law firm left out certain details. The council said its Administrative and Finance Committee would hear public comment on the report in its next hearing on June 17 at 5:30 p.m. During her official comments to the council, Roberts spoke for about 10 seconds before a councilor interrupted her to ask whether her speech was relevant to the meeting agenda. After Roberts restarted and accused councilors of trying to silence her with "manipulative back-room conversations," Council President Vop Osili interrupted Roberts. 'You're welcome to have me hauled out by sheriffs, but I'm going to take my time," Roberts told Osili. 'You will have two minutes," Osili replied, invoking the standard time limit for public comment, "and when you are done with that two minutes, you will be done." When the two minutes were up, Osili said, "Ms. Roberts, you are now done." After she refused to stop talking and leave the microphone, Osili said, "Sheriff, you will remove anyone who is talking at this point." Multiple sheriff's deputies pushed Roberts out of the room while she resisted and told them to stop touching her. "It is never a pleasure to escort someone from our room," Osili told media after the meeting. "But we have a sense of order here and we have rules that we have followed … for a very long time. And others have had to abide by those. When someone indicates or says that they will talk for as long as they like, it's not something that this council can stand with." Roberts' overarching message to councilors Monday night was that they should call for Hogsett to resign. So far, three councilors — Democrat Andrew Nielsen, Democratic socialist Jesse Brown and Republican Joshua Bain, who announced his demand Tuesday — have called on Hogsett to resign. Councilor Crista Carlino, chair of the investigative committee, said after Monday's meeting that she was "deeply considering" that possibility. In her statement, Roberts chastised all the councilors for failing to act. "Survivors, whistleblowers, city workers and campaign staff who speak out about abuse are not the problem for the Democratic party, for this administration, or for this council," Roberts said. "Abusers are the problem. Your constituents cannot afford for you to spend another moment wringing your hands or claiming that your role is limited to policymaking."
