Canada factory PMI rises in May but sector remains in contraction
TORONTO, June 2 (Reuters) - Canadian manufacturing activity contracted for a fourth straight month in May as trade uncertainty led to firms shedding workers at the fastest pace since shortly after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, data on Monday showed.
The S&P Global Canada Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) edged up to 46.1 in May from 45.3 in April but was stuck below the 50 no-change level for the fourth straight month. A reading below 50 indicates contraction in the sector.
'With manufacturers continuing to be hit by tariffs and trade uncertainty, May saw the sector experience a further significant contraction," Paul Smith, economics director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said in a statement.
"The hard to predict nature of trade policies means the outlook for production remains extremely uncertain and given the recent scale of the downturn in the sector, job losses are mounting."
The employment component fell to 44.9 from 47.6 in April, marking the lowest level since June 2020, while measures of output and new orders also remained in contraction.
Canada sends about 75% of its exports to the United States, including steel, aluminum and autos which have been hit with hefty U.S. duties. Retaliatory tariffs have been imposed on some U.S. goods.
'Unsurprisingly, tariffs remain the primary source of price pressures, whilst also leading to an intensification of supply side delays," Smith said.
The measure of input prices rose to 63.5 from 62.1 in April, leaving it just below the 31-month peak it touched in March, while the average lead times for the delivery of inputs lengthened for an 11th straight month. The deterioration in vendor performance was linked to port congestion and challenges at customs.
The Future Output Index edged up to 50.9 from 50.4 in April, with some firms hopeful that government policies could help stabilize the macroeconomic environment, but was well below the survey's historical norm, S&P Global said.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, whose Liberal Party retained power in an April election, has proposed sweeping changes to boost economic growth.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
DoorDash, Grubhub, Uber Eats settle with New York City over fee caps
June 4 (Reuters) - DoorDash , Grubhub and Uber Eats (UBER.N), opens new tab have settled a lawsuit against New York City over a law capping how much they can charge restaurants for delivering meals. The proposed settlement anticipates changes to the law, and was described in a Wednesday filing in federal court in Manhattan. In connection with the settlement, DoorDash, Grubhub and Uber Eats agreed to dismiss their lawsuit with prejudice.
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump administration signals it will slash funds for long-delayed California high-speed rail project
The Trump administration signaled Wednesday that it intends to cut off federal funding for a long-delayed California high-speed rail project plagued by multibillion-dollar cost overruns, following the release of a scathing federal report that concluded there is 'no viable path' to complete even a partial section of the line. Voters first authorized $10 billion in borrowed funds in 2008 to cover about a third of the estimated cost, with a promise the train would be up and running by 2020. Five years beyond that deadline, no tracks have been laid and its estimated price tag has ballooned to over $100 billion. In a letter to the California High-Speed Rail Authority, which oversees the project, Federal Railroad Administration acting Administrator Drew Feeley wrote that what was envisioned as an 800-mile system connecting the state's major cities has been reduced to a blueprint for 'a 119-mile track to nowhere.' After a $4 billion federal investment, the California agency 'has conned the taxpayer ... with no viable plan to deliver even that partial segment on time,' Feeley wrote. State officials defended what's known as the nation's largest infrastructure project and said they remain committed to construction, though it's not clear what funding would replace the federal support if it's withdrawn. Feeley noted the FRA could seek repayment of the federal funds but is not proposing to claw back those dollars at this time. Carol Dahmen, the state authority's chief of strategic communications, said in a statement that the federal conclusions are misguided and 'do not reflect the substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California.' Dahmen noted that the majority of the funding for the line has been provided by the state and that Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom's budget proposal would extend at least $1 billion a year for 20 years to complete an initial segment of the line. State officials are focused on a stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced, which is set to be operating by 2033. The state agency has about a month to formally respond to the FRA, after which the grants could be terminated. State Sen. Tony Strickland, a Republican from Huntington Beach who is vice chair of the Transportation Committee, said that 'commonsense has prevailed" and urged the Legislature's dominant Democrats to redirect the funds from the rail line to lowering gas prices or investing in viable construction projects. 'Let's stop wasting California's hard-earned taxpayer dollars,' Strickland said. There is no known source for the billions of dollars that would be needed to complete the line. California High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Ian Choudri suggested in April that private investors could step in and fill the funding gap for the project that promised nonstop rail service between San Francisco and Los Angeles in under three hours. At the time, he acknowledged that even if funding is secured, it might take nearly two more decades to complete most of that segment. President Donald Trump — who canceled nearly $1 billion in federal dollars for the project in his first term — said in May that his administration will not continue to fund the line. 'That train is the worst cost overrun I've ever seen,' Trump told reporters at the time, calling it "totally out of control.' California Democratic U.S. Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff called the administration's announcement a 'devastating' blow for 21st century transportation and an effort to punish a heavily Democratic state that didn't support the Republican president in the election. 'High-speed rail is the future of transportation with the potential to bring customers to new businesses, businesses to new employees and to connect communities hundreds of miles away with affordable and faster transit,' they said in a joint statement.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Trump reveals the ONLY issue he agrees on with liberal 'Pocahantas' Elizabeth Warren
President Donald Trump has found common ground with a longtime political foe. The president announced Wednesday that he agrees with Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on the issue of raising the debt limit, which is the maximum amount of debt that the federal government is allowed to borrow. 'I am very pleased to announce that, after all of these years, I agree with Senator Elizabeth Warren on SOMETHING,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'The Debt Limit should be entirely scrapped to prevent an Economic catastrophe.' 'It is too devastating to be put in the hands of political people that may want to use it despite the horrendous effect it could have on our Country and, indirectly, even the World.' 'As to Senator Warren's second statement on the $4 Trillion Dollars, I like that also, but it would have to be done over a period of time, as short as possible. Let's get together, Republican and Democrat, and DO THIS!' the president posted on Truth Social. Last month, Warren called upon her congressional colleagues to scrap the debt limit to prevent an 'economic catastrophe.' '@realDonaldTrump and I agree: the debt limit should be scrapped to prevent an economic catastrophe. Let's pass a bipartisan bill and get rid of it forever. But jacking up the debt limit by $4 trillion to fund more tax breaks for billionaires is an outrage,' Warren posted on May 30th. . @realDonaldTrump and I agree: the debt limit should be scrapped to prevent an economic catastrophe. Let's pass a bipartisan bill and get rid of it forever. But jacking up the debt limit by $4 trillion to fund more tax breaks for billionaires is an outrage. — Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) May 30, 2025 Trump's comment came as the president is aiming to steer his spending package through the Senate, after the bill passed the House of Representatives before the Memorial Day recess. Still, Trump and Warren's relationship is far from being all rainbows and butterflies. Trump and Warren have a storied history, much of which revolves around Trump calling Warren 'Pocahontas.' Warren self-identified that she had Native American heritage on applications to Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania. But after being called out by Trump, Warren later released a DNA test in 2018 which revealed that she was only 1/512th Native American. The White House separately is directly trying to slash another top Warren priority in the bill that is snaking its way through the Senate. The Trump administration put out a '50 Wins in the One Big Beautiful Bill' on Tuesday which included reining in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), a 'brainchild' of Senator Warren. 'This brainchild of Sen. Elizabeth Warren has long functioned as another woke, weaponized arm of the bureaucracy — with minimal accountability or oversight — that leverages its power against certain industries and individuals disfavored by the so-called 'elites.'' the White House wrote. Trump's comments also came hours before his Wednesday meeting with members of the Senate Finance Committee, which includes Warren in its ranks. The push to raise the debt ceiling in the president's 'big, beautiful bill' has rubbed some Republicans the wrong way, including Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) Earlier this week, Paul told reporters that the proposed debt ceiling increase was a key reason for his opposition to the bill. "We have never raised the debt ceiling without actually meeting that target," Paul noted on Monday. "So you can say it doesn't directly add to the debt, but if you increase the ceiling $5 trillion, you'll meet that. And what it does is it puts it off the back-burner. And then we won't discuss it for a year or two," Paul concluded. Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.), a member of the Appropriations Committee who is a vocal MAGA ally on Capitol Hill, told Fox News host Will Cain Wednesday afternoon that Warren only wants to raise the debt limit 'because she doesn't believe in it, you cannot spend enough, you got to spend like a drunken sailor.'
