logo
Egypt's President El-Sisi to Trump: exert all your efforts to end war in Gaza and allow entry of aid

Egypt's President El-Sisi to Trump: exert all your efforts to end war in Gaza and allow entry of aid

Arab News13 hours ago
Egypt's President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi called on US President Donald Trump in a televised speech on Monday to exert all efforts to end the war in Gaza and to allow entry of aid to the enclave.
'He is capable of stopping the war,' El-Sisi said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Houthis say they hold 10 crew from Greek-operated ship they sank off Yemen
Houthis say they hold 10 crew from Greek-operated ship they sank off Yemen

Arab News

time2 hours ago

  • Arab News

Houthis say they hold 10 crew from Greek-operated ship they sank off Yemen

CAIRO/ATHENS: Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis said on Monday they had rescued 10 seafarers from the Greek-operated cargo ship Eternity C which they attacked and sank in the Red Sea earlier this month. The Liberia-flagged Eternity C was the second ship to sink off Yemen this month after repeated attacks by Houthi militants with sea drones and rocket-propelled grenades. Another Greek-operated vessel, the Magic Seas, had gone down days earlier. The strikes on the two vessels marked a revival of attacks on shipping by the Houthis, who have hit more than 100 ships between November 2023 and December 2024 in what they say is a show of solidarity with the Palestinians in the war in Gaza. The Eternity C crew and three armed guards were forced to abandon the ship following the attacks. Ten people were rescued by a privately led mission, while five more are feared dead mainly due to the attacks. Another 10 people were believed to be held by Houthis, maritime security sources had told Reuters. On Monday, the Houthis group released a six-minute video showing pictures of the 10 seafarers with some of them contacting their families. They also showed testimonies saying that the crew members were not aware of a maritime ban by Houthis against vessels sailing to Israeli ports. They said the vessel was heading to Israel's Eilat Port to load fertilizers. Reuters could not independently verify the footage. In what they called phase four of their military operations, the Houthis said on Sunday they would target any ships belonging to companies that do business with Israeli ports, regardless of their nationalities. Following the recent attacks, Greece said it would deploy a salvage vessel in the Red Sea to assist in maritime accidents and protect seafarers and global shipping.

Trump slams London mayor again on UK visit
Trump slams London mayor again on UK visit

Arab News

time2 hours ago

  • Arab News

Trump slams London mayor again on UK visit

TURNBERRY, United Kingdom: US President Donald Trump attacked London's Mayor Sadiq Khan once again at a news conference in Scotland alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who interjected that Khan was his 'friend.' Asked by a reporter if he intended to come to London in September during a state visit, Trump responded affirmatively but then clarified: 'I'm not a fan of your mayor. I think he's done a terrible job.' 'The Mayor of London... a nasty person,' he added. The comments prompted Starmer to state: 'He's a friend of mine, actually.' But doubling down on his view of Khan, Trump went on: 'I think he's done a terrible job. But I would certainly visit London.' There is no love lost between Trump and Khan, like Starmer a member of the Labour Party. In January, on the eve of Trump's return to the White House, Khan penned an article warning of western 'reactionary populists' posing a 'century-defining challenge' for progressives. During his first term in power, Khan also became embroiled in a war of words after speaking out against a US travel ban on people from certain Muslim countries. Trump then accused Khan, the first Muslim mayor of a Western capital when he was first elected in 2016, of doing a 'very bad job on terrorism,' calling him a 'stone cold loser' and 'very dumb.' In a podcast recorded before Trump's re-election on November 5, 2024, Khan accused the incoming president of targeting him because of the color of his skin. 'He's come for me because of, let's be frank, my ethnicity and my religion,' he said. But in a interview with AFP in December, Khan said the American people had 'spoken loudly and clearly' and 'we have got to respect the outcome of the presidential elections.' In a statement later Monday, a spokesperson for Khan said the mayor was 'delighted that President Trump wants to come to the greatest city in the world.' 'He'd see how our diversity makes us stronger not weaker; richer, not poorer,' he added.

Court restricts who can bring voting rights challenges in a case involving voters with disabilities
Court restricts who can bring voting rights challenges in a case involving voters with disabilities

Al Arabiya

time3 hours ago

  • Al Arabiya

Court restricts who can bring voting rights challenges in a case involving voters with disabilities

A federal appeals court panel on Monday ruled that private individuals and organizations cannot bring voting rights cases under a section of the law that allows others to assist voters who are blind, disabled, or unable to read. It's the latest ruling from the St. Louis-based 8th Circuit Court of Appeals saying only the government can bring lawsuits alleging violations of the Voting Rights Act. The findings upend decades of precedent and will likely head to the US Supreme Court. The case centered on whether an Arkansas state law that limits how many voters can be assisted by one person conflicts with Section 208 of the landmark federal law. The opinion from the three-judge panel followed the reasoning of another 8th Circuit panel in a previous case from 2023. That opinion held that the Arkansas State Conference NAACP and the Arkansas Public Policy Conference could not bring cases under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. 'Like the provision at issue in Arkansas State Conference, we conclude the text and structure of (Section) 208 do not create a private right of action,' said the decision written by Judge L. Steven Grasz, a nominee of President Donald Trump. 'Likewise, we conclude no private right of action is created by the Supremacy Clause.' In the previous case, the district court judge said he could not reach an opinion on the merits because the plaintiffs did not have standing under Section 2 and gave the Justice Department five days to join the case. The circuit court panel agreed with his reasoning in a 2-1 decision. The 8th Circuit, which covers Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota, has issued three rulings holding that individuals and private entities don't have standing to bring challenges against voting laws. The other came in May in a lawsuit over North Dakota redistricting. In that case, the Spirit Lake Tribe and Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians with reservations 60 miles apart argued that the state's 2021 legislative map violated the Voting Rights Act by diluting their voting strength and ability to elect their own candidates. The appeals court ruled in a 2-1 decision that only the US Department of Justice could bring such lawsuits and the full circuit declined to take up the case. The US Supreme Court blocked the ruling last week while it decides whether to hear the case. The Justice Department declined to comment on whether it would be intervening in the Arkansas case. It earlier declined to comment on the case involving the two North Dakota tribes. The Mexican American Legal Defense Fund, which is representing the plaintiffs in the lawsuit revolving around voters with disabilities, declined to comment on Monday's ruling. Sophia Lin Lakin, director of the Voting Rights Project for the ACLU, said she wasn't surprised by the ruling given the decisions in the earlier cases. 'I think it's important to keep focus on the fact that the 8th Circuit's decisions are radical and completely at odds with decades of precedent, including from the Supreme Court itself, as well as the text, history, and purpose of the Voting Rights Act,' said Lakin, who was one of the attorneys in the initial Arkansas State Conference case. 'Private litigants have been the engine of enforcement of the Voting Rights Act for sixty years.' Section 2 is considered one of the more consequential parts of the Voting Rights Act that remains intact after a 2013 Supreme Court decision removed Section 5. That section required that all or parts of 15 states with a history of discrimination in voting get approval from the federal government before changing their voting and election laws.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store